First-year engineering students’ learner agency sources in a systemic PBL environment: a Q study

References

• Aragh, M. J. M., and R. L. Kajfez. 2020. “Ten Years of First-Year Engineering Literature (2005–2014): A Systematic Literature Review of Four Engineering Education Journals.” The International Journal of Engineering Education 36 (1): 18–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie, C. 1998. “Addressing First-Year Issues in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 23 (4): 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799808923524.
   Google Scholar
• Banasick, S. 2019. “KADE: A Desktop Application for Q Methodology.” Journal of Open Source Software 4 (36): 1360. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01360.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2006. “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (2): 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2008. “Toward an Agentic Theory of the Self.” In Self-Processes, Learning, and Enabling Human Potential: Dynamic New Approaches, edited by H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, and D. M. McInerney, 15–49. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beagon, Ú., D. Niall, and E. Ní Fhloinn. 2019. “Problem-Based Learning: Student Perceptions of its Value in Developing Professional Skills for Engineering Practice.” European Journal of Engineering Education 44 (6): 850–865. http://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1536114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke, L. M. 2012. “Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self-Determined Learning.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 13 (1): 56–71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., J. Karlin, L. D. McNair, and K. Beddoes. 2013. “Team Effectiveness Theory from Industrial and Organizational Psychology Applied to Engineering Student Project Teams: A Research Review.” Journal of Engineering Education 102 (4): 472–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkworth, R., B. McCann, C. Matthews, and K. Nordström. 2009. “First Year Expectations and Experiences: Student and Teacher Perspectives.” Higher Education 58 (2): 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9188-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. 1980. Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. 2019. “Subjectivity in the Human Sciences.” The Psychological Record 69 (4): 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00354-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., and D. Smardon. 2018. “A Typology of Agency in New Generation Learning Environments: Emerging Relational, Ecological and New Material Considerations.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 26 (1): 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2017.1345975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desing, R., and R. L. Kajfez. 2020. How to Use Q Methodology in Engineering Education Research. Paper presented at the ASEE Virtual Conference, Virtual Online. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–34737.
   Google Scholar
• Dringenberg, E., and Ş Purzer. 2018. “Experiences of First-Year Engineering Students Working on Ill-Structured Problems in Teams.” Journal of Engineering Education 107 (3): 442–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, X., U. Ebead, S. Sabah, J. Ma, and K. K. Naji. 2019. “Engineering Students’ Approaches to Learning and Views on Collaboration: How Do Both Evolve in a PBL Environment and what are their Contributing and Constraining Factors?” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 15 (11): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106197.
   Google Scholar
• Du, X., A. Lundberg, M. A. Ayari, K. K. Naji, and A. Hawari. 2021. “Examining Engineering Students' Perceptions of Learner Agency Enactment in Problem- and Project-Based Learning Using Q Methodology.” Journal of Engineering Education 111 (1): 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, X., K. K. Naji, S. Sabah, and U. Ebead. 2020. “Engineering Students’ Conceptions of Collaboration, Group-Based Strategy Use, and Perceptions of Assessment in PBL: A Case Study in Qatar.” International Journal of Engineering Education 36 (1): 296–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C S. 2006. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrberg, N. R., and H. T. Holmegaard. 2019. “Motivational Patterns in STEM Education: A Self-Determination Perspective on First Year Courses.” Research in Science & Technological Education 37 (1): 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1421529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2005. “Relational Agency: Learning to be a Resourceful Practitioner.” International Journal of Educational Research 43 (3): 168–182. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.010.
   Google Scholar
• Ehlert, K. M., and M. K. Orr. 2019. “Comparing Grouping Results between Cluster Analysis and Q-Methodology.” IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028444.
   Google Scholar
• Fluckinger, C. D. 2014. “Big Five Measurement via Q-sort: An Alternative Method for Constraining Socially Desirable Responding.” SAGE Open 4 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014547196.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Martínez, Y., R. Bustamante-Bello, S. A. Navarro-Tuch, A. A. López-Aguilar, A. Molina, and I. Álvarez-Icaza Longoria. 2021. “A Challenge-Based Learning Experience in Industrial Engineering in the Framework of Education 4.0.” Sustainability 13 (17): 9867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gynnild, V. 2002. “Agency and Structure in Engineering Education: Perspectives on Educational Change in the Light of Anthony Giddens’ Structuration Theory.” European Journal of Engineering Education 27 (3): 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790210140880.
   Google Scholar
• Hadgraft, R. G., and A. Kolmos. 2020. “Emerging Learning Environments in Engineering Education.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 25 (1): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2020.1713522.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, D., and I. Macdonald. 2000. “A Collaborative Project to Improve Teaching and Learning in First Year Programming.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 9 (1): 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. T., R. R. Jensen, and D. D. McLean. 2013. “Learning in the Geoscience Classroom: Q-Methodology, Learning Styles, and Individual Preferences.” Journal of Geoscience Education 61 (1): 120–128. https://doi.org/10.5408/12-301.1.
   Google Scholar
• Helle, L., P. Tynjälä, and E. Olkinuora. 2006. “Project-Based Learning in Post-Secondary Education-Theory, Practice and Rubber Sling Shots.” Higher Education 51: 287–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hening, D. A., and D. A. Koonce. 2015. “Important Soft Skills for Engineers to Succeed in a Work Environment.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Operations Excellence & Service Engineering, 852–861. http://ieomsociety.org/IEOM_Orlnado_2015/papers/260.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J., and P. Benson. 2013. “Autonomy, Agency and Identity in Foreign and Second Language Education.” Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 36 (1): 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2013-0002.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris, K. 1991. “Project Education in Denmark.” International Journal of Project Management 9 (1): 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(91)90055-Z.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J. R., and D. K. Smith. 2015. The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. J., and H. S. Kim. 2021. “A Study on the Types of Students’ Perceptions of Engineering Education Accreditation.” Natural Volatiles & Essential Oils 8 (4): 5027–5044.
   Google Scholar
• Kipper, L. M., S. Iepsen, A. J. Dal Forno, R. Frozza, L. Furstenau, J. Agnes, and D. Cossul. 2021. “Scientific Mapping to Identify Competencies Required by Industry 4.0.” Technology in Society 64:101454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S., E. F. Holton III, and R. A. Swanson. 2014. The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmos, A. 2017. “PBL Curriculum Strategies: From Course Based PBL to a Systemic PBL Approach.” In PBL in Engineering Education: International Perspectives on Curriculum Change, edited by A. Guerra, R. Ulseth, and A. Kolmos, 1–12. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmos, A., and E. de Graaff. 2014. “Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education: Merging Models.” In Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, edited by A. Johri and B. M. Olds, 141–161. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.012.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. L., H. P. Yueh, T. L. Chen, and H. J. Sheen. 2015. “Identifying Nanotechnology Professional Competencies for Engineering Students Using Q Methodology.” International Journal of Engineering Education 31 (5): 1389–1397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, A., R. de Leeuw, and R. Aliani. 2020. “Using Q Methodology: Sorting out Subjectivity in Educational Research.” Educational Research Review 31:100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutfallah, S., and L. Buchanan. 2019. “Quantifying Subjective Data Using Online Q-Methodology Software.” The Mental Lexicon 14 (3): 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20002.lut.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, I. 2000. “What Do We Mean by Transition, and What Is the Problem?” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 9 (1): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.115710.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. 2004. “Self-Regulated Learning, Social Cognitive Theory, and Agency.” Educational Psychologist 39 (2): 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masek, A., and S. Yamin. 2010. “Problem Based Learning Model: A Collection from Literature.” Asian Social Science 6 (8): 148. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n8p148.
   Google Scholar
• McQuade, R., E. Ventura-Medina, S. Wiggins, and T. Anderson. 2020. “Examining Self-Managed Problem-Based Learning Interactions in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 45 (2): 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1649366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, S. 2011. “Understanding Learner Agency as a Complex Dynamic System.” System 39 (4): 427–436. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, S. 2012. “The Complexity of Learner Agency.” Apples-Journal of Applied Language Studies 6 (2): 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E., and J. Reale. 2021. “Supporting Learner Agency Using the Pedagogy of Choice.” In Unleashing the Power of Learner Agency, edited by S. Hase and L. M. Blaschke, 77–85. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/up/ecol.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. “The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030.” https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Page, A., and P. Knight. 2007. “Assessing Wicked Competences.” Educational Developments 8 (3): 6.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., T. Kostova, and K. T. Dirks. 2001. “Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations.” The Academy of Management Review 26 (2): 298–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/259124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., M. R. Priestley, and G. Biesta. 2015. Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rotellar, C., and J. Cain. 2016. “Research, Perspectives, and Recommendations on Implementing the Flipped Classroom.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 80 (2): 34. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoon, I. 2018. Conceptualising Learner Agency: A Socio-Ecological Developmental Approach. Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies. www.llakes.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhar, P., and M. Borrego. 2017. “Implementing Project-Based Learning in a Civil Engineering Course: A Practitioner’s Perspective.” The International Journal of Engineering Education 33 (4): 1138–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenalt, M. H., and B. Lassesen. 2022. “Does Student Agency Benefit Student Learning? A Systematic Review of Higher Education Research.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (5): 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, P., and N. Akhtar. 2017. “Exploring Preschool Teachers’ Perspectives on Linguistic Diversity: A Q Study.” Teaching and Teacher Education 65:157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrón-López, M. J., M. J. García-García, P. J. Velasco-Quintana, J. Ocampo, M. R. Vigil Montaño, and M. C. Gaya-López. 2017. “Implementation of a Project-Based Engineering School: Increasing Student Motivation and Relevant Learning.” European Journal of Engineering Education 42 (6): 618–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1209462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toohey, K., and B. Norton. 2003. “Learner Autonomy as Agency in Sociocultural Settings.” In Learner Autonomy across Cultures: Language Education Perspectives, edited by D. Palfreyman and R. C. Smith, 58–72. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S., and P. Stenner. 2012. Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method and Interpretation. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251911.
   Google Scholar