Private schooling, subject choice, upper secondary attainment and progression to university

References

• Antecol, H., Eren, O., & Ozbeklik, S. (2016). Peer effects in disadvantaged primary schools: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Journal of Human Resources, 51(1), 95–132. University of Wisconsin Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blow, L., Blundell, R., Machin, S., & Sibieta, L. (2011). The demand for private schooling in the UK: The role of income and inequality (Institute of Fiscal Studies Working Paper no. 11/13). London: Institute of Fiscal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Boliver, V. (2013). How fair is access to more prestigious UK universities? The British Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 344–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, J., Dearden, L., Shephard, N., & Vignoles, A. (2016). How English domiciled graduate earnings vary with gender, institution attended, subject and socioeconomic background (IFS Working Paper W16/06). London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdry, H., Crawford, C., & Goodman, A. (2011). The role of attitudes and behaviours in explaining socio-economic differences in attainment at age 16. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 2(1), 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (2000). Social capital in the creation of human capital. In Knowledge and social capital: Foundations and applications (pp. 17–41). Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann. doi:10.1016/B978-0-7506-7222-1.50005-2
   Google Scholar
• Crawford & Vignoles. (2014). Heterogeneity in graduate earnings by socio-economic background (Institute of Fiscal Studies W14/30). London. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/7419
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, L., Ferri, J., & Meghir, C. (2002). The effect of school quality on educational attainment and wages. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilnot, C. (2015). A taxonomy of A-level subjects according to the expressed preferences of Russell Group universities: Who does what? (DoQSS Working Papers). Retrieved from http://repec.ioe.ac.uk/REPEc/pdf/qsswp1512.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dilnot, C. (2018). The relationship between A-level subject choice and league table score of university attended: The “facilitating”, the “less suitable” and the counter-intuitive. Oxford Review of Education, 44(1), 118–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, L., & Symons, J. (1999). Attainment in secondary school. Oxford Economic Papers, 55(2), 300–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P., Öckert, B., & Oosterbeek, H. (2013). Long-Term effects of class size. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 249–285. Oxford University Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, S., & McNally, S. 2013. The Effects of Resources Across School Phases: A Summary of Recent Evidence: LSE, Centre for Economic Performance, Discussion Paper No 1226.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, T. (2017). Uptake of GCSE subjects in 2015 using new school classifications (Statistics Report Series No. 113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/our-research/all-published-resources/statistical-reports/
   Google Scholar
• Graddy, K., & Stevens, M. (2003). The impact of school inputs on student performance: An empirical study of private schools in the UK. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 58(3), 1-35.
   Google Scholar
• Green, F., Anders, J., Henderson, M., & Henseke, G. (2017b). Who chooses private schooling in Britain and why?,62, 1-50. London: Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies Research.
   Google Scholar
• Green, F., Henseke, G., & Vignoles, A. (2017a). Private schooling and labour market outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, F., Machin, S., Murphy, R., & Zhu, Y. (2011). The changing economic advantage from private schools. Economica, 79, 658–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, F. S., & Kynaston, D. (2019). Engines of privilege: Britain’s private school problem. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Halsey, A. H., Health, A., & Ridge, J. M. (1980). Origins and destinations: Family, class, and education in modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannay, T. (2015). State or private? Part 3: All subjects are not equal. Schooldash Blog. Retrieved from https://www.schooldash.com/blog-1603.html#20160301a
   Google Scholar
• Hong, K., & Zimmer, R. (2016). Does investing in school capital infrastructure improve student achievement? Economics of Education Review, 53, 143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. K., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2016). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218. Oxford University Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S., & Schluter, C. (2002). The effect of family income during childhood on later-life attainment: Evidence from Germany. Discussion Papers 604. Institute of Labor Economcis (IZA).
   Google Scholar
• Jerrim, J., Chmielewski, A. K., & Parker, P. (2015). Socioeconomic inequality in access to high-status colleges: A cross-country comparison. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 42, 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R., & Young, R. (2011). Toward best practices in analyzing datasets with missing data: Comparisons and recommendations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 73, 926–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, P. (2016). Shadow schooling private tuition and social mobility in the UK. Sutton Trust. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Shadow-Schooling-formatted-report_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Malacova, E. (2007). Effect of single sex education on progress in GCSE. Oxford Review of Education, 33(2), 233–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndaji, F., Little, J., & Coe, R. (2016). A comparison of academic achievement in independent and state schools, centre for evaluation and monitoring. Durham University.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue, C., Thomas, S., Goldstein, H., & Knight, T. (1997). 1996 study on value added for 16–18 year olds in England (DfEE Research Study RS52). [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/cmm/migrated/documents/alevdfee.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S., Green, F., Ploubidis, G. B., Sullivan, A., & Wiggins, R. D. (2017). The influence of private primary schooling on children’s learning: Evidence from three generations of children living in the UK. British Educational Research Journal, 43(5), 823–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piesse, A., & Kalton, G. (2009). A strategy for handling missing data in the longitudinal study of young people in England (LSYPE) (Department for children, schools and families: Research Report DCSF-RW086). [Online]. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4160592.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, A., Friedman, S., Rahal, C., & Flemmen, M. (2017). The decline and persistence of the old boy: Private schools and elite recruitment 1897 to 2016. American Sociological Review, 82 (6), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. and Pevalin, D.J. (eds), (2003). A Researcher's Guide to the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification. Sage Publications Ltd., London.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Russell Group. (2016). Informed choices: A Russell Group guide to making decisions about post-16 education. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.russellgroup.ac.uk/media/5272/informedchoices-print.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sakellariou, C. (2017). Private or public school advantage? Evidence from 40 countries using PISA 2012-mathematics. Applied Economics, 49(29), 2875–2892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Woolley, E., Pingault, J. B., Selzam, S., Rimfeld, K., Krapohl, E., von Stumm, S., … Plomin, R. (2018). Differences in exam performance between pupils attending selective and non-selective schools mirror the genetic differences between them. NPJ Science of Learning, 3, 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan, A., & Heath, A. (2003). Intakes and examination results at state and private schools. In G. Walford (Ed.), British private schools: Research on policy and practice,77-104. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A., Parsons, S., Green, F., Wiggins, R. D., & Ploubidis, G. (2017). The path from social origins to top jobs: Social reproduction via education. The British Journal of Sociology. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A., Parsons, S., Wiggins, R. D., Heath, A., & Green, F. (2014). Social origins, school type and higher education destinations. Oxford Review of Education, 40(6), 739–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCAS, (2016). Applicants and acceptances by groups of applicants 2016. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.ucas.com/data-and-analysis/ucas-undergraduate-releases/ucas-undergraduate-end-cycle-data-resources/applicants-and-acceptances-groups-applicants-2016
   Google Scholar