Identifying merit and potential beyond grades: opportunities and challenges in using contextual data in undergraduate admissions at nine highly selective English universities

References

• All Party Parliamentary Group on Social Mobility. (2017). The class ceiling: Increasing access to the leading professions. APPG.
   Google Scholar
• Anders, J. (2017). The influence of socio-economic status on changes in young people’s expectations of applying to university. Oxford Review of Education, 43(4), 381–401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1329722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & Wong, B. (2014). Spheres of influence: What shapes young people’s aspirations at age 12/13 and what are the implications for education policy? Journal of Education Policy, 29(1), 58–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.790079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastedo, M., Bell, D., Howell, J. S., Hsu, J., Hurwitz, M., Perfetto, G., & Welch, M. (in press). Identifying contexts for achievement: Field experiments on information use in college admissions. American Educational Research Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Bastedo, M. N. (in press). Holistic Admissions as a Global Phenomenon. In H. Eggins, A. Smolentseva, & H. de Wit (Eds.), The next decade: Challenges for global higher education. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Boliver, V., Crawford, C., Powell, M., & Craige, W. (2017). Admissions in context: The use of contextual information by leading universities. Sutton Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdry, H., Crawford, C., Dearden, L., Goodman, A., & Vignoles, A. (2013). Widening participation in higher education: Analysis using linked administrative data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 176(2), 431–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, C. (2014). The link between secondary school characteristics and university participation and outcomes. Institute for Fiscal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., Boliver, V., Siddiqui, N., Banerjee, P., & Morris, R. (2017). Which are the most suitable contextual indicators for use in widening participation to HE? Working Paper. School of Education and School of Applied Social Sciences, Durham University, Durham.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, N., & Waller, R. (2018). Challenging discourses of aspiration: The role of expectations and attainment in access to higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 44(5), 914–938. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartocollis, A. (2019a, December 10). University of California is sued over use of SAT and ACT in admissions. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Hartocollis, A. (2019b, August 27). SAT ‘Adversity score’ is abandoned in wake of criticism. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• HEFCE. (2005). Schooling effects on higher education achievement – Further analysis: Entry at age 19.
   Google Scholar
• HEFCE. (2014). Differences in degree outcomes: Key findings.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Steering Group. (2004). Fair admissions to higher education: recommendations for good practice. (The Schwartz Report). Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Hoare, A., & Johnston, R. (2011). Widening participation through admissions policy: A British case study of school and university performance. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903414297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Pampaka, M., Swain, D., & Skyrme, J. (2017). Contextualising degree-level achievement: An exploration of interactions between gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status and school type at one large UK University. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 22(4), 455–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2017.1381287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlenberg, R. (2010). Affirmative action for the rich: Legacy preferences in college admissions. The Century Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/321300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, D. (2019, January 17). French university admissions: The crème de la crème? Times Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, M., Abbas, A., & Ashwin, P. (2017). Quality in undergraduate education: How powerful knowledge disrupts inequality. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Milburn, A. (2012). University challenge: How higher education can advance social mobility. A progress report by the Independent Reviewer on Social Mobility and Child Poverty. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J, Mountford-Zimdars, A and Wiggans, J. (2013). Contextualised admissions: examining the evidence Report of research into the evidence base for the use of contextual information and data in admissions of UK students to undergraduate courses in the UK, 23.10.2020, Report to Supporting Professionalism in Admissions. Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A., & Kahlenberg, R. (2019). Admissions policies lack credibility. The cure: Radical Transparency. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 21.
   Google Scholar
• Mountford-Zimdars, A. (2017). Can holistic and contextualised admission (HaCA) widen access at highly selective universities? Experiences from England and the United States. In A. Mountford-Zimdars & N. Harrison (Eds.), Access to higher education: Theoretical perspectives and contemporary challenges. p. 205-214. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mountford-Zimdars, A., Moore, J., & Graham, J. (2016). Is contextualised admission the answer to the access challenge? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 20(4), 143–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2016.1203369
   Google Scholar
• Mountford-Zimdars, A., Moore, J. & Higham, L. (2019). What is the current state of debate around the use of contextualised admissions for undergraduate admissions? A review of the current stakeholder perspective, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2019.1640802
   Google Scholar
• Mzangwa, S. (2019). The effects of higher education policy on transformation in post-apartheid South Africa. Cogent Education, 6, 1, 1592737. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1592737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for Students (OfS). (2019, February 28). New ‘What works’ centre to help universities cut equality gaps. OfS website. Bristol: OfS. https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/news-blog-and-events/press-and-media/new-what-works-centre-to-help-universities-cut-equality-gaps/
   Google Scholar
• OfS. (2020, January 29). Our approach to access and participation. OfS website. https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/promoting-equal-opportunities/our-approach-to-access-and-participation/
   Google Scholar
• Ogg, T., Zimdars, A., & Heath, A. (2009). Schooling effects on degree performance: A comparison of the predictive validity of aptitude testing and secondary school grades at Oxford University. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 781–807. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903165611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, B. (2019, May 9). Lessons from a scandal: Colleges quietly tighten the athletic recruiting process. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A., & Hout, M. (1993). Maximally maintained inequality: Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education. Sociology of Education, 66(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2112784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1983-1987). Time and narrative (Temps et Récit). (K. McLaughlin and D. Pellauer, trans. (1984-1988)). (Vols. 1-3). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiner, M., & Noden, P. (2014). ‘Why are you applying there?’: ‘race’, class and the construction of higher education ‘choice’ in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(8), 1170–1191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.902299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. (2007). Creating a class. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundorph, E., Vasilev, D., & Coiffait, L. (2017). Joining the elite: How top universities can enhance social mobility. Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton Trust. (2017). Admissions in context: The use of contextual information by leading universities.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T., Rees, G., Sloan, L., & Davies, R. (2013). Creating an inclusive higher education system? Progression and outcomes of students from low participation neighbourhoods at a Welsh university. Contemporary Wales, 26, (1) 138. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/uwp/cowa/2013/00000026/00000001/art00010
   Google Scholar
• UCAS. (2017). 2017 End-of-cycle Report.
   Google Scholar
• UCAS (2019). UCAS end of Cycle Report.
   Google Scholar
• Zimdars, A. M. (2016). Meritocracy and the university: Selective admission in England and the United States. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar