Mapping for depth and variety: using a “Six W’s” scaffold to facilitate concept mapping for different history concepts with different degrees of freedom

References

• Aristotle. 2002. The Categories on Interpretation. Translated and edited by H. P. Cooke. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. 1994. “The Significance of Disciplinary Differences.” Studies in Higher Education 19 (2): 151–161.10.1080/03075079412331382007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. 1973. “Relationships between Subject Matter Characteristics and the Structure and Output of University Departments.” Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (3): 204–213.10.1037/h0034699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing, S. B. 1982. “Role of Adjunct Questions and Reading Ability Levels on Rote and Conceptual Learning from Prose.” Instructional Science 11: 129–138.10.1007/BF00154883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callender, A. A., and M. A. McDaniel. 2007. “The Benefits of Embedded Question Adjuncts for Low and High Structure Builders.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99: 339–348.10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. 1966. “The Scree Test for the Number of Factors.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 1: 245–276.10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K. E., Y. T. Sung, and S. F. Chen. 2001. “Learning through Computer-based Concept Mapping with Scaffolding Aid.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17: 21–33.10.1046/j.1365-2729.2001.00156.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, L. S. 2006. “A Constructivist Approach to Designing Computer Supported Concept-mapping Environment.” International Journal of Instructional Media 33 (2): 153–164.
   Google Scholar
• Denner, P. R. 1992. “Comparison of the Effects of Episodic Mapping and Traditional Notetaking on the Recall of Historical Text.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northern Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association, Rapid City, SD.
   Google Scholar
• Dowaliby, F. J. 1990. “Adjunct Questions in Prose: A Question Position-by-reading Ability Interaction.” American Annals of the Deaf 135: 50–53.10.1353/aad.2012.0430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis, J. A., P. J. Konoske, W. H. Wulfeck, II, and W. E. Montague. 1982. “Comparative Effects of Adjunct Postquestions and Instructions on Learning from Text.” Journal of Educational Psychology 74 (6): 860–867.10.1037/0022-0663.74.6.860
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., W. Baggett, and K. Williams. 1996. “Question-driven Explanatory Reasoning.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 10: 17–31.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenen, J., and H. Schrijnemakers. 2000. “Suffrage, Feudal, Democracy, Treaty … History’s Building Blocks: Learning to Teach Historical Concepts.” Teaching History 98: 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, R. J. 1985. “A Framework for the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Adjunct Questions and Objectives.” Review of Educational Research 55: 47–85.10.3102/00346543055001047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harniss, M. K., K. L. Hollenbeck, D. B. Crawford, and D. Carnine. 1994. “Content Organization and Instructional Design Issues in the Development of History Texts.” Learning Disability Quarterly 17 (3): 235–248.10.2307/1511076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, D. B., and I. M. Kinchin. 2006. “Using Concept Maps to Reveal Conceptual Typologies.” Education & Training 48: 127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Herl, H. E., Eva L. Baker, and David Niemi. 1996. “Construct Validation of an Approach to Modeling Cognitive Structure of U.S. History Knowledge.” The Journal of Educational Research 89 (4): 206–218.10.1080/00220671.1996.9941206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, C. W. 2002. “Formative Use of Select-and-fill-in Concept Maps in Online Instruction: Implications for Students of Different Learning Styles.” Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Lambiotte, J. G., D. F. Dansereau, D. R. Cross, and S. B. Reynolds. 1989. “Multirelational Semantic Maps.” Educational Psychology Review 1: 331–367.10.1007/BF01320098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S. E., P. W. C. Cheng, M. S. Lam, and S. F. Ngan. 2003. “Developing Reflective and Thinking Skills by Means of Semantic Mapping Strategies in Kindergarten Teacher Education.” Early Child Development and Care 173: 55–72.10.1080/0300443022000022422
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. P. 1995. Schemas in Problem Solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527890
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. 2001. “Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching.” Studies in Higher Education 26 (2): 135–146.10.1080/03075070120052071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, R., S. Parry, and T. Becher. 2002. “Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A Conceptual Analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (4): 405–417.10.1080/0307507022000011525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. 1990. “Concept Maps and Vee Diagrams: Two Metacognitive Tools to Facilitate Meaningful Learning.” Instructional Science 19: 29–52.10.1007/BF00377984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., and A. J. Cañas. 2008. The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., and D. B. Gowin. 1984. Learning How to Learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173469
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, A. M., D. F. Dansereau, and R. H. Hall. 2002. “Knowledge Maps as Scaffolds for Cognitive Processing.” Educational Psychology Review 14: 71–86.10.1023/A:1013132527007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oughton, J. M., and W. M. Reed. 2000. “The Effect of Hypermedia Knowledge and Learning Style on Student-centered Concept Maps about Hypermedia.” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 32: 366–384.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. D. 1993. “Practices of Distributed Intelligence and Designs for Education.” In Distributed Cognitions, edited by G. Salomon, 47–87. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., and C. McCormick. 1995. Cognition, Teaching, and Assessment. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, C., N. Mattern, M. Zeilik, and K. W. Teague. 1999. “Select-and-fill-in Concept Map Scores as a Measure of Undergraduate Students’ Connected Understanding of Introductory Astronomy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert, T. L. 1993. “Effects of Elaborative Interrogation with Prose Passages.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (4): 642–651.10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., and M. A. Ruiz-Primo. 2000. “On the Psychometrics of Assessing Science Understanding.” In Assessing Science Understanding, edited by J. Mintzes, J. Wandersee, and J. Novak, 304–341. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. L., W. G. Holliday, and H. W. Austin. 2010. “Students’ Comprehension of Science Textbooks Using a Question-based Reading Strategy.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (4): 363–379.10.1002/tea.v47:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J., R. J. Coulson, P. J. Feltovich, and D. K. Anderson. 1994. “Cognitive Flexibility Theory: Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-structured Domains.” In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, edited by R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, and H. Singer, 602–615. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J., and J. C. Jehng. 1990. “Cognitive Flexibility and Hypertext: Theory and Technology for the Nonlinear and Multidimensional Traversal of Complex Subject Matter.” In Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Explorations in High Technology, edited by D. Nix and R. J. Spiro, 163–205. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meij, H. 1994. “Student Questioning: A Componential Analysis.” Learning and Individual Differences 6: 137–161.10.1016/1041-6080(94)90007-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L., and D. L. Medin. 1985. “The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence.” Psychological Review 92: 289–316.10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Drie, J., and C. van Boxtel. 2003. “Developing Conceptual Understanding through Talk and Mapping.” Teaching History 110: 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, T. G., and W. J. McKeachie. 2005. “The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.” Educational Psychologist 40 (2): 117–128.10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, D., J. R. Pomeroy, J. Park, E. Gerstenberger, and J. Sandoval. 2000. “Critical Thinking in Graduate Medical Education.” JAMA 284 (9): 1105–1110.10.1001/jama.284.9.1105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzstein, A., and W. Hacker. 2004. “Reflective Verbalization Improves Solutions – The Effects of Question-based Reflection in Design Problem Solving.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 18: 145–156.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woloshyn, V., M. Pressley, and W. Schneider. 1992. “Elaborative-Interrogation and Prior-knowledge Effects on Learning of Facts.” Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 115–124.10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar