Teaching about terrorism, extremism and radicalisation: some implications for controversial issues pedagogy

References

• ACT. (2015). The prevent duty and controversial issues: Creating a curriculum response through citizenship. London: Expert Subject Advisory Group for Citizenship with the Association for Citizenship Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K., & McCully, A. (2007). Teaching controversial issues … where controversial issues really matter. Teaching History, 127, 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G. (1972). Categoroes and cognition. In J. Spradely (Ed.) Culture and Cognition, 168–190
   Google Scholar
• Camicia, S. P. (2008). Deciding what is a controversial issue: A case study of social studies curriculum controversy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 36(4), 298–316.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, L. (2016). The casey review: A review into opportunity and integration. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• CCEA. (2015). Teaching controversial issues at key stage 3. Belfast: Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies for qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 249–291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chikoko, V., Gilmour, J., Harber, C., & Serf, J. (2011). Teaching controversial issues and teacher education in England and South Africa. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claire, H., & Holden, C. (2007). The challenge of teaching controversial issues: Principles and practice. In H. Claire & C. Holden (Eds.), The challenge of teaching controversial issues (pp. 1-14). Stoke on Trent: Trentham.
   Google Scholar
• Cooling, T. (2012). What is a controversial issue? Implications for the treatment of religious beliefs in education. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 33(3), 169–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooling, T. (2014). The epistemic criterion: A response to Michael hand. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 35(1), 86–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, D. (2006). Teaching controversial environmental issues: Neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational Research, 48(2), 223–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfE. (2011). Teachers’ standards: Guidance for school leaders, school staff and governing bodies (DFE-00066-2011). London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2014). Promoting fundamental British values as part of SMSC in schools. Departmental advice for maintained schools (DFE-00679-2014). London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2015). The prevent duty. Departmental advice for schools and childcare providers. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, J., & Pike, M. (2006). Citizenship and moral education: Values in action. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, M. (2008). What should we teach a controversial? A defence of the epistemic criteria. Educational Theory, 58(2), 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, M. (2014). Religion, reason and non-directive teaching: A reply to Trevor cooling. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 35(1), 79–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hlebowitsh, P. S. (2005). Designing the school curriculum. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• HMG. (2011). The prevent strategy. London: Her Majesty’s Government.
   Google Scholar
• HMG. (2015). Channel duty guidance: Protecting vulnerable people from being drawn into terrorism. Statutory guidance for channel panel members and partners of local panels. London: Her Majesty’s Government.
   Google Scholar
• JCHR. (2016). Counter-extremism. Second report of session 2016-17 (HL paper 39, HC 105). London: House of Lords and House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Jerome, L., & Elwick, A. (2016). Evaluation report on the ACT building resilience project. London: Association for Citizenship Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Kello, K. (2016). Sensitive and controversial issues in the classroom: Teaching history in a divided society. Teachers and Teaching, 22(1), 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, T. E. (1986). Discussing controversial issues: Four perspectives on the teacher’s role. Theory and Research in Social Education, 14(2), 113–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, D., & Huddleston, T. (2015). Teaching controversial issues: Professional development pack for the effective teaching of controversial issues. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Kundnani, A., & Hayes, B. (2018). The globalisation of countering violent extremism policies: Undermining human rights, instrumentalising civil society. Amsterdam: The Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lammy, D. (2017). The Lammy review: An independent review into the treatment of, and outcomes for, Black, Asian and minority ethnic individuals in the criminal justice system. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/643001/lammy-review-final-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misco, T. (2012). The importance of context for teaching controversial issues in international settings. International Education, 42(1), 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2016). School inspection handbook. Handbook for inspecting schools in England under section 5 of the education act 2005 (150066). London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Oulton, C., Day, V., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Controversial issues – Teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 489–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, J. (2015). The charged classroom: Predicaments and possibilities for democratic teaching. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, P. (2012). Dealing with the exceptional: Pre-crime anti-terrorism policy and practice. Policing and Society, 22(4), 519–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, W. (1999). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, I., Segal, A., Lefstein, A., & Meshulam, A. (2018). Teaching controversial issues in a fragile democracy: Defusing deliberation in Israeli primary classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(3), 387–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A. (1991). Controversial issues in the humanities: Helping pupils to handle bias. In P. Gordon (Ed.), Teaching the humanities (pp. 127-156). London: Woburn Press.
   Google Scholar
• QCA. (1998). Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Raths, L. E., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. B. (1978). Values and teaching: Working with values in the classroom (2nd ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D. (2000). The Caliph’s coin: The currency of narrative frameworks in history teaching. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 83-101). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stradling, R. (1984). The teaching of controversial issues: An evaluation. Educational Review, 36(2), 121–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stradling, R., Noctor, M., & Baines, M. (1984). Teaching controversial issues. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. (2016). The campaign against prevent is based on myths and distortion – And it’s helping Islamic extremists thrive. The Telegraph. Retrieved from www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/07/campaign-against-prevent-based-myths-distortion-helping-islamic/
   Google Scholar
• Swalwell, K., & Schweber, S. (2016). Teaching through turmoil: Social studies teachers and local controversial current events. Theory and Research in Social Education, 44(3), 283–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2007). Education and theory: Strangers in paradigms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2007). The culturally responsive teacher. Educational Leadership, 64(6), 28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. (Ed). (1986). Controversial issues in the curriculum. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar