The historical evolution of engineering degrees: competing stakeholders, contestation over ideas, and coherence across national borders

References

• ABET. 2000. Engineering Criteria 2000. Baltimore, MD: ABET.
   Google Scholar
• Aboites, Hugo. 2010. “Latin American Universities and the Bologna Process: From Commercialisation to the Tuning Competencies Project.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 8 (3): 443–455. doi:10.1080/14767724.2010.505107.
   Google Scholar
• Adelman, Clifford. 2009. The Bologna Process for U.S. Eyes: Re-Learning Higher Education in the age of Convergence. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Augusti, Giuliano. 2006. “Transnational Recognition and Accreditation of Engineering Educational Programmes in Europe: Perspectives in A Global Framework.” European Journal of Engineering Education 31 (3): 249–260. doi:10.1080/03043790600644370.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. A. 1986. “The Diaspora of British Engineering.” Technology and Culture 27 (3): 501–524. doi:10.2307/3105383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, Jennifer M., Duncan M. Fraser, Anil Kumar, and Ambrose Itika. 2016. “The Significance of Context for Curriculum Development in Engineering Education: A Case Study Across Three African Countries.” European Journal for Engineering Education 41 (3): 279–292. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2015.1056103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Cecilia K. Y., and Lillian Y. Y. Luk. 2013. “Faculty Perspectives on the ‘3+3+ 4’ Curriculum Reform in Hong Kong: A Case Study.” International Education Studies 6 (4): 56–66. doi: 10.5539/ies.v6n4p56
   Google Scholar
• Divall, Colin. 1994. “Education for Design and Production: Professional Organization, Employers, and the Study of Chemical Engineering in British Universities, 1922-1976.” Technology and Culture 35 (2): 258–288. doi:10.2307/3106302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukasaku, Yukiko. 1995. “Foreign Influence in the Development of Shipbuilding Technology and the Education of Engineers in Japan, 1855–1940.” History and Technology 12 (2): 119–127. doi: 10.1080/07341519508581879
   Google Scholar
• Gouzévitch, I. 1995. “Technical Higher Education in Nineteenth-Century Russia and France: Some Thoughts on a Historical Choice.” History and Technology 12 (2): 109–117. doi: 10.1080/07341519508581878
   Google Scholar
• Grasso, D., and M. D. Burkins, eds. 2009. Holistic Engineering Education: Beyond Technology. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grimson, Jane. 2002. “Re-engineering the Curriculum for the 21st Century.” European Journal of Engineering Education 27 (1): 31–37. doi: 10.1080/03043790110100803
   Google Scholar
• Guédon, Jean-Claude. 1995. “Engineering by Alienated Design: The Case of French-Speaking Engineers in Quebec.” History and Technology 12 (2): 129–146. doi:10.1080/07341519508581880.
   Google Scholar
• Guile, David. 2014. “Professional Knowledge and Professional Practice as Continuous Recontextualisation: A Social Practice Perspective.” In Knowledge, Expertise and the Professions, edited by Michael Young and Johan Muller, 78–92. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, J. 2006. “Engineering Education Between Science and Practice: Rethinking the Historiography.” History and Technology 22 (1): 53–79. doi:10.1080/07341510500497210.
   Google Scholar
• James, Richard, and Peter McPhee. 2012. “Case Study: The Whole-of-Institution Curriculum Renewal Undertaken by the University of Melbourne, 2005-2011.” In Strategic Curriculum Change: Global Trends in Universities, edited by Paul Blackmore and Camille Kandiko, 145–160. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karvar, Anousheh. 1995. “Model Reception in the Domain of Engineering Education: Mediation and Negotiation.” History and Technology, an International Journal 12 (2): 81–93. doi:10.1080/07341519508581876.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, M., P. Christensen, X. Du, and M. Thrane. 2008. “Problem-oriented and Project-based Learning (POPBL) as an Innovative Learning Strategy for Sustainable Development in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 33 (3): 283–295. doi: 10.1080/03043790802088566
   Google Scholar
• Lucena, Juan, Gary Downey, Brent Jesiek, and Sharon Elber. 2008. “Competencies Beyond Countries: The Re-organization of Engineering Education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (4): 433–447. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00991.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckett, K. 2009. “The Relationship Between Knowledge Structure and Curriculum: A Case Study in Sociology.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (4): 441–453. doi:10.1080/03075070902772018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgreen, Peter. 1990. “Engineering Education in Europe and the USA, 1750–1930: The Rise to Dominance of School Culture and the Engineering Professions.” Annals of Science 47 (1): 33–75. doi:10.1080/00033799000200111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, William C. 2000. “U.S. and International Engineering Education: A Vision of Engineering’s Future.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice 126 (4): 152. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2000)126:4(152).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffioli, Francesco, and Giuliano Augusti. 2003. “Tuning Engineering Education into the European Higher Education Orchestra.” European Journal of Engineering Education 28 (3): 251–273. doi:10.1080/0304379031000098832.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. 2008. “Global Field and Global Imagining: Bourdieu and Worldwide Higher Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 29 (3): 303–315. doi: 10.1080/01425690801966386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, David F. 1977. America by Design. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Palma, Martín, Ignacio de los Ríos, and Erick Miñán. 2011. “Generic Competences in Engineering Field: A Comparative Study Between Latin America and European Union.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 15: 576–585. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.144.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, Donna M. 2012. “Aiding and ABETing: The Bankruptcy of Outcomes-based Education as a Change Strategy.” ASEE Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, Paul L. 1974. “Technical Education in the British Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Industries, 1863–1914.” The Economic History Review 27 (2): 222–235. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.1974.tb00218.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rompelman, O., and E. De Graaff. 2006. “The Engineering of Engineering Education: Curriculum Development from a Designer’s Point of View.” European Journal of Engineering Education 31 (2): 215–226. doi: 10.1080/03043790600567936
   Google Scholar
• Seely, B. E. 1999. “The Other re-Engineering of Engineering Education, 1900-1965.” Journal of Engineering Education 88: 285–294. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00449.x
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, Elaine. 2002. “Tracking the Processes of Change in US Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology.” Science Education 86 (1): 79–105. doi:10.1002/sce.1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay, Suellen. 2011. “Curriculum Formation: A Case Study From History.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (3): 315–329. doi:10.1080/03075071003706681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turmeau, W. A. 1982. “Engineering Degree Curricula for the Future.” Higher Education 11 (4): 397–403. doi:10.2307/3446170. doi: 10.1007/BF00157657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkington, J. 2002. “A Process for Curriculum Change in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 27 (2): 133–148. doi: 10.1080/03043790210129603
   Google Scholar
• Walther, Joachim, Llewellyn Manna, and David Radcliffe. 2005. “Global Engineering Education: Australia and the Bologna Process.” 4th ASEE/AaeE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar