One index, two publishers and the global research economy

References

• Aronova, E. (2021). Scientometrics with and without computers: The cold war transnational journeys of the science citation index. In M. Solovey & C. Dayé (Eds.), Cold war social science: Transnational entanglements (pp. 73–98). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Asubiaro, T. V., & Onaolapo, S. (2023). A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in web of science, scopus, and crossref. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(7), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asubiaro, T., Sonalopo, O., & Mills, D. (2024). Regional disparities in web of science and Scopus journal coverage. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04948-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, M. C. (2015). Making nature: The history of a scientific journal. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baykoucheva, S. (2019). Eugene Garfield’s ideas and legacy and their impact on the culture of Research. Publications, 7(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, M. (2021). Bibliodiversity at the centre: Decolonizing open access development and change. Development and Change, 52(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M. (2018). Quality to impact, text to metadata: Publication and evaluation in the age of metrics. Know: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge, 2(2), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1086/699152
   Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M., Lippman, A., Csiszar, A., Gingras, Y., Power, M., Wouters, P., Griesemer, J. R., Kehm, B. M., de Rijcke, S., Stöckelová, T., & Fanelli, D. (2020). Introduction: Metrics and the new ecologies of academic misconduct. In M. Biagioli & A. Lippman (Eds.), Gaming the metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Björn, B. Huneman, P., Schönbrodt, F., Nilsonne, G., Toma, S., Renke, S., Pandelis, P., Varvara, T., Lai, M., & Rodriguez-Cuadrado, S. (2023). Replacing academic journals. Royal Society Open Science, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, A., & Gabb, H. (2016). The value proposition of the corporate library, past and present. Information & Culture, 51(2), 192–225. https://doi.org/10.7560/IC51203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., & Mutz, R. (2021). Growth rates of modern science: A latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 224. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00903-w
   Google Scholar
• Brembs, B. (2015). What should a modern scientific infrastructure look like? The Winnower. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.143497.72726
   Google Scholar
• Brock, W. H. (1980). The development of commercial science publishing in Victorian Britain. In A. J. M. In (Ed.), The development of science publishing in Europe. Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. H. (1947). Scientific publishing in continental Europe: Notes on its war and postwar status. Science, 106(2742), 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.106.2742.54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, V. (1944). Science, the endless frontier. National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J., & Cole, S. (1971). Measuring the quality of sociological research: Problems in the use of the “science citation index”. The American Sociologist, 6(1), 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, B. (2002). The Pergamon phenomenon 1951–1991: Robert Maxwell and scientific publishing. Learned Publishing, 15(4), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315102760319233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher?. https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/
   Google Scholar
• Csiszar, A. (2020). Gaming metrics before the game: Citation and the bureaucratic virtuoso. In M. Biagioli & A. Lippman (Eds.), Gaming the Metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daling, D. (2023). “On the ruins of seriality”: The scientific journal and the nature of the scientific life. Endeavour, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2023.100885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daling, W. (2006). The encyclopaedia as pioneer of the journal. The early years of Elsevier’s scientific publishing company, 1936–1956. In M. T. G. E. Van Zelft, F. Glas, & J. Salman (Eds.), New perspectives in book history. Contributions from the low countries (pp. 31–48). Walburg Pers.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, H. (2004). Maurits Dekker and Eric Proskauer: A synergy of talent in Exile. Logos, 15, 188–190.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal politics: The real and the possible. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frame, J. D., Narin, F., & Carpenter, B. D. (1977). The distribution of world science. Social Studies of Sciences, 7(4), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.546100
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1983). Mapping science in the third world. Science and Public Policy, 10(3), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/10.3.112
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1997). A statistically valid definition of bias is needed to determine whether the science citation index discriminates against third world journals. Current science, 73(8), 639–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, R. (2004). Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, W. W. (1995). Lost science in the third world. Scientific American, 273(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0895-92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordin, M. (2015). Scientific babel: How science was done before and after global English. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griesemer, J. (2020). Taking Goodhart’s law meta: Gaming, meta-gaming, and hacking academic performance metrics. Gaming the Metrics, 77.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, J. (2023, March 15). Quality questions as publisher’s growth challenges big players. Times Higher Education Supplement. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/quality-questions-publishers-growth-challenges-big-player
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, E. J. (1990). Science as a vocation in the 1990s - the changing organizational culture of academic science. The Journal of Higher Education, 61(3), 241–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1990.11780710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, J. (1988). Maxwell. Macdonald and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, M. A., Barreiro, P. G., Crosetto, P., & Brockington, D. (2023). The strain on scientific publishing. arXiv preprint arXiv2309.15884.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, S., Ball, J., Alperin, J. P., & Willinsky, J. (2022). Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(4), 912–930. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00228
   Google Scholar
• Khelfaoui, M., & Gingras, Y. (2022). Expanding nature: Product line and brand extensions of a scientific journal. Learned Publishing, 35(2), 187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knöchelmann, M. (2021). The democratisation myth. Science and Technology Studies, 34(2), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.94964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamdan, S. (2022). Data cartels: The companies that control and monopolize our information. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., Haustein, S., Mongeon, P., & Glanzel, W. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the Digital Era. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luwel, M. (1999). Is the science citation index US-biased? Scientometrics, 46(3), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, A., & Oransky, I. (2014). What studies of retractions tell us. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 15(2), 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.855
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markusova, V. (2012). All Russian institute for scientific and technical information (viniti) of the Russian academy of sciences. Acta Informatica Medica: AIM: Journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina: Casopis Drustva Za Medicinsku Informatiku BiH, 20(2), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2012.20.113-117
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maxwell, E. (1988). Robert Maxwell & Pergamon press: 40 years’ service to science, technology and education. Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, A. J. (1980). Development of science publishing in europe. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, K. (2021). Introduction: The politics of open access — decolonizing research or corporate capture? Development & Change, 52, 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, D., & Robinson, N. (2021). Democratising monograph publishing or preying on researchers? Scholarly recognition and global ‘credibility economies’. Science as Culture, 31(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2021.2005562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2018). The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2), 171–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mounier, P., & Aspaas, P. (2023). DIAMAS: Supporting high quality diamond open access publishing. Open Science Talk, 48(48). https://doi.org/10.7557/19.6862
   Google Scholar
• Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Computer Horizons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, M. W. (2020). How academic science gave its soul to the publishing industry. Issues in Science and Technology, 36(2), 35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. T. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227(5260), 870. https://doi.org/10.1038/227870b0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo-Guerra, J. P. (2022). The quantified scholar: How research evaluations transformed the British social sciences. Columbia, Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pendlebury, D. A. (2021). 1.3 Eugene Garfield and the institute for scientific information. In B. Rafael (Ed.), Handbook bibliometrics (pp. 27–40). De Gruyter Saur.
   Google Scholar
• Pooley, J. (2022). Surveillance publishing. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.1874
   Google Scholar
• Preston, J. (2021). Fall: The mystery of Robert Maxwell. Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Price, D. J. D. S. (1961). Science since Babylon. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabkin, Y. M., Eisemon, T. O., Lafitte-Houssat, J.-J., & McLean Rathgeber, E. (1979). Citation visibility of Africa’s science. Social Studies of Science, 9(4), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277900900406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabkin, Y. M., & Inhaber, H. (1979). Science on the periphery: A citation study of three less developed countries. Scientometrics, 1(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retraction Watch. (2023, December 6). Wiley to stop using “Hindawi” name amid $18 million revenue decline. https://retractionwatch.com/2023/12/06/wiley-to-stop-using-hindawi-name-amid-18-million-revenue-decline/
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 2053951718820549. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer, K., Chan, L., Kuchma, I., & Mounier, P. (2020). Fostering bibliodiversity in scholarly communications: A call for action!. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1153&context=scholcom
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state and higher education. John Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, I. (2009). Robert Maxwell and the invention of modern scientific publishing. Publishing History, 65, 97–III.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STM. (2021). The STM report: Global research trends and transformation in Open Access.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO recommendation on Open Science.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (1918). The higher learning in America: A memorandum on the conduct of universities by business men. B. W. Huebsch.
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, B. C. (1948). Bradford’s law of scattering. Journal of Documentation, 4(3), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1918 [1946]). Science as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, P. (1999). The Citation Culture [ PhD Dissertation Faculty of Science]. University of Amsterdam. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.163066
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, P. (2017). Eugene Garfield (1925–2017). Nature, 543(7646), 492–492. https://doi.org/10.1038/543492a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar