Exploring Engineering instructors’ views about writing and online tools to support communication in Engineering

References

• Aditomo, A., R. Calvo, and P. Reiman. 2011. “Collaborative Writing: Too Much of a Good Thing? Exploring Engineering Students’ Perceptions Using the Repertory Grid.” Computer Supported Cooperative Learning 1: 128–135.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 1985. “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior.” In Action Control SE - 2, edited by J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann, 11–39. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, I., A. Espasa, and T. Guasch. 2011. “The Value of Feedback in Improving Collaborative Writing Assignments in an Online Learning Environment.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (4): 387–400. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.510182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiarsky, C. 2004. “Teaching Engineering Students to Communicate Effectively: A Metacognitive Approach.” International Journal of Engineering Education 20 (2): 251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, R. A. 2015. “Affect-aware Reflective Writing Studios.” In Handbook of Affective Computing, edited by R. A. Calvo, S. K. D’Mello, J. Gratch, and A. Kappas, 457–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, R. A., S. T. O’Rourke, J. Jones, K. Yacef, and P. Reimann. 2011. “Collaborative Writing Support Tools on the Cloud.” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 4 (1): 88–97. doi: 10.1109/TLT.2010.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M., M. Ferzli, and E. N. Wiebe. 2007. “Writing to Learn by Learning to Write in the Disciplines.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 21 (3): 278–302. doi:10.1177/1050651907300466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. M., T. M. Wells, P. B. Lowry, and T. Higbee. 2008. “An Overview and Tutorial of the Repertory Grid Technique in Information Systems Research.” The Communications of the Association for Information Systems 23: 38–62. doi: 10.14209/jcis.2008.5
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury, H., P. O’Carroll, and T. Langrish. 2006. “Online Approach to Teaching Report Writing in Chemical Engineering: Implementation and Evaluation.” International Journal of Engineering Education 22 (4): 858–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunsmore, K., J. Turns, and J. M. Yellin. 2011. “Looking Toward the Real World: Student Conceptions of Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (2): 329–348. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00016.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. 2011. “Peer Feedback on Writing: Is On-line Actually Better Than On-Paper?” Journal of Academic Language & Learning 5 (1): A88–A99.
   Google Scholar
• Emig, J. 1977. “Writing as a Mode of Learning.” College Compostion and Communication 28 (2): 122–128. doi: 10.2307/356095
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. 2005. “Teacher Pedagogical Beliefs: The Final Frontier in Our Quest for Technology Integration?” Educational Technology, Research and Development 53 (4): 25–40. doi: 10.1007/BF02504683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, A. D. 2008. “The Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering.” Royal Academy of Engineering, London, November 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2000. “Episodic Interviewing.” In Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound, edited by M. Bauer and G. Gaskell, 75–92. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., and L. A. Riley. 2003. “Integrating Communication and Engineering Education: A Look at Curricula, Courses, and Support Systems.” Journal of Engineering Education 92 (4): 325–328. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00776.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fransella, F., R. Bell, and D. Bannister. 2004. A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gassman, S. L., M. A. Maher, and B. E. Timmerman. 2013. “Supporting Students’ Disciplinary Writing in Engineering Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education 29 (5): 1270–1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylen, C., and J. Vander Sloten. 2013. “A Technical Writing Programme Implemented in a First-year Engineering Course at KU Leuven.” European Journal of Engineering Education, 38 (6): 595–607. doi:10.1080/03043797.2013.794201.
   Google Scholar
• Honey, P. 1979. “The Repertory Grid in Action.” Industrial and Commercial Training 11 (11): 452–459. doi:10.1108/eb003756.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S., M. K. Jordan, and P. O. Weiland. 1993. “The Role of Writing in Graduate Engineering Education: A Survey of Faculty Beliefs and Practices.” English for Specific Purposes 12 (1): 51–67. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(93)90027-L.
   Google Scholar
• Karpova, E., A.-P. Correia, and E. Baran. 2009. “Learn to Use and Use to Learn: Technology in Virtual Collaboration Experience.” The Internet and Higher Education 12 (1): 45–52. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. 1991. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keynan, A., O. Ben-Zvi Assaraf, and D. Goldman. 2014. “ The Repertory Grid as a Tool for Evaluating the Development of Students’ Ecological System Thinking Abilities.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 41: 90–105. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, P. W. 2014. “The Role of Context in Teachers” Concerns About the Implementation of an Innovative Curriculum.” Teaching and Teacher Education 38: 44–55. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax, J. 2014. “Laying a Foundation for Academic Writing in Engineering: Helping International Graduate Students Write in English.” In Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2014 IEEE International, 1–4. Pittsburgh: IEEE. doi:10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020353.
   Google Scholar
• Leydens, J. A., and J. Schneider. 2009. “Innovations in Composition Programs That Educate Engineers: Drivers, Opportunities, and Challenges.” Journal of Engineering Education 98 (3): 255–271. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01023.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens, J. 2012. “Debunking the Nerd Myth: Doing Action Research with First-Year Engineering Students in the Academic Writing Class.” Journal of Adacemic Writing 2 (1): 74–84. doi: 10.18552/joaw.v2i1.66
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, B., and I. Geva-May. 2009. “Attitudes Affecting Online Learning Implementation in Higher Education Institutions.” Journal of Distance Education 23 (1): 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, C. S., and A. Patil. 2008. “Industry vs Universities: Re-engineering Graduate Skills – A Case Study.” Australian Universities Quality Forum (AUQF) 16: 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, M., J. Hewitt, and C. Brett. 2014. “Influence of Group Configuration on Online Discourse Writing.” Computers & Education 71: 289–302. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendahl, M., and L.-A. K. Breuch. 2013. “Toward a Complexity of Online Learning: Learners in Online First-Year Writing.” Computers and Composition 30 (4): 297–314. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2013.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Rikakis, T., D. Tinappl, and L. Olson. 2013. “The Digital Culture Degree: A Competency-based Interdisciplinary Program Spanning Engineering and the Arts.” Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013 IEEE. doi:10.1109/FIE.2013.6685110.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, L. A., P. Furth, and J. Zelmer. 2000. “Assessing Our Engineering Alumni: Determinants of Success in the Workplace.” 2000 ASEE/Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference, Las Cruces, NM, April 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe, V. 2011. “Can Turnitin Be Used to Provide Instant Formative Feedback?” British Journal of Educational Technology 42 (4): 701–710. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01091.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, E. 2009. “Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning.” Review of Educational Research 79 (2): 625–649.
   Google Scholar
• Umbach, P., and S. Porter. 2002. “How Do Academic Departments Impact Student Satisfaction? Understanding the Contextual Effects of Departments.” Research in Higher Education 43 (2): 209–234. doi:10.1023/A:1014471708162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46 (2): 186–204. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2634758. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waycott, J., S. Bennett, G. Kennedy, B. Dalgarno, and K. Gray. 2010. “Digital Divides? Student and Staff Perceptions of Information and Communication Technologies.” Computers & Education 54 (4): 1202–1211. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, E., and R. L. McDonald. 2000. “Writing in Engineering Courses.” Journal of Engineering Education 89 (4): 481–486. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2000.tb00555.x.
   Google Scholar