Understanding informal feedback to improve online course design

References

• Ambrose, Susan A. 2010. How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Askew, Susan, and Caroline Lodge. 2000. “Gifts, Ping-Pong and Loops – Linking Feedback and Learning.” In Feedback for Learning, edited by Susan Askew, 1–17. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Bassi, Roxana, Thanasis Daradoumis, Fatos Xhafa, Santi Caballe, and Ardiana Sula. 2014. “Software Agents in Large Scale Open E-Learning: A Critical Component for the Future of Massive Online Courses (MOOCs).” In 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, IEEE INCoS 2014, 184–188. Salerno, Italy: IEEE. doi:10.1109/INCoS.2014.15.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, John, and Catherine Tang. 2007. “Teaching for Quality Learning at University.” McGraw Hill Third: 31. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2007.09.003.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Paul, and Dylan Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (5): 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Paul, Dylan Wiliam, Paul Black, and Dylan Wiliam. 1998. ““Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, David, and Elizabeth Molloy. 2013a. “Changing Conceptions of Feedback.” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education : Understanding It and Doing It Well, edited by David Boud, and Elizabeth Molloy, 11–33. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, David, and Elizabeth Molloy. 2013b. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, William G. 2012. “The ‘Cost Disease’ in Higher Education: Is Technology the Answer?” The Tanner Lectures 1: 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Deborah L., and Philip H. Winne. 1995. “Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 245–281. doi:10.2307/1170684 doi: 10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, David, Diane Salter, Min Yang, and Joy Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Ian. 2012. “Formative Assessment : Assessment Is for Self-Regulated Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 24 (2): 205–249. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley, Edward F., Johan Malmqvist, Sören Östlund, Doris R. Brodeur, and Kristina Edström. 2014. “The CDIO Approach.” In Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, 2nd ed 11–46. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9.
   Google Scholar
• De Freitas, Sara Isabella, John Morgan, and David Gibson. 2015. “Will MOOCs Transform Learning and Teaching in Higher Education? Engagement and Course Retention in Online Learning Provision.” British Journal of Educational Technology 46 (3): 455–471. doi:10.1111/bjet.12268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado Kloos, Carlos, Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino, Carlos Alario-Hoyos, Iria Estévez Ayres, and Carmen Fernández-Panadero. 2015. “Mixing and Blending MOOC Technologies with Face-to-Face Pedagogies.” IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 1: 967–971. Tallinn, Estonia. doi:10.1109/EDUCON.2015.7096090.
   Google Scholar
• Dodero, Juan Manuel, Enrique Juan González-Conejero, Guillermo Gutiérrez-Herrera, Sonia Peinado, José Tomás Tocino, and Iván Ruiz-Rube. 2017. “Trade-off Between Interoperability and Data Collection Performance When Designing an Architecture for Learning Analytics.” Future Generation Computer Systems 68: 31–37. doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.06.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edström, Kristina, and Anette Kolmos. 2014. “PBL and CDIO: Complementary Models for Engineering Education Development.” European Journal of Engineering Education 39 (5): 539–555. doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.895703.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, Sara Isabella de, John Morgan, and David Gibson. 2015. “Will MOOCs Transform Learning and Teaching in Higher Education? Engagement and Course Retention in Online Learning Provision.” British Journal of Educational Technology 46 (3): 455–71. doi:10.1111/bjet.12268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbott, Mark, and Gillian Hogg. 2000. “An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Non-Verbal Communication on Service Evaluation.” European Journal of Marketing 34 (3/4): 384–398. doi:10.1108/03090560010311911.
   Google Scholar
• Gašević, Dragan, Shane Dawson, Tim Rogers, and Danijela Gasevic. 2016. “Learning Analytics Should Not Promote One Size Fits All: The Effects of Instructional Conditions in Predicting Academic Success.” The Internet and Higher Education 28: 68–84. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillet, Denis, Anh Vu Nguyen Ngoc, and Yassin Rekik. 2005. “Collaborative Web-Based Experimentation in Flexible Engineering Education.” IEEE Transactions on Education 48 (4): 696–704. doi:10.1109/TE.2005.852592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncher, Andrea M, and Wageeh Boles. 2016. “Investigating the Use of Vector Analysis to Assess Students‘ Understanding.” In AAEE2016 Conference, edited by Andrew Rose, 1–8. Coffs Harbour, Australia: Australasian Association for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, Joan, and Diane M Millette. 1997. “A Comparative Analysis of Teacher and Student Perceptions of Sources of Motivation and Demotivation in College Classes.” Communication Education 46 (4): 245–261. doi:10.1080/03634529709379099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gose, Ben. 2016. “When the Teaching Assistant Is a Robot.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, October. http://www.chronicle.com/article/When-the-Teaching-Assistant-Is/238114.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Judith A, and Mark L Knapp. 2013. Nonverbal Communication. Berlin/Boston, GERMANY: De Gruyter, Inc. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucalgary-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1132029.
   Google Scholar
• Halupka, Veronica. 2016. “Augmented Reality in Engineering Education : Current Status and Future Opportunities.” In AAEE2016 Conference, edited by Andrew Rose, 1–9. Coffs Harbour, Australia: Australasian Association for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, John. 2003. “Teachers Make a Difference: What Is the Research Evidence ?” In Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on: Building Teacher Quality, 1–17. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research. doi:10.1177/002221949002300106.
   Google Scholar
• Hugo, Ronald J. 2014. “From the Printing Press to You Tube – Welcome to the World of Lecture 2.0.” In 10th International CDIO Conference, 1–12. Barcelona: Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya.
   Google Scholar
• Hugo, Ronald J, and Alexandra Meikleham. 2016. “Statistical Analysis of Global Online Watch Data.” In AAEE2016 Conference, edited by Andrew Rose, 1–9. Coffs Harbour: Australasian Association for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jokinen, Kristiina. 2009. “Nonverbal Feedback in Interactions.” In Affective Information Processing, 227–240. London: Springer London. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84800-306-4_13
   Google Scholar
• Koen, Billy V. 2002. “On the Importance of Presence in a Web-Based Class.” In 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 21–26. Boston, MA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, George D, Jillian Kinzie, Jennifer A Buckley, Brian K Bridges, and John C Hayek. 2006. “What Matters to Student Success : A Review of the Literature.”.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, Ming-Shiou, and Tsung-Yen Chuang. 2016. “How Gamification Motivates Visits and Engagement for Online Academic Dissemination – An Empirical Study.” Computers in Human Behavior 55: 16–27. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAndrew, Patrick, and Eileen Scanlon. 2013. “Open Learning at a Distance: Lessons for Struggling MOOCs.” Science 342: 1450–1451. doi:10.1126/science.1239686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, Albert. 1981. Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub Co.
   Google Scholar
• Meikleham, Alexandra, Ron Hugo, and Robert Brennan. 2018. “Blended and Project-Based Learning: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly.” In 14th international CDIO Conference, Kanazawa, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Mikroyannidis, Alexander, John Domingue, Daan Pareit, Jono Vanhie Van Gerwen, Christos Tranoris, Guillaume Jourjon, and Johann M. Marquez-Barja. 2016. “Applying a Methodology for the Design, Delivery and Evaluation of Learning Resources for Remote Experimentation.” In IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 448–454. Abu Dhabi: IEEE. doi:10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474592.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Brenda. 2008. “Using Technology to Promote Communities of Practice (CoP) in Social Work Education.” Social Work Education 27 (6): 592–600. doi:10.1080/02615470802201580.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, David J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascarella, Ernest T. 2006. “How College Affects Students: Ten Directions for Future Research.” Journal of College Student Development 47 (5): 508–520. doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuessler, Hans, Alexandre Kolomenski, Paisley Bunker, and Cade Perkins. 2016. “Improving Effectiveness of Teaching Large Introductory Physics Courses with Modern Information Technology.” In 2nd International Conference on Higher Education Advances, 249–256. Valencia: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.037.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, Nathalie. 2015. “75.000 Views and Growing: Creating Vidcasts for YouTube With No Budget.” In European Conference on E-Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, George. 2005. “Connectivism: Learning as Network-Creation.” ASTD Learning News 10 (1): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sindelar, Nancy. 2015. “Summative Assessment.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Technology, edited by J. Michael Spector, 685–688. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/lib/ucalgary-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1996002.
   Google Scholar
• Stöckli, Sabrina, Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Stefan Borer, and Andrea C. Samson. 2018. “Facial Expression Analysis with AFFDEX and FACET: A Validation Study.” Behavior Research Methods 50 (4): Behavior Research Methods: 1446–1460. doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0996-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisdell, Christopher C. 2016. “How Do Australasian Students Engage with Instructional YouTube Videos? An Engineering Mathematics Case Study.” In AAEE2016 Conference, edited by Andrew Rose, 1–9. Coffs Harbour: Australasian Association of Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Topps, David, Joyce Helmer, and Rachel Ellaway. 2013. “YouTube as a Platform for Publishing Clinical Skills Training Videos.” Academic Medicine 88 (2): 192–197. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827c5352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, Lev. 1978. “Interaction Between Learning and Development.” In Readings on the Development of Children, edited by Gauvain, and Cole, 34–40. New York, NY: Scientific American Books. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79572-3.
   Google Scholar
• Wautelet, Yves, Samedi Heng, Manuel Kolp, Loris Penserini, and Stephan Poelmans. 2016. “Designing an MOOC as an Agent-Platform Aggregating Heterogeneous Virtual Learning Environments.” Behaviour & Information Technology 35 (11): 980–997. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2016.1212095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne, Richard A McDermott, and William Snyder. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice : A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business Review Press. http://ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=79094&site=ehost-live.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, BRETT, TED Brown, and ROBYN Benson. 2013. “Feedback in the Digital Environment.” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education, edited by David Boud and Elizabeth Molloy, 125–139. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203074336.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, Alyssa Friend, Yi Cui, Wanqi Jin, and Jovita Vytasek. 2017. “Mining for Gold: Identifying Content-Related MOOC Discussion Threads Across Domains Through Linguistic Modeling.” Internet and Higher Education 32: 11–28. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharis, Nick Z. 2015. “A Multivariate Approach to Predicting Student Outcomes in Web-Enabled Blended Learning Courses.” Internet and Higher Education 27: 44–53. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yulei, Yan Dang, and Beverly Amer. 2016. “A Large-Scale Blended and Flipped Class: Class Design and Investigation of Factors Influencing Students’ Intention to Learn.” IEEE Transactions on Education 59 (4): 263–273. doi:10.1109/TE.2016.2535205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar