Developing creativity and problem-solving skills of engineering students: a comparison of web- and pen-and-paper-based approaches

References

• Badran, I. 2007. “Enhancing Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32 (5): 573–585. doi: 10.1080/03043790701433061
   Google Scholar
• Becattini, N., Y. Borgianni, F. Rotini, and G. Cascini. 2013. “A TRIZ-based CAI Framework to Guide Engineering Students towards a Broad-spectrum Investigation of Inventive Technical Problems.” International Journal of Engineering Education 29: 318–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belski, I. 2002. “Seven Steps to Systems Thinking.” Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference and Convention, Australian Association of Engineering Educators, Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I. 2007. Improve Your Thinking: Substance-field Analysis. Melbourne: TRIZ4U.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I. 2011. “Dynamic and Static Worked Examples in Student Learning.” Proceedings of the 22th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education – AAEE2011, Fremantle, Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I. 2015. “TRIZ Education: Victories, Defeats, and Challenges.” Educational Technologies (Russian: Образовательные технологии) 2: 83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I., J. Baglin, and J. Harlim. 2013. “Teaching TRIZ at University: A Longitudinal Study.” International Journal of Engineering Education 29 (2): 346–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belski, I., and I. Belski. 2008. “Cognitive Foundations of TRIZ Problem-solving Tools.” Proceedings of the TRIZ-Future Conference 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I., and I. Belski. 2013. “Application of TRIZ in Improving Creativity of Engineering Experts.” Proceedings of the TRIZ Future Conference 2013, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I., A. Belski, V. Berdonosov, B. Busov, M. Bartlova, E. Malashevskaya, T. Kassi, A. Kutvonen, and N. Tervonen. 2015. “Can Simple Ideation Techniques Influence Idea Generation: Comparing Results From Australia, Czech Republic, Finland and Russian Federation.” Proceedings of the 26th annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education – AAEE2015 (474–483). Geelong.
   Google Scholar
• Belski, I., A. Hourani, A. Valentine, and A. Belski. 2014. “Can Simple Ideation Techniques Enhance Idea Generation?” In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, edited by A. Bainbridge -Smith, Z. T. Qi, and G. S. Gupta, 1–9. Wellington: School of Engineering & Advanced Technology, Massey University.
   Google Scholar
• Birolini, V., C. Rizzi, and D. Russo. 2013. “Teaching Students to Structure Engineering Problems with CAI Tools.” International Journal of Engineering Education 29 (2): 334–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom, A., and H. Saeki. 2012. “Employability and Skill Sets of Newly Graduated Engineers in India.” IUP Journal of Soft Skills 6 (4): 7–50.
   Google Scholar
• Cagiltay, N., and S. Ozalp-Yaman. 2013. “How can we get Benefits of Computer-based Testing in Engineering Education?” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 21 (2): 287–293. doi: 10.1002/cae.20470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campton, P. 2004. “A Comparative Analysis of Online and Paper-Based Assessment Methods: A University Case Study.” Paper presented at the Australian Computers in Education Conference (ACEC).
   Google Scholar
• Cavallucci, D., and D. Oget. 2013. “On the Efficiency of Teaching TRIZ: Experiences in a French Engineering School.” The International Journal of Engineering Education 29: 304–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charyton, C. 2014. An Overview of the Relevance of Creative Engineering Design: Background. Creative Engineering Design Assessment, 1–10. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, Y. P. 2012a. “Effects of Computer-based Testing on Test Performance and Testing Motivation.” Computers in Human Behavior 28 (5): 1580–1586. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, Y. P. 2012b. “Replacing Paper-based Testing with Computer-based Testing in Assessment: Are we Doing Wrong?” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 61: 655–664.
   Google Scholar
• Clariana, R., and P. Wallace. 2002. “Paper-based versus Computer-based Assessment: Key Factors Associated with the Test Mode Effect.” British Journal of Educational Technology 33 (5): 593–602. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, S. R., E. A. Mosyjowski, and C. M. Seifert. 2014. “Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses.” Journal of Engineering Education 103 (3): 417–449. doi: 10.1002/jee.20048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bono, E. 1995. “Serious Creativity.” Journal for Quality and Participation 18: 12–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrusskin, C., A. Belski, and I. Belski. 2014. “On the Effectiveness of Systematized Substance-field Analysis for Idea Generation.” Paper presented at the TFC 2014: GIC-global Innovation Convention.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, D. E., and S. H. VanHuss. 1992. “Creativity Software and DSS: Cautionary Findings.” Information & Management 23 (1): 1–6. doi: 10.1016/0378-7206(92)90049-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elam, J. J., and M. Mead. 1990. “Can Software Influence Creativity?” Information Systems Research 1 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1287/isre.1.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, L., and B. MacKay. 2011. “A Comparison Between Paper-based and Online Learning in Higher Education.” British Journal of Educational Technology 42 (5): 727–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01081.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, R. 2012. “Computer Aided Cognition and Creativity: A Three Year Monitoring Exercise.” Digital Aids to Design Creativity 2: 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Harlim, J., and I. Belski. 2011. “Learning TRIZ: Impact on Confidence When Facing Problems.” Proceedings of the TRIZ Future Conference - Systematically Innovating for Sustainable Competitiveness, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Harlim, J., and I. Belski. 2013. “Long-term Innovative Problem Solving Skills: Redefining Problem Solving.” International Journal of Engineering Education 29 (2): 280–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, M. A., D. K. Follman, M. Sumpter, and G. M. Bodner. 2006. “Factors Influencing the Self-efficacy Beliefs of First-year Engineering Students.” Journal of Engineering Education 95 (1): 39–47. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00876.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H. 2014. “A Comparative Study of Scores on Computer-based Tests and Paper-based Tests.” Behaviour & Information Technology 33 (4): 410–422. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2012.710647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johri, A., H. J. Teo, J. Lo, M. Dufour, and A. Schram. 2014. “Millennial Engineers: Digital Media and Information Ecology of Engineering Students.” Computers in Human Behavior 33: 286–301. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazanci, Z. 2015. “University Students’ Preferences of Reading from a Printed Paper or a Digital Screen – A Longitudinal Study.” International Journal of Culture and History 1 (1): 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, D., N. Vye, J. Bransford, E. Sanders, M. Richey, D. French, and R. Stephens. 2012. “Online Learning based on Essential Concepts and Formative Assessment.” Journal of Engineering Education 101 (2): 244–287. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00050.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limniou, M., and M. Smith. 2010. “Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Through Virtual Learning Environments.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (6): 645–653. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2010.505279
   Google Scholar
• Macedo-Rouet, M., M. Ney, S. Charles, and G. Lallich-Boidin. 2009. “Students’ Performance and Satisfaction with Web vs. Paper-based Practice Quizzes and Lecture Notes.” Computers & Education 53 (2): 375–384. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrander, C., R. Manansala, S. Rawson, and J. Han. 2012. “The Difference in Performance between Computer and Paper Administered Tests in a Stressful Environment.” Journal of Advanced Student Science, 2012 01 – Spring: 17 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Male, S., M. Bush, and E. Chapman. 2010. “Perceptions of Competency Deficiencies in Engineering Graduates.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 16 (1): 55–68. doi: 10.1080/22054952.2010.11464039
   Google Scholar
• Marakas, G. M., and J. J. Elam. 1997. “Creativity Enhancement in Problem Solving: Through Software or Process?” Management Science 43 (8): 1136–1146. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.43.8.1136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Caro, E., and F. Campuzano-Bolarín. 2011. “Factors Affecting Students’ Satisfaction in Engineering Disciplines: Traditional vs. Blended Approaches.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36 (5): 473–483. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2011.619647
   Google Scholar
• Massetti, B. 1996. “An Empirical Examination of the Value of Creativity Support Systems on Idea Generation.” MIS Quarterly 20: 83–97. doi: 10.2307/249543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michinov, N., E. Jamet, N. Métayer, and B. Le Hénaff. 2015. “The Eyes of Creativity: Impact of Social Comparison and Individual Creativity on Performance and Attention to Others’ Ideas During Electronic Brainstorming.” Computers in Human Behavior 42: 57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, C. S., A. Patil, and P. Mertova. 2009. “Re-engineering Graduate Skills – A Case Study.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (2): 131–139. doi: 10.1080/03043790902829281
   Google Scholar
• Nikou, S., and A. A. Economides. 2013. “Student Achievement in Paper, Computer/Web and Mobile based Assessment.” Paper presented at the 6th Balkan Conference in Informatics.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, J., and K. Garland. 2008. “Computer- vs. Paper-based Tasks: Are They Equivalent?” Ergonomics 51 (9): 1352–1375. doi: 10.1080/00140130802170387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldham, G. R., and N. Da Silva. 2015. “The Impact of Digital Technology on the Generation and Implementation of Creative Ideas in the Workplace.” Computers in Human Behavior 42: 5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osburn, H. K., and M. D. Mumford. 2006. “Creativity and Planning: Training Interventions to Develop Creative Problem-solving Skills.” Creativity Research Journal 18 (2): 173–190. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1802_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadi, E., S. Ramadi, and K. Nasr. 2016. “Engineering Graduates’ Skill Sets in the MENA Region: A Gap Analysis of Industry Expectations and Satisfaction.” European Journal of Engineering Education 41 (1): 34–52. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2015.1012707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts, C., and S. Wilks. 2002. “Improving Student Performance through Computer-based Assessment: Insights from Recent Research.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5): 475–479. doi: 10.1080/0260293022000009348
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, P., and K. Jablokow. 2010. “Psychological Inertia and the Role of Idea Generation Techniques in the Early Stages of Engineering Design.” Paper presented at the Fall 2010 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference Villanova.
   Google Scholar
• Seehafer, H. 2014. “Effects of Learning Style on Paper versus Computer based Reading Comprehension.” The Red River Psychology Journal 1 (2014), 17 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Selker, T. 2005. “Fostering Motivation and Creativity for Computer Users.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63 (4): 410–421. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serwatka, J. A. 2003. “Assessment in On-line CIS Courses.” The Journal of Computer Information Systems 44 (1): 16–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, K., and J. Cappel. 2006. “Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study.” Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 5 (1): 201–219. doi: 10.28945/243
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, T., I. Belski, J. Harlim, J. Baglin, R. Ferguson, and T. Molyneaux. 2011. “Do we Succeed in Developing Problem-solving Skills –The Engineering Students’ Perspective.” Proceedings of the 22th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education – AAEE2011, Fremantle, Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Treffinger, D. J., S. G. Isaksen, and K. B. Stead-Dorval. 2006. Creative Problem Solving: An Introduction. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, A., I. Belski, and M. Hamilton. 2015. “A Comparison of Web and Paper based Approaches for Idea Generation.” Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education – AAEE2015, 567–576. Geelong.
   Google Scholar
• Wickramasinghe, V., and L. Perera. 2010. “Graduates’, University Lecturers’ and Employers’ Perceptions towards Employability Skills.” Education + Training 52 (3): 226–244. doi: 10.1108/00400911011037355
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, Y., and K. Nakakoji. 2005. “Interaction Design of Tools for Fostering Creativity in the Early Stages of Information Design.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63 (4): 513–535. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar