Open the ‘black box’ creativity and innovation: a study of activities in R&D departments. Some prospects for engineering education

References

• AFNOR. 2014. Management de l’innovation - Management de la Créativité. N° FD X 50-274. Paris, France: Groupe AFNOR.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, Teresa. 1996. Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Oxford: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auger, Pascale. 2004. “Mesurer Ou Créer ?” In Actes Du Congrès AGRH. Vol. Tome 1 - Contribution de la GRH à la performance organisationnelle. UQAM - ESG. http://www.agrh2004-esg.uqam.ca/pdf/Tome1/Auger.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Badran, Ibrahim. 2007. “Enhancing Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32 (5): 573–585. doi: 10.1080/03043790701433061
   Google Scholar
• Baillie, Caroline, and Paul Walker. 1998. “Fostering Creative Thinking in Student Engineers.” European Journal of Engineering Education 23 (1): 35–44. doi: 10.1080/0304379980230105
   Google Scholar
• Batey, Mark. 2012. “The Measurement of Creativity : From Definitional Consensus to the Introduction of a New Heuristic Framework.” Creativity Research Journal 24 (1): 55–65. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.649181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boly, Vincent. 2004. Ingénierie de l’innovation : Organisation et Méthodologies des Entreprises Innovantes. Paris: Hermès.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallucci, Denis, and David Oget. 2013. “On the Efficiency of Teaching TRIZ: Experiences in a French Engineering School.” The International Journal of Engineering Education 29 (2): 304–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantelot, Sébastien. 2010. “Vers Une Mesure de La Créativité : La Construction de La Classe Créative Française.” Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine juin (3): 511–540.
   Google Scholar
• Court, Andrew W. 1998. “Improving Creativity in Engineering Design Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 23 (2): 141–154. doi: 10.1080/03043799808923493
   Google Scholar
• Csíkszentmihályi, Mihály. 1996. Creativity : Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, Mark, and Sybille Hinze. 2000. “Indicators Used to Measure the Innovation Process: Defects and Possible Remedies.” Research Evaluation 9 (2): 101–114. doi:10.3152/147154400781777368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. 1998. “A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 2 (4): 290–309. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gattie, David K., Nadia N. Kellam, John R. Schramski, and Joachim Walther. 2011. “Engineering Education as a Complex System.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36 (6): 521–535. doi:10.1080/03043797.2011.622038.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît. 1996. L’état Des Indicateurs Scientifiques et Technologiques Dans Les Pays de l’OCDE. Document de recherche. Ottawa: Statistiques Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hadji, Charles. 2000. L’évaluation, Règles Du Jeu : Des Intentions Aux Outils. 5ème éd. Issy-les-Moulineaux: ESF.
   Google Scholar
• INSEE. 2010. Esane, Lifi, Clap.
   Google Scholar
• Kabla, Isabelle. 1994. “Un Indicateur de L’innovation : Le Brevet.” Économie et Statistique 275 (1): 95–109. doi:10.3406/estat.1994.5892.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R. G. M., M. Folkeringa, J. P. J. De Jong, and E. F. M. Wubben. 2003. “Innovation and Firm Performance.” Research Report H200207, Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMES, Zoetermeer. http://www.ondernemerschap.nl/pdf-ez/H200207.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen-Yrjanheikki, Kati, Taina Tukiainen, and Minna Takala. 2007. “New Challenging Approaches to Engineering Education: Enhancing University-Industry Co-Operation.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32 (2): 167–179. doi: 10.1080/03043790601118697
   Google Scholar
• Langdon, Morris. 2008. “Innovation Metrics. The Innovation Process and How to Measure It.” InnovationLabs white paper. http://www.innovationtools.com/PDF/measuring_innovation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Langdon, Morris. 2012. “Chapter 6 : Innovation Metrics.” The Innovation Master Plan : The CEO’s Guide to Innovation. http://www.innovationmanagement.se/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Innovation-Master-Plan_Chapter-6.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, Todd I., Christophe Mouchiroud, Sylvie Tordjman, and Frank Zenasni. 2003. Psychologie de la Créativité. Paris: A. Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Mahboub, Kamyar C., Margaret B. Portillo, Yinhui Liu, and Susantha Chandraratna. 2004. “Measuring and Enhancing Creativity.” European Journal of Engineering Education 29 (3): 429–436. doi: 10.1080/03043790310001658541
   Google Scholar
• Mnisri, Kamel. 2007. “La Créativité Appliquée À L’organisation : Apports et Les Limites. Proposition D’un Cadre D’analyse.” Presented at the 5ème Congrès International de l’Académie de l’Entrepreneuriat, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada. http://www.entrepreneuriat.com/fileadmin/ressources/actes07/Mnisri_Kamel.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Munier, Francis. 2002. “Mesure(s) de L’innovation : Méthodologie et Principaux Indicateurs Européens.” Bulletin de l’Observatoire Des Politiques Économiques En Europe 6 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Ojanen, Ville, and Olli Vuola. 2003. “Categorizing the Measures and Evaluation Methods of R&D Performance.” A State-of-the-Art Review on R&D Performance Analysis. Workin Paper 16, Telecom Business Research Center Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta. http://www.tbrc.fi/pubfilet/Workingpaper16_final040403_ojanenvuola.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, David, and Johan Roos. 2006. “Créativité et Identité Organisationnelle.” Revue Française de Gestion 32 (161): 139–153. doi:10.3166/rfg.161.139-154.
   Google Scholar
• Piffer, Davide. 2012. “Can Creativity Be Measured? An Attempt to Clarify the Notion of Creativity and General Directions for Future Research.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 7 (3): 258–264. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousselot, François, Cecilia Zanni-Merk, and Denis Cavalucci. 2012. “Toward a Formal Definition of Contradiction in Inventive Design.” Computers in Industry 63 (3): 231–242. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2012.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, Mark. 2007. Creativity. Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tahéri, A. 2015. “Key Performance Indicators of Inventive Activities for Characterizing Technological Design in R&D; Application in Automotive Industries.” PhD., University of Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Tornkvist, Soren. 1998. “Creativity: Can It Be Taught? The Case of Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 23 (1): 5–12. doi: 10.1080/0304379980230102
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, W. M. A., and George M. C. Fisher. 2002. “A Makeover for Engineering Education.” Issues in Science et Technology, Spring. http://issues.org/18-3/p_wulf/.
   Google Scholar
• Zampetakis, Leonidas A., Nancy Bouranta, and Vassilis S. Moustakis. 2010. “On the Relationship between Individual Creativity and Time Management.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 5 (1): 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanni-Merk, Cecilia, Denis Cavallucci, and François Rousselot. 2009. “An Ontological Basis for Computer Aided Innovation.” Computers in Industry 60 (8): 563–574. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2009.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Chunfang. 2012. “Integrating Creativity Training into Problem and Project-Based Learning Curriculum in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 37 (5): 488–499. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2012.714357
   Google Scholar