The role of collaborative interactions versus individual construction on students’ learning of engineering concepts

References

• Alfieri, L., T. J. Nokes-Malach, and C. D. Schunn. 2013. “Learning Through Case Comparisons: A Meta-analytic Review.” Educational Psychologist 48 (2): 87–113. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2013.775712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S. C., B. B. Schwarz, and N. Cohen-Eliyahu. 2014. “Outcome Feedback During Collaborative Learning: Contingencies Between Feedback and Dyad Composition.” Learning and Instruction 34: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., D. C. Moos, J. A. Greene, F. I. Winters, and J. G. Cromley. 2008. “Why is Externally-facilitated Regulated Learning More Effective Than Self-Regulated Learning with Hypermedia?” Educational Technology Research and Development 56 (1): 45–72. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas, Gautam, Krittaya Leelawong, Daniel Schwartz, Nancy Vye, and The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt. 2005. “Learning by Teaching: A New Agent Paradigm for Educational Software.” Applied Artificial Intelligence 19 (3–4): 363–392. doi: 10.1080/08839510590910200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callister, W. D. 2006. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. 1997. “Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 6 (3): 271–315. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. 2009. “Active-constructive-interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (1): 73–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., and Muhsin Menekse. 2015. “Dialogue Patterns on Peer Collaboration That Promote Learning.” In Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue, edited by Lauren Resnick, Christa Asterhan, and Sherice Clarke, 263–274. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., and Ruth Wylie. 2014. “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes.” Educational Psychologist 49 (4): 219–243. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Czerniak, C. M., and J. J. Haney. 1998. “The Effect of Collaborative Concept Mapping on Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Anxiety, Efficacy, And Achievement in Physical Science.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 9 (4): 303–320. doi: 10.1023/A:1009431400397
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. 1999. “What Do You Mean by ‘Collaborative Learning’?” In Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, edited by P. Dillenbourg, 1–19. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Eggert, Ryan, Aditi Joshi, Saarth Mehrotra, Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, and Veronica Darer. 2014. “Using Discourse Analysis to Understand Failure Modes of Undergraduate Engineering Teams.” Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2014 IEEE, Madrid, Spain, 1–5. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Fila, N. D., and M. C. Loui. 2014. “Structured Pairing in a First-year Electrical and Computer Engineering Laboratory: The Effects on Student Retention, Attitudes, and Teamwork.” International Journal of Engineering Education 30 (4): 848–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadgil, S., and T. J. Nokes-Malach. 2012. “Overcoming Collaborative Inhibition Through Error Correction: A Classroom Experiment.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 26 (3): 410–420. doi:10.1002/acp.1843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijlers, H., and T. de Jong. 2013. “Using Concept Maps to Facilitate Collaborative Simulation-based Inquiry Learning.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 22: 340–374. doi:10.1080/10508406.2012.748664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hake, R. R. 1998. “Interactive-engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-thousand-student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 66 (1): 64–74. doi: 10.1119/1.18809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C., and H. S. Barrows. 2008. “Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Building.” Cognition and Instruction 26 (1): 48–94. doi:10.1080/07370000701798495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiung, C. M. 2010. “Identification of Dysfunctional Cooperative Learning Teams Based on Students’ Academic Achievement.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (1): 45–54. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01041.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiung, C. M. 2012. “The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning.” Journal of Engineering Education 101 (1): 119–137. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00044.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H. C., S. G. Shih, and W. C. Lai. 2011. “Cooperative Learning in Engineering Education: A Game Theory-based Approach.” International Journal of Engineering Education 27 (4): 875–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaartinen, S., and K. Kumpulainen. 2002. “Collaborative Inquiry and the Construction of Explanations in the Learning of Science.” Learning and Instruction 12 (2): 189–212. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00004-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., D. A. Kashy, and W. L. Cook. 2006. The Analysis of Dyadic Data. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerle, J., and U. Cress. 2008. “Group Awareness and Self-presentation in Computer-supported Information Exchange.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3: 85–97. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9027-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. 1999. “Discourse Patterns for Mediating Peer Learning.” In Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, edited by A. M. O’Donnell and A. King, 87–115. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. 2002. “Structuring Peer Interaction to Promote High-level Cognitive Processing.” Theory Into Practice 41 (1): 33–39. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, F., F. Paas, and P. A. Kirschner. 2009. “A Cognitive Load Approach to Collaborative Learning: United Brains for Complex Tasks.” Educational Psychology Review 21: 31–42. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., F. Fischer, and J. D. Slotta. 2007. “Internal and External Scripts in Computer-supported Collaborative Inquiry Learning.” Learning and Instruction 17 (6): 708–721. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., and V. Dudai. 2009. “Group-metacognitive Support for Online Inquiry in Mathematics with Differential Self-questioning.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 40 (4): 377–404. doi: 10.2190/EC.40.4.a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2015. “Thinking Together and Alone.” Educational Researcher 44 (1): 46–53. doi:10.3102/0013189X15569530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. 2013. “Calculating and Reporting Effect Sizes to Facilitate Cumulative Science: A Practical Primer for T-tests and Anovas.” Frontiers in Psychology 4: 863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, Y., P. C. Abrami, and S. d’Apollonia. 2001. “Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 71 (3): 449–521. doi:10.3102/00346543071003449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, Y., P. C. Abrami, J. C. Spence, C. Poulsen, B. Chambers, and S. d’Apollonia. 1996. “Within-class Grouping: A Meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 66 (4): 423–458. doi:10.3102/00346543066004423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menekse, Muhsin. 2012. “Interactive-constructive-active-passive: The Relative Effectiveness of Differentiated Activities on Students’ Learning.” Unpublished PhD diss., Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Menekse, Muhsin, Ross Higashi, Christian D. Schunn, and Emily Baehr. 2017. “The Role of Robotics Teams’ Collaboration Quality on Team Performance in a Robotics Tournament.” Journal of Engineering Education 106 (4): 564–584. doi:10.1002/jee.20178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menekse, Muhsin, Glenda S. Stump, Stephen Krause, and Michelene TH Chi. 2013. “Differentiated Overt Learning Activities for Effective Instruction in Engineering Classrooms.” Journal of Engineering Education 102 (3): 346–374. doi: 10.1002/jee.20021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, D., S. Ostrovska, and T. Hacaloglu. 2015. “Assessing Team Work in Engineering Projects.” International Journal of Engineering Education 31 (2): 627–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, J. 2009. Essentials of Modern Materials Science and Engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, A. M. 2006. “The Role of Peers and Group Learning.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology, edited by P. Alexander and P. Winne, 2nd ed., 781–802. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, A., and C. Hmelo-Silver. 2013. “Introduction: What Is Collaborative Learning? An Overview.” In The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning, edited by C. E. Hmelo-Silver, 1–15. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Okada, T., and H. A. Simon. 1997. “Collaborative Discovery in a Scientific Domain.” Cognitive Science 21 (2): 109–146. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasha-Zaidi, N., E. Afari, J. Mohammed, S. Cubero, A. M. Shoukry, and W. El Sokkary. 2015. “Gender-based Teams: Perceptions of Team Satisfaction and Effectiveness among Engineering Students in the United Arab Emirates.” International Journal of Engineering Education 31 (4): 953–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntambekar, S. 2006. “Analyzing Collaborative Interactions: Divergence, Shared Understanding and Construction of Knowledge.” Computers and Education 47 (3): 332–351. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purzer, S. 2011. “The Relationship Between Team Discourse, Self-efficacy, and Individual Achievement: A Sequential Mixed-methods Study.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (4): 655–679. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., and A. S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Renkl, A. 1995. “Learning for Later Teaching: An Exploration of Mediational Links Between Teaching Expectancy and Learning Results.” Learning and Instruction 5: 21–36. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)00015-H.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, Rod D., and Michelene TH Chi. 2007. “Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-building and Knowledge-telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions.” Review of Educational Research 77 (4): 534–574. doi: 10.3102/0034654307309920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rummel, N., and H. Spada. 2005. “Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-mediated Settings.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 14 (2): 201–241. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherbaum, C. A., and J. M. Ferreter. 2009. “Estimating Statistical Power and Required Sample Sizes for Organizational Research Using Multilevel Modeling.” Organizational Research Methods 12 (2): 347–367. doi: 10.1177/1094428107308906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. 1995. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, L., M. Stanne, and S. Donovan. 1999. “Effects of Small-group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology: A Meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 69 (1): 21–51. doi:10.3102/00346543069001021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G., and F. Hesse. 2009. “Paradigms of Shared Knowledge.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4: 365–369. doi: 10.1007/s11412-009-9075-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G., T. Koschmann, and D. Suthers. 2014. “Computer-supported Collaborative Learning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by K. Sawyer, 2nd ed., 479–500. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streveler, Ruth A., and Muhsin Menekse. 2017. “Taking a Closer Look at Active Learning.” Journal of Engineering Education 106 (2): 186–190. doi: 10.1002/jee.20160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, M., and S. E. Volet. 2010. “Group Work Does Not Necessarily Equal Collaborative Learning: Evidence From Observations and Self-reports.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 25 (4): 473–492. doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0026-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terenzini, Patrick T., Alberto F. Cabrera, Carol L. Colbeck, John M. Parente, and Stefani A. Bjorklund. 2001. “Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students’ Reported Learning Gains.” Journal of Engineering Education 90 (1): 123–130. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00579.x
   Google Scholar
• Tonso, K. L. 2006. “Teams That Work: Campus Culture, Engineer Identity, and Social Interactions.” Journal of Engineering Education 95 (1): 25–37. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00875.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volet, S. E., M. Summers, and J. Thurman. 2009. “High-level Co-regulation in Collaborative Learning: How Does It Emerge and How Is It Sustained?” Learning and Instruction 19: 128–143. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. 1989. “Peer Interaction and Learning in Small Groups.” International Journal of Educational Research 13: 21–39. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1.
   Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R., and D. E. Watkins. 2011. “Peer Relationships and Learning: Implications for Instruction.” In Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, edited by R. Mayer and P. Alexander, 322–343. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yetter, G., T. B. Gutkin, A. Saunders, A. M. Galloway, R. R. Sobansky, and S. Y. Song. 2006. “Unstructured Collaboration Versus Individual Practice for Complex Problem Solving: A Cautionary Tale.” Journal of Experimental Education 74 (2): 137–160. doi:10.3200/JEXE.74.2.137-160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafft, C. R., S. G. Adams, and G. S. Matkin. 2009. “Measuring Leadership in Self-managed Teams Using the Competing Values Framework.” Journal of Engineering Education 98 (3): 273–282. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar