Strategies to improve learning of all students in a class

References

• Anderson, L. W., and D. R. Krathwohl. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Auyang, S. 2006. Engineering – An Endless Frontier. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, T. R., K. L. Hughes, and M. M. Karp. 2003. Dual Enrolment Programs: Easing Transitions from High School to College (CCRC Brief). New York: Community College Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Balduf, M. 2009. “Underachievement Among College Students.” Journal of Advanced Academics 20: 274–294. doi: 10.1177/1932202X0902000204
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1989. “Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory.” American Psychologist 44: 1175–1184. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Baslanti, U. 2008. “Investigating the Underachievement of University Students in Turkey: Exploring Subscales.” International Journal of Progressive Education 4: 40–56.
   Google Scholar
• Benny, N., and R. Blonder. 2016. “Factors that Promote/Inhibit Teaching Gifted Students in a Regular Class: Results from a Professional Development Program for Chemistry Teachers.” Education Research International 2016: 1–11. doi:10.1155/2016/2742905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berube, B. N., ed. 1995. What Educators Need to Know About Underachievement and Gifted Students (Practitioners’ Guide A9712). Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center for the Gifted and Talented.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, S. 1999. “Choosing Teaching Methods Based on Learning Objectives: An Integrative Framework.” Issues in Accounting Education 14: 11–39. doi: 10.2308/iace.1999.14.1.11
   Google Scholar
• Bradforth, S. E., E. R. Miller, W. R. Dichtel, A. K. Leibovich, A. L. Feig, J. D. Martin, K. S. Bjorkman, Z. D. Schultz, and T. L. Smith. 2015. “Improve Undergraduate Science Education.” Nature 523: 282–284. doi: 10.1038/523282a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M., W. R. Doyle, H. V. Hartley III, A. S. Hirschy, W. A. Jones, and M. K. McClendon. 2014. Rethinking College Student Retention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bullard, L. G., and R. M. Felder. 2007. “A Student-centered Approach to Teach Material and Energy Balances. 1. Course Design.” Chemical Engineering Education 41: 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, P. 2012. “Effect of Students’ Self-directed Learning Abilities on Online Learning Outcomes: Two Exploratory Experiments in Electronic Engineering.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 2: 172–179.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, P., L. McKinney, M. Lee, and D. Pino. 2016. “First-year Community College Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward Intrusive Academic Advising.” NACADA Journal 36: 30–42. doi: 10.12930/NACADA-15-012
   Google Scholar
• Earl, W. R. 1988. “Intrusive Advising of Freshmen in Academic Difficulty.” NACADA Journal 8: 27–33. doi: 10.12930/0271-9517-8.2.27
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. 2002. “Designing Tests to Maximise Learning.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 128: 1–3. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2002)128:1(1)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., and R. Brent. 2005. “Understanding Student Differences.” Journal of Engineering Education 94: 57–72. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., and R. Brent. 2007. “Co-operative Learning.” In Active Learning: Models from the Analytical Sciences, edited by P. A. Mabrouk, ACS Symposium Series 970, 34–53. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., D. R. Woods, J. E. Stice, and A. Rugarcia. 2000. “The Future of Engineering Education. II. Teaching Methods that Work.” Chemical Engineering Education 34: 26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F. 1986. “A Conception of Giftedness.” In Identifying and Nurturing the Gifted: An International Perspective, edited by K. A. Heller, and J. F. Feldhusen, 33–38. Toronto: Hans Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, C. J., and J. M. Krause. 2014. “Lost Confidence and Potential: A Mixed Methods Study of Underachieving College Students’ Sources of Self-efficacy.” Social Psychology of Education 17: 249–268. doi: 10.1007/s11218-013-9239-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. 2003. “Scientific Thinking in Gifted Children.” In Science Education: Talent Recruitment and Public Understanding, Vol. 38 of NATO Science Series, 17–30. New York: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, T. 2015. “The Relationship Between Academic Advising and Student Success in Canadian Colleges: A Review of the Literature.” College Quarterly 18: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. 2004. “Transforming Gifts into Talents: The DMGT as a Developmental Theory.” High Ability Studies 15: 119–147. doi: 10.1080/1359813042000314682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. 1993. Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glennen, R. E., and D. M. Baxley. 1985. “Reduction of Attrition Through Intrusive Advising.” NASPA Journal 22: 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, P., J. R. Sullivan, and N. S. Guerra. 2007. “A Closer Look at College Students: Self-efficacy and Goal Orientation.” Journal of Advanced Academics 18: 454–476. doi: 10.4219/jaa-2007-500
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, S. K. 2004. “Definitions, Models, and Characteristics of Gifted Students.” In Identifying Gifted Students: A Practical Guide, 1–22. Waco: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovas, Y., C. M. A. Haworth, P. S. Dale, and R. Plomin. 2007. “The Genetic and Environmental Origins of Learning Abilities and Disabilities in the Early School Years.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 72: vii–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00453.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovas, Y., and R. Plomin. 2007. “Learning Abilities and Disabilities.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 16: 284–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00521.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein, M. 1999. “An Alternative to the Developmental Theory of Advising.” The Mentor. Accessed February 21, 2017. http://dus.psu.edu/mentor/old/articles/991122ml.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Lyman, F. 1987. “Think-Pair-Share: An Expanding Teaching Technique.” MAA-CIE Cooperative News 1: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, R. B., S. R. Beach, and S. Lau. 2000. “The Nature and Correlates of Underachievement Among Elementary Schoolchildren in Hong Kong.” Child Development 71: 785–801. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., and D. Siegle. 2003. “Factors that Differentiate Underachieving Gifted Students from High-achieving Gifted Students.” Gifted Child Quarterly 47: 144–154. doi: 10.1177/001698620304700205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. 2002. Systematic Assessment of Learning Outcomes: Developing Multiple-choice Exams. London: Jones and Bartlett.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, S. 2015. “Competency-based Education 2.0.” Accessed April 10, 2016. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-beta/competency-based-education-20.
   Google Scholar
• Misra, A. 2015. “Report of the Committee to Examine the JEE System.” Accessed February 21, 2017. https://www.iitsystem.ac.in/Media-uploads/f4a3dc378b6c47b433a7184d3b5.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. B. 2014. “Factors that Lead Millennial Alumni to Contribute to their Alma Mater.” Dissertations, Paper 839.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, W. I., and I. Bloom. 1960. “Characteristics of Slow Learners and Pupils of Normal Intelligence Referred to a Child Guidance Clinic.” Journal of Education Research 54: 43–48. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1960.10882678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mysorekar, V. V. 2012. “Need for Mentorship to Improve Learning in Low Performers.” National Medical Journal of India 25: 292–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neber, H., and M. Schommer-Aikins. 2002. “Self-regulated Science Learning with Highly Gifted Students: The Role of Cognitive, Motivational, Epistemological, and Environmental Variables.” High Ability Studies 13: 59–74. doi:10.1080/13598130220132316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padmavathy, K. M., S. Patil, and S. P. Pani. 2009. “Unravelling the Secrets of High Performance to Help Low Performers.” South East Asian Journal of Medical Education 3: 65–66.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., and A. H. Paris. 2001. “Classroom Applications of Research on Self-regulated Learning.” Educational Psychologist 36: 89–101. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomin, R., C. M. A. Haworth, and O. S. P. Davis. 2010. “Genetics of Learning Abilities and Disabilities: Recent Developments from the UK and Possible Directions for Research in China.” Behavior Genetics 40: 297–305. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9355-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., and D. B. McCoach. 2000. “The Underachievement of Gifted Students: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?” Gifted Child Quarterly 44: 152–170. doi: 10.1177/001698620004400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., K. J. Crippen, and K. Hartley. 2006. “Promoting Self-regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning.” Research in Science Education 36: 111–139. doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, R. A. 2002. “Illuminating Realities: A Phenomenological View from Two Underachieving Gifted Learners.” Roeper Review 24: 203–212. doi: 10.1080/02783190209554181
   Google Scholar
• Sureshkumar, G. K. 2001. “A Choose-Focus-Analyze Exercise in ChE Undergraduate Courses.” Chemical Engineering Education 35: 80–84.
   Google Scholar
• Thambayah, A. 2011. “On the Design of Learning Outcomes for Undergraduate Engineer’s Final Year Project.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36: 35–46. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2010.528559
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. I. 1966. Extended School Year Designs: An Introduction to New Plans of School Organization Which Can Result in Financial Economies and Provide More Education for All Pupils. New York: University of the State of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tassel-Baska, J. 2003. “Selecting Instructional Strategies for Gifted Learners.” Focus on Exceptional Children 36: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Varney, J. 2013. “Proactive Advising.” In Academic Advising Approaches: Strategies that Teach Students to Make the Most of College, edited by J. K. Drake, P. Jordan, and M. A. Miller, 137–154. Manhattan: NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising.
   Google Scholar
• Waldrop, M. M. 2015. “The Science of Teaching Science.” Nature 523: 272–274. doi: 10.1038/523272a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wankat, P. C. 2013. “Challenge Problems.” Chemical Engineering Education 47: inside cover.
   Google Scholar
• Wankat, P. C., and F. S. Oreovicz. 2015. Teaching Engineering. 2nd ed. Purdue: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. M., and G. Rasmussen. 1960. “Grading Practices in Undergraduate Education Courses: Are the Standards Too Low?” The Journal of Higher Education 31: 143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. “Attainment of Self-regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective.” In Handbook of Self-regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 13–39. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2002. “Becoming a Self-regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41: 64–70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., and R. Risemberg. 1997. “Self-regulatory Dimensions of Academic Learning and Motivation.” In Handbook of Academic Learning: Construction of Knowledge, edited by G. D. Phye, 105–125. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar