Why do students choose to study on engineering foundation year programmes within the UK?

References

• Ainscow, M. 1999. Understanding the Development of Inclusive Schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alpay, E., A. L. Ahearn, R. H. Graham, and A. M. J. Bull. 2008. “Student Enthusiasm for Engineering: Charting Changes in Student Aspirations and Motivation.” European Journal of Engineering Education 33 (5-6): 573–585.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, H., and C. Mares. 1963. “Liberal Studies in Advanced Scientific and Technological Courses.” Report. Slough. National Foundation for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. Osborne, J. DeWitt, J. Dillon, B. Wong, and B. Willis. 2013. ASPIRES: Young People’s Science and Career Aspirations, Age 10-14. London: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Aschbacher, P. R., E. Li, and E. J. Roth. 2010. “Is Science Me? High School Students’ Identities, Participation and Aspirations in Science, Engineering, and Medicine.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47: 564–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atman, C. A. J., S. D. Sheppard, J. Turns, R. S. Adams, L. N. Fleming, R. Stevens, and R. A. Streveler. 2010. Enabling Engineering Student Success: The Final Report for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool. http://www.engr.washington.edu/caee/final_report.html.
   Google Scholar
• Austen, L., N. Pickering, and M. Judge. 2020. “Student Reflections on the Pedagogy of Transitions Into Higher Education, Through Digital Storytelling.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 45 (3): 337–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, S., T. M. Hassan, B. Bagilhole, and A. R. J. Dainty. 2012. “They’re Not Girly Girls’: An Exploration of Quantitative and Qualitative Data on Engineering and Gender in Higher Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 37 (2): 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, M., E. Silfver, and A. Danielsson. 2019. “In Search of the New Engineer: Gender, Age, and Social Class in Information About Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 44 (5): 650–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Budgeon, S. 2001. “Emerging Feminist(?) Identities: Young Women and the Practice of Micropolitics.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 8 (1): 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBI. 2009. Future Fit: Preparing Graduates for the World of Work. London: CBI and Universities UK.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, B. S. K., D. Churchill, and T. K. F. Chiu. 2017. “Digital Literacy Learning in Higher Education Through Digital Storytelling Approach.” Journal of International Education Research 13 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, J., and N. Kellam. 2018. “Beginning an Engineer's Journey: A Narrative Examination of How, When, and Why Students Choose the Engineering Major.” Journal of Engineering Education 107: 556–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, L. 1966. Liberal Studies and Technology. Cardiff: Wales University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, D. 2011. “Reasons and Motivations for the Option of an Engineering Career in Portugal.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36 (4): 367–376.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, T. P., and S. F. Rallis. 1991. “Factors and Influences on High School Student’s Career Choices.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22 (4): 281–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodgson, R., and H. Whitham. 2004. Learner Experience of Foundation Degrees in the North East of England: Access, Support and Retention. Sunderland: Aimhigher. North East/ Universities for the North East.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. 1994. “Understanding Women’s Educational and Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 18 (4): 585–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. 2005. “Subjective Task Value and the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices.” In Handbook of Competence and Motivation, edited by A. J. Elliot and C. S. Dweck, 105–121. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., T. F. Adler, R. Futterman, S. B. Goff, C. M. Kaczala, J. L. Meece, and C. Midgley. 1983. “Expectancies, Values, and Academic Behaviors.” In Achievement and Achievement Motivation, edited by J. T. Spence, 75–146. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Engineering Professors Council. 2021. “Engineering Opportunity: Maximising the Opportunities for Social Mobility from Studying Engineering.” Engineering Professors Council. http://epc.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Engineering-opportunity_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Engineering UK. 2020. “Engineering UK 2020: Education Pathways into Engineering.” https://www.engineeringuk.com/media/232298/engineering-uk-report-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eris, O., D. Chachra, H. L. Chen, S. Sheppard, L. Ludlow, C. Rosca, T. Bailey, and G. Toye. 2010. “Outcomes of a Longitudinal Administration of the Persistence in Engineering Survey.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (4): 371–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertl, H., G. Hayward, and M. Hoelscher. 2009. “Learners’ Transition from Vocational Education and Training to Higher Education.” In Improving Learning by Widening Participation, edited by M. David, 75–87. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. 2007. “Nuts and Bolts and People: Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities.” Social Studies of Science 37 (3): 331–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, T. R., N. A. Fouad, and P. L. Smith. 2000. “The Role of Family Context in a Social Cognitive Model for Career-Related Choice Behavior: A Math and Science Perspective.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 57 (3): 348–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson, A. 2019. “Preparing for Degree Study: Analysis of Access to Higher Education Diplomas and Integrated Foundation Year Courses.” Office for Students. https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/media/ f3450e04-2d2b-4b33-932f-41140d57c41e/ofs2019_20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B. 2006. “Troubling Trajectories. Gendered ‘Choices’ and Pathways from School to Work.” In Gender and Lifelong Learning. Critical Feminist Engagements, edited by C. Leathwood and B. Francis, 57–69. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gachago, D., and C. Livingston. 2020. “The Elephant in the Room: Tensions Between Normative Research and an Ethics of Care for Digital Storytelling in Higher Education.” Reading & Writing 11 (1): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J., J. Cowan, L. Hewitt, and P. Cannell. 2004. “Failure Dances to the Tune of Insecurity': Affective Issues in the Assessment and Evaluation of Access Learning.” Journal of Access Policy and Practice 1: 119–133.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, J., J. E. Mills, S. Franzway, and R. Sharp. 2008a. “Oh you Must be Very Clever!’ High-Achieving Women, Professional Power and the Ongoing Negotiation of Workplace Identity.” Gender and Education 20: 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, J., R. Sharp, J. Mills, and S. Franzway. 2008b. “I Still Wanna Be an Engineer! Women, Education and the Engineering Profession.” European Journal of Engineering Education 33 (4): 391–402.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmartin, S. K., E. Li, and P. Aschbacher. 2006. “The Relationship Between Secondary Students’ Interest in Physical Science or Engineering, Science Class Experiences, and Family Contexts: Variations by Gender and Race/Ethnicity.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 12 (2-3): 179–207.
   Google Scholar
• Godwin, A., and A. Kirn. 2020. “Identity-based Motivation: Connections Between First-Year Students’ Engineering Role Identities and Future-Time Perspectives.” Journal of Engineering Education 109: 362–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, A., L. Klotz, Z. Hazari, and G. Potvin. 2016a. “Sustainability Goals of Students Underrepresented in Engineering: An Intersectional Study.” International Journal of Engineering Education 32 (4): 1742–1748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, A., G. Potvin, Z. Hazari, and R. Lock. 2016b. “Identity, Critical Agency, and Engineering: An Affective Model for Predicting Engineering as a Career Choice.” Journal of Engineering Education 105 (2): 312–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, A., D. Verdín, A. Kirn, and D. Satterfield. 2018. “The Intersection of Gender and Race: Exploring Chemical Engineering Students’ Attitudes.” Chemical Engineering Education 52 (2): 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, R. 2018. The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Grinter, L. E. 1955. Report on the Evaluation of Engineering Education. Washington DC. American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 1993. “Disaffection and Access.” In Disaffection and Diversity. Overcoming Barriers to Adult Learning, edited by J. Calder, 35–56. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Hatt, S., and A. Baxter. 2003. “From FE to HE: Studies in Transition.” Journal of Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning 5 (2): 18–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett, S. A., C. Buck Luce, L. J. Servon, L. Sherbin, P. Shiller, E. Sosnovich, and K. Sumberg. 2008. The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology. Watertown, MA: Harvard Business School. http://documents.library.nsf.gov/edocs/HD6060-.A84-2008-PDF-Athena-factor-Reversing-the-brain-drainin-science,-engineering,-and-technology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hoelscher, M., G. Hayward, H. Ertl, and H. Dunbar-Goddet. 2008. “The Transition from Vocational Education and Training to Higher Education: A Successful Pathway?” Research Papers in Education 23 (2): 139–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, S., and N. Ryan. 2014. “Digital Narratives, Social Connectivity and Disadvantaged Youth: Raising Aspirations for Rural and Low Socioeconomic Young People.” International Studies in Widening Participation 1 (1): 28–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsell, D. 2007. Integrative Assessment. Blending Assignments and Assessments for High-Quality Learning. Guide Number 3. Mansfield: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G., N. Taddese, and E. Walter. 2000. Research and Development Report: Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education (NCES 2000-601). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, C. 2005. Widening Participation in Higher Education art and Design: Part 2 Questionnaire Report. Winchester: Council for Higher Education in Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G. A., and M. E. Nelson. 2005. “Locating the Semiotic Power of Multimodality.” Written Communication 22 (2): 224–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IET. 2019. New Approaches to Engineering Higher Education. London: The Institution of Engineering and Technologists.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M., R. Erikson, J. Goldthorpe, and M. Yaish. 2007. “Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment: The Transition to A-Level Courses in England and Wales.” Acta Sociologica 50 (3): 211–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawitz, J., and J. Case. 1998. “Exploring the Reasons South African Students Give for Studying Engineering.” International Journal of Engineering Education 14 (4): 235–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, M., and P. Gravestock. 2012. “Digital Storytelling as an Alternative Assessment.” In Improving Student Engagement and Development Through Assessment: Theory and Practice in Higher Education, edited by L. Clouder, C. Broughan, S. Jewell, and G. Steventon, 126–137. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., and J. Stewart. 1997. “Factors Influencing Support in Engineering/Technology Design Projects in Australia and South Africa.” 9th annual AAEE convention and conference, Ballarat, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott. 2010. “An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First-Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans.” Journal of Engineering Education 99: 319–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz, L., G. Potvin, A. Godwin, J. Cribbs, Z. Hazari, and N. Barclay. 2014. “Sustainability as a Route to Broadening Participation in Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education 103: 137–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leathwood, C. 2005. “Assessment Policy and Practice in Higher Education: Purpose, Standards and Equity.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 307–324.
   Google Scholar
• Leathwood, C., and M. Hutchings. 2003. “Entry Routes to Higher Education. Pathways, Qualifications and Social Class.” In Higher Education and Social Class, edited by L. Archer, M. Hutchings, and A. Ross, 307–324. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett. 1994. “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 45 (1): 79–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, S., and J. Murray. 2005. “Tertiary Entrance Scores Need Not Determine Academic Success: An Analysis of Student Performance in an Equity and Access Program.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (1): 129–141.
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, B. 2007, April. “A Longitudinal Study of Students’ Attitudes Towards Science and Choice of Career.” Paper presented at the 80th NARST International Conference, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Long, B. T., and T. Hall. 2017. “From Dewey to Digital: Design-Based Research for Deeper Reflection Through Digital Storytelling.” In Digital Storytelling in Higher Education. Digital Education and Learning, edited by G. Jamissen, P. Hardy, Y. Nordkvelle, and H. Pleasants, 55–72. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Matusovich, H. M., R. A. Streveler, and R. L. Miller. 2010. “Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students’ Motivational Values.” Journal of Engineering Education 99: 289–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan, H. 2007. “Digital Storytelling in Higher Education.” Journal of Compuing in Higher Education 19: 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• McMasters, J. H. 2004. “Influencing Engineering Education: One (Aerospace) Industry Perspective.” International Journal of Engineering Education 20 (3): 353–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentkowski, M. 2006. “Accessible and Adaptable Elements of Alverno Student Assessment-as-Learning.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 48–63. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 1961. Better Opportunities in Technical Education. London: HMSO. Cmnd 1254.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., and J. Beggs. 2005. Primary Science in the UK: A Scoping Study. Final Report to the Wellcome Trust. London: Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• NAO (National Audit Office). 2007. Staying the Course: The Retention of Students in Higher Education. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering. 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod, M. B., and D. Duckworth. 1975. Pupils’ Attitudes to Science. Slough: NFER.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, M., Z. Hazari, P. Sadler, and G. Sonnert. 2009. “Career Motivations of Freshmen Engineering and Non-engineering Students: A Gender Study.” Paper presented at the ASEE Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, J. K., K. E. Snyder, and P. A. Ralston. 2017, June. “Why Engineering? Students’ Reasons for Choosing an Engineering Majo.” Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2—29126.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, J. 2003. Vocational pathways at age 16–19. Research report RR501. London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Peasgood, Alice. 2003. “Gateway or Obstacle? Reflections Upon the Role of Assessment in Widening Participation.” Paper presented at the Forum for the Advancement of Continuing Education, University of Stirling. http://www.face.stir.ac.uk/documents/Paper081Peasgood.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, J. 2013. Professor John Perkins’ Review of Engineering Skills. London: UK Department of Business Innovation and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A., A. Dainty, and B. Bagilhole. 2010. “Achieving Gender Equality in the Construction Professions: Lessons from the Career Decisions of Women Construction Students in the UK.” In 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, edited by C. Egbu, 573–582. Leeds: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A., A. Dainty, and B. Bagilhole. 2012. “Gender Stereotypes among Women Engineering and Technology Students in the UK: Lessons from Career Choice Narratives.” European Journal of Engineering Education 37 (6): 541–556.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, S. P. M. 2016. “Developing Intercultural Awareness Using Digital Storytelling.” Language and Intercultural Communication 16 (1): 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, S. P. M. 2017. “Digital Storytelling: Learning to be in Higher Education.” In Digital Storytelling in Higher Education. Digital Education and Learning, edited by G. Jamissen G, P. Hardy, Y. Nordkvelle, and H. Pleasants, 207–223. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, E. 2005. “Young Women, Life Choices and Feminist Identities and Neo-liberalism.” Women’s Studies International Forum 28 (6): 495–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Academy of Engineering. 2007. Educating Engineers for the 21st Century. London: Royal Academy of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Academy of Engineering. 2014. The Universe of Engineering: A Call to Action. London: Royal Academy of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Academy of Engineering. 2018. Designing Inclusion Into Engineering Education A Fresh, Practical Look at How Diversity Impacts on Engineering and Strategies for Change. London: Royal Academy of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society, with OPM. 2006. Taking a Leading Role—Scientists Survey. London: The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. W., and J. Aasetre. 2021. “Digital Storytelling, Student Engagement and Deep Learning in Geography.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 3 (45): 380–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seron, C., S. Silbey, E. Cech, and B. Rubineau. 2018. “I am Not a Feminist, but … .”: Hegemony of a Meritocratic Ideology and the Limits of Critique Among Women in Engineering.” Work and Occupations 45 (2): 131–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., and N. M. Hewitt. 1997. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S., S. Gilmartin, H. L. Chen, K. Donaldson, G. Lichtenstein, E. Özgür, M. Lande, and G. Toye. 2010. Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES) (TR-10-01). Technical Report CAEE-TR-10-01. Seattle, WA: Center for theAdvancement for Engineering Education, September.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., and R. Naylor. 2001. “Dropping out of University: A Statistical Analysis of the Probability of Withdrawal for UK University Students.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 164 (2): 389–405.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, J. E. 2006. “Pedagogy and Student Change in the Women’s and Gender Studies Classroom.” Gender and Education 18 (2): 199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, R. H., C. Qi Liu, A. V. Maltese, and X. Fan. 2006. “Planning Early for Careers in Science.” Science 312 (5777): 1143–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. 2001. “An Ethic of Care.” In Ethics in Community-Based Elder Care, edited by M. B. Holstein, and P. B. Mitzen, 60–68. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, T., H. L. Chen, and S. Sheppard. 2011. Early academic experiences of non-persisting engineering undergraduates. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• UCAS. 2018. “Preparing for Careers the Skills Employers are looking for”. Available at: https://www.ucas.com/file/130381/download?token=zX_vZu_9.
   Google Scholar
• UNITE. 2017. Student Resilience Exploring the positive case for resilience. Available at https://www.unite-group.co.uk/sites/default/files/2017-05/student-resilience.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, O., L. Wyness, and D. Cotton. 2017. Enhancing Access, Retention, Attainment and Progression in Higher Education -A Review of the Literature Showing Demonstrable Impact. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., and J. S. Eccles. 1992. “The Development of Achievement Task Values: A Theoretical Analysis.” Developmental Review 12 (3): 265–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, A., W. G. Graziano, S. E. Branch, I. Ngambeki, and D. Evangelou. 2012. “Engineering Students’ Beliefs About Research: Sex Differences, Personality, and Career Plans.” Journal of Engineering Education 101 (3): 495–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolnough, B. E. 1994. “Affecting Students’ Choice of Science and Engineering.” International Journal of Science Education 16 (6): 659–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar