Complicated shadows: a discussion of positionality within educational research

References

• Arthur, N., Lund, D. E., Russell-Mayhew, S., Nutter, S., Williams, E., Sesma Vazquez, M., & Kassan, A. (2017). Employing polyethnography to navigate researcher positionality on weight bias. The Qualitative Report, 22(5), 1395–1416. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2558
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. (1997). Narrative turn or Blind Alley? Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239700700302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustine. (2010). Revisions (Retractationes) (Roland S. J. Teske & Boniface Ramsey, Eds.). New City Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgmann, A. (1992). Crossing the postmodern divide. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2007). Sketch for a self-analysis. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, F. (2021). Scientific research activity and its self-reflexive consideration. Historical Social Research, 46(2), 80–105. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.46.2021.2.80-105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. (2015). Still learning after three studies: From epistemology to ontology. International Review of Qualitative Research, 8(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2015.8.1.127
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W. (2006). Education without theory. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(2), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. P., & Walsh, J. (2020). The politics of positionality: The difference between post-, anti-, and de-colonial methods. Culture, Theory & Critique, 61(4), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2020.1808801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed). (2017). Handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference (A. Bass, Trans.). Routledge & Keegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, M. (2015). Ideology, sociology of. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioural sciences (2nd ed., pp. 573–587). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 733–766). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (1994). Dis-stance and other stances: Negotiations of power inside feminist research. In A. Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research (pp. 13–35). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fryer, T. C. (2020). Reflecting on positionality: Archaeological heritage Praxis in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 31(1), 26–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/apaa.12126
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gallop, J. (2002). Anecdotal theory. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grix, J. (2019). The foundations of research. Macmillan International.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, N., & Standish, P. (2006). Induction into educational research networks: The striated and the smooth. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(4), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00533.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P. (2004). Research as a form of work: Expertise, community and methodological objectivity. British Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920310001629947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, A. G. D. (2020). Researcher positionality – A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research – A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Text, processes and practices (pp. 99–121). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, C. H. (1996). Plato and the Socratic dialogue: The philosophical use of a literary form. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). Social and scientific method or what do we make of the distinction between the natural and the social sciences? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(3), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318101100304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1994). Fertile obsession. In A. Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research (pp. 36–60). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D. (2001). On “reflexivity” in qualitative research: Two readings and a third. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700103
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. (1998). What comes (just) after “post”? The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 338–406). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Marguin, S., Haus, J., Heinrich, A. J., Kahl, A., Schendzielorz, C., & Singh, A. (2021). Positionality reloaded: Debating the dimensions of reflexivity in the relationship between science and society: An editorial. Historical Social Research, 46(2), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.46.2021.2.7-34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., Ercan, S. A., & Furlong, P. (2017). A skin not a sweater: Ontology and epistemology in political science. In V. Lowndes, D. Marsh, & G. Stroker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (4th ed., pp. 177–198). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, T. (1994). On the idea of a critical theory and its relation to philosophy. In D. C. Hoy & T. McCarthy (Eds.), Critical theory (pp. 7–30). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1942/1973). The normative structure of science. In N. W. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267–278). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minh-Ha, T. T. (1991). When the moon waxes red: Representation, gender and cultural politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), 415–442. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.60.4.n4405243p6635752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momigliano, A. (1971). The development of Greek biography; four lectures. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S. (2008). Personality: A new positionality? Area, 40(3), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00815.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. S., Megill, A., & McCloskey, D. N. (1987). The rhetoric of the human sciences language and argument in scholarship and public affairs. University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J., & Sawyer, R. D. (2012). Toward a dialogic methodology. In J. Norris, R. D. Sawyer, & D. E. Lund (Eds.), Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (pp. 9–39). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ormston, R., Spencer, L., Barnard, M., & Snape, D. (2014). The foundations of qualitative research. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 1–23). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patai, D. (1994). Response) when method becomes power. In A. Gitlen (Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research (pp. 61–76). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. S. (2003). Confession, catharis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635
   Google Scholar
• Plato. (1957). The last days of Socrates (H. Tredennick, Trans.). Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Plochman, G. K. (1973). Plato. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (1992). Postmodern epistemology of practice. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 146–165). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., & Howell Major, C. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simandan, D. (2019). Revisiting positionality and the thesis of situated knowledge. Dialogues in Human Geography, 9(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619850013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. (2002). Vision of politics volume one: Regarding method. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, L. (2006). Kuhnian science and educational research: Analytics of practice and training. In P. Meyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: Why what works does n’t work (pp. 127–142). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1919). Platon. Berlin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, N. (1990). Postmodernism—The twilight of the real. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar