The continuous adjoint approach to the k–ε turbulence model for shape optimization and optimal active control of turbulent flows

References

• Anderson, W. K., and D. L. Bonhaus. 1999. “Airfoil Design on Unstructured Grids for Turbulent Flows.” AIAA Journal 37 (2): 185–191. doi: 10.2514/2.712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, W. K., and V. Venkatakrishnan. 1999. “Aerodynamic Design Optimization on Unstructured Grids with a Continuous Adjoint Formulation.” Computers & Fluids 28 (4–5): 443–480. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7930(98)00041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno-Orovio, A., C. Castro, F. Palacios, and E. ZuaZua. 2012. “Continuous Adjoint Approach for the Spalart–Allmaras Model in Aerodynamic Optimization.” AIAA Journal 50 (3): 631–646. doi: 10.2514/1.J051307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgreen, G. W., and O. Baysal. 1996. “Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using Discrete Sensitivity Analysis.” AIAA Journal 34 (9): 1761–1770. doi: 10.2514/3.13305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnarius, Angelo, Frank Thiele, Emre Özkaya, Anil Nemili, and Nicolas R. Gauger. 2013. “Optimal Control of Unsteady Flows Using a Discrete and a Continuous Adjoint Approach.” System Modeling and Optimization, IFIP Advances and Communication Technology 391: 318–327. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-36062-6_32
   Google Scholar
• Cathalifaud, P., and P. Luchini. 2000. “Algebraic Growth in Boundary Layers: Optimal Control by Blowing and Suction at the Wall.” European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids 19 (4): 469–490. doi: 10.1016/S0997-7546(00)00128-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collis, S. Scott, Ronald D. Joslin, Avi Seifert, and Vassilis Theofilis. 2004. “Issues on Active Flow Control: Theory, Control, Simulation and Experiment.” Progress in Aerospace Sciences 40 (4-5): 237–289. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duta, M. C., M. B. Giles, and M. S. Campobasso. 2002. “The Harmonic Adjoint Approach to Unsteady Turbomachinery Design.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 40 (3–4): 323–332. doi: 10.1002/fld.289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwight, R., J. Brézillon, and D. Vollmer. 2006. “Efficient Algorithms for Solution of the Adjoint Compressible Navier–Stokes Equations with Applications.” Paper presented at the 7th ONERA-DLR Aerospace Symposium (ODAS), Toulouse, October 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J., and J. Peraire. 1996. “Aerodynamic Design Using Unstructured Meshes.” Paper presented at the 27th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, New Orleans, LA, June 17–20. 10.2514/6.1996-1941.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., and C. M. Reeves. 1964. “Function Minimization by Conjugate Gradients.” Computer Journal 7 (2): 149–154. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/7.2.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, M. B., and N. A. Pierce. 1997. “Adjoint Equations in CFD: Duality, Boundary Conditions and Solution Behaviour.” Paper presented at the 13th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass Village, CO, June 29–July 2. 10.2514/6.1997-1850.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, M., and N. Pierce. 2000. “An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design.” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 65: 393–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1011430410075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinfield, P. 2010. “Hadamard's Formula Inside and Out.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 146 (3): 654–690. doi: 10.1007/s10957-010-9681-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J. W., M. Chevalier, R. Glowinski, R. Metcalfe, A. Nordlander, and J. Periaux. 2000. “Drag Reduction by Active Control for Flow Past Cylinders.” Computational Mathematics Driven by Industrial Problems 1739: 287–363.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, A. 1988. “Aerodynamic Design Via Control Theory.” Journal of Scientific Computing 3 (3): 233–260. doi: 10.1007/BF01061285
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, Antony, and Juan J. Alonso. 1996. “Automatic Aerodynamic Optimization on Distributed Memory Architectures.” Paper presented at the 34th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 8–12. AIAA Paper Number 96-0409. http://aero-comlab.stanford.edu/Papers/reno96.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, A., N. Pierce, and L. Martinelli. 1998. “Optimum Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier–Stokes equations.” Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 10: 213–237. doi: 10.1007/s001620050060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslin, R. D., M. D. Gunzburger, R. A Nicolaides, G. Erlebacher, and M. Y. Hussaini. 1997. “Self-Contained Automated Methodology for Optimal Flow Control.” AIAA Journal 35 (5): 816–824. doi: 10.2514/2.7452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launder, B. E., and B. I. Sharma. 1974. “Application of the Energy-Dissipation Model of Turbulence to the Calculation of Flow near a Spinning Disc.” Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer 1 (2): 131–137. doi: 10.1016/0094-4548(74)90150-7
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B. J., and C. Kim. 2007. “Automated Design Methodology of Turbulent Internal Flow Using Discrete Adjoint Formulation.” Aerospace Science and Technology 11 (2–3): 163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Zhijin, I. M. Navo, M. Y. Hussaini, and F. X. Le Dimet. 2003. “Optimal Control of Cylinder Wakes Via Suction and Blowing.” Computers & Fluids 32 (2): 149–171. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7930(02)00007-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A., K. Mani, D. Mavriplis, and J. Sitaraman. 2013. “Time Dependent Adjoint-Based Optimization for Coupled Aeroelastic Problems.” Presented at the 31st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Diego, CA. 10.2514/6.2013-2906.
   Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, Siva, and Antony Jameson. 2001. “Studies of the Continuous and Discrete Adjoint Approaches to Viscous Automatic Aerodynamic Shape Optimization.” Paper presented at the 15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Anaheim, June 11–14. 10.2514/6.2001-2530.
   Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, S., and A. Jameson. 2002. “Optimal Control Theory of Unsteady Flows Using a Time Accurate Method.” Presented at the 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, GA, September 4–6. 10.2514/6.2002-5436.
   Google Scholar
• Naumann, Uwe. 2012. The Art of Differentiating Computer Programs: An Introduction to Algorithmic Differentiaion. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Nemili, A., E. Özkaya, N. R. Gauger, F. Kramer, A. Carnarius, and F. Thiele. 2013. “Discrete Adjoint Based Sensitivity Analysis for Optimal Flow Control of a 3D High-Lift Configuration.” Presented at the 21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, June 24–27. 10.2514/6.2013-2585.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, E. J., J. Lu, M. A. Park, and D. L. Darmofal. 2004. “An Implicit Exact Dual Adjoint Solution Method for Turbulent Flows on Unstructured Grids.” Computers & Fluids 33 (9): 1131–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2003.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othmer, C. 2008. “A Continuous Adjoint Formulation for the Computation of Topological and Surface Sensitivities of Ducted Flows.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 58 (8): 861–877. doi: 10.1002/fld.1770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, D. I., and K. C. Giannakoglou. 2007. “A Continuous Adjoint Method with Objective Function Derivatives Based on Boundary Integrals for Inviscid and Viscous Flows.” Journal of Computers & Fluids 36 (2): 325–341. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, D. I., and K. C. Giannakoglou. 2012. “Aerodynamic Design Using the Truncated Newton Algorithm and the Continuous Adjoint Approach.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 68 (6): 724–739. doi: 10.1002/fld.2530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patankar, S. V., and D. B. Spalding. 1972. “Calculation Procedure for Heat, Mass and Momentum Transfer in Three-dimensional Parabolic Flows.” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 15 (10): 1787–1806. doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(72)90054-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pironneau, O. 1984. Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pralits, J. O., A. Hanifi, and D. S. Henningson. 2002. “Adjoint-Based Optimization of Steady Suction for Disturbance Control in Incompressible Flows.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 467: 129–161. doi: 10.1017/S0022112002001301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prandtl, L. 1904. “Über Flüssigkeitsbeweung bei sehr kleiner Reibung.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Mathematical Congress, Heidelberg, 484–491. Teuber Verlag, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Reuther, J., J. J. Alonso, M. J. Rimlinger, and A. Jameson. 1996. “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Supersonic Aircraft Configurations Via an Adjoint Formulation on Distributed Memory Parallel Computers.” Presented at the 6th AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, September 4–6. 10.2514/6.1996-4045.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. W. R., F. Palacios, K. Duraisami, and J. J. Alonso. 2013. “A Hybrid Adjoint Approach Applied to Turbulent Flow Simulations.” Presented at the 21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, June 24–27. 10.2514/6.2013-2452.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., P. C. Chen, S. Yang, Z. Wang, and Q. Wang. 2013. “Unsteady Aero-Structure Coupled Adjoint Method for Flutter Suppression.” Presented at the 21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, June 24–27. 10.2514/6.2013-2849.
   Google Scholar
• Zymaris, A. S., D. I. Papadimitriou, K. C. Giannakoglou, and C. Othmer. 2009. “Continuous Adjoint Approach to the Spalart–Allmaras Turbulence Model for Incompressible Flows.” Computers & Fluids 38 (8): 1528–1538. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2008.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zymaris, A. S., D. I. Papadimitriou, K. C. Giannakoglou, and C. Othmer. 2010. “Adjoint Wall Functions: A New Concept for Use in Aerodynamic Shape Optimization.” Journal of Computational Physics 229 (13): 5228–5245. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zymaris, A. S., D. I. Papadimitriou, E. M. Papoutsis-Kiachagias, K. C. Giannakoglou, and C. Othmer. 2013. “The Continuous Adjoint Method as a Guide for the Design of Flow Control Systems Based on Jets.” Engineering Computations 30 (4): 494–520. doi: 10.1108/02644401311329343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar