Formulation and application of weight-function-based physical programming

References

• Carrese, R., H. Winarto, X.D. Li, A. Sobester and S. Ebenezer. 2012. “A comprehensive preference-based optimization framework with application to high-lift aerodynamic design.” Engineering Optimization 44 (10): 1209–1227. doi: 10.1080/0305215X.2011.637558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chica, M., O. Cordon, S. Damas and J. Bautista. 2011. “Including different kinds of preferences in a multi-objective ant algorithm for time and space assembly line balancing on different Nissan scenarios.” Expert Systems with Applications 38 (1): 709–720. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, I., and J. E. Dennis. 1997. “A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 14 (1): 63–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, I. 1997. “Nonlinear multicriteria optimization and robust optimality.” PhD diss. Rice University, Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., and J. Sundar. 2006. “Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms.” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research 2 (3): 273–286. doi: 10.5019/j.ijcir.2006.67
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., S. Agrawal, A. Pratap, and T. Meyarivan. 2000. “A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, 18–20 September 2000, Paris, Vol. 1917 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by M. Schoenauer, K. Deb, G. Rudolph, X. Yao, E. Lutton, J. J. Merelo,and H.-P. Schwefel. Berlin: Springer, 849–858.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Z.H., H.S. Ding, F. Jiang, Z.C. Huang and T. Fu. 2012. “Structural parameters optimization of parallel stable platform based on physical programming.” Advances in Design Technology 2: 187–192.
   Google Scholar
• Doumpos, M., and C. Zopounidis. 2004. “Developing sorting models using preference disaggregation analysis: An experimental investigation.” European Journal of Operational Research 154 (3): 585–598. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00815-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, D. W., J. Sun, and X. F. Ji. 2013. “Evolutionary algorithms with preference polyhedron for interval multi-objective optimization problems.” Information Sciences 233: 141–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goradia, A., C. Haffner, X. Ning and M. Mutka. 2007. “Optimality framework for Hausdorff tracking using mutational dynamics and physical programming.” In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 10–14 April 2007, Roma, Italy, 3476–3481.
   Google Scholar
• Khare, V., X. Yao, and K. Deb. 2003. “Performance scaling of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms.” Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization 2632: 376–390. doi: 10.1007/3-540-36970-8_27
   Google Scholar
• Kongar, E., and S. M. Gupta. 2009. “Solving the disassembly-to-order problem using linear physical programming.” International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research 1 (3): 504–531. doi: 10.1504/IJMOR.2009.026279
   Google Scholar
• Kongsuwan, P., and S. Shin. 2009. “Integrating physical programming to information security system management.” In 11th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, 15–18 February 2009, Phoenix Park, Korea, 143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, J., B. R. Cho, and J. Antony. 2008. “Development of an experiment-based robust design paradigm for multiple quality characteristics using physical programming.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 35 (11–12): 1100–1112. doi: 10.1007/s00170-006-0792-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V.V., M. Tripathi, M.K. Pandey and M.K. Tiwari. 2009. “Physical programming and conjoint analysis-based redundancy allocation in multistate systems: A Taguchi embedded algorithm selection and control (TAS&C) approach.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O—Journal of Risk and Reliability 223 (3): 215–232. doi: 10.1243/1748006XJRR210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, X., M. Xie, and K. C. Tan. 2006. “QFD optimization using linear physical programming.” Engineering Optimization 38 (5): 593–607. doi: 10.1080/03052150500448059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., M. J. Zuo, and R. Moghaddass. 2011. “Optimal design of a multi-state weighted series–parallel system using physical programming and genetic algorithms.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research 28 (4): 543–562. doi: 10.1142/S0217595911003235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R. C., et al., 2013. “A preference multi-objective optimization based on adaptive rank clone and differential evolution.” Natural Computing 12 (1): 109–132. doi: 10.1007/s11047-012-9339-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Y. Z., G. J. Tang, and G. Parks. 2008. “Multi-objective optimization of perturbed impulsive rendezvous trajectories using physical programming.” Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics 31 (6): 1829–1832. doi: 10.2514/1.35409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria, A., C.A. Mattson, A. Ismail-Yahaya and A. Messac. 2003. “Linear physical programming for production planning optimization.” Engineering Optimization 35 (1): 19–37. doi: 10.1080/0305215031000078401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, C.D., T.W. Simpson, K. Hacker, K. Lewis and A. Messac. 2005. “Integrating linear physical programming within collaborative optimization for multiobjective multidisciplinary design optimization.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 29 (3): 178–189. doi: 10.1007/s00158-004-0481-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melachrinoudis, E., A. Messac, and H. Min. 2005. “Consolidating a warehouse network: A physical programming approach.” International Journal of Production Economics 97 (1): 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messac, A., 1996. “Physical programming: Effective optimization for computational design.” AIAA Journal 34 (1): 149–158. doi: 10.2514/3.13035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messac, A., S. M. Gupta, and B. Akbulut. 1996. “Linear physical programming: A new approach to multiple objective optimization.” Transactions on Operational Research 8 (2): 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Messac, A., and C. A. Mattson. 2002. “Generating well-distributed sets of Pareto points for engineering design using physical programming.” Optimization and Engineering 3 (4): 431–450. doi: 10.1023/A:1021179727569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messac, A., S. Van Dessel, A.A. Mullur and A. Maria. 2004. “Optimization of large-scale rigidified inflatable structures for housing using physical programming.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 26 (1–2): 139–151. doi: 10.1007/s00158-003-0317-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messac, A., C. P. Sukam, and E. Melachrinoudis. 2001. “Mathematical and pragmatic perspectives of physical programming.” AIAA Journal 39 (5): 885–893. doi: 10.2514/2.1392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messac, A., and A. Ismail-Yahaya. 2002. “Multiobjective robust design using physical programming.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 23 (5): 357–371. doi: 10.1007/s00158-002-0196-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagrath, D., et al., 2005. “Multiobjective optimization strategies for linear gradient chromatography.” AIChE Journal 51 (2): 511–525. doi: 10.1002/aic.10459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, E., C. Henggeler Antunes, and A. Gomes. 2013. “A comparative study of different approaches using an outranking relation in a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm.” Computers & Operations Research 40 (6): 1602–1615. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2011.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pochampally, K. K., and S. M. Gupta. 2012. “Use of linear physical programming and Bayesian updating for design issues in reverse logistics.” International Journal of Production Research 50 (5): 1349–1359. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.571933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, Y. L., C. C. Cai, and P. Z. Lang. 2013. “Mathematical modeling on multi-stage series crushing ratio distribution based on fuzzy physical programming.” Journal of Coal Science & Engineering 19 (2): 262–267. doi: 10.1007/s12404-013-0224-2
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, H.B., Y.Y. Dong, Y. Wang and L. Gao. 2012. “Tolerance optimization design based on physical programming methods and PSO algorithm.” Sustainable Construction Materials and Computer Engineering 346: 584–592.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan, S., and Y. Abu Hasan. 2013. “Fuzzy preference-based multi-objective optimization method.” Artificial Intelligence Review 39 (2): 165–181. doi: 10.1007/s10462-011-9264-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, B. 1991. “The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods.” Theory and Decision 31 (1): 49–73. doi: 10.1007/BF00134132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchis, J., M.A. Martinez, X. Blasco and G. Reynoso-Meza. 2010. “Modelling preferences in multi-objective engineering design.” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 23 (8): 1255–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2010.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchis, J., M. Martinez, and X. Blasco. 2008. “Multi-objective engineering design using preferences.” Engineering Optimization 40 (3): 253–269. doi: 10.1080/03052150701693057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schott, J. R. 1995. “Fault tolerant design using single and multicriteria genetic algorithm optimization.” MS diss. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Siraj, S., L. Mikhailov, and J. A. Keane. 2012. “Preference elicitation from inconsistent judgments using multi-objective optimization.” European Journal of Operational Research 220 (2): 461–471. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soylu, B. and S. K. Ulusoy. 2011. “A preference ordered classification for a multi-objective max–min redundancy allocation problem.” Computers & Operations Research 38 (12): 1855–1866. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2011.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappeta, R.V., J.E. Renaud, A. Messac and G.J. Sundararaj. 2000. “Interactive physical programming: Tradeoff analysis and decision making in multicriteria optimization.” AIAA Journal 38 (5): 917–926. doi: 10.2514/2.1048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautmann, H., and J. Mehnen. 2009. “Preference-based Pareto optimization in certain and noisy environments.” Engineering Optimization 41 (1): 23–38. doi: 10.1080/03052150802347926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., X. Chen, and Y. Lin. 2011. “Multi-objective optimization based on the integration of linear physical programming within analytical target cascading.” In 4th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), 15–17 October 2011, Shanghai, PR China, 2286–2289.
   Google Scholar
• Wozniak, P. 2011. “Preferences in multi-objective evolutionary optimisation of electric motor speed control with hardware in the loop.” Applied Soft Computing 11 (1): 49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, J., K.W. Yang, J. Liu, Q.S. Zhao and Y.W. Chen. 2012. “A two-stage preference-based evolutionary multi-objective approach for capability planning problems.” Knowledge-Based Systems 31: 128–139. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., H. Z. Huang, and L. F. Yu. 2006. “Fuzzy preference based interactive fuzzy physical programming and its application in multi-objective optimization.” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 20 (6): 731–737. doi: 10.1007/BF02915937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. H., et al. 2012. “Multidisciplinary collaborative satisfaction negotiation based on the physical programming method in product design.” Mechatronics and Applied Mechanics 157–158: 258–262.
   Google Scholar