Improving kindergarten teachers’ differentiation practices to better anticipate student differences

References

• Al Otaiba, S., C. M. Connor, J. S. Folsom, L. Greulich, J. Meadows, and Z. Li. 2011. “Assessment Data-Informed Guidance to Individualize Kindergarten Reading Instruction: Findings from a Cluster-randomized Control Field Trial.” The Elementary School Journal 111: 535–560.10.1086/659031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., and J. Shattuck. 2012. “Design-based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research?” Educational Researcher 41 (1): 16–25. 10.3102/0013189X11428813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S., and K. Squire. 2004. “Design-based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 (1): 1–14. 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, T., and K. Van Veen. 2004. “Het leren van leraren in de context van onderwijsvernieuwing: waarom is het zo moeilijk? [Teacher Learning During Educational Innovation: Why is it so Hard?]” Tijdschrift Voor Lerarenopleiders, 25 (4): 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Brighton, C. M., H. L. Hertberg, T. R. Moon, C. A. Tomlinson, and C. M. Callahan. 2005. The Feasibility of High-end Learning in a Diverse Middle School. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., and S. J. Ceci. 1994. “Nature-nurture Reconceptualized in Developmental Perspective: A Bioecological Model.” Psychological Review 101: 568–586. 10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., and P. A. Morris. 2006. “The Bioecological Model of Human Development.” In Handbook of Child Psychology (6th Ed.): Vol 1, Theoretical Models of Human Development, edited by R. M. Lerner and W. Damon, 793–828. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cabell, S. Q., J. DeCoster, J. LoCasale-Crouch, B. K. Hamre, and R. C. Pianta. 2013. “Variation in the Effectiveness of Instructional Interactions across Preschool Classroom Settings and Learning Activities.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 28: 820–830. 10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens, A., M. Engel, and F. C. Curran. 2013. “Academic Content, Student Learning, and the Persistence of Preschool Effects.” American Educational Research Journal, Accessed February 13, 2014. http://aer.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/2011/2025/0002831213513634. 10.3102/0002831213513634
   Google Scholar
• Colangelo, N., S. G. Assouline, and M. U. M. Gross. 2004. A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest Students. the Templeton National Report on Acceleration. Vol. 1. Iowa City, IA: Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., F. J. Morrison, B. Fishman, S. Giuliani, M. Luck, P. S. Underwood, A. Bayraktar, E. C. Crowe, and C. Schatschneider. 2011. “Testing the Impact of Child Characteristics X Instruction Interactions on Third Graders’ Reading Comprehension by Differentiating Literacy Instruction.” Reading Research Quarterly 46: 189–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., F. J. Morrison, C. Schatschneider, J. R. Toste, E. Lundblom, E. C. Crowe, and B. Fishman. 2011. “Effective Classroom Instruction: Implications of Child Characteristics by Reading Instruction Interactions on First Graders’ Word Reading Achievement.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 4 (3): 173–207.10.1080/19345747.2010.510179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., and R. E. Snow. 1977. Aptitudes and Instructional Methods. New York: Irvington Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., K. R. Rathunde, S. Whalen, and M. Wong. 1993. Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer, G. C., A. E. M. G. Minnaert, and G. Kamphof. 2013. “Gifted Education in the Netherlands.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 36: 133–150.10.1177/0162353212471622
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., T. M. Smith, and D. E. Frisvold. 2010. “Survey Measures of Classroom Instruction: Comparing Student and Teacher Reports.” Educational Policy 24: 267–329.10.1177/0895904808330173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, E. M., A. Walraven, T. Mooij, and P. A. Kirschner. Forthcoming. “Factors Affecting Intervention Fidelity of Differentiated Instruction in Kindergarten.” Research Papers in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Doolaard, S., and G. J. Harms. 2013. Omgaan met excellente leerlingen in de dagelijkse onderwijspraktijk [Handling Excellent Pupils in Every Day Classroom]. Groningen: GION, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, F. M., C. M. Reigeluth, M. Solomon, G. Caine, A. A. Carr-Chellman, L. Almeida, T. Frick, K. Thompson, J. Koh, C.D. Ryan, and S. DeMars. 2006. “The Process of Systemic Change.” TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning 50 (2): 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, M., A. Claessens, and M. A. Finch. 2013. “Teaching Students What They Already Know? The (Mis)Alignment between Mathematics Instructional Content and Student Knowledge in Kindergarten.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 35: 157–178.10.3102/0162373712461850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firmender, J. M., S. M. Reis, and S. M. Sweeny. 2013. “Reading Comprehension and Fluency Levels Ranges across Diverse Classrooms: The Need for Differentiated Reading Instruction and Content.” Gifted Child Quarterly 57: 3–14.10.1177/0016986212460084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. 2011. “Academic Talent Development and the Equity Issue in Gifted Education.” Talent Development & Excellence 3 (1): 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gayfer, M. 1991. The Multi-Grade Classroom: Myth and Reality. A Canadian Study. Toronto: Canadian Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A. 1999. “Individual (Learning and Motivational) Needs versus Instructional Conditions of Gifted Education[1].” High Ability Studies 10 (1): 9–21.10.1080/1359813990100102
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A., F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, and R. F. Subotnik. 2000. International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent. 2nd ed. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Hertberg-Davis, H. 2009. “Myth 7: Differentiation in the Regular Classroom is Equivalent to Gifted Programs and is Sufficient: Classroom Teachers Have the Time, the Skill, and the Will to Differentiate Adequately.” Gifted Child Quarterly 53: 251–253. 10.1177/0016986209346927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 1997. Allemaal Andersdenkenden. Omgaan Met Cultuurverschillen [All Dissenters. Dealing with Cultural Differences]. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Contact.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., P. Ayres, P. Chandler, and J. Sweller. 2003. “The Expertise Reversal Effect.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 23–31. 10.1207/s15326985ep3801_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, D., and V. L. Allen. 1983. Human Development. An Interactional Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, M. F., D. B. Greenfield, and R. J. Bulotsky-Shearer. 2013. “Development and Validation of a Preschool Teachers’ Attitudes and Beliefs toward Science Teaching Questionnaire.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 28: 366–378. 10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., and T. Reeves. 2012. Conducting Educational Design Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mooij, T. 2000. “Screening Children’s Entry Characteristics in Kindergarten.” Early Child Development and Care 165: 23–40. 10.1080/0300443001650103.
   Google Scholar
• Mooij, T. 2007. “Design of Educational and ICT Conditions to Integrate Differences in Learning: Contextual Learning Theory and a First Transformation Step in Early Education.” Computers in Human Behavior 23: 1499–1530. 10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooij, T. 2008. “Education and Self‐regulation of Learning for Gifted Pupils: Systemic Design and Development.” Research Papers in Education 23: 1–19. 10.1080/02671520701692551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooij, T. 2013a. “Designing Instruction and Learning for Cognitively Gifted Pupils in Preschool and Primary School.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 17: 597–613. 10.1080/13603116.2012.696727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooij, T. 2013b. “Onderwijs en cognitief hoogbegaafde leerlingen: Tussenbalans van interventie in Leonardoscholen [Education and cognitively gifted pupils: Mid-term evaluation of an intervention in Leonardo schools].” Tijdschrift Voor Orthopedagogiek [Journal for Orthopedagogiek] 52 (9): 427–442.
   Google Scholar
• Mooij, T., E. M. Dijkstra, A. Walraven, and P. A. Kirschner. 2014. “Towards Optimal Education including Self-regulated Learning in Technology-Enhanced Preschools and Primary Schools.” European Educational Research Journal 13: 529–552.10.2304/eerj
   Google Scholar
• Mooij, T., and D. Fettelaar. 2010. Naar Excellente scholen, leraren, leerlingen en studenten [Towards Excellent Schools, Teachers, Pupils, and Students]. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Mooij, T., T. Paas, and D. Fettelaar. 2012, June. “Onderwijs en cognitief hoogbegaafde leerlingen: Leonardoschool of -leerling? Tussenbalans van interventieonderzoek project Onderwijs Bewijs ODB08093 [Education and cognitively gifted pupils: Leonardo school or Leonardo pupil? Intermediate results of intervention research project Evidence-based Education ODB08093].” In Effecten van afstemming en maatwerk in het onderwijs [Effects of Adaptation and Fine-tuning in Education], M. van der Steeg (Chair), Wageningen: Symposium conducted at the Onderwijs Research Dagen [Educational Research Days].
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, L., J. Roeleveld, and H. Vierke. 2007. Onderbenutting van capaciteiten in basis- en voortgezet onderwijs [Underutilization of Abilities in Elementary and Secondary Education]. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.
   Google Scholar
• National Association for the Education of Young Children 2009. Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8. Position Statement. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., and W. Kuiper. 2012. “Balancing Curriculum Freedom and Regulation in the Netherlands.” European Educational Research Journal 11 (3): 357–368.10.2304/eerj
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C. L. 2008. “Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Fidelity of Implementation and Its Relationship to Outcomes in K-12 Curriculum Intervention Research.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 33–84. 10.3102/0034654307313793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberon 2013. Opbrengstgericht werken bij kleuters [Achievement oriented education for young pupils]. Utrecht: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 2006. Starting Strong II: Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, J. H., D. E. Burns, C. A. Tomlinson, M. B. Imbeau, and J. L. Martin. 2002. “Bridging the Gap: A Tool and Technique to Analyze and Evaluate Gifted Education Curricular Units.” Gifted Child Quarterly 46: 306–321.10.1177/001698620204600407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razali, N., and Y. B. Wah. 2011. “Power Comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling Tests.” Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics 2 (1): 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., and D. B. McCoach. 2000. “The Underachievement of Gifted Students: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?” Gifted Child Quarterly 44 (3): 152–170. 10.1177/001698620004400302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., D. B. McCoach, C. A. Little, L. M. Muller, and R. B. Kaniskan. 2011. “The Effects of Differentiated Instruction and Enrichment Pedagogy on Reading Achievement in Five Elementary Schools.” American Educational Research Journal 48: 462–501.10.3102/0002831210382891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., and K. L. Westberg. 1994. “The Impact of Staff Development on Teachers’ Ability to Modify Curriculum for Gifted and Talented Students.” Gifted Child Quarterly 38: 127–135.10.1177/001698629403800306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A., F. Guay, and P. Valois. 2013. “Teaching to Address Diverse Learning Needs: Development and Validation of a Differentiated Instruction Scale.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 17: 1186–1204. 10.1080/13603116.2012.743604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangelo, T., and C. A. Tomlinson. 2012. “Teacher Educators’ Perceptions and Use of Differentiated Instruction Practices: An Exploratory Investigation.” Action in Teacher Education 34: 309–327.10.1080/01626620.2012.717032
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, M. J., and H. Winskel. 2008. “Towards Effective Partnerships in a Collaborative Problem-Solving Task.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 581–596. 10.1348/000709908x281619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., T. D. Cook, and D. T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S. M., C. P. Edwards, C. A. Marvin, and L. L. Knoche. 2009. “Professional Development in Early Childhood Programs: Process Issues and Research Needs.” Early Education and Development 20: 377–401.10.1080/10409280802582795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14.10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Simpkins, P. M., M. A. Mastropieri, and T. E. Scruggs. 2009. “Differentiated Curriculum Enhancements in Inclusive Fifth-grade Science Classes.” Remedial and Special Education 30: 300–308.10.1177/0741932508321011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, R., and W. Humpert. 2012. “Differentiated Instruction in Small Schools.” Teaching & Teacher Education 28: 1152–1162. 10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stichting Leerplan Ontwikkeling 2010a. Rekenontwikkeling van het jonge kind: de doelen [Development in Arithmetics for Young Pupils: The Goals]. Enschede: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Stichting Leerplan Ontwikkeling 2010b. Taalontwikkeling van het jonge kind: de doelen [Language Development of Young Pupils: The Goals]. Enschede: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, E., J. Wanzek, C. Haring, S. Ciullo, and L. McCulley. 2013. “Intervention Fidelity in Special and General Education Research Journals.” The Journal of Special Education 47 (1): 3–13. 10.1177/0022466911419516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tazouti, Y., C. Viriot-Goeldel, C. Matter, A. Geiger-Jaillet, R. Carol, and D. Deviterne. 2011. “French Nursery Schools and German Kindergartens: Effects of Individual and Contextual Variables on Early Learning.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 26: 199–213.10.1007/s10212-010-0043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. 2005. How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., C. Brighton, H. Hertberg, C. M. Callahan, T. R. Moon, K. Brimijoin, L. A. Conover, and T. Reynolds. 2003. “Differentiating Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse Classrooms: A Review of Literature.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 27: 119–145.10.1177/016235320302700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., and M. B. Imbeau. 2012. “Common Sticking Points about Differentiation.” School Administrator 69 (5): 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Grift, W. J. C. M. 2010. Ontwikkeling in de beroepsvaardigheden van leraren [Development of Vocational Skills of Teachers]. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. “Interaction between Learning and Development.” In Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman, 79–91. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, X., J. Elicker, and M. McMullen. 2011. “Early Childhood Teachers’ Curriculum Beliefs: Are They Consistent with Observed Classroom Practices?” Early Education and Development 22: 945–969.10.1080/10409289.2010.507495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ysseldyke, J., and D. M. Bolt. 2007. “Effect of Technology-Enhanced Continuous Progress Monitoring on Math Achievement.” School Psychology Review 36 (3): 453–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar