Active Learning session based on Didactical Engineering framework for conceptual change in students’ equilibrium and stability understanding

References

• Albanese, A., M. Cesar, D. Neves, and M. Vicentini. 1998. “Students’ Ideas About Equilibrium, Friction and Dissipation.” Acta Scientarium 20 (4): 461–472.
   Google Scholar
• Artigue, M. 1994. “Didactical Engineering as a Framework for the Conception of Teaching Products.” In Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline, edited by R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Sträßber, and B. Winkelmann (Mathematic), Vol. 54, 481. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. doi:10.1007/0-306-47204-X.
   Google Scholar
• Artigue, M. 2009. “Didactical Design in Mathematics Education.” In Nordic Research in Mathematics Education. Proceedings from NORMA08, Copenhagen, April 21–25, 2008, edited by C. Winslow, 7–16. London: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Artigue, M., and J. Perrin-Glorian. 1991. “Didactic Engineering, Research and Development Tool: Some Theoretical Problems Linked to This Duality.” For the Learning of Mathematics 11 (1): 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Åström, K. J., and R. M. Murray. 2009. Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Control and Cybernetics, Vol. 36, 426. Pasadena, CA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. 1969. “A Cognitive Theory of School Learning.” Psychology in the Schools 6 (4): 331–335. doi: 10.1002/1520-6807(196910)6:4<331::AID-PITS2310060402>3.0.CO;2-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonawitz, E. B., S. Lim, and L. E. Schulz. 2007. “Weighing the Evidence: Children’s Naïve Theories of Balance Affect Their Exploratory Play.” In 28th Annual Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. Nashville, Tennessee: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., and J. A. Eison. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No.1. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. 1988. “Le contrat didactique: le milieu.” Recherches En Didactique Des Mathématiques 9 (3): 309–336.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. 1997. Theory of Didactical Situation in Mathematics. Edited by N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, and V. Warfield. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Canu, M. 2015. Apport de l'étude conjointe de systèmes libres et commandés dans la compréhension des concepts d'équilibre et de stabilité. IREM de Paris. ISBN: 978-2-86612-358-1. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01108459.
   Google Scholar
• Canu, M., and M. Duque. 2014. “ Didactic Engineering for Conceptual Change in Students’ Equilibrium and Stability Understanding.” In Active Learning in Engineering Education, edited by V. Villas-Boas and O. Giovani, 292–299. Caxias du Sul: Editora ABENGE.
   Google Scholar
• Canu, M., C. de Hosson, and M. Duque. 2014. “Students” Understanding of Equilibrium and Stability: The Case of Dynamic Systems.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education , Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9565-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. 2009. “Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (1): 73–105. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. 1993. “Towards an Epistemology of Physics.” Cognition and Instruction 10 (2–3), 105–225. doi: 10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A., N. Gillespie, and J. Esterly. 2004. “Coherence Versus Fragmentation in the Development of the Concept of Force.” Cognitive Science 28 (6): 843–900. doi:10.1016/j.cogsci.2004.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doise, W., and G. Mugny. 1981. Le Développement Social de L’intelligence (IntereEdit.). Paris: Interéditions.
   Google Scholar
• Flores-García, S., L. L. Alfaro-Avena, J. E. Chávez-Pierce, J. Luna-González, and M. D. González-Quezada. 2010. “Students” Difficulties with Tension in Massless Strings.” American Journal of Physics 78 (12): 1412–1420. doi: 10.1119/1.3490008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunstone, R. F. 1987. “Student Understanding in Mechanics: A Large Population Survey.” American Journal of Physics 55 (8): 691–696. doi: 10.1119/1.15058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunstone, R. F., and R. T. White. 1981. “Understanding of Gravity.” Science Education 65 (3): 291–299. doi:10.1002/sce.3730650308.
   Google Scholar
• Minstrell, J. 1992. “Facets of Students’ Knowledge and Relevant Instruction.” In Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, edited by R. Duit, F. Goldberg, and H. Niedderer, 110–128. Kiel: IPN.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomer, L. J., and S. P. Steif. 2008. “Student Thinking About Static Equilibrium: Insights from Written Explanations to a Concept Question.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (4): 481–490. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00994.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, L. G., P. R. L. Heron, and P. S. Shaffer. 2005. “Student Understanding of Static Equilibrium: Predicting and Accounting for Balancing.” American Journal of Physics 73 (6): 545–553. doi: 10.1119/1.1862640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. H. 2001. “Investigating the Relationship Between Students’ Multiple Conceptions of Action and Reaction in Cases of Static Equilibrium.” Research in Science and Technical Education 19 (2): 193–204. doi: 10.1080/02635140120087722
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. 1950. The Psychology of Intelligence, 192. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pozo, J. I., M. del Puy Pérez, A. Sanz, and M. Limón. 1992. “Las Ideas de los Alumnos Sobre la Ciencia Como Teorías Implícitas.” Infancia Y Aprendizaje 15 (57): 3–21. doi:10.1080/02103702.1992.10822321.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. 2004. “Does Active Learning WorkA Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 93 (3): 223–231. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., M. A. Ruiz-Primo, and E. W. Wiley. 2005. “Windows into the Mind.” Higher Education 49 (4), 413–430. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-9448-9.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., and Z. Chen. 2002. “Development of Rules and Strategies: Balancing the Old and the New.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 81 (4): 446–457. doi:10.1006/jecp.2002.2666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamayo, F. J., M. Canu, and M. Duque. 2012. “Didactic Engineering Applied to Control System Learning: Equilibrium and Stability Concepts in the Ball and Beam Experiment.” In Active Learning in Engineering Education, edited by C. C. M. Spliid, P. H. Andersson, and Jørgen B. Røn. Paper presented at the 11th Active Learning in Enginering Workshop, Copenhagen, June 20–22, 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Vergnaud, G. 2009. “The Theory of Conceptual Fields.” Human Development 52: 83–94. doi:10.1159/000202727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viennot, L. 1979. “Spontaneous Reasoning in Elementary Dynamics.” European Journal of Science Education 1 (2): 205–221. doi:10.1080/0140528790010209.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, H., and E. de Graaff. 2004. “Developing Metacognition: A Basis for Active Learning.” European Journal of Engineering Education 29 (4): 543–548. doi:10.1080/03043790410001716257.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. Interaction Between Learning and Development. Mind and Society, 79–91. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar