754
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Sociodigital futures of education: reparations, sovereignty, care, and democratisation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ada Lovelace Institute. (2022). Algorithmic accountability for the public sector. https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/report/algorithmic-accountability-public-sector/
  • Agrawal, H. (2022). How can technology mitigate inequity in education systems? https://elearningindustry.com/how-can-technology-mitigate-inequity-in-education-systems
  • Bonini, T., & Treré, E. (2024). Algorithms of resistance: The everyday fight against platform power. MIT Press.
  • Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. MIT Press.
  • Crooks, R. (2021). Productive myopia: Racialized organizations and EdTech. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 205395172110504. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211050499
  • Crooks, R., & Currie, M. (2021). Numbers will not save us: Agonistic data practices. The Information Society, 37(4), 4, 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1920081
  • Davies, H., Eynon, R., Komljenovic, J., & Williamson, B. (2022). Investigating the financial power brokers behind EdTech. In S. Livingstone & K. Pothing (Eds.), Education Data Futures: Critical, Regulatory, and Practical Reflections. Digital Futures Commission, 5 Rights Foundation: https://educationdatafutures.digitalfuturescommission.org.uk/essays/competing-interests-in-education-data/investigation-financial-power-brokers-edtech
  • Davis, J. L., Williams, A., & Yang, M. W. (2021). Algorithmic reparation. Big Data & Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211044808
  • De Oliveira, V. M. (2021). Hospicing modernity: Facing humanity’s wrongs and the implications for social activism. North Atlantic Books.
  • DTBC – Data. Tech and black communities (2021) is EdTech really improving outcomes for marginalised children?. https://medium.com/data-tech-black-communities/is-edtech-really-improving-outcomes-for-marginalised-children-53fbbd5c9c2
  • Duncan, G. (2005). Critical race ethnography in education: Narrative, inequality and the problem of epistemology. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341015
  • Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
  • Facer, K., & Selwyn, N. (2021). Digital technology and the futures of education –towards ‘non-stupid’ optimism. Paper commissioned for the UNESCO Futures of Education report. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377071
  • Fremeaux, I., & Jordan, J. (2021). We are ‘nature’ defending itself: Entangling art, activism and autonomous zones. Pluto Press.
  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse economies: Performative practices for ‘other worlds. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090821
  • GIDA – Global Indigenous Data Alliance. (2022, December 12). https://www.gida-global.org/
  • Gulson, K. N., Sellar, S., & Webb, P. T. (2022). Algorithms of education: How datafication and artificial intelligence shape policy. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Gulson, K. N., & Witzenberger, K. (2022). Repackaging authority: Artificial intelligence, automated governance and education trade shows. Journal of Education Policy, 37(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1785552
  • Hakimi, L., Eynon, R., & Murphy, V. (2021). The ethics of using digital trace data in education: A thematic review of the research landscape. Review of Educational Research, 91(5), 671–717. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211020116
  • Heath, M. K., Gleason, B., Mehta, R., & Hall, T. (2023). More than knowing: Toward collective, critical, and ecological approaches in educational technology research. Educational Technology Research & Development, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10242-z
  • Holloway, J., Lewis, S., & Langman, S. (2022). Technical agonism: Embracing democratic dissensus in the datafication of education, learning, media and technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2160987
  • Knox, J. (2022). (Re)politicising data-driven education: From ethical principles to radical participation. Learning, Media and Technology.
  • Krutka, D. G., Smits, R. M., & Willhelm, T. A. (2021). Don’t Be evil: Should we use Google in schools? Tech Trends, 65(4), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00599-4
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003
  • Macgilchrist, F. (2019). Cruel optimism in edtech: When the digital data practices of educational technology providers inadvertently hinder educational equity. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1556217
  • Macgilchrist, F., Allert, H., Cerratto Pargman, T., & Jarke, J. (2023). Designing postdigital futures: Which designs? Whose futures? Postdigital Science & Education, 6(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00389-y
  • Martin, A., Myers, N., & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715602073
  • McQuillan, D. (2022). Resisting AI: an anti-fascist approach to artificial intelligence. Bristol University Press.
  • McQuillan, D. (2023, June). Predicted benefits, proven harms: How AI’s algorithmic violence emerged from our own social matrix. The Sociological Review Magazine, 6. https://doi.org/10.51428/tsr.ekpj9730
  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2015). The white possessive: Property, power, and indigenous sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 745–758.
  • OECD. (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021. Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, Blockchain and robots. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en
  • Oremus, W. (2020, June 26). 5 ideas to make silicon valley less racist. https://onezero.medium.com/five-ideas-to-make-silicon-valley-less-racist-7a1069ad05f8
  • Perrigo, B. (2023, January 18). OpenAI used Kenyan workers on less than $2 per hour to make ChatGPT less toxic. Time. https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/
  • Perrotta, C. (2022). Advancing data justice in education: Some suggestions towards a deontological framework. Learning, Media and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2156536
  • Prehn, J. (2022, June). Indigenous data sovereignty and education. The digitalisation of Education. NORRAG policy insights #01. https://resources.norrag.org/resource/719/the-digitalisation-of-education.38–39 accessed 30/12/2022.
  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301
  • Rudolph, S. (2019). Unsettling the gap: Race, politics and indigenous education. Peter Lang.
  • Selwyn, N. (2022). Less work for teacher? The ironies of automated decision-making in schools. In Pink, S., Berg, M., Lupton, D., & Ruckenstein, M. (Eds.), Everyday automation: Experiencing and anticipating emerging technologies. Taylor & Francis.
  • Selwyn, N. (2023). Digital degrowth: Toward radically sustainable education technology, learning. Media and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2159978
  • Selwyn, N., Henderson, M., & Chao, S.-H. (2015). Exploring the role of digital data in contemporary schools and schooling —’200,000 lines in an Excel spreadsheet’. British Educational Research Journal, 41(5), 767–781. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3186;http://www.jstor.org/stable/24808118
  • Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Bergviken-Rensfeldt, A., & Perrotta, C. (2023). Making sense of the digital automation of education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00362-9
  • Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Sriprakash, A. (2022). Reparations: Theorising just futures of education, discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 44(5), 782–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2022.2144141
  • Swist, T., & Gulson, K. N. (2023). Instituting socio-technical education futures: Encounters with/through technical democracy, data justice, and imaginaries. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(2), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2205225
  • Táíwò, O. O. (2022). Reconsidering reparations. Oxford University Press.
  • Thompson, G., Gulson, K., Swist, T., & Witzenberger, K. (2022). Responding to sociotechnical controversies in education: A modest proposal toward technical democracy. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(2), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2126495
  • UNESCO. (2023). An ed-tech tragedy? Educational technologies and school closures in the time of COVID-19. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386701
  • Valle, F. S. (2023). In Defense of Solidarity and pleasure: Feminist technopolitics from the global south. Stanford University Press.
  • Veale, M. (2022). Schools must resist big EdTech – but it won’t be easy. In In S. Livingstone & K. Pothong (Eds.), Education data futures: Critical, regulatory and practical reflections. Digital Futures Commission, 5Rights Foundation: https://educationdatafutures.digitalfuturescommission.org.uk/essays/competing-interests-in-education-data/schools-must-resist-big-edtech
  • Walter, M., Lovett, R., Maher, B., Williamson, B., Prehn, J., Bodkin-Andrews, G., & Lee, V. (2021). Indigenous data sovereignty in the era of big data and open data. The Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.141
  • Whitman, M. (2020). “We called that a behavior”: The making of institutional data. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 2053951720932200. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720932200
  • Williams, A., Miceli, M., & Gebru, T. (2022, October 13). The exploited labor behind artificial intelligence. Noema. https://www.noemamag.com/the-exploited-labor-behind-artificial-intelligence/
  • Williamson, B. (2019). Datafication of education: A critical approach to emerging analytics technologies and practices. In Beetham, H. & Sharpe, R. (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Principles and practices of design. Routledge.
  • Williamson, B., Gulson, K. N., Perrotta, C., & Witzenberger, K. (2022). Amazon and the new global connective architectures of educational governance. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.2.231
  • Williamson, B., & Komljenovic, J. (2022). Investing in imagined digital futures: The techno-financial ‘futuring’ of edtech investors in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 64(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2022.2081587
  • World Bank. (2020). Reimagining human connections: Technology and innovation in education at the World Bank.
  • Yu, J., & Couldry, N. (2022). Education as a domain of natural data extraction: Analysing corporate discourse about educational tracking. Information, Communication & Society, 25(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1764604
  • Zakharova, I., & Jarke, J. (2022). Educational technologies as matters of care. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.2018605