Relationships among students’ perceptions of native and non-native EFL teachers’ immediacy behaviours and credibility and students’ willingness to communicate in class

References

• Amiryousefi, M. (2018). Willingness to communicate, interest, motives to communicate with the instructor, and L2 speaking: A focus on the role of age and gender. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 221–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543–559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baran-Łucarz, M. (2014). The link between pronunciation anxiety and willingness to communicate in the foreign language classroom: The Polish EFL context. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(4), 445–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt, L., & Kontra, E. H. (2000). Native English-speaking teachers in cultures other than their own. TESOL Journal, 9(3), 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bosuwon, T., & Woodrow, L. (2009). Developing a problem-based course based on needs analysis to enhance English reading ability of Thai undergraduate students. RELC Journal, 40(1), 42–64.
   Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50(1), 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47(1), 82–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah, N. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence, motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major undergraduates: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 140–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, A. N., Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., Elledge, N., Jernberg, K. A., & Larson, L. M. (2009). A meta-analytical review of teacher credibility and its associations with teacher behaviors and student outcomes. Communication Education, 58(4), 516–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Thompson, C. A. (1992). Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41(4), 388–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gol, M., Zand-Moghadam, A., & Karrabi, M. (2014). The construct of willingness to communicate and its relationship with EFL learners’ perceived verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy. Issues in Language Teaching, 3(1), 135–160.
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37(1), 40–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, S. J., Jantarach, V., & Kettem, S. (2010). Studying English with Thai and native‐speaking teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 16(5), 559–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, L. (2010). The impact of perceived teachers’ nonverbal immediacy on students’ motivation for learning English. Asian EFL Journal, 12(4), 188–204.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., & Miller, A. (2002). A cross-cultural study of immediacy, credibility, and learning in the U.S. and Kenya. Communication Education, 51(3), 280–292.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2005). What do students think about the pros and cons of having a native speaker teacher? In E. Llurda (Ed.), Non-native language teachers: Perceptions, challenges, and contributions to the profession (pp. 217–241). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H., & Macaro, E. (2013). Investigating age in the use of L1 or English-only instruction: Vocabulary acquisition by Korean EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 887–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. W. (1999). Bilingual unpacking of monolingual texts in two primary classrooms in Brunei Darussalam. Language and Education, 13(1), 38–58.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., Sallinen, A., & Barraclough, R. A. (1996). A multi‐cultural examination of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 44(3), 297–307.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1(6), 203–207.
   Google Scholar
• Menzel, K. E., & Carrell, L. J. (1999). The impact of gender and immediacy on willingness to talk and perceived learning. Communication Education, 48(1), 31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, S. (2004). Significant motivational predictors of the amount of reading by EFL learners in Japan. RELC Journal, 35(1), 63–81.
   Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P., Parker-Raley, J., Beebe, S. A., & Cunningham, C. (2007). Instructors who resist “college lite”: The neutralizing effect of instructor immediacy on students’ course-workload violations and perceptions of instructor credibility and affective learning. Communication Education, 56(2), 145–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussu, L., & Llurda, E. (2008). Non-native English-speaking English language teachers: History and research. Language Teaching, 41(3), 315–348.
   Google Scholar
• Munezane, Y. (2013). Attitudes, affect and ideal L2 self as predictors of willingness to communicate. EUROSLA Yearbook, 13(1), 176–198.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (2004). The relationship between perceived instructor credibility and college student in-class and out-of-class communication. Communication Reports, 17(2), 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (2010). Instructional communication: The emergence of a field. In D. L. Fassett & J. T. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 149–159). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Martin, M. M. (2018). Instructor credibility. In M. L. Houser & A. M. Hosek (Eds.), The handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 38–50). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J. (2015). L2 motivational self system, attitudes, and affect as predictors of L2 WTC: An imagined community perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 433–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogue, L., & Ahyun, K. (2006). The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning. Communication Education, 55(3), 331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39(3), 181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 574–590). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Samimy, K., & Brutt-Griffler, J. (1999). To be a native or non-native speaker: Perceptions of ‘non-native’ students in a graduate TESOL program. In G. Braine (Ed.), Nonnative educators in English language teaching (pp. 127–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Selvi, A. F. (2011). The non-native speaker teacher. ELT Journal, 65(2), 187–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatar, S., & Yildiz, S. (2010). Empowering nonnative-English speaking teachers in the classroom. In A. Mahboob (Ed.), The NNEST lens: Non native English speakers in TESOL (pp. 114–128). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Teven, J. J., & Hanson, T. L. (2004). The impact of teacher immediacy and perceived caring on teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly, 52(1), 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46(1), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üstünlüoglu, E. (2007). University students’ perceptions of native and non‐native teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 13(1), 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashima, T. (2009). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 144–163). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar