A novel single-loop simulation method and its combination with adaptive kriging for moment-independent global sensitivity analysis

References

• Borgonovo, E. 2007. “A New Uncertainty Importance Measure.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 92: 771–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourinet, J. M., F. Deheeger, and M. Lemaire. 2011. “Assessing Small Failure Probabilities by Combined Subset Simulation and Support Vector Machines.” Structural Safety 33 (6): 343–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K., and Z. Z. Lu. 2018a. “Adaptive Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansions for Global Sensitivity Analysis Based on Support Vector Regression.” Computers and Structures 194: 86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K., and Z. Z. Lu. 2018b. “Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion Based on D-MORPH Regression.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 323: 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, H. H., H. Zhang, W. Wang, and G. Xue. 2012. “Structural Reliability Assessment by Local Approximation of Limit State Functions Using Adaptive Markov Chain Simulation and Support Vector Regression.” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 27: 676–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echard, B., N. Gayton, and M. Lemaire. 2011. “AK-MCS: An Active Learning Reliability Method Combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation.” Structural Safety 33: 145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, K. X., Z. Z. Lu, C. Y. Ling, and W. Y. Yun. 2019. “An Innovative Estimation of Failure Probability Function Based on Conditional Probability of Parameter Interval and Augmented Failure Probability.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 123: 606–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, K. X., Z. Z. Lu, and C. Pang. 2019. “Safety Life Analysis Under Required Failure Credibility Constraint for Unsteady Thermal Structure With Fuzzy Input Parameters.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 59 (1): 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, K. X., Z. Z. Lu, C. Pang, and W. Y. Yun. 2018. “An Efficient Computational Method of a Moment-Independent Importance Measure Using Quantile Regression.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 109: 235–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, K. X., Z. Z. Lu, C. Pang, and W. Y. Yun. 2019. “Time-Dependent Failure Credibility Analysis and Its Optimization Based Computational Methods.” Engineering Structures 181: 605–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, K. X., Z. Z. Lu, and W. Y. Yun. 2019. “Aircraft Icing Severity Analysis Considering Three Uncertainty Types.” AIAA Journal 57 (4): 1514–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, K. X., Z. Z. Lu, W. Y. Yun, and L. L. He. 2020. “Bi-objective Adaptive Kriging for Reliability Analysis With Random and Evidence Variables.” AIAA Journal 58 (4): 1733–1747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helton, J. C. 1993. “Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Use in Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 42 (2-3): 327–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helton, J. C. 1994. “Treatment of Uncertainty in Performance Assessments for Complex Systems.” Risk Analysis 14 (4): 483–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helton, J. C., and F. J. Davis. 2003. “Latin Hypercube Sampling and the Propagation of Uncertainty in Analysis of Complex Systems.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 81 (1): 23–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., and S. Mahadevan. 2016. “Global Sensitivity Analysis-Enhanced Surrogate (GASA) Modeling for Reliability Analysis.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 53: 501–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C., and H. L. Yang. 2006. “Unsteady Supercavitating Flow Past Cones.” Journal of Hydrodynamics 18 (3): 262–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B., and X. Du. 2006. “Analytical Robustness Assessment for Robust Design.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 34 (2): 123–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iman, R. L. 1987. “A Matrix-Based Approach to Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for Fault Tree.” Risk Analysis 7: 21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., and B. J. Garric. 1981. “On the Quantitative Definition of Risk.” Risk Analysis 1 (1): 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, G., and G. Lin. 2014. “Selection of Polynomial Chaos Bases via Bayesian Model Uncertainty Methods With Applications to Sparse Approximation of PDEs With Stochastic Inputs.” Journal of Computational Physics 259 (259): 114–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaymaz, I. 2005. “Application of Kriging Method to Structural Reliability Problems.” Structural Safety 27 (2): 133–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kioutsioukis, I., S. Tarantola, A. Saltelli, and D. Gatelli. 2004. “Uncertainty and Global Sensitivity Analysis of Road Transport Emission Estimates.” Atmospheric Environment 38 (38): 6609–6620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C. 2009. “Kriging Metamodeling in Simulation: A Review.” European Journal of Operational Research 192 (3): 707–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, J., and J. Pan. 1998. “A New Method for Selection of Population Distribution and Parameter Estimation.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 60: 247–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., and T. Homma. 2009. “A New Computational Method of a Moment-Independent Uncertainty Importance Measure.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 94: 1205–1211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocquigny, E., N. Devictor, and S. Tarantola. 2008. Uncertainty in Industrial Practice. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A. 2002. “Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment.” Risk Analysis 22: 579–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol, I. M. 1976. “Uniformly Distributed Sequences With an Additional Uniform Property.” USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 16: 236–242.
   Google Scholar
• Sobol, I. M. 1993. “Sensitivity Analysis for Non-linear Mathematical Models.” Mathematical Modelling and Computational Experiment 1: 407–414.
   Google Scholar
• Sobol, I. M., and S. Kucherenko. 2009. “Derivative Based Global Sensitivity Measures and Their Link With Global Sensitivity Indices.” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 79 (10): 3009–3017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, S. F., T. Zhou, L. Wang, S. Kucherenkoc, and Z. Z. Lu. 2019. “Derivative-Based New Upper Bound of Sobol’ Sensitivity Measure.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 187: 142–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Z. P. Qiu, M. H. Xu, and Y. L. Li. 2017. “Novel Reliability-Based Optimization Method for Thermal Structure With Hybrid Random, Interval and Fuzzy Parameters.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 47: 573–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, P. F., Z. Z. Lu, and J. W. Song. 2015. “Variable Importance Analysis: A Comprehensive Review.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 142: 399–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, P. F., Z. Z. Lu, and X. K. Yuan. 2013. “Monte Carlo Simulation for Moment-Independent Sensitivity Analysis.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 110: 60–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, W. Y., Z. Z. Lu, K. X. Feng, and L. Y. Li. 2019. “An Elaborate Algorithm for Analyzing the Borgonovo Moment-Independent Sensitivity by Replacing the Probability Density Function Estimation With the Probability Estimation.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 189: 99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. C., Z. Z. Lu, K. Cheng, and W. Y. Yun. 2019. “A Bayesian Monte Carlo-Based Method for Efficient Computation of Global Sensitivity Indices.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 117 (15): 498–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar