2,987
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Exploring Year 6 pupils’ perceptions of private tutoring: evidence from three mainstream schools in England

ORCID Icon

References

  • Armstrong, D. (2007). Classroom visions: Efficient and effective ways to differentiate education. Retrieved from www.classroomvisions.com.
  • Bartley, J. (2017). Case briefing: A briefing from Campaign for State Education. Retrieved from http://www.campaignforstateeducation.org.uk/CASE%20briefing%20-%20Faith%20Schools%20(September%202014).pdf
  • Bray, M. (2011). The challenge of shadow education: Private tutoring and its implications for policy makers in the European Union. Brussels: EC/NESSE.
  • Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2014). Regulating private tutoring for public good: Policy options for supplementary education in Asia. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre and UNESCO.
  • Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2016). Designing and implementing mixed approaches to shadow education research: Experiences and lessons in Hong Kong. In M. Bray, O. Kwo, & B. Jokić (Eds.), Researching private supplementary tutoring: Methodological lessons from diverse cultures (pp. 149–178). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong & Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Bray, M., Kwo, O., & Jokić, B. (Eds.). (2016). Researching private supplementary tutoring: Methodological lessons from diverse cultures. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong & Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Bray, M., Mazawi, A. E., & Sultana, R. G. (Eds.). (2013). Private tutoring across the Mediterranean: Power dynamics and implications for learning and equity. Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Breathnach, H., Danby, S., & O’Gorman, L. (2017). ‘Are you working or playing?’ Investigating young children’s perspectives of classroom activities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 25, 439–454.
  • Clark, A. (2005). Ways of seeing: Using the Mosaic approach to listen to young children’s perspectives. In A. Clark, A. T. Kjørholt, & P. Moss (Eds.), Beyond listening. Children’s perspectives on early childhood services (pp. 29–49). Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
  • Cole, R. (2017). Estimating the impact of private tutoring on academic performance: Primary students in Sri Lanka. Education Economics, 25, 142–157.
  • Corsaro, W. (2005). The sociology of childhood (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-First Century. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Driessnack, M. (2005). Children’s drawings as facilitators of communication: A meta analysis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 20, 415–423.
  • Fargas-Malet, M., McSherry, D., Larkin, E., & Robinson, C. (2010). Research with children: Methodological issues and innovative techniques. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8, 175–192.
  • Gao, X. (2013). Reflexive and reflective thinking: A crucial link between agency and autonomy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 226–237.
  • Glaesser, J. (2015). Young people's educational careers in England and Germany: Integrating survey and interview analysis via qualitative comparative analysis. New York: Springer.
  • Hajar, A. (2016). Motivated by visions: A tale of a rural learner of English. The Language Learning Journal, 1–17.
  • Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230.
  • Huser, C. (2010). Children’s voices on play in a Mosaic Approach study: Children as conscious participants in a case study. Boğaziçi University Journal of Education, 26, 35–48.
  • Ireson, J. (2004). Private tutoring how prevalent and effective is it? London Review of Education, 2(2), 109–122.
  • Ireson, J., & Rushforth, K. (2005). Mapping and evaluating shadow education (ESRC End of Award Report Ref No. RES-000-23-0117).
  • Ireson, J., & Rushforth, K. (2011). Private tutoring at transition points in the English education system: Its nature, extent and purpose. Research Papers in Education, 26, 1–19.
  • Ireson, J., & Rushforth, K. (2014). Why do parents employ private tutors for their children? Exploring psychological factors that influence demand in England. Journal for Educational Research Online, 6, 12–33.
  • Kanyal, M., & Cooper, L. (2012). Young children’s perceptions of their classroom environment: Perspectives from England and India. In T. Papatheodorou & J. Moyles (Eds.), Cross-cultural perspectives on early childhood (pp. 58–72). London: Sage.
  • Kanyal, M., Luff, P., Cooper, L., & Webster, R. (2014). Participatory approaches in research involving children. In M. Kanyal (Ed.), Children’s rights 0-8: Promoting participation in education and care (pp. 116–150). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Kim, Y. C. (2016). Shadow education and the curriculum and culture of schooling in South Korea. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kirby, P. (2016). Shadow schooling: Private tuition and social mobility in the UK. The Sutton Trust. Retrieved from http://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Shadow-Schooling-formatted-report_FINAL.pdf
  • Kong, O., Yu, X., & Zhao, X. (2017). Private tutoring. In J. Morgan, Q. Gu, & F. Li (Eds.), Handbook of Education in China (pp. 333–355). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Leonard, M. (2006). Children’s drawings as a methodological tool: Reflections on the eleven plus system in Northern Ireland. Irish Journal of Sociology, 15(2), 52–66.
  • Liu, J., & Bray, M. (2017). Determinants of demand for private supplementary tutoring in China: Findings from a national survey. Education Economics, 25, 205–218.
  • Ljung-Djarf, A., Aberg-Bengtsson, L., & Ottosson, T. (2005). Ways of relating to computer use in pre-school activity. International Journal of Early Years Education, 13, 29–41.
  • Loyalka, P., & Zakharov, A. (2016). Does shadow education help students prepare for college? Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Educational Development, 49, 22–30.
  • Maylor, U., Rose, A., Minty, S., Ross, A., Issa, T., & Abol Kiyok, K. (2013). Exploring the impact of supplementary schools on Black and Minority Ethnic pupils’ mainstream attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 39, 107–125.
  • Morris, R., & Perry, T. (2017). Reframing the English grammar schools debate. Educational Review, 69, 1–24.
  • Pearce, S., Power, S., & Taylor, C. (2017). Private tutoring in Wales: Patterns of private investment and public provision. Research Papers in Education, 33, 113–126.
  • Pinter, A., & Zandian, S. (2014). ‘I don’t ever want to leave this room’: Benefits of researching ‘with’ children. ELT Journal, 86, 64–74.
  • Prout, A., & James, A. (1997). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood (2nd ed.). (pp. 7–33). London: Falmer Press.
  • Riihelä, M. (2002). Children’s play is the origin of social activity. European Early Childhood Education Research, 10, 39–53.
  • Ryan-Wenger, N. A. (2001). Use of children’s drawings for measurement of developmental level and emotional status. Journal of Child and Family Nursing, 4, 139–149.
  • Schapiro, T. (1999). What is a child? Ethics, 109, 715–738.
  • Šťastný, V. (2016). Private supplementary tutoring in the Czech Republic. European Education, 48, 1–22.
  • Sutton Trust. (2015, September 4). London pupils are twice as likely to receive private tuition as those outside the capital. Press Release. Retrieved from http://www.suttontrust.com/newsarchive/london-pupils-are-twiceas-likely-to-receive-private-tuition-as-those-outside-the-capital/
  • Tanner, E., Ireson, J., Day, N., Rushforth, K., Tennant, R., Turczuk, O., & Smith, K. (2009). Private tutoring in England (Research Report DCSF-RR081). London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
  • Tokmak, H. S., & Incikabi, L. (2013). Integration of the computer games into early childhood education pre-service teachers’ mathematics teaching. In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Research perspectives and best practices in educational technology integration (pp. 178–196). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • West, A., Noden, P., & Edge, A. (1998). Parental involvement in education in and out of school. British Educational Research Journal, 24, 461–484.
  • Wyness, M. (2006). Childhood and society: An introduction to the sociology of childhood. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Yung, K. W. H., & Bray, M. (2017). Shadow education: Features, expansion and implications. In T. K. C. Tse & M. Lee (Eds.), Making sense of education in post-handover Hong Kong: Achievements and challenges (pp. 95–111). London: Routledge.
  • Zhan, S., Bray, M., Wang, D., Lykins, C., & Kwo, O. (2013). The effectiveness of private tutoring: Students’ perceptions in comparison with mainstream schooling in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14, 495–509.
  • Zhang, W., & Bray, M. (2017). Micro-neoliberalism in China: Public–private interactions at the confluence of mainstream and shadow education. Journal of Education Policy, 32, 63–81.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.