How engineers perceive the importance of ethics in Finland

References

• Airaksinen, T. 2003. Tekniikan suuret kertomukset – Filosofinen raportti. Helsinki: Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Bairaktarova, D., and A. Woodcock. 2014. “The Role of Personality Factors in Engineering’ Students Ethical Decisions.” In Proceedings of IEEE conference on engineering ethics, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Bairaktarova, D., and A. Woodcock. 2016. “Engineering Student’s Ethical Awareness and Behavior: A New Motivational Model.” Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9814-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, L. L. 2008. “Ethics and Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 33 (2): 141–149. doi: 10.1080/03043790801979856
   Google Scholar
• Colby, A., and W. Sullivan. 2008. “Ethics Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 327–338. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00982.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, E., M. Murphy, and W. Grimson. 2007. “Engineering Science as Opposed to Natural Science and Applied Science.” In Philosophy in Engineering, edited by S. H. Christensen, M. Meganck, B. Delahousse, and J. B. Jacobsen, 139–160. Aarhus: Academia.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, E. F., J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, D. R. Brodeur, and K. Edström. 2014. Rethinking Engineering Education, The CDIO Approach, (2nd ed). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design – Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 2012. How We Think. Boston: Reneissance Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. W. 2008. Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2010. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Froyd, J. E., P. C. Wankat, and K. A. Smith. 2012. “Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education.” Invited Paper. JEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. 2002. “Who Stole the Money, and When? Individual and Situational Determinants of Employee Theft.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89: 985–1003. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00039-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkerö, T. 2012. Ethics in Technology: A Philosophical Study. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Herkert, J. R. 2002. “Continuing and Emerging Issues in Engineering Ethics Education.” The Bridge 32 (2): 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Huttunen, R. 1997. “Professionalisoituminen ja indoktrinaation ongelma asiantuntijakoulutuksessa.” In Muuttuva asiantuntijuus, edited by J. Kirjonen, P. Remes, and A. Eteläpelto. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Huttunen, R. 2003. Kommunikatiivinen opettaminen. Indoktrinaation kriittinen teoria. Jyväskylän yliopisto: SoPhi 82.
   Google Scholar
• Hyötynen, P., S. Mursu, and J.-P. Teini. 2014. Professional Knowledge, Skills and Competencies of the New Graduates and the Engineering Professionals – Comparison of the Importance in Working-life.” SEFI Annual Conference, Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Järvi, A., V. Taajamaa, and S. Hyrynsalmi. 2015. “Lean Software Startup – An Experience Report from an Entrepreneurial Software Business Course.” The 6th International Conference on Software Business, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Karanian, B., M. Eskandari, and V. Taajamaa. 2016. “Conversational Storytelling: Classroom Teaching through Story Parallels Entrepreneurial – Need for Engagement.” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, M. 1938. “A New Measure of Rank Correlation.” Biometrika 30 (1–2): 81–93. doi: 10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. 1981. Essays on Moral Development Volume One: The Philosophy of Moral Development, (Vol. 1). New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Leifer, L. J., and M. Steinert. 2011. “Dancing with Ambiguity: Causality Behavior, Design Thinking, and Triple-Loop-Learning.” Information Knowledge Systems Management 10 (2011): 151–173.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, F., C. Leite, and C. Rocha. 2016. “The Influence of Engineers’ Training Models on Ethics and Civic Education Component in Engineering Courses in Portugal.” European Journal of Engineering Education. doi:10.1080/03043797.2016.1267716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newberry, B. 2004. “The Dilemma of Ethics in Engineering Education.” Science and Engineering Ethics 10: 343–351. doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0030-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2011. Talouskasvua tärkeämpä ä – miksi demokratia tarvitsee humanistista sivistystä. Helsinki: Gaudeamus Helsinki University Press. Eng. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. T. 2007. “The Reflexive Engineer: Perceptions of Integrated Development.” Journal of International Development 19: 99–110. doi: 10.1002/jid.1351
   Google Scholar
• Roman-Suero, S., J. Sánchez-Martin, and F. Zamora-Polo. 2013. “Opportunities Given by Final Degree Dissertations Inside the EHEA to Enhance Ethical Learning in Technical Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 38 (2): 149–158. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2012.755498
   Google Scholar
• Snellman, J. V. 1840. Akateemisesta opiskelusta. Snellman-korkeakoulun julkaisuja. No. 1. (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. P. 1998. The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taajamaa, V. M. 2017. “O-CDIO: Engineering Education Framework with Embedded Design Thinking Methods.” Diss., University of Turku, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• TEK Survey for Graduate Studies. 2015. Accessed July 18, 2015. https://www.tek.fi/fi/uutishuone/tutkimukset/vastavalmistuneiden-palautekysely.
   Google Scholar
• Tweed, G. R., and D. R. Lehman. 2002. “Learning Considered Within a Cultural Context Confucian and Socratic Approaches.” American Psychologist 57 (2): 89–99. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Vorst, R. 1998. “Engineering, Ethics and Professionalism.” European Journal of Engineering Education 23 (2): 171–179. doi: 10.1080/03043799808923496
   Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon, F. 1945. “Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods.” Biometrics Bulletin 1 (6): 80–83. doi: 10.2307/3001968
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 2003. “Education for the Profession Formerly Known as Engineering.” The Chronicle of Higher Education 49 (20): B12–B13.
   Google Scholar