Harm not only females: math-gender stereotypes and engagement of engineering students at Russian universities

References

• Abulela, M. A., and W. M. Bart. 2021. “Learning and Study Strategies and Engagement among Egyptian Undergraduates: Do Gender and Discipline Matter?” Educational Psychology 41 (9): 1160–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACED. 2020. Australian Engineering Education Statistics. Report of Australian Council of Engineering Deans. http://www.aced.edu.au/downloads/ACED20Engineering20Statistics20Mar202020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ambady, N., M. Shih, A. Kim, and T. Pittinsky. 2001. “Stereotype Susceptibility in Children: Effects of Identity Activation on Quantitative Performance.” Psychological Science 12 (5): 385–390. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoshchuk, I. A. 2021. “Moving Through the STEM Pipeline: A Systematic Literature Review of the Gender Inequality in Russian Engineering.” Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i Sotsial'nye Peremeny 3: 57–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ashlock, J., M. Stojnic, and Z. Tufekci. 2022. “Gender Differences in Academic Efficacy Across STEM Fields.” Sociological Perspectives 65 (3): 555–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. 1984. “Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education.” Journal of College Student Personnel 25 (4): 297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astorne-Figari, C., and J. D. Speer. 2018. “Drop out, Switch Majors, or Persist? The Contrasting Gender Gaps.” Economics Letters 164: 82–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, L. J., C. McDowell, and K. Kalahar. 2009. “Exploring Factors That Influence Computer Science Introductory Course Students to Persist in the Major.” ACM Sigcse Bulletin 41 (1): 153–157.
   Google Scholar
• Blickenstaf, J. C. 2005. “Women and Science Careers: Leaky Pipeline or Gender Filter?” Gender and Education 17 (4): 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. D., D. Gay, R. A. Jones, L. Morrison, and H. Remick. 1981. “Sex Differences in College Studentteacher Interactions: Fact or Fantasy?” Sex Roles 7: 775–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. W. 1986. “Classroom Communication Apprehension: A Survey.” Communication Education 35: 372–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brint, Steven. 2006. Schools and Societies. 2nd ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brint, S., and A. Cantwell. 2012. Portrait of the Disengaged.
   Google Scholar
• Brint, S., and A. M. Cantwell. 2014. “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Analyzing the Characteristics of Academically Disengaged Students: Results from UCUES 2010.” Journal of College Student Development 55 (8): 808–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, E. R., J. L. Smith, D. B. Thoman, J. M. Allen, and G. Muragishi. 2015. “From Bench to Bedside: A Communal Utility Value Intervention to Enhance Students’ Biomedical Science Motivation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 107 (4): 1116–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1992. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model fit.” Sociological Methods & Research 21 (2): 230–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhalter, N., and M. R. Shegebayev. 2012. “Critical Thinking as Culture: Teaching Post-Soviet Teachers in Kazakhstan.” International Review of Education 58 (1): 55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Canada, K., and R. Pringle. 1995. “The Role of Gender in College Classroom Interactions: A Social Context Approach.” Sociology of Education 68: 161–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnes, M., P. G. Devine, L. B. Manwell, A. Byars-Winston, E. Fine, C. E. Ford, and J. Sheridan. 2015. “The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution.” Academic Medicine 90 (2): 221–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., W. M. Williams, and S. M. Barnett. 2009. “Women’s Underrepresentation in Science: Sociocultural and Biological Considerations.” Psychological Bulletin 135 (2): 218–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. 2007. “Sensitivity of Goodness of fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14 (3): 464–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., V. C. Plaut, P. G. Davies, & C. M. Steele. 2009. “Ambient Belonging: How Stereotypical Cues Impact Gender Participation in Computer Science.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97: 1045–1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., J. O. Siy, M. Vichayapai, B. J. Drury, and S. Kim. 2011. “Do Female and Male Role Models Who Embody STEM Stereotypes Hinder Women’s Anticipated Success in STEM?” Social Psychological and Personality Science 2 (6): 656–664. doi:10.1177/1948550611405218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirikov, I., T. Semenova, N. Maloshonok, E. Bettinger, and R. F. Kizilcec. 2020. “Online Education Platforms Scale College STEM Instruction with Equivalent Learning Outcomes at Lower Cost.” Science Advances 6 (15): eaay5324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, M., and M. MacLeod. 1990. “Gender in the College Classroom: An Assessment of the Chilly Climate for Women.” Sex Roles 23: 101–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crombie, G., S. W. Pyke, N. Silverthorn, A. Jones, and S. Piccinin. 2003. “Students’ Perceptions of Their Classroom Participation and Instructor as a Function of Gender and Context.” The Journal of Higher Education 74: 51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaher, K., and C. S. Crandall. 2008. “Stereotype Threat in Applied Settings Re-Examined.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38 (6): 1639–1655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, N., M. M. Scircle, and M. Hunsinger. 2015. “Female Peers in Small Work Groups Enhance Women’s Motivation, Verbal Participation, and Career Aspirations in Engineering.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (16): 4988–4993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. G., S. J. Spencer, and C. M. Steele. 2005. “Clearing the Air: Identity Safety Moderates the Effects of Stereotype Threat on Women’s Leadership Aspirations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (2): 276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, H., R. J. Bosker, and M. P. van der Werf. 2010. “Sustainability of Teacher Expectation Bias Effects on Long-Term Student Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 102 (1): 168–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, H., A. C. Timmermans, and M. P. Van Der Werf. 2018. “The Effects of Teacher Expectation Interventions on Teachers’ Expectations and Student Achievement: Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis.” Educational Research and Evaluation 24 (3–5): 180–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deboer, G. E. 1985. “Characteristics of Male and Female Students who Experienced Success or Failure in Their First College Science Course.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 22 (2): 153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertl, B., S. Luttenberger, and M. Paechter. 2017. “The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on the Self-Concept of Female Students in STEM Subjects with an Under-Representation of Females.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, L., and L. McHugh. 2017. “Examining Gender-STEM Bias Among STEM and non-STEM Students Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP).” Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 6 (1): 80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F., G. Sonnert, and I. Nikiforova. 2011. “Programs for Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering.” Gender & Society 25 (5): 589–615. doi:10.1177/0891243211416809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froumin, I. D., and M. S. Dobryakova. 2012. “What Drives Russian Universities to Change: A Disengagement Compact. [Chto Zastavlyaet Menyatsya Rossiyskie Vuzy: Dogovor o Nevovlechennosti].” Voprosy Obrazovaniya 2: 159–191. (in Russ.).
   Google Scholar
• Fuesting, M. A., A. B. Diekman, and N. Bautista. 2021. “Integrating Communal Content into Science Lessons: An Investigation of the Beliefs and Attitudes of Preservice Teachers.” School Science and Mathematics 121 (3): 154–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, E., T. Aubrey, and R. King. 2010. “Who Leaves and who Stays? Retention and Attrition in Engineering Education.” Engineering Education 5 (2): 26–40.
   Google Scholar
• Good, C., J. Aronson, and J. A. Harder. 2008. “Problems in the Pipeline: Stereotype Threat and Women’s Achievement in High-Level Math Courses.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29 (1): 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griethuijsen, R. A. L. F., M. W. Eijck, H. Haste, P. J. Brok, N. C. Skinner, N. Mansour, et al. 2015. “Global Patterns in Students’ Views of Science and Interest in Science.” Research in Science Education 45 (4): 581–603. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9438-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, A. L. 2010. “Persistence of Women and Minorities in STEM Field Majors: Is it the School That Matters?” Economics of Education Review 29 (6): 911–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, E. A., G. Ramirez, S. C. Levine, and S. L. Beilock. 2012. “The Role of Parents and Teachers in the Development of Gender-Related Math Attitudes.” Sex Roles 66 (3): 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyder, A., and U. Kessels. 2017. “Boys Don’t Work? On the Psychological Benefits of Showing low Effort in High School.” Sex Roles 77 (1): 72–85. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0683-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, S., S. H. Rodger, M. Biggers, D. Binkley, C. K. Frantz, D. Gundermann, and M. Sweat. 2009. “Using Peer-led Team Learning to Increase Participation and Success of Under-Represented Groups in Introductory Computer Science.” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 41 (1): 163–167.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, T. L., and P. Yu. 2022. “Exploring Achievement Motivation, Student Engagement, and Learning Outcomes for STEM College Students in Taiwan Through the Lenses of Gender Differences and Multiple Pathways.” Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S., and G. D. Kuh. 2002. “Being (dis) Engaged in Educationally Purposeful Activities: The Influences of Student and Institutional Characteristics.” Research in Higher Education 43 (5): 555–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S., and G. C. Wolniak. 2013. “College Student Engagement and Early Career Earnings: Differences by Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Academic Preparation.” The Review of Higher Education 36 (2): 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huerta-Manzanilla, E. L., M. W. Ohland, and R. del Rocío Peniche-Vera. 2021. “Co-enrollment Density Predicts Engineering Students’ Persistence and Graduation: College Networks and Logistic Regression Analysis.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 70: 101025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C., and S. Dempster. 2009. “‘I sat Back on my Computer … with a Bottle of Whisky Next to me’: Constructing ‘Cool’ Masculinity Through ‘Effortless’ Achievement in Secondary and Higher Education.” Journal of Gender Studies 18 (4): 341–356. doi:10.1080/09589230903260019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C., and A. S. Nyström. 2015. “‘Smart Students get Perfect Scores in Tests Without Studying Much’: Why is an Effortless Achiever Identity Attractive, and for Whom is it Possible?” Research Papers in Education 30 (4): 393–410. doi:10.1080/02671522.2014.970226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. M., G. Ozogul, M. D. DiDonato, and M. Reisslein. 2013. “Engineering Perceptions of Female and Male K-12 Students: Effects of a Multimedia Overview on Elementary, Middle-, and High-School Students.” European Journal of Engineering Education 38 (5): 519–531.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, D. A., and W. C. Yoels. 1976. “The College Classroom: Some Observations on the Meanings of Student Participation.” Sociology and Social Research 60: 421–439.
   Google Scholar
• Kinzie, J., R. Gonyea, G. D. Kuh, P. Umbach, C. Blaich, and A. Korkmaz. 2007. “The Relationship Between Gender and Student Engagement in College.” 32nd annual conference of the association for the study of higher education, Louisville, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Kondratjeva, O., E. V. Gorbunova, and J. D. Hawley. 2017. “Academic Momentum and Undergraduate Student Attrition: Comparative Analysis in US and Russian Universities.” Comparative Education Review 61 (3): 607–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kray, L. J., L. Thompson, and A. Galinsky. 2001. “Battle of the Sexes: Gender Stereotype Confirmation and Reactance in Negotiations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (6): 942–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. 2009. What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., J. L. Kinzie, J. A. Buckley, B. K. Bridges, and J. C. Hayek. 2006. What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature (Vol. 8). Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., J. Kinzie, J. A. Buckley, B. K. Bridges, and J. C. Hayek. 2007. “Piecing Together the Student Success Puzzle: Research, Propositions, and Recommendations.” ASHE Higher Education Report Vol 32, No 5. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Latulipe, C., A. Rorrer, and B. Long. 2018, February. “Longitudinal Data on Flipped Class Effects on Performance in cs1 and Retention After cs1.” In Proceedings of the 49th ACM technical symposium on computer science education, 411–416.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, K. M. 2021. “Women’s Daily Performance, Enjoyment, and Comfort in Male-Dominated Majors: The Role of Social Interactions in Classes.” Research in Higher Education 62 (4): 478–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., H. J. Lee, J. Song, and M. Bong. 2021. “Enhancing Children’s Math Motivation with a Joint Intervention on Mindset and Gender Stereotypes.” Learning and Instruction 73: 101416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, S. J., A. Cimpian, M. Meyer, and E. Freeland. 2015. “Expectations of Brilliance Underlie Gender Distributions Across Academic Disciplines.” Science 347 (6219): 262–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. M., J. S. Hyde, J. L. Petersen, and M. C. Linn. 2010. “New Trends in Gender and Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 136 (6): 1123–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logel, C., G. M. Walton, S. J. Spencer, E. C. Iserman, W. von Hippel, and A. E. Bell. 2009. “Interacting with Sexist men Triggers Social Identity Threat among Female Engineers.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (6): 1089–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. 2012. “Theories and Models of Student Development.” In Environments for Student Growth and Development: Librarians and Student Affairs in Collaboration, edited by L. J. Hinchliffe and M. A. Wong, 41–55. Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Loyalka, P., M. Carnoy, I. Froumin, R. Dossani, J. B. Tilak, and P. Yang. 2014. “Factors Affecting the Quality of Engineering Education in the Four Largest Emerging Economies.” Higher Education 68 (6): 977–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyalka, P., O. L. Liu, G. Li, E. Kardanova, I. Chirikov, S. Hu, and Y. Li. 2021. “Skill Levels and Gains in University STEM Education in China, India, Russia and the United States.” Nature Human Behaviour 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundeberg, M. A., P. W. Fox, and J. Punćcohaŕ. 1994. “Highly Confident but Wrong: Gender Differences and Similarities in Confidence Judgments.” Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (1): 114–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maass, A., C. D’Ettole, and M. Cadinu. 2008. “Checkmate? The Role of Gender Stereotypes in the Ultimate Intellectual Sport.” European Journal of Social Psychology 38: 231–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloshonok, N. 2020. “Undergraduate Time-use: A Comparison of US, Chinese, and Russian Students at Highly Selective Universities.” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (3): 515–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloshonok, N. G., and I. A. Shcheglova. 2020. “Роль гендерных стереотипов в отсеве студентов инженерно-технического профиля.” The Monitoring of Public Opinion Economic&Social Changes 2: 273–292. doi:10.14515/monitoring.2020.2.945. (in Russ).
   Google Scholar
• Maloshonok, N., and I. Shcheglova. 2021. “Do the Effects of Student Engagement on the Development of Generic Skills Differ Across Nations?” European Journal of Higher Education 1–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason, C., J. Twomey, D. Wright, and L. Whitman. 2018. “Predicting Engineering Student Attrition Risk Using a Probabilistic Neural Network and Comparing Results with a Backpropagation Neural Network and Logistic Regression.” Research in Higher Education 59 (3): 382–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, J. A. 2019. “A Comparative Study of Student Engagement Among STEM Majors at Women’s Colleges and Coeducational Institutions.” Ph. D. Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, A. C., J. Kinzie, and R. M. Gonyea. 2013. “Student Engagement: Bridging Research and Practice to Improve the Quality of Undergraduate Education.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by M. B. Paulsen. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McGlone, M. S., J. Aronson, and D. Kobrynowicz. 2006. “Stereotype Threat and the Gender gap in Political Knowledge.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 30: 392–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., and S. Marx. 2014. “Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of why Undergraduates Leave Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education 103 (4): 525–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelson, Roslyn A. 1989. “Why Does Jane Read and Write So Well? The Anomaly of Women’s Achievement.” Sociology of Education 62: 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey, K., D. Hallett, A. Bakhtiar, and C. Fitzpatrick. 2019. “Implicit Math-Gender Stereotype Present in Adults but not in 8th Grade.” Journal of Adolescence 74: 173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson, Thomas. 2003. What’s Wrong with the Guys? Washington, DC: Pell Institute on Postsecondary Education Opportunity.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, E. A., P. B. Campbell, I. Busch-Vishniac, and D. W. Guillaume. 2011. “The Effect of Context on Student Engagement in Engineering.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36 (3): 211–224.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. C., and R. West. 1991. “An Initial Investigation of the Effects of Gender on Student Questions in the Classroom: Developing a Descriptive Base.” Communication Education 40: 22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, C. R., D. Heim, A. R. Levy, and D. T. Larkin. 2016. “Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological Mediators.” PloS one 11 (1): e0146487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A., A. Dainty, and B. Bagilhole. 2012. “Gender Stereotypes among Women Engineering and Technology Students in the UK: Lessons from Career Choice Narratives.” European Journal of Engineering Education 37 (6): 541–556.
   Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., B. King, E. Grodsky, and C. Muller. 2012. “The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same? Prior Achievement Fails to Explain Gender Inequality in Entry into STEM College Majors Over Time.” American Educational Research Journal 49 (6): 1048–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocca, K. A. 2010. “Student Participation in the College Classroom: An Extended Multidisciplinary Literature Review.” Communication Education 59 (2): 185–213.
   Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, L., and D. Svetina. 2014. “Assessing the Hypothesis of Measurement Invariance in the Context of Large-Scale International Surveys.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 74 (1): 31–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, L., and D. Svetina. 2017. “Measurement Invariance in International Surveys: Categorical Indicators and Fit Measure Performance.” Applied Measurement in Education 30 (1): 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenz, V. B., D. Hatch, B. E. Bukoski, S. Kim, K. H. Lee, and P. Valdez. 2011. “Community College Student Engagement Patterns.” Community College Review 39 (3): 235–267.
   Google Scholar
• Said, H., B. B. Badru, and M. Shahid. 2011. “Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) for Testing Validity and Reliability Instrument in the Study of Education.” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 5 (12): 1098–1103.
   Google Scholar
• Schmader, T., M. Johns, and M. Barquissau. 2004. “The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences: The Role of Stereotype Endorsement in Women’s Experience in the Math Domain.” Sex Roles 50 (11): 835–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schott, G., and N. Selwyn. 2000. “Examining the 'Male, Antisocial' Stereotype of High Computer Users.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 23: 291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., A. Nora, F. K. Stage, E. A. Barlow, and J. King. 2006. “Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review.” The Journal of Educational Research 99 (6): 323–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. R., and S. L. Neuberg. 2007. “From Stereotype Threat to Stereotype Threats: Implications of a Multi-Threat Framework for Causes, Moderators, Mediators, Consequences, and Interventions.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 11 (2): 107–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. R., and A. M. Williams. 2012. “The Role of Stereotype Threats in Undermining Girls’ and Women’s Performance and Interest in STEM Fields.” Sex Roles 66 (3-4): 175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shcheglova, I., E. Gorbunova, and I. Chirikov. 2020. “The Role of the First-Year Experience in Student Attrition.” Quality in Higher Education 26 (3): 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmeleva, E. D., and I. D. Froumin. 2020. “Факторы отсева студентов инженерно-технического профиля в российских вузах.” Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow 3: 110–136.
   Google Scholar
• Sontam, V., and G. Gabriel. 2012. “Student Engagement at a Large Suburban Community College: Gender and Race Differences.” Community College Journal of Research and Practice 36 (10): 808–820.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., C. M. Steele, and D. M. Quinn. 1999. “Stereotype Threat and Women’s Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35 (1): 4–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, C. R. 2018. “I’m Not a Science Nerd!.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 42 (4): 489–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, C. R., and S. D. Simpkins. 2021. “High School Students’ Math and Science Gender Stereotypes: Relations with Their STEM Outcomes and Socializers’ Stereotypes.” Social Psychology of Education 24 (1): 273–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., and J. Aronson. 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (5): 797–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., and D. Geary. 2018. “The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education.” Psychological Science 29 (4): 581–593. doi:10.1177/0956797617741719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subekti, F. E. 2021, June. “Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Abilities on Number Sequence Pattern Material: Viewed from a Gender Perspective.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1918 (4): 042107. IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Szelényi, K., and K. K. Inkelas. 2011. “The Role of Living–Learning Programs in Women’s Plans to Attend Graduate School in STEM Fields.” Research in Higher Education 52 (4): 349–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2018. “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education.” Research in Science Education 48 (6): 1273–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, K. D. 2009. “Talking to Learn: Why Biology Students Should be Talking in Classrooms and how to Make it Happen.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 8 (2): 89–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tossavainen, T., R. J. Rensaa, P. Haukkanen, M. Mattila, and M. Johansson. 2020. “First-year Engineering Students’ Mathematics Task Performance and its Relation to Their Motivational Values and Views About Mathematics.” European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra, C. P., E. L. Dey, and G. D. Herrin. 2008. “Is Modeling of Freshman Engineering Success Different from Modeling of Non-Engineering Success?” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (4): 467–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, D., A. Postma, B. Brake, and J. Imperato-McGinley. 2007. “Gender Differences in Object Location Memory: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14 (1): 23–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, R. 1994. “Teacher Education Students’ Views on Class Discussion: Implications for Fostering Critical Reflection.” Teaching and Teacher Education 10: 231–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisgram, E. S., and R. S. Bigler. 2007. “Effects of Learning About Gender Discrimination on Adolescent Girls’ Attitudes Toward and Interest in Science.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 31 (3): 262–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüst, K., and H. Beck. 2018. ““I Thought I Did Much Better”-Overconfidence in University Exams.” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 16 (4): 310–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., M. Fang, and K. Shauman. 2015. “STEM Education.” Annual Review of Sociology 41: 331–357. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar