References
- Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intension, reflection, critique. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Ammermueller, A., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Peer effects in European primary schools: Evidence from the progress in international reading literacy study. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 315–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/603650
- Andersen, I. G., & Andersen, S. C. (2017). Student-centered instruction and academic achievement: Linking mechanisms of educational inequality to schools’ instructional strategy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(4), 533–550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1093409
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/096959598005010
- Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T. A., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 319–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134719
- Carvalho, C., Santos, J., Conboy, J., & Martins, D. (2014). Teachers’ feedback: Exploring differences in students’ perceptions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 169–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.351
- Clariana, R. B. (1999). Differential memory effects for immediate and delayed feedback: A delta rule explanation of feedback timing effects. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Annual Convention, Houston, TX.
- Diprete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. Russell Sage Foundation.
- Dysthe, O. (2009). Evaluering i klassen til støtte for læring - Hvordan bruge fællesskabet for at fremme læring hos den enkelte? [Classroom evaluation to support learning - How to use students in class to promote individual learning?]. KvaN, 85, 43–59.
- Egelund, N. (Ed.) (2013). PISA 2012 - Danske unge i en international sammenligning [youth in Denmark in an international comparison]. KORA - National institute for research and analyses.
- Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. J. (2010). International stratification and mobility file: Conversion tools. [Web page]. Retrieved June 2, 2018, from http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/isco08/index.htm
- Hattie, J. A. (2009). Visible learning - A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
- Hattie, J. A., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 249–271). Routledge.
- Hattie, J. A., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
- Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
- Hoxby, C., & G. Weingarth (2006): “Taking Race Out of the Equation: School Reassign-ment and the Structure of Peer Effects,” Working Paper, Harvard University. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.472.2561&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Hu, F. (2015). Do girl peers improve your academic performance? Economics Letters, 137(C), 54–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.10.025
- Jahanshahi, B. (2017). Separating gender composition effect from peer effects in education. Education Economics, 25(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2016.1199661
- Kelly, A. (1988). Gender differences in teacher–pupil interactions: A meta-analytic review. Research in Education, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/003452378803900101
- Klafki, W., & Stöcker, H. (1976). Innere differenzierung des unterrichts. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik, 4, 497ff.
- Klette, K. (2016). Introduction: Studying interaction and instructional patterns in classrooms. In K. Klette, O. K. Bergem, & A. Roe (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in lower secondary schools in the era of PISA and TIMSS (pp. 1–16). Springer.
- Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
- Lavy, V., & Schlosser, A. (2011). Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,3(2), 1–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.2.1
- Lindenskov, L., & Andresen, M. (2010). Recent development in school mathematics’ roles and relations. In B. Sriraman, C. Bergsten, S. Goodchild, G. Pálsdóttir, B. Dahl, & L. Haapasalo (Eds.), The first sourcebook on Nordic research on mathematics education (pp. 583–596). IAP.
- Liu, N., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582
- Nicaise, V., Cogérino, G., Bois, J., & Amorose, A. J. (2006). Students’ perceptions of teacher feedback and physical competence in physical education classes: Gender effects. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.25.1.36
- Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
- Nuthall, G. (2007). The hidden lives of learners. NZCER Press.
- OECD (2015), The ABC of Gender Equality in Education: Aptitude, Behaviour, Confidence, PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264229945-en
- OECD. (2008). Assessment for learning formative assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Olken, B. A., & Singhal, M. (2011). Informal taxation. American Economic Journal. Applied Economics, 3(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.4.1
- Palardy, G. J. (2008). Differential school effects among low, middle, and high social class composition schools: A multiple group, multilevel latent growth curve analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450801936845
- Renold, E. (2006). Gendered classroom experiences. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender and education (pp. 439–452). SAGE Publications.
- Rowe, A. D., & Wood, L. N. (2008). Student perceptions and preferences for feedback. Asian Social Science, 4(3), 78–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v4n3p78
- Ryan, C. (2017). For the student: Measurement of peer effects. The Australian Economic Review, 50(1), 121–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12213
- Sacerdote, B. (2011). Chapter 4 - Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far? In E. A. Hanushek & S. Machin, L. B. T.-H. of the E. of E. Woessmann Eds., Handbook of the economics of education (1st., Vol. 3, pp. 249–277). Elsevier.
- Sacerdote, B. (2014). Experimental and quasi-experimental analysis of peer effects: Two steps forward? Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 253–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-071813-104217
- Sadker, & Sadker. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. Touchstone.
- Sadker, D. (2002). An educator’s primer to the gender war. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(3), 235–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200523
- Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
- Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Sage Publishers.
- Sortkær. (2018). Details omitted for double-blind reviewing.
- Sortkær. (2019). Details omitted for double-blind reviewing.
- Sortkær, B., & Reimer, D. (2018). Classroom disciplinary climate of schools and gender – Evidence from the Nordic countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(4), 511–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1460382
- Straub, R. (1996). The concept of control in teacher response: Defining the varieties of “directive” and “facilitative” commentary. College Composition and Communication, 47(2), 223–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/358794
- Thornhøj Christensen, V. (Ed.) (2019). PISA 2018 – Danske unge i en international sammenligning [Youth in Denmark in an international comparison]. VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research. www.vive.dk
- Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
- Topping, K. J. (2013). Peers as a source of formative and summative assessment. In J. Mcmillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 395–412). Sage Publications.
- Yarnell, L. M., Pasch, K. E., Brown, H. S., Perry, C. L., & Komro, K. A. (2014). Cross-gender social normative effects for violence in middle school: Do girls carry a social multiplier effect for at-risk boys? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1465–1485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0104-0
- Younger, M., Warrington, M., & Williams, J. (1999). The gender gap and classroom interactions: Reality and rhetoric? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3), 325–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01425699995290