A methodology for supporting the design of a learning outcomes-based formative assessment: the engineering drawing case study

References

• Alpay, E., P. S. Cutler, S. Eisenbach, and A. J. Field. 2010. “Changing the Marks-based Culture of Learning Through Peer-assisted Tutorials.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (1): 17–32. doi:10.1080/03043790903202983.
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., F. Dochy, and K. Struyven. 2008. “Students’ Approaches to Learning and Assessment Preferences in a Portfolio-based Learning Environment.” Instructional Science 36 (5): 359–374. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9060-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagban, T. I., S. R. Patil, A. Gat, and S. K. Shirgave. 2017. “On Selection of Assessment Methods in Outcome Based Education (OBE).” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 30 (3): 327–332.
   Google Scholar
• Baronio, G., B. Motyl, and D. Paderno. 2016. “Technical Drawing Learning Tool-level 2: An Interactive Self-learning Tool for Teaching Manufacturing Dimensioning.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 24 (4): 519–528. doi:10.1002/cae.21728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. 1987. Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Research Monograph. ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M. 1997. “Assessment Preferences and Their Relationship to Learning Strategies and Orientations.” Higher Education 33 (1): 71–84. doi: 10.1023/A:1002985613176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M. 2007. “Assessment and Instruction Preferences and Their Relationship with Test Anxiety and Learning Strategies.” Higher Education 53 (6): 749–768. doi: 10.1007/s10734-005-4843-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M., and R. A. Feldman. 1998. “Relationships Between Learning Patterns and Attitudes Towards two Assessment Formats.” Educational Research 40 (1): 90–98. doi: 10.1080/0013188980400109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, J. M., and D. G. Altman. 1997. “Statistics Notes: Cronbach9s Alpha.” BMJ 314 (7080): 572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. 1971. Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., ed. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, A.-M. 2005. “Assessment of Learning with Multiple-choice Questions.” Nurse Education in Practice 5 (4): 238–242. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2004.12.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, S. A. 1987. “Instructional Alignment: Searching for a Magic Bullet.” Educational Researcher 16 (8): 16–20. doi: 10.3102/0013189X016008016
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1992. “A Power Primer.” Psychological Bulletin 112 (1): 155. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., and R. J. Shavelson. 2004. “My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 64 (3): 391–418. doi: 10.1177/0013164404266386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, A., C. Dirks, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2008. “Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 7 (4): 368–381. doi: 10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowell, T. L. 2015. “Student Self Grading: Perception vs. Reality.” American Journal of Educational Research 3 (4): 450–455.
   Google Scholar
• Demetrulias, D. A. M., and L. E. McCubbin. 1982. “Constructing Test Questions for Higher Level Thinking.” Nurse Educator 7 (5): 13–17. doi: 10.1097/00006223-198200750-00003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dochy, F. J., and L. McDowell. 1997. “Introduction: Assessment as a Tool for Learning.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 23 (4): 279–298. doi: 10.1016/S0191-491X(97)86211-6
   Google Scholar
• Dudek, F. J. 1979. “The Continuing Misinterpretation of the Standard Error of Measurement.” Psychological Bulletin 86 (2): 335. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebel, R. L. 1972. Essentials of Educational Measurement. Oxford: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., and F. Dochy. 2006. “Students’ Assessment Preferences and Approaches to Learning: can Formative Assessment Make a Difference?” Educational Studies 32 (4): 399–409. doi:10.1080/03055690600850354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., M. Segers, and E. Struyf. 2008. “Constructivist Learning Environments and the (Im)possibility to Change Students’ Perceptions of Assessment Demands and Approaches to Learning.” Instructional Science 36 (5): 431. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9064-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimson, J. 2002. “Re-engineering the Curriculum for the 21st Century.” European Journal of Engineering Education 27 (1): 31–37. doi:10.1080/03043790110100803.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, W. 2007. “The new Bloom's Taxonomy: Implications for Music Education.” Arts Education Policy Review 108 (4): 7–16. doi: 10.3200/AEPR.108.4.7-16
   Google Scholar
• Jaccheri, L., and T. Osterlie. 2005. Can We Teach Empirical Software Engineering?” 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'05), Como, Italy, 25–25. IEEE. 
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. G., and U. Fuller. 2006. Is Bloom's Taxonomy Appropriate for Computer Science?” Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research: Koli Calling 2006 (Baltic Sea '06), NewYork, NY, 120–123. ACM. doi:10.1145/1315803.1315825.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. O., J. Harland, J. M. Reid, and R. Bartlett. 2009. Relationship Between Examination Questions and Bloom's Taxonomy.” Paper Presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, 2009. FIE'09, San Antonio, TX, 39th IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, M. H. 2011. Multivariable Analysis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians and Public Health Researchers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, C., and S. So. 2010. “QR Codes in Education.” Journal of Educational Technology Development & Exchange 3 (1): 85–100. doi: 10.18785/jetde.0301.07
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-K., I.-S. Lee, and Y.-J. Kwon. 2011. “Scan & Learn! Use of Quick Response Codes & Smartphones in a Biology Field Study.” The American Biology Teacher 73 (8): 485–492. doi: 10.1525/abt.2011.73.8.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemons, P. P., and J. D. Lemons. 2013. “Questions for Assessing Higher-Order Cognitive Skills: It's Not Just Bloom’s.” CBE Life Sciences Education 12 (1): 47–58. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-03-0024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, T. 2017. “Problems in Relating Various Tasks and Their Sample Solutions to Bloom’s Taxonomy.” The Mathematics Enthusiast 14 (1): 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzinger, T., L. R. Lattuca, R. Hadgraft, and W. Newstetter. 2011. “Engineering Education and the Development of Expertise.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (1): 123–150. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00006.x.
   Google Scholar
• Metraglia, R., G. Baronio, and V. Villa. 2011. “ Learning levels in technical drawing education: Proposal for an assessment grid based on the European Qualifications Framework (EQF).” Paper presented at the DS 68-8: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 8: Design Education, Lyngby/Copenhagen, 15–19 August 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., and I. H. Bernstein. 1967. Psychometric Theory (Vol. 226). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, F. 1999. “Business Students’ Learning Preferences and Associated Task Performance.” Journal of Education for Business 75 (1): 27–32. doi: 10.1080/08832329909598986
   Google Scholar
• Segers, M., and F. Dochy. 2006. “Introduction Enhancing Student Learning Through Assessment: Alignment Between Levels of Assessment and Different Effects on Learning.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 32 (3): 171–179. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• Segers, M., J. Nijhuis, and W. Gijselaers. 2006. “Redesigning a Learning and Assessment Environment: The Influence on Students’ Perceptions of Assessment Demands and Their Learning Strategies.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 32 (3): 223–242. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.08.004.
   Google Scholar
• Speranza, D., G. Baronio, B. Motyl, S. Filippi, and V. Villa. 2017. “Best Practices in Teaching Technical Drawing: Experiences of Collaboration in Three Italian Universities.” In Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Mechanics, Design Engineering & Advanced Manufacturing (JCM 2016), 14-16 September, 2016, Catania, Italy, edited by B. Eynard, V. Nigrelli, S. M. Oliveri, G. Peris-Fajarnes, and S. Rizzuti, 903–913. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Udovic, D., D. Morris, A. Dickman, J. Postlethwait, and P. Wetherwax. 2002. “Workshop Biology: Demonstrating the Effectiveness of Active Learning in an Introductory Biology Course.” BioScience 52 (3): 272–281. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0272:WBDTEO]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Watering, G., D. Gijbels, F. Dochy, and J. van der Rijt. 2008. “Students’ Assessment Preferences, Perceptions of Assessment and Their Relationships to Study Results.” Higher Education 56 (6): 645. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9116-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violante, M. G., and E. Vezzetti. 2014. “Implementing a new Approach for the Design of an e-Learning Platform in Engineering Education.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 22 (4): 708–727. doi: 10.1002/cae.21564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violante, M. G., and E. Vezzetti. 2015. “Virtual Interactive e-Learning Application: An Evaluation of the Student Satisfaction.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 23 (1): 72–91. doi: 10.1002/cae.21580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violante, M. G., and E. Vezzetti. 2017a. “Design and Implementation of 3D Web-Based Interactive Medical Devices for Educational Purposes.” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 11 (1): 31–44. doi: 10.1007/s12008-015-0277-0
   Google Scholar
• Violante, M. G., and E. Vezzetti. 2017b. “Guidelines to Design Engineering Education in the Twenty-First Century for Supporting Innovative Product Development.” European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–21. doi:10.1080/03043797.2017.1293616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar