US principals’ attitudes about and experiences with single-sex schooling

References

• Bandura, A., C. Barbaranelli, G. Vittorio Caprara, and C. Pastorelli. 2001. “Self-efficacy Beliefs as Shapers of Children’s Aspirations and Career Trajectories.” Child Development 72: 187–206. doi:10.111/1467-8624.00273.
   Google Scholar
• Bigler, R. S., and L. S. Liben. 2006. “A Developmental Intergroup Theory of Social Stereotypes and Prejudice.” In Advances in Child Development and Behavior. Vol. 34, edited by R. V. Kail, 38–89. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bigler, R. S., and M. Signorella. 2011. “Single-sex Education: New Perspectives and Evidence on a Continuing Controversy.” Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 65: 659–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0046-x.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., and S. K. Biklen. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. S. 2013. “Legal Issues Surrounding Single-sex Schools in the U.S.: Trends, Court Cases, and Conflicting Laws.” Sex Roles 69: 356–362. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0001-x.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwell, D. W. 2010. A Gendered Choice: Designing and Implementing SS Programs and Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eckes, S. E., and S. D. McCall. 2014. “The Potential Impact of Social Science Research on Legal Issues Surrounding Single-sex Classrooms and Schools.” Educational Administration Quarterly 50: 195–232. doi:10.1177/0013161X13492794.
   Google Scholar
• Eliot, L. 2009. Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow into Troublesome Gaps- and What We Can Do about It. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Fabes, R. A., E. Pahlke, C. L. Martin, and L. D. Hanish. 2013. “Gender-segregated Schooling and Gender Stereotyping.” Educational Studies 39: 315–319. doi:10.1080/03055698.2012.760442.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., and M. G. Taylor. 2000. “Gender Essentialism in Cognitive Development.” In Toward a Feminist Developmental Psychology, edited by P. H. Miller and E. Kofsky Scholnick, 169–190. Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Good, T. L. 2008. “In the Midst of Comprehensive School Reform: Principals’ Perspectives.” Teachers College Record 110: 2341–2360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, T. L., and M. McCaslin. 2008. “What We Learned about Research on School Reform: Considerations for Practice and Policy.” Teachers College Record 110: 2475–2495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurian, M., P. Henley, and T. Trueman. 2001. Boys and Girls Learn Differently! A Guide for Teachers and Parents. New York: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gurian, M., K. Stevens, and P. Daniels. 2009. Successful SS Classrooms: A Practical Guide to Teaching Boys and Girls Separately. New York: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., J. Murphy, and C Hausman. 1991. “Restructuring Schools: Principals’ Perceptions of Fundamental Educational Reform (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 334 681).” Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., L. Eliot, R. S. Bigler, R. A. Fabes, L. D. Hanish, J. Hyde, L. S. Liben, and C. L. Martin. 2011. “The Pseudoscience of SS Schooling.” Science 333: 1706–1707. doi:10.1126%2Fscience.1205031.
   Google Scholar
• Hilliard, L. J., and L. S. Liben. 2010. “Differing Levels of Gender Salience in Preschool Classrooms: Effects on Children’s Gender Attitudes and Intergroup Bias.” Child Development 81: 1787–1798. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01510.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S. 2005. “The Gender Similarities Hypothesis.” American Psychologist 60: 581–592. doi:10.1037%2F0003-066X.60.6.581.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C., and I. D. Smith. 2000. “Poles Apart? An Exploration of Single-sex and Mixed-sex Educational Environments in Australia and England.” Educational Studies 26: 409–422. doi:10.1080%2F03055690020003610.
   Google Scholar
• James, A. N. 2007. Teaching the Male Brain: How Boys Think, Feel, and Learn in School. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, A. N. 2009. Teaching the Female Brain: How Girls Learn Math and Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, S. 2012. “State of Public School Sex Segregation in the United States 2007–2010.” http://feminist.org/education/pdfs/sex_segregation_study_part1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leaper, C., and C. S. Brown. 2008. “Experiences with Sexism and Feminist Awareness among Adolescent Girls.” Child Development 79: 685–704. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01151.x.
   Google Scholar
• Legewie, J., and T. DiPrete. 2012. “School Context and the Gender Gap in Educational Achievement.” American Sociological Review 77: 463–485. doi:10.1177/0003122412440802.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, S. 2010. Americans’ Views of Public Schools Still Far Worse than Parents’. http://www.gallup.com/poll/142658/americans-views-public-schools-far-worse-parents.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Meehan, D. M. 2007. Learning like a Girl: Educating Our Daughters in Schools of Their Own. New York: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• National Association for SS Public Education. 2011. “SS Schools/Schools with SS Classrooms: What’s the Difference?” http://www.singlesexschools.org/schools.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., F. L. Smyth, N. Sriram, N. M. Linder, T. Devos, A. Ayala, and A. G. Greenwald. 2009. “National Differences in Gender: Science Stereotypes Predict National Sex Differences in Science and Math Achievement.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106.
   Google Scholar
• Pahlke, E., J. S. Hyde, and C. M. Allison. 2014. “The Effects of Single-sex Compared with Coeducational Schooling on Students’ Performance and Attitudes: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 140: 1042–1072. doi:10.1037/a0035740.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P., and A. Smithers. 1999. “Should the Sexes Be Separated for Secondary Education? Comparisons of Single-sex and Co-educational Schools.” Research Papers in Education 14: 23–50.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, R. 1988. “The Limits of Access: The History of Coeducation in America.” In Women and Higher Education in American History, edited by J. M. Faragher and F. Howe, 107–129. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., and P. Glick. 2008. The Social Psychology of Gender: How Power and Intimacy Shape Gender Relations. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rustad, N., and J. Woods. 2004. Statement on the Legality of Single-sex Education. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women. http://www.aauw.org/advocacy/issue_advocacy/actionpages/upload/singlesex_comments.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sadker, M., and D. Sadker. 1994. Failing at Fairness: How Our Schools Cheat Girls. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. 2005. Why Gender Matters. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. 2009. Boys Adrift: The Five Factors Driving the Growing Epidemic of Unmotivated Boys and Underachieving Young Men. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shapka, J. D., and D. P. Keating. 2003. “Effects of a Girls-only Curriculum during Adolescence: Performance, Persistence, and Engagement in Mathematics and Science.” American Educational Research Journal 40: 929–960. doi:10.3102%2F00028312040004929.
   Google Scholar
• Signorella, M. L., A. R. Hayes, and Y. Li. 2013. “A Meta-analytic Critique of Mael et al.’s (2005) Review of Single-sex Schooling.” Sex Roles 69: 423–441. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0288-x.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, B. M. 1985. In the Company of Educated Women: A History of Women and Higher Education in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and J. Creswell. 2008. “Mixed Methodology across Disciplines.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2: 3–6. doi:10.1177/15586807309913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavris, C. 1992. The Mismeasure of Woman. New York: Simon and Schuster/Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 1996. “The Development of Children’s Beliefs about Social and Biological Aspects of Gender Differences.” Child Development 67: 1555–1571. doi:10.2307%2F1131718.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., and A. Tashakkori. 2006. “A General Typology of Research Designs Featuring Mixed Methods.” Research in the Schools 13: 12–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tiedemann, J. 2002. “Teachers’ Gender Stereotypes as Determinants of Teacher Perceptions in Elementary School Mathematics.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 50: 49–62. doi:10.1023/A:1020518104346.
   Google Scholar
• Upadyaya, K., and J. S. Eccles. 2014. “Gender Differences in Teachers’ Perceptions and Children’s Ability Concepts.” In Gender Differences in Aspirations and Attainment, edited by I. Schoon and J. S. Eccles, 79–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, C., and D. H. Zimmerman. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender and Society 1: 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White-Smith, K. A., and M. A. White. 2009. “High School Reform Implementation: Principals’ Perceptions on Their Leadership Role.” Urban Education 44: 259–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. A. 2010. “Learning Differences: Sex-role Stereotyping in Single-sex Public Education.” Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 33: 555–580.
   Google Scholar