Publication Cover
International Interactions
Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations
Volume 44, 2018 - Issue 4
381
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Attitudes toward Consent-Based and Non-Consent-Based International Law in a Regional Power Context

References

  • Almeida, Paulo Roberto de. (2004) Uma Política Externa Engajada: A Diplomacia Do Governo Lula. Revista Brasileira De Política Internacional 47(1):162–184.
  • Anjum, Gulnaz, Adam S. Chilton, and Zahid Usman. (2016) United Nations Endorsement & Support for Human Rights: An Experiment on Women’s Rights in Pakistan. University of Chicago Public Law Working Paper No. 563. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2736680. (Accessed September 17, 2017)
  • Arraes, Virgílio Caixeta. (2005) O Brasil E O Conselho De Segurança Da Organização Das Nações Unidas: Dos Anos 90 a 2002. Revista Brasileira De Política Internacional 48(2):152–168.
  • Cabral, Lidia, and Julia Weinstock. (2010) Brazil: An Emerging Aid Player. In ODI Briefing Paper 64. London: Overseas Development Institute.
  • Chapman, Terrence, and Stephen Chaudoin. (2017) Contingent Public Support for International Legal Institutions. unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois.
  • Chaudoin, Stephen. (2013) Replication Data For: Promises or Policies? An Experimental Analysis of International Agreements and Audience Reactions. Harvard Dataverse. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/21980. (Accessed June 19, 2016)
  • Chaudoin, Stephen. (2014) Promises or Policies? An Experimental Analysis of International Agreements and Audience Reactions. International Organization 68(1):235–256.
  • Chaudoin, Stephen. (2016) How Contestation Moderates the Effects of International Institutions: The International Criminal Court and Kenya. Journal of Politics 78(2):557–571.
  • Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Handler Chayes. (1993) On Compliance. International Organization 47(02):175–205.
  • Chilton, Adam S. (2014) The Influence of International Human Rights Agreements on Public Opinion: An Experimental Study. Chicago Journal of International Law 15(1):110–137.
  • Chilton, Adam S. (2015) The Laws of War and Public Opinion: An Experimental Study. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 171(1):181–201.
  • Chilton, Adam S., and Mila Versteeg. (2016) International Law, Constitutional Law, and Public Support for Torture. Research & Politics 3(1):1–9.
  • Dai, Xinyuan. (2005) Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism. International Organization 59(2):363–398.
  • Dai, Xinyuan. (2007) International Institutions and National Policies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • De Lima, Soares, Maria Regina, and Mônica Hirst. (2006) Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice and Responsibilities. International Affairs 82(1):21–40.
  • Downs, George W., David M. Rocke, and Peter N. Barsoom. (1996) Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation? International Organization 50(3):379–406.
  • Falkner, Gerda, Miriam Hartlapp, Simone Leiber, and Oliver Treib. (2004) Non-Compliance with EU Directives in the Member States: Opposition through the Backdoor? West European Politics 27(3):452–473.
  • Falkner, Gerda, Oliver Treib, and Elisabeth Holzleithner. (2008) Compliance in the Enlarged European Union: Living Rights or Dead Letters? Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Frowein, Jochen A. (2013) Jus Cogens. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press Public International Law. Available at http://opul.ouplaw.com. (Accessed September 17, 2017).
  • Garcia, Eugênio Vargas. (1998) Questões Estratégicas E De Segurança Internacional: A Marca Do Tempo E a Força Histórica Da Mudança. Revista Brasileira De Política Internacional 41:99–120.
  • Goldsmith, Jack L., and Eric A. Posner. (2005) The Limits of International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Guzman, Andrew T. (2005) Reputation and International Law. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 34:379–391.
  • Guzman, Andrew T. (2012) Against Consent. Virginia Journal of International Law 52(4). Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1862354. (Accessed October 12, 2016)
  • Hollyer, James R., and B. Peter Rosendorff. (2011) Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention against Torture? Signaling, Domestic Politics and Non-Compliance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6(3–4):275–327.
  • Hurrell, Andrew. (2008) Lula’s Brazil: A Rising Power, but Going Where? Current History 107(706):51.
  • Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de São Paulo (IRI-USP). (2015) The Americas and the World: Public Opinion and Foreign Policy in Brazil. São Paulo, Brazil: University of São Paulo.
  • Johnstone, Ian. (2008) Legislation and Adjudication in the UN Security Council: Bringing down the Deliberative Deficit. American Journal of International Law 102(1):275–308.
  • Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Levi, Margaret, and Audrey Sacks. (2009) Legitimating Beliefs: Sources and Indicators. Regulation & Governance 3(4):311–333.
  • Lupu, Yonatan, and Geoffrey P.R. Wallace. (2017) Violence, Non-Violence, and the Effects of International Human Rights Law. unpublished manuscript, George Washington University.
  • Mearsheimer, John. (1994) The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19(3):5–49.
  • Morrow, James D. (2007) When Do States Follow the Laws of War? American Political Science Review 101(3):559–572.
  • Oliveira, Amâncio Jorge de, and Janina Onuki. (2012) South-South Cooperation and Brazilian Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Research Center Journal 3:80–99.
  • Reynolds, Evangeline. (2011) Source of Obligation Matters to International Legal Compliance: Evidence from UN Security Council Resolutions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
  • Simmons, Beth. (2009) Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Simmons, Beth. (2010) Treaty Compliance and Violation. Annual Review of Political Science 13(1):273–296.
  • Szasz, Paul C. (2002) The Security Council Starts Legislating. American Journal of International Law 96(4):901–905.
  • Tallberg, Jonas. (2002) Delegation to Supranational Institutions: Why, How, and with What Consequences? West European Politics 25(1):23–46.
  • Talmon, Stefan. (2005) The Security Council as World Legislature. American Journal of International Law 99(1):175.
  • Tomz, Michael. (2008) Reputation and the Effect of International Law on Preferences and Beliefs. unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
  • Torreblanca, Jose Ignacio, and Mark Leonard. (2013) The Continent-Wide Rise of Euroscepticism. European Council on Foreign Relations Working Paper . 16.
  • Toshkov, Dimiter. (2008) Embracing European Law. European Union Politics 9(3):379–402.
  • Treib, Oliver. (2014) The Voter Says No, but Nobody Listens: Causes and Consequences of the Eurosceptic Vote in the 2014 European Elections. Journal of European Public Policy 21(10):1541–1554.
  • Usherwood, Simon, and Nick Startin. (2013) “Euroscepticism as a Persistent Phenomenon.”. Journal of Common Market Studies 51(1):1–16.
  • Vigevani, Tullo, and Gabriel Cepaluni. (2012) Brazilian Foreign Policy in Changing Times: The Quest for Autonomy from Sarney to Lula. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Wallace, Geoffrey P.R. (2013) International Law and Public Attitudes toward Torture: An Experimental Study. International Organization 67(1):105–140.
  • Wolford, Wendy, and Ryan Nehring. (2015) Constructing Parallels: Brazilian Expertise and the Commodification of Land, Labour and Money in Mozambique. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement 36(2):208–223.
  • Zürn, Michael. (2004) Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems. Government and Opposition 39(2):260–287.
  • Zürn, Michael, and Matthew Stephen. (2010) The View of Old and New Powers on the Legitimacy of International Institutions. Politics 30(s1):91–101.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.