Evaluation of an adaptive tutorial supporting the teaching of mathematics

References

• Anderson, T., and J. Shattuck. 2012. “Design-based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research?” Educational Researcher 41 (1): 16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. C., and R. M. Shiffrin. 1968. "Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes." In Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 2., edited by K. W. Spence K. W., and J. T. Spence J. T., 89–195. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P., and J. Sweller. 2014. “The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning 2nd ed., edited by R. E. Mayer, 206–226. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker-Blease, K. A., and K. C. P. Bostwick. 2016. “Adaptive Quizzing in Introductory Psychology: Evidence of Limited Effectiveness.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 2 (1): 75–86. doi:10.1037/stl0000056.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Naim, D., M. Bain, and N. Marcus. 2009. A User-Driven and Data-Driven Approach for Supporting Teachers in Reflection and Adaptation of Adaptive Tutorials. In EDM ‘09 – Educational Data Mining 2009: 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Naim, D., N. Marcus, and M. Bain. 2008. Visualization and Analysis of Student Interaction in an Adaptive Exploratory Learning Environment. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Intelligent Support for Exploratory Environment, EC-TEL (Vol 8).
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Naim, D., and G. Prusty. 2010. Towards a community of practice concerning the use of adaptive tutorials in engineering mechanics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Betrancourt, M. 2005. "The Animation and Interactivity Principles in Multimedia Learning." In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, edited by R. E. Mayer, 287–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., and J. Sweller. 1991. “Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction.” Cognition and Instruction 8 (4): 293–332. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Design-Based Research Collective. 2003. “Design-based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry.” Educational Researcher 32 (1): 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Easterday, M. W., D. R. Lewis, and E. M. Gerber. 2014. Design-based Research Process: Problems, Phases, and Applications. Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, R., F. Ari, F. A. Inan, and I. Arslan-Ari. 2012. “The Impact of Adapting Content for Students with Individual Differences.” Educational Technology & Society 15 (3): 251–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halabi, A. K. 2006. “Applying an Instructional Learning Efficiency Model to Determine the Most Efficient Feedback for Teaching Introductory Accounting.” Global Perspectives on Accounting Education 3 (1): 93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Halabi, A. K., J. E. Tuovinen, and K. X. Smyrnios. 2000. “Using CBL to Improve Cognitive Load and Reduce Feedback Redundancy in Accounting Distance Learning.” Distance Education 21 (1): 162–182. doi:10.1080/0158791000210110.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. 2014. “Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 15 (1). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., P. Ayres, P. Chandler, and J. Sweller. 2003. “The Expertise Reversal Effect.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamardeen, I. 2014. “Adaptive e-Tutorial for Enhancing Student Learning in Construction Education.” International Journal of Construction Education and Research 10 (2): 79–95. doi:10.1080/15578771.2012.756437.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, H., and M. Ebner. 2014. “MOOCS Completion Rates and Possible Methods to Improve Retention - A Literature Review.” In World Conference on Educational Media, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2014 (1): 1305–1313.
   Google Scholar
• Khawaja, M. A., F. Chen, and N. Marcus. 2014. “Measuring Cognitive Load Using Linguistic Features: Implications for Usability Evaluation and Adaptive Interaction Design.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 30 (5): 343–368. doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.860579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khawaja, M. A., G. B. Prusty, R. A. J. Ford, N. Marcus, and C. Russell. 2013. “Can More Become Less? Effects of an Intensive Assessment Environment on Students’ Learning Performance.” European Journal of Engineering Education 38 (6): 631–651. doi:10.1080/03043797.2013.834295.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark. 2006. “Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discory, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching.” Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, N., D. Ben-Naim, and M. Bain. 2011. Instructional Support for Teachers and Guided Feedback for Students in an Adaptive eLearning Environment. In Proceedings - 2011 8th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, 626–631. doi:10.1109/ITNG.2011.111
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, N., M. Cooper, and J. Sweller. 1996. “Understanding Instructions.” Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (1): 49. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. 2014. “Measuring Cognitive Load and Cognition: Metrics for Technology-Enhanced Learning.” Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice 20 (7-8): 592–621. doi:10.1080/13803611.2014.997140.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, B. J., and R. Bruning. 2001. Providing Feedback in Computer-Based Instruction: What the Research Tells Us. CLASS Research Report No. 9. Center for Instrnctional Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2005. “Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning : Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity, and Temporal Contiguity Principles.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, edited by R. Mayer, 183–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and P. Chandler. 2001. “When Learning is Just a Click Away: Does Simple User Interaction Foster Deeper Understanding of Multimedia Messages?” Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2): 390–397. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., and R. E. Mayer. 1999. “Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 91 (2): 348–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narciss, S. 2013. “Designing and Evaluating Tutoring Feedback Strategies for Digital Learning Environments on the Basis of the Interactive Tutoring Feedback Model.” Digital Education Review 23 (1): 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. 1993. The Children's Machine: Rethinking School in The Age of The Computer. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Polly, P., N. Marcus, D. Maguire, Z. Belinson, and G. M. Velan. 2014. “Evaluation of an Adaptive Virtual Laboratory Environment Using Western Blotting for Diagnosis of Disease.” BMC Medical Education 14 (1): 222. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prusty, B. G., O. Ho, and S. Ho. 2009. Adaptive Tutorials Using eLearning Platform for Solid Mechanics Course in Engineering. In 20th Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, December 2009, 828–833.
   Google Scholar
• Prusty, B. G., and C. Russell. 2011. Engaging Students in Learning Threshold Concepts in Engineering Mechanics: Adaptive eLearning Tutorials. In 17th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE), 21-26 August 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., and A. C. Butler. 2011. “The Critical Role of Retrieval Practice in Long-Term Retention.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (1): 20–27. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiter, K., and P. Gerjets. 2007. “Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments.” Educational Psychology Review 19 (3): 285–307. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. 1989. “Teaching Machines.” Science 243 (4898): 1535–1535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. L., and T. J. Ragan. 1993. "Designing Instructional Feedback for Different Learning Outcomes." In Interactive Instruction and Feedback, edited by J. V. Dempsey, and G. C. Sales, 75–103. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 1988. “Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning.” Cognitive Science 12 (2): 257–285. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., and G. A. Cooper. 1985. “The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra.” Cognition and Instruction 2 (1): 59–89. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., J. J. G. van Merrienboer, and F. Paas. 1998. “Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design.” Educational Psychology Review 10 (3): 251–296. doi:10.1023/a:1022193728205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarmizi, R. A., and J. Sweller. 1988. “Guidance During Mathematical Problem Solving.” Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (4): 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Akker, J., K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, and N. Nieveen. 2006. "Introducing Educational Design Research." In Educational Design Research, edited by J. Van Den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, and N. Nieveen, 3–7. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Es, S. L., R. K. Kumar, W. M. Pryor, E. L. Salisbury, and G. M. Velan. 2015. “Cytopathology Whole Slide Images and Adaptive Tutorials for Postgraduate Pathology Trainees: A Randomized Crossover Trial.” Human Pathology 46 (9): 1297–1305. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2015.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velan, G., D. Ben-Naim, R. Kumar, M. Bain, B. Kan, and N. Marcus. 2009. Adaptive tutorials using virtual slides to enhance learning of microscopic morphology. Paper presented at the E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Velan, G., M. Lattimore, R. Lindeman, and R. Kumar. 2010. “A Web-Based Module on Lymphoma for Senior Medical Students: Benefits for Learning.” Journal of International Association of Medical Science Educators 20 (1): 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, V., A. J. Smith, N. J. Hawkins, R. K. Kumar, N. Young, M. Kyaw, and G. M. Velan. 2015. “Adaptive Tutorials Versus Web-Based Resources in Radiology: A Mixed Methods Comparison of Efficacy and Student Engagement.” Academic Radiology 22 (10): 1299–1307. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2015.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar