877
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Are psychology students getting worse at math?: Trends in the math skills of psychology statistics students across 21 years

&
Pages 282-295 | Received 17 Sep 2015, Accepted 26 Nov 2016, Published online: 05 Jan 2017

References

  • Abd-El-Fattah, Sabry M. 2005. “The Effect of Prior Experience with Computers, Statistical Self-efficacy, and Computer Anxiety on Students’ Achievement in an Introductory Statistics Course: A Partial Least Squares Path Analysis.” International Education Journal 5 (5): 71–79.
  • American Psychological Association. 2013. APA Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Baloğlu, Mustafa. 2003. “Individual Differences in Statistics Anxiety among College Students.” Personality and Individual Differences 34 (5): 855–865. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00076-4.
  • Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2014. “Fitting Linear Mixed-effects Models Using Lme4.” June. http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823.
  • Canty, Angelo, and Brian Ripley. 2015. “Boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions.” R Package Version 1.3-15.
  • Chiesi, Francesca, Caterina Primi, and Jose Carmona. 2011. “Measuring Statistics Anxiety: Cross-country Validity of the Statistical Anxiety Scale (SAS).” Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 29 (6): 559–569. doi:10.1177/0734282911404985.
  • The College Board. 2010. “SAT Trends.” The College Board. http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/2010-sat-trends.pdf.
  • The College Board. 2015a. “About the SAT.” College Board SAT and SAT Subject Tests FAQ. http://press.collegeboard.org/sat/faq#basics.
  • The College Board. 2015b. “Calculator Policy.” Calculator Policy. http://sat.collegeboard.org/register/calculator-policy.
  • Davison, A. C., and D. V. Hinkley. 1997. Bootstrap Methods and their Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802843
  • Dempster, Martin, and Noleen K. McCorry. 2009. “The Role of Previous Experience and Attitudes toward Statistics in Statistics Assessment Outcomes among Undergraduate Psychology Students.” Journal of Statistics Education 17. www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n2/dempster.html.
  • Fidler, Fiona. 2006. “Should Psychology Abandon P-Values and Teach CIs Instead? Evidence-based Reforms in Statistics Education.” International Conference on Teaching Statistics 7: 1–6.
  • Field, Andy. 2013. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Finney, Sara J., and Gregory Schraw. 2003. “Self-efficacy Beliefs in College Statistics Courses.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 28 (2): 161–186. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00015-2.
  • Garfield, Joan, Bob Hogg, Candace Schau, and Dex Whittinghill. 2002. “First Courses in Statistical Science: The Status of Educational Reform Efforts.” Journal of Statistics Education 10 (2): 456–467.
  • Gordon, Rachel A. 2012. Applied Statistics for the Social and Health Sciences. New York: Routledge.
  • Greer, Brian, and Gabriele Semrau. 1984. “Investigating Psychology Students’ Conceptual Problems in Mathematics in Relation to Learning Statistics.” Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 37: 123–125.
  • Howley, Peter P. 2008. “Keeping it Real, Keeping them Interested, and Keeping it in their Minds.” Journal of Statistics Education 16 (1). www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v16n1/howley.html.
  • Hox, Joop. 2010. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
  • Hubbard, Raymond, and Patricia A. Ryan. 2000. “The Historical Growth of Statistical Significance Testing in Psychology – And its Future Prospects.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 60 (5): 661–681. doi:10.1177/00131640021970808.
  • Jala, Liza Lorena, and Enriqueta Reston. 2010. “Assessment of Graduate Students’ Conception of Statistical Inference: Philippine Perspective.” International Conference on Teaching Statistics 8. http://icots.net/8/cd/pdfs/invited/ICOTS8_10C1_JALA.pdf.
  • Johnson, Marianne, and Eric Kuennen. 2006. “Basic Math Skills and Performance in an Introductory Statistics Course.” Journal of Statistics Education 14 (2). www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v14n2/johnson.html.
  • Keeley, Jared, Ryan Zayac, and Christopher Correia. 2008. “Curvilinear Relationships between Statistics Anxiety and Performance among Undergraduate Students: Evidence for Optimal Anxiety.” Statistics Education Research Journal 7 (1): 4–15.
  • Kirk, Roger E. 1978. Introductory Statistics. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Kirk, Roger E. 2008. Statistics: An Introduction. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  • Kuznetsova, A., P. B. Brockhoff, and R. H. B. Christensen. 2014. “LmerTest: Tests for Random and Fixed Effects for Linear Mixed Effect Models (Lmer Objects of Lme4 Package).” R Package Version 2.0-6.
  • Lech, James C. 2007. “The Math-verbal Achievement Gap: Are We Getting Better at Math, or are the SAT Questions Getting Easier?” Unpublished doctoral diss., Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
  • Mulhern, Gerry, and Judith Wylie. 2004. “Changing Levels of Numeracy and Other Core Mathematical Skills among Psychology Undergraduates between 1992 and 2002.” British Journal of Psychology 95 (3): 355–370. doi:10.1348/0007126041528176.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. 2016. “Trends in Student Performance: International Trends in Average Scores – Mathematics Literacy.” Program for International Student Assessment (PISA): 2012 Results. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pisa2012/pisa2012highlights_6a.asp.
  • Phoenix, Dave A. 1999. “Numeracy and the Life Scientist!” Journal of Biological Education 34 (1): 3–4. doi:10.1080/00219266.1999.9655675.
  • Pinheiro, José, and Douglas Bates. 2000. Mixed-effects Models in S and S-pLUS. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1
  • Provasnik, Stephen, D. Kastberg, D. Ferraro, N. Lemanski, S. Roey, and F. Jenkins. 2013. Highlights from TIMSS 2011: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourth- and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context. U. S. Department of Education.
  • Raftery, Adrian E. 1995. “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research.” Sociological Methodology 25: 111–163.10.2307/271063
  • Raudenbush, Stephen W., and Anthony S. Byrk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ruggeri, Kai. 2011. “The Impact of Misunderstanding the Nature of Statistics.” Psychology Teaching Review 17 (1): 35–40.
  • Snee, Ronald D. 1990. “Statistical Thinking and its Contribution to Total Quality.” The American Statistician 44 (2): 116–121.10.2307/2684144
  • Sotos, Castro, Ana Elisa, Stijn Vanhoof, Wim Van Den Noortgate, and Patrick Onghena. 2007. “Students’ Misconceptions of Statistical Inference: A Review of the Empirical Evidence from Research on Statistics Education.” Educational Research Review 2 (2): 98–113. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.04.001.
  • Sotos, Castro, Ana Elisa, Stijn Vanhoof, Wim Van Den Noortgate, and Patrick Onghena. 2009. “How Confident are Students in their Misconceptions about Hypothesis Tests?” Journal of Statistics Education 17 (2). www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n2/castrosotos.html.
  • Stoloff, Michael, Maureen McCarthy, Lizbeth Keller, Veronika Varfolomeeva, Joanna Lynch, Kara Makara, Samantha Simmons, and Whitney Smiley. 2009. “The Undergraduate Psychology Major: An Examination of Structure and Sequence.” Teaching of Psychology 37 (1): 4–15. doi:10.1080/00986280903426274.
  • Tariq, Vicki N. 2002. “A Decline in Numeracy Skills among Bioscienceunder Graduates.” Journal of Biological Education 36 (2): 76–83. doi:10.1080/00219266.2002.9655805.
  • Tariq, Vicki N. 2004. “Numeracy, Mathematical Skills, and the Life Scientist.” MSOR Connections 4 (2): 25–29.10.11120/msor.2004.04020025
  • Tariq, Vicki N. 2008. “Defining the Problem: Mathematical Errors and Misconceptions Exhibited by First-year Bioscience Undergraduates.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 39 (7): 889–904.10.1080/00207390802136511
  • Wild, Chris J., and Maxine Pfannkuch. 1999. “Statistical Thinking in Empirical Enquiry.” International Statistical Review 67 (3): 223–248. doi:10.2307/1403699.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.