Engaging students as partners in developing online learning and feedback activities for first-year fluid mechanics

References

• Alpay, Esat, P. S. Cutler, Susan Eisenbach, and A. J. Field. 2010. “Changing the Marks-Based Culture of Learning through Peer-Assisted Tutorials.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (1): 17–32. doi: 10.1080/03043790903202983
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, John B. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, Catherine, Alison Cook-Sather, and Peter Felten. 2011. “Students as Co-Creators of Teaching Approaches, Course Design, and Curricula: Implications for Academic Developers.” International Journal for Academic Development 16 (2): 133–145. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, Peter, and Mark Russell. 2007. “A Blended Learning Approach to Teaching First Year Engineering Degree Students.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education, Coimbra, Portugal, September 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, Edward F., Johan Malmqvist, Sören Östlund, Doris R. Brodeur, and Kristina Edström. 2014. “Teaching and Learning.” In Rethinking Engineering Education, 143–163. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, L., E. Schelew, and C. Wieman. 2011. “Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class.” Science 332 (6031): 862–864. doi: 10.1126/science.1201783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duah, Francis, and Tony Croft. 2012. “ Students as Partners in Mathematics Course Design.” Paper presented at the Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning – Maths, Stats and OR Network Conference 2011, Coventry.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., K. A. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, and D. T. Willingham. 2013. “Improving Students’ Learning with Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions from Cognitive and Educational Psychology.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society 14 (1): 4–58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, M., E. Alpay, and A. Bull. 2010. “A Quantitative Approach to Identifying Threshold Concepts in Engineering Education.” Paper presented at the Higher Education Academy Engineering Education Conference, Birmingham, July 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, Mark. 2007. “Fast and Effective Feedback: Are Model Answers the Answer?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (6): 601–611. doi: 10.1080/02602930601116946
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, Seibu Mary, Betsy Lee, and Gillian Rosemary Lueckenhausen. 2009. “Measuring Critical Thinking Skills in Engineering Mathematics using Online Forums.” Paper presented at the IEEE Conference in Engineering Education, Kuala Lumpur, December 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, Paul A., and Jeroen JG van Merriënboer. 2013. “Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education.” Educational Psychologist 48 (3): 169–183. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2013.804395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, Justin, and David Dunning. 1999. “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–1134. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Vicky L., and Michael Pressley. 1991. “Elaborative-Interrogation Effects Depend on the Nature of the Question.” Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (1): 113–119. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, Mark A., and Carol M. Donnelly. 1996. “Learning with Analogy and Elaborative Interrogation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (3): 508–519. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, Bruce M., Sung-Joo Lim, and Kenneth R. Koedinger. 2008. “When and How Often Should Worked Examples Be Given to Students? New Results and a Summary of the Current State of Research.” Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, Texas, 2176–2181.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-García, Miguel A., Guillermo P. Moreda, Natalia Hernández-Sánchez, and Vanesa Valiño. 2013. “Student Reciprocal Peer Teaching as a Method for Active Learning: An Experience in an Electrotechnical Laboratory.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 22 (5): 729–734. doi: 10.1007/s10956-012-9426-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olakanmi, E. O., and M. Doyoyo. 2014. “Using Structured Examples and Prompting Reflective Questions to Correct Misconceptions about Thermodynamic Concepts.” European Journal of Engineering Education 39 (2): 157–187. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2013.833177
   Google Scholar
• Olivero, F. 2011. Innovative Pedagogical Scenarios for First Year Mechanics Students. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Power, Clare, and Kiyomi Dunphy. 2010. “Peer Facilitated Learning in Mathematics for Engineering: A Case Study from an Australian University.” Engineering Education 5 (1): 75–84. doi: 10.11120/ened.2010.05010075
   Google Scholar
• Prusty, B. Gangadhara, and Carol Russell. 2011. “Engaging Students in Learning Threshold Concepts in Engineering Mechanics: Adaptive eLearning Tutorials.” Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Engineering Education, Belfast, August 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, Ataur. 2016. “A Blended Learning Approach to Teach Fluid Mechanics in Engineering.” European Journal of Engineering Education. doi:10.1080/03043797.2016.1153044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ron, Gila, Tommy Dreyfus, and Rina Hershkowitz. 2010. “Partially Correct Constructs Illuminate Students’ Inconsistent Answers.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 75 (1): 65–87. doi: 10.1007/s10649-010-9241-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Mark. 2005. “Evaluating the Weekly-Assessed Tutorial Sheet Approach to Assessment: Background, Pedagogy and Impact.” Journal for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching 2 (1): 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., and P. Bullen. 2005. Improving Student Success and Retention through Greated Participation and Tackling Student Unique Tutorial Sheets. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, Wendy A., Kevin Ward, Justin Folsom, Teresa Borrenpohl, Sophie Mumford, Zach Pershin, Danielle Carriere, and Heather Smart. 2013. “Cheap and Effective: The Impact of Student-Led Recitation Classes on Learning Outcomes in Introductory Economics.” The Journal of Economic Education 44 (1): 1–16. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2013.740368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streveler, Ruth A., Thomas A. Litzinger, Ronald L. Miller, and Paul S. Steif. 2008. “Learning Conceptual Knowledge in the Engineering Sciences: Overview and Future Research Directions.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 279–294. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00979.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Willy Lens, and Edward L. Deci. 2006. “Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation.” Educational Psychologist 41 (1): 19–31. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman, Neal A., and Jonathan D. Fife. 1988. “ Peer Teaching: To Teach is to Learn Twice.” ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report no. 4. ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, Keith, and Anne Gardner. 2010. “Investigating the Capacity of Self and Peer Assessment Activities to Engage Students and Promote Learning.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (4): 429–443. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2010.490577
   Google Scholar