Higher education provision using systems thinking approach – case studies

References

• Barak, M., and P. Williams. 2007. “Learning Elemental Structures and Dynamic Processes in Technological Systems: A Cognitive Framework.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 17 (3): 323–340. doi: 10.1007/s10798-006-9006-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belmonte, F., Laurent Heurley, and Robert Capel. 2011. “Interdisciplinary Safety Analysis of Complex Socio-technological Systems Based on the Functional Resonance Accident Model: An Application to Railway Traffic Supervision.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 96 (2011): 237–249. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.006
   Google Scholar
• CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2014. European Standardization. http://www.cencenelec.eu/standards/Pages/default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• CEN (European Committee for Standardization) Workshop on Learning Technologies. 2010. Guidelines on a European Learner Mobility Model – CEN Workshop Agreement Document 16133:2010.
   Google Scholar
• CEN Technical Committee 353. 2010. European Norm (EN) 15981 – European Learner Mobility Achievement Information Model (EuroLMAI ).
   Google Scholar
• Chin, M., P. Sanderson, and M. Watson. 1999. “Cognitive Work Analysis of the Command and Control Work Domain.” Proceedings of the 1999 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2000. Research Methods in Education. 5th ed. London: RoutledgeFalmer. p. 446.
   Google Scholar
• Colbeck, C. L., S. E. Campbell, and S. A. Bjorklund. 2000. “Grouping in the Dark: What College Students Learn from Group Projects.” The Journal of Higher Education 71 (1): 60–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon, E. 2008. “The New Engineer: Between Employability and Social Responsibility.” European Journal of Engineering Education 33 (2): 151–159. doi: 10.1080/03043790801996371
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. 2010. “Key Challenges in the Design of Learning Technology Standards: Observations and Proposals.” International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research 8 (2): 20–28. doi: 10.4018/jitsr.2010070102
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., and M. Foster. 1971. “Sociotechnical Systems.” American Psychologist 26: 467–474. doi: 10.1037/h0031539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dainoff, M. J., L. S. Mark, C. Hall, and A. R. Richardson. 2002. “Cognitive Work Analysis in Education and Training: Relating Pedagogical Methods to Course Objectives.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 46 (8): 825–828.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. C., R. Challenger, D. N. Jayewardene, and C. W. Clegg. 2014. “Advancing Socio-technical Systems Thinking: A Call for Bravery.” Applied Ergonomics 45 (2): 171–180. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denison, D. R., R. Hooijberg, and R. E. Quinn. 1995. “Paradox & Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership.” Organization Science 6 (5): 524–540. doi: 10.1287/orsc.6.5.524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. 2010. The Good Research Guide for Small-scale Social Research Projects. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dhukaram, A. V., and C. Baber. 2011. “An Approach to Designing Interactive Decision Support System for Cardiac Patients.” HCI 2011 conference, Newcastle Upon Tyne UK, July.
   Google Scholar
• Dhukaram, A. V., and C. Baber. 2015. “Modelling Elderly Cardiac Patients Decision Making Using Cognitive Work Analysis: Identifying Requirements for Patient Decision Aids.” International Journal of Medical Informatics 84 (6): 430–443. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhukaram, A. V., and C. Baber. 2016. “A Systematic Approach for Developing Decision Aids: From Cognitive Work Analysis to Prototype Design and Development.” Systems Engineering 19 (2): 79–100. doi:10.1002/sys.21320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENQA. 2013. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ESG_3edition-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. New Skills for New Jobs – Anticipating and Matching Labour Market and Skills Needs. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SEC:2008:3058:FIN:EN:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Strategic Framework for European Cooperation in Education and Training. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2009:119:0002:0010:EN:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and The Council. 2004. Decision No 2241/2004/EC on a Single Community Framework for the Transparency of Qualifications and Competences (Europass). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:390:0006:0020:EN:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., and R. Brent. 2005. “Understanding Student Differences.” Journal of Engineering Education 94 (1): 57–72. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattie, D. K., N. N. Kellam, J. R. Schramski, and J. Walther. 2011. “Engineering Education as a Complex System.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36 (6): 521–535. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2011.622038
   Google Scholar
• Haddock, J. 1993. “Profile of a Nurturing College Professor.” Journal of Engineering Education 82 (1): 34–37. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1993.tb00070.x
   Google Scholar
• Handy, C. 1993. Handy Understanding Organizations. 4th ed. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hoel, T., and J. M. Pawlowski. 2011. “Modelling the CEN WS-LT Standardisation Space.” Special Issue of the IEEE LT Newsletter on Adopting Standards and Specifications for Educational Content 13 (3). http://www.ieeetclt.org/issues/july2011/IEEE-LT-Jul11.htm#_Toc300788488.
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, P., and L. Unwin. 1997. Teaching and Learning in Further Education. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2014. What is a Standard? http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards.htm.
   Google Scholar
• JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee). 2012. Higher Education Achievement Report (HEAR) XML Data Specification: Relationship with Standards. http://www.xcri.co.uk/HEAR/HearTechStandardsBrief_v1.0.docx.
   Google Scholar
• JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee). 2013. “Course-related Processes.” JISC Infonet. http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/infokits/course-information/what-is-course-information/course-related-processes/.
   Google Scholar
• Joham, C., and M. Clarke. 2012. “Teaching Critical Management Skills: The Role of Problem-based Learning.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (1): 75–88. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2011.590975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroes, P., M. Franssen, Ibo van de Poel, and M. Ottens. 2006. “Treating Socio-technical Systems as Engineering Systems: Some Conceptual Problems.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23 (6): 803–814. doi: 10.1002/sres.703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, R. 2014. “Service Innovation: Are We Creating Patchwork Quilts? The Case of Education.” Comment on the Whitehouse Office of Science and Technology Policy’s (OSTP) January 13, 2014 Federal Register Notice “High Impact Learning Technologies”, pp. 153.
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt, H. J., and James G. March. 1965. “Applied Organizational Change in Industry: Structural, Technological and Humanistic Approaches.” In Handbook of Organizations, edited by James G. March, 1144–1170. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Lintern, G., and N. Naikar. (1998). “Cognitive Work Analysis for Training System Design.” Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference, Adelaide, SA, November 30–December 4. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Long, S., ed. 2013. Socioanalytic Methods: Discovering the Hidden in Organisations and Social Systems. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Loo, R. 2004. “Kolb’s Learning Styles and Learning Preferences: Is There a Linkage?” Educational Psychology 24 (1): 99–108. doi: 10.1080/0144341032000146476
   Google Scholar
• Lucena, J., and J. Schneider. 2008. “Engineers, Development, and Engineering Education: From National to Sustainable Community Development.” European Journal of Engineering Education 33 (3): 247–257. doi: 10.1080/03043790802088368
   Google Scholar
• Naikar, N., and P. M. Sanderson. 2001. “Evaluating Design Proposals for Complex Systems with Work Domain Analysis.” Human Factors 43: 529–542. doi: 10.1518/001872001775870322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, B. 2006. Researching Information Systems and Computing. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, Z. H. (2007, December). “A Review of Accident Modelling Approaches for Complex Socio-technical Systems.” In Proceedings of the Twelfth Australian Workshop on Safety Critical Systems and Software and Safety-related Programmable Systems, 86, pp. 47–59. Darlinghurst: Australian Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Rompelman, O., and E. De Graaff. 2006. “The Engineering of Engineering Education: Curriculum Development from a Designer’s Point of View 1.” European Journal of Engineering Education 31 (2): 215–226. doi: 10.1080/03043790600567936
   Google Scholar
• Morton, M. S. S. 1991. The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerville, I., D. Cliff, R. Calinescu, J. Keen, T. Kelly, M. Kwiatkowska, J. McDermid, and R. Paige. 2012. “Large-scale Complex IT Systems.” Communications of the ACM 55 (7): 71–77. doi: 10.1145/2209249.2209268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trist, E. 1950. “The Relations of Social and Technical Systems in Coal-minig.” Trabajo presentado en la British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• USIT (University Center of Information Technology), University of Oslo. 2013. The Common Student (FS) System. http://www.fellesstudentsystem.no/english/applications/.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, K. J. 1999. Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-based Work. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, Joachim, and David Radcliffe. 2006. “Accidental Competencies: Is Engineering Education Simply a Complex System?” [online]. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: Creativity, Challenge, Change; Partnerships in Engineering Education. Auckland, NZ.
   Google Scholar