The relationship between psychological factors and inquiry-based working by primary school teachers

References

• Ajzen, I. 2002. “Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32: 665–683.10.1111/jasp.2002.32.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Sabbagh, S. 2009. Instruments and Implements of Enquiry Based Learning. Online Submission. Accessed November 12, 2013. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED507027
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., F. Dochy, and K. Struyven. 2012. “Using Students’ Motivational and Learning Profiles in Investigating Their Perceptions and Achievement in Case-based and Lecture-based Learning Environments.” Educational Studies 38 (5): 491–506.10.1080/03055698.2011.643113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. 2002. “Student-generated Questions: Encouraging Inquisitive Minds in Learning Science.” Teaching and Learning 23 (1): 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., and E. O. Turner. 2011. “Research on Data Use: A Framework and Analysis.” Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective 9 (4): 173–206.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. 2009. “‘Re-culturing’ Teacher Education: Inquiry, Evidence, and Action.” Journal of Teacher Education 60 (5): 458–468.10.1177/0022487109347206
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., V. Park, and B. Kennedy-Lewis. 2013. “Affordances and Constraints in the Context of Teacher Collaboration for the Purpose of Data Use.” Journal of Educational Administration 51 (3): 341–362.10.1108/09578231311311500
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., F. J. Janssen, and J. H. Van Driel. 2016. “Teachers and Science Curriculum Materials: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go.” Studies in Science Education 52 (2): 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L., and M. Fullan. 2003. “Using Data in Leadership for Learning.” Cambridge Journal of Education 33 (3): 383–394.10.1080/0305764032000122023
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L., and S. Katz. 2006. Leading Schools in a Data-rich World. Harnassing Data for School Improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., and K. Castle. 2010. “Teacher Research as Continuous Process Improvement.” Quality Assurance in Education 18 (4): 271–285.10.1108/09684881011079134
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. 2004. “The Hollow Core of Leadership Practice in Education.” Paper presented at the 2nd Annual International Summit on Leadership in Education, Boston, MA, November 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 2010. Predicting and Changing Behavior. the Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geijsel, F. P., J. C. Sleegers, R. D. Stoel, and M. L. Krüger. 2009. “The Effect of Teacher Psychological and School Organizational and Leadership Factors on Teachers’ Professional Learning in Dutch Schools.” The Elementary School Journal 109 (4): 406–427.10.1086/593940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, R., W. Hoy, and A. Woolfolk Hoy. 2004. “Collective Efficacy Beliefs: Theoretical Developments, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions.” Educational Researcher 33 (3): 3–13.10.3102/0013189X033003003
   Google Scholar
• Ikemoto, G. S., and J. A. Marsh. 2007. “Cutting through the ‘Data-driven’ Mantra: Different Conceptions of Data-driven Decision Making.” In Evidence and Decision Making, edited by P. A. Moss, 105–131. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. T., and C. J. Eick. 2007. “Implementing Inquiry Kit Curriculum: Obstacles, Adaptations, and Practical Knowledge Development in Two Middle School Science Teachers.” Science Education 91 (3): 492–513.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, S., and L. A. Dack. 2014. “Towards a Culture of Inquiry for Data Use in Schools: Breaking down Professional Learning Barriers through Intentional Interruption.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 42: 35–40.10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger, M. L. 2010a. “Leading Schools in the Knowledge Society: On the Way to Leaders of Learning in Inquiry-based Schools.” In Global Perspectives on Educational Leadership Reform, edited by A. H. Normore, 397–417. Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, M. 2010b. De invloed van schoolleiderschap op het onderzoeksmatig handelen van leraren in veranderingsprocessen [The Impact of School Leadership on the Research Attitude of Teachers in Innovation Processes]. Amsterdam: Hogeschool van Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, M. L., and F. P. Geijsel. 2011. “The Effect of School Leadership on Teachers’ Inquiry Habit of Mind.” Paper presented at AERA, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Lachat, M. A., and S. Smith. 2005. “Practices That Support Data Use in Urban High Schools.” Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 10 (3): 333–349.10.1207/s15327671espr1003_7
   Google Scholar
• Lam, Y. R., S. K. Tse, J. W. Lam, and E. K. Loh. 2010. “Does the Gender of the Teacher Matter in the Teaching of Reading Literacy? Teacher Gender and Pupil Attainment in Reading Literacy in Hong Kong.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (4): 754–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, B. L., E. E. Thomas, K. Drago, and L. A. Rex. 2013. “Examining Studies of Inquiry-based Learning in Three Fields of Education Sparking Generative Conversation.” Journal of Teacher Education 64 (5): 387–408.10.1177/0022487113496430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., and E. S. Gummer. 2013. “A Systemic View of Implementing Data Literacy in Educator Preparation.” Educational Researcher 42 (1): 30–37.10.3102/0013189X12459803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., and C. C. Farrell. 2014. “How Leaders Can Support Teachers with Data-driven Decision Making. A Framework for Understanding Capacity Building.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 43 (2): 269–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap. 2013. Kerncijfers 2008–2012. Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap [Key Figures 2008–2012. Education, Culture and Science]. Den Haag: Ministerie van OCW.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S. 2013. “Teacher Experience and the Class Size Effect – Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Public Economics 98: 44–52.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullola, S., M. Jokela, N. Ravaja, J. Lipsanen, M. Hintsanen, S. Alatupa, and L. Keltikangas-Järvinen. 2011. “Associations of Student Temperament and Educational Competence with Academic Achievement: The Role of Teacher Age and Teacher and Student Gender.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (5): 942–951.10.1016/j.tate.2011.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, S., and S. Loucks-Horsley, eds. 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubie-Davies, C. M., A. Flint, and L. G. McDonald. 2012. “Teacher Beliefs, Teacher Characteristics, and School Contextual Factors: What Are the Relationships?” British Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (2): 270–288.10.1111/bjep.2011.82.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, D. M., and R. H. Fazio. 1990. “The Role of Attitudes in Memory-based Decision Making.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (4): 614–622.10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenke, W., J. Van Driel, F. Geijsel, and M. Volman. 2016. “Characterizing Cross-professional Collaboration in Research and Development Projects in Secondary Education.” Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice 22 (5): 553–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., M. Ehren, and M. K. Lai. 2012. “Editorial Article for the Special Issue on Data-based Decision Making around the World: From Policy to Practice to Results.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23 (2): 123–131.10.1080/09243453.2011.652122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., and W. Kuiper. 2010. “Data-informed Curriculum Reform: Which Data, What Purposes, and Promoting and Hindering Factors.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (3): 482–496.10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., M. K. Lai, and L. Earl. 2013. Data-based Decision Making in Education. Challenges and Opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. 1999. “Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers.” American psychologist 54 (2): 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, E. M., and S. Skaalvik. 2007. “Dimensions of Teacher Self-efficacy and Relations with Strain Factors, Perceived Collective Teacher Efficacy, and Teacher Burnout.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (3): 611–625.10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uiterwijk-Luijk, L., M. Krüger, B. Zijlstra, and M. Volman. Forthcoming. “Inquiry-based Leadership: The Influence of Attitude, Experienced Social Pressure and Self-efficacy.” Journal of Educational Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, W., A. Bakx, A. Ros, D. Beijaard, and M. Vermeulen. 2012. “Student Teachers’ Development of a Positive Attitude towards Research and Research Knowledge and Skills.” European Journal of Teacher Education 35 (4): 401–419.10.1080/02619768.2011.643401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Rijst, R. M., J. W. Kijne, N. Verloop, and J. H. Van Driel. 2008. “Exploring Scientific Research Disposition from the Perspective of Academics.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ledden, W. H. 2011. Kennis Maken met Onderzoek [Introduction to Research]. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoof, J., K. Vanlommel, S. Thijs, and H. Vanderlocht. 2014. “Data Use by Flemish School Principals: Impact of Attitude, Self-efficacy and External Expectations.” Educational Studies 40 (1): 48–62.10.1080/03055698.2013.830245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., A. Stes, and P. Van Petegem. 2012. “Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Measuring Teachers’ Motivations for Teaching in Higher Education.” Higher Education 64 (3): 421–436.10.1007/s10734-011-9502-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., and S. Stringfield. 2003. “Teacher-friendly Options to Improve Teaching through Student Data Analysis.” Paper presented at the 10th annual meeting of the American Association for Teaching and Curriculum, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar