Experiencing complex stakeholder dynamics around emerging technologies: a role-play simulation

References

• Alanne, K. 2016. “An Overview of Game-Based Learning in Building Services Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 41 (2): 204–219. doi:10.1080/03043797.2015.1056097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, S., and B. Budde. 2012. “Technological Hype and Disappointment; Lessons from the Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Case.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (6): 549–563. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.693662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumber, A., G. Kligyte, M. van der Bijl-Brouwer, and S. Pratt. 2020. “Learning Together: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Student–Staff Partnerships in Higher Education.” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (3): 395–410. doi:10.1080/07294360.2019.1684454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M. 2001. “Online Role-Play; Anonymity, Engagement and Risk.” Educational Media International 38 (4): 251–260. doi:10.1080/09523980110105141
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, D. M., E. Stokes, and A. Rip, Eds. 2017. Embedding new Technologies Into Society; A Regulatory, Ethical and Societal Perspective. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. M. 1994. “Using Role Play to Integrate Ethics Into Business Curriculum; A Financial Management Example.” Journal of Business Ethics 13: 105–110. doi:10.1007/BF00881579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummel, B. J., C. K. Gunsalus, K. L. Anderson, and M. C. Loui. 2010. “Development of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 16: 573–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, L. L., and D. E. Drew. 2015. “Liberal Studies in Engineering; A Design Plan.” Engineering Studies 7 (2/3): 103–122. doi:10.1080/19378629.2015.1077253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, E. P., and G. Mullally. 2014. “Educating Engineers to Embrace Complexity and Context.” Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers 167 (6): 241–248.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., and D. F. J. Campbell. 2009. “Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’; Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem.” International Journal of Technology Management 46 (3/4): 201–234. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, J., R. Dukes, and W. Gamson. 2009. “Asessment in Simulation and Gaming.” Simulation & Gaming 40 (4): 553–568. doi:10.1177/1046878109332955
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conlon, E., and H. Zandvoort. 2011. “Broadening Ethics Teaching in Engineering; Beyond the Individualistic Approach.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17: 217–232. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9205-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croockall, D. 2010. “Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline.” Simulation & Gaming 41 (6): 898–920. doi:10.1177/1046878110390784
   Google Scholar
• CTA Toolbox. Accessed 10 March 2023. https://cta-toolbox.nl/tools/.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75: 332–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedehayir, O., and M. Steinert. 2018. “The Hype Cycle Model; A Review and Future Directions.” Technology Forecasting & Social Change 108: 28–41. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNeve, K. M., and M. J. Heppner. 1997. “Role Play Simulation; The Assessment of an Active Learning Technique and Comparisons with Traditional Lectures.” Innovative Higher Education 21 (3): 231–246. doi:10.1007/BF01243718
   Google Scholar
• Doorn, N., and J. O. Kroesen. 2013. “Using and Developing Role Plays in Teaching Aimed at Preparing for Social Responsibility.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19: 1513–1527. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9335-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchatelet, D., D. Gijbels, P. Bursens, V. Donche, and P. Spooren. 2019. “Looking at Role-Play Simulations of Political Decision-Making in Higher Education Through a Contextual Lens; A State-of-the-art.” Educational Research Review 27: 126–139. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, K. L., P. Ayres, and J. Sweller. 2015. “Cognitive Load Theory for the Design of Medical Simulations.” Simulation in Healthcare 10 (5): 295–307. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000097
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garud, R., and D. Ahlstrom. 1997. “Technology Assessment: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 14: 25–48. doi:10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00005-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. E., and M. Somerville. 2014. A Whole new Engineer; The Coming Revolution in Engineering Education. Douglas: ThreeJoy Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, A., and F. Rodriguez. 2021. “Educating Engineers 2030; PBL, Social Progress and Sustainability.” European Journal of Engineering Education 46 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1080/03043797.2020.1828678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., and L. Gommer. 2021. “To Play or not to Play; On the Motivational Effects of Games in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 46 (3): 319–343. doi:10.1080/03043797.2019.1690430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, J. L., and N. D. Fila. 2016. The Development and Growth of Empathy among Engineering Students. New Orleans.: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, J. L., J. Strobel, and A. O. Brightman. 2017. “The Development of Empathic Perspective-Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course.” Journal of Engineering Education 106 (4): 534–563. doi:10.1002/jee.20175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyward, P. 2010. “Emotional Engagement Through Drama; Strategies to Assist Learning Through Role-Play.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 22 (2): 197–203.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, P. S., and B. Elzen. 2010. “Exploring System Innovation in the Electricity System Through Sociotechnical Scenarios.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (6): 653–670. doi:10.1080/09537325.2010.496282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyner, B., and L. Young. 2006. “Teaching Medical Students Using Role Play; Twelve Tips for Successful Role Plays.” Medical Teacher 28 (3): 225–229. doi:10.1080/01421590600711252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, N. F. 2018. “Increasing Interaction in a Flipped Classroom Through Video Conferencing.” TechTrends 62: 618–624. doi:10.1007/s11528-018-0336-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, K., J. Markard, A. Ruef, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Strategic Responses to Fuel Cell Hype and Disappointment.” Technology Forecasting & Social Change 79 (6): 1084–1098. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linser, R., N. Ree-Linstad, and T. Vold. 2008. The Magic Circle; Game Design Principles and Online Role-play Simulations. Proceedings ED-MEDIA 2008, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Loui, M. C. 2009. “What Can Students Learn in an Extended Role-Play Simulation on Technology and Society?” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 29 (1): 37–47. doi:10.1177/0270467608328710
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. A., E. Conlon, and B. Bowe. 2019. “The Role of Role-Play in Student Awareness of the Social Dimension of the Engineering Profession.” European Journal of Engineering Education 44 (6): 882–905. doi:10.1080/03043797.2019.1624691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, I. S. 2009. “The Gaming of Policy and the Politics of Gaming; A Review.” Simulation & Gaming 40 (6): 825–862. doi:10.1177/1046878109346456
   Google Scholar
• Mazzurco, A., and S. Daniel. 2020. “Socio-technical Thinking of Students and Practitioners in the Context of Humanitarian Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education 109: 243–261. doi:10.1002/jee.20307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parandian, A. 2012. “Constructive TA of Newly Emerging Technologies.” Doctoral disser., TU Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Parandian, A., A. Rip, and H. te Kulve. 2012. “Dual Dynamics of Promises, and Waiting Games Around Emerging Nanotechnologies.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (6): 565–582. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.693668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawley, A. L. 2017. “Shifting the “Default”: The Case for Making Diversity the Expected Condition for Engineering Education and Making Whiteness and Maleness Visible.” Journal of Engineering Education 106: 531–533. doi:10.1002/jee.20181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina e Cunha, M., K. Kamoche, and R. Campos e Cunha. 2003. “Organizational Improvisation and Leadership; A Field Study in two Computer-Mediated Settings.” International Studies of Management and Organization 33 (1): 34–57. doi:10.1080/00208825.2003.11043677
   Google Scholar
• Rao, D., and I. Stupans. 2012. “Exploring the Potential of Role Play in Higher Education; Development of a Typology and Teacher Guidelines.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (4): 427–436. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.728879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., T. J. Misa, and J. Schot. 1995. Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London: Printer Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and H. te Kulve. 2008. “Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Scenarios.” In The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Volume I: Presenting Futures, edited by E. Fisher, C. Selin, and J. M. Wetmore, 49–70. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. K. R., P. Le Masson, and B. Weil. 2012. “Waiting Games; Innovation Impasses in Situations of High Uncertainty.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (6): 543–547. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.693661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumore, D., T. Schenk, and L. Susskind. 2016. “Role-play Simulations for Climate Change Adaptation Education and Engagement.” Nature Climate Change 6: 745–750. doi:10.1038/nclimate3084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze Greiving, V. C., and K. Konrad. 2017. “Society is Part of the Equation.” Nature Nanotechnology 12: 184. doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Te Kulve, H., and K. Konrad. 2017. “Sectoral Demand Articulation; The Case of Emerging Sensor Technologies in the Drinking Water Sector.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 119: 154–169. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D. 2008. “Constructive Controversy for Management Education; Developing Committed, Open-Minded Researchers.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 7 (1): 73–85. doi:10.5465/amle.2008.31413864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bilsen, G., J. Kadijk, and C. Kortleven. 2013. Yes and … your Business; The Added Value of Improvisation in Organizations.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Riet, O. A. W. T. 2003. “Policy Analysis in Multi-actor Policy Settings; Navigating Between Negotiated Nonsense & Superfluous Knowledge.” Doctoral disser., TU Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Vera, D., and M. Crossan. 2004. “Theatrical Improvisation: Lessons for Organizations.” Organization Studies 25 (5): 727–749. doi:10.1177/0170840604042412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visscher, K., and A. Rip. 2003. “Coping with Chaos in Change Processes.” Creativity and Innovation Management 12 (2): 121–128. doi:10.1111/1467-8691.00274
   Google Scholar
• Visscher, K., P. Stegmaier, A. Damm, R. Hamaker-Taylor, A. Harjanne, and R. Giordano. 2020. “Matching Supply and Demand; A Typology of Climate Services.” Climate Services 17. doi:10.1016/j.cliser.2019.100136
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J., M. A. Brewer, N. W. Sochacka, and S. E. Miller. 2019. “Empathy and Engineering Formation.” Journal of Engineering Education 109: 11–33. doi:10.1002/jee.20301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wareham, D. G., T. P. Elefsiniotis, and D. G. Elms. 2006. “Introducing Ethics Using Structured Controversies.” European Journal of Engineering Education 31 (6): 651–660. doi:10.1080/03043790600911712
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. R. 2013. “Using the Chernobyl Incident to Teach Engineering Ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19: 625–640. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9337-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wits, W. W., J. J. Homminga, M. D. Endedijk, K. Visscher, L. E. Krab-Hüsken, F. M. J. W. van den Berg, and P. Wilhelm. 2014. “Teaching Design Engineering in an Interdisciplinary Program.” Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Wright-Maley, C. 2015. “Beyond the “Babel Problem”; Defining Simulations for the Social Studies.” The Journal of Social Studies Research 39: 63–77. doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2014.10.001
   Google Scholar