554
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Intergenerational impact of a curriculum enigma: the scholarly legacy of Joseph J. Schwab

& ORCID Icon
Pages 421-448 | Received 26 Mar 2017, Accepted 19 Aug 2017, Published online: 27 Oct 2017

References

  • Ben-Peretz, M. 1990a. “Perspectives on Time in Education.” In The Nature of Time in Schools: Theoretical Concepts, Practitioner Perceptions, edited by M. Ben-Peretz and R. Bromme, 64–77. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Ben-Peretz, M. 1990b. The Teacher-Curriculum Encounter: Freeing Teachers from the Tyranny of Texts. New York: The Sate University of New York Press (Hebrew edition Published by MOFET in 1995).
  • Ben-Peretz, M. 2009. “The Voice of Teachers: A Critical Aspect of Schwab’s ‘Practical’.” ‘The Practical’: An East-West Dialogue. The First International Conference on ‘the Practical’ Curriculum, Beijing, PRC.
  • Caldeiro, C. P. 2002. Los principales enfoques curriculares durante el siglo XX. Enfoques teóricos del currículum [The Main Curricular Approaches during the 20th Century: Theoretical Approaches of the Curriculum]. Buenos Aires. https:educacion.idoneos.com/363702/
  • Chiappetta, E. 2008. “Historical Development of Teaching Science as Inquiry.” In Science as Inquiry for Secondary Settings, edited by J. Luft, R. Bell, and L. Gess-Newsome, 21–30. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
  • Chiappetta, E., and T. Koballa. 2010. Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools: Developing Fundamental Knowledge and Skills. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Clandinin, D. J. 1985. “Personal Practical Knowledge: A Study of Teachers' Classroom Images.” Curriculum Inquiry 15 (4): 361–385.
  • Clandinin, D. J., and F. M. Connelly. 1992. “Teacher as Curriculum Maker.” In Handbook of Research on Curriculum, edited by P. Jackson, 363–401. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
  • Clandinin, D. J. 2013. Engaging in Narrative Inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  • Clarke, A., and G. Erickson. 2004. “Self-Study: The Fifth Commonplace.” Australian Journal of Education 48 (2): 199–211.10.1177/000494410404800208
  • Cohen, B., P. Pereira, T. Roby, and A. Block. 2005. “A Curriculum for Character Education: Joseph Schwab and the Ramah Camps.” American Educational Research Journal 32 (2): 116–127.
  • Connelly, F. M. 2013. “Joseph Schwab, Curriculum, Curriculum Studies and Educational Reform.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 45 (5): 622–639.10.1080/00220272.2013.798838
  • Connelly, F. M., M. F. He, and J. Phillion, eds. 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Craig, C. 2009. “The Impracticality of Not Being ‘Practical’: Organized School Reform Through the Teacher-as-Curriculum-Maker Lens.” Keynote Address. ‘The Practical’: An East-West dialogue. The First International Conference on ‘the Practical’ Curriculum, Beijing, PRC.
  • Craig, C., and V. Ross. 2008. “Cultivating the Image of Teachers as Curriculum Makers.” In The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction, edited by F. M. Connelly, 282–305. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781412976572
  • Craven III, J., and J. Penick. 2001. “Preparing New Teachers to Teach Science: The Role of the Science Teacher Educator.” Electronic Journal of Science Education 6 (1). September. http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7670/5437.
  • Cronbach, L. 1957. “The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology.” American Psychologist 12 (11): 671.10.1037/h0043943
  • Deng, Z. 2011. “Revisiting Curriculum Potential.” Curriculum Inquiry 41 (5): 538–559.10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00563.x
  • Diederich, Mary E. 1971. “Curricular Materials Concerning Physicists’ Evaluation of Theories in Early Quantum Physics.” Thesis (Ph.D.), University of Chicago.
  • Eisner, E. W. 1981. “On the Differences Between Scientific and Artistic Approaches to Qualitative Research.” Educational Researcher 10 (4): 5–9.10.3102/0013189X010004005
  • Eisner, E. W. 1984. “No Easy Answers: Joseph Schwab’s Contributions to Curriculum.” Curriculum Inquiry 14 (2): 201–210.10.1080/03626784.1984.11075921
  • Eisner, E. W. 2002. “From Episteme to Phronesis to Artistry in the Study and Improvement of Teaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education. 18 (4): 375–385.10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00004-5
  • Eisner, E. 2005. Reimagining Schools: The Selected Works of Elliot W. Eisner. New York: Routledge.
  • Faulkner, W. 1958. A Rose for Emily, 170–179. Paderborn, De: Verlag F. Schöningh.
  • Fenstermacher, G. 1980. “The Nature of Science and Its Uses for Education: Remarks on the Philosophical Import of Schwab’s Work.” Curriculum Inquiry 10 (2): 191–197.10.1080/03626784.1980.11075215
  • Fox, S. 1972. “A Practical Image of “The Practical”.” Curriculum Theory Network 10: 45–57.10.2307/1179217
  • Fox, S. 1985. “The Vitality of Theory in Schwab’s Conception of the Practical.” Curriculum Inquiry 15 (1): 63–89.
  • Fuhrman, S. 1994. “Uniting Producers and Consumers: Challenges in Creating and Utilizing Educational Research.” In Educational Research and Reform: An International Perspective, edited by T. Tuijnman, 133–147. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
  • Glass, B., and A. Grobman. 1963. “Preface (History of the Biology Teachers’ Handbook).” In Biology Teachers’ Handbook, edited by J. Schwab, i–xi. New York: Wiley.
  • Glassman, M. 2004. “Running in Circles: Chasing Dewey.” Educational Theory 54 (3): 315–341.10.1111/edth.2004.54.issue-3
  • Greene, M. 1994. “Epistemology and Educational Research: The Influence of Recent Approaches to Knowledge.” Review of Research in Education 20: 423–464.
  • Guba, E., ed. 1990. The Paradigm Dialog. Newbury Park: Sage Publishing.
  • Houser, W. 1968. “Biology Education in Turkey.” American Biology Teacher 30 (1): 31–35.
  • Hemsley-Brown, J., and I. Oplatka. 2005. “Bridging the Research-Practice Gap: Barriers and Facilitators to Research Use Among School Principals from England and Israel.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 18 (5): 424–446.10.1108/09513550510608886
  • Herron, M. 1971, February. “The Nature of Scientific Enquiry.” The School Review 79 (2): 171–212.10.1086/442968
  • Hlebowitsh, P. 2005. “Generational Ideas in Curriculum: A Historical Triangulation.” Curriculum Inquiry 35 (1): 73–87.
  • Huberman, A. M. 2002. “Moving Towards the Inevitable: The Sharing of Research in Education.” Teachers & Teaching: Theory & Practice 8 (3–4): 257–268.10.1080/135406002100000404
  • Husén, T. 1988. “Research Paradigms in Education.” Interchange 19 (1): 2013.
  • Jackson, P. 1968. Life in Schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Jackson, P. 1992. “Conceptions of Curriculum and Curriculum Specialists.” In Handbook of Curriculum Research, edited by P. Jackson, 3–40. New York: Macmillan.
  • Kelly, D. 1990. “What is Happening to the History of Ideas?” Journal of the History of Ideas, Autumn: 36–50.
  • Knitter, W. 2006. “The Ramah Camp Tapes: Rehearsing the Future.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 7.
  • Kogan, M. 1984. School Governing Bodies. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
  • Kogan, M., and S. Hanney. 1999. Reforming Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingley Publishers.
  • Koppes, S. 2004, January 8. “‘Honest Jim’: James D. Watson, the Writer, Exhibition Highlights Life of Chicago Alumnus Who Co-discovered Structure of DNA, Wrote Eight Books.” University of Chicago Chronicle 23 (4): 1–3.
  • Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lauglo, J. 1990. “Factors Behind Decentralization in Education Systems: A Comparative Perspective with Special Reference to Norway.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 20 (1): 21–39.10.1080/0305792900200103
  • Lauglo, J. 1996. “Banking on Education and the Uses of Research: A Critique of World Bank Priories and Strategies for Education.” International Journal of Educational Development 16 (3): 221–233.10.1016/0738-0593(96)00015-6
  • Lightner, J. P. 1964. “BSCS and Advanced Biology.” The American Biology Teacher 26 (5): 338–340.
  • Lincoln, Y., and E. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
  • Lovejoy, A. 1940. “Reflections on the History of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas 1: 3–23.10.2307/2707007
  • Miles, M., and A. M. Huberman. 1984. “Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft.” Educational Researcher 13 (5): 20–30.10.3102/0013189X013005020
  • Munby, H., and T. Russell. 1998. “Epistemology and Context in Research on Learning to Teach Science.” In International Handbook of Science Education, edited by B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin, 643–665. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2
  • Palmer, J., ed. 2001. Fifty Modern Thinkers on Education: From Piaget to the Present Day, 73–78. New York: Routledge.
  • Palomares, A. 2004. Profesorado y Educación para la Diversidad en el siglo XXI [Teachers and Education for Diversity in the 21st Century]. Real: Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
  • Pereira, P. 2006. “Curriculum Deliberation, Democracy and the Eclectic Arts.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 7.
  • Perez Torres, E. 2015. Currículo deliberativo [Curriculum Deliberations]. August 13. https://prezi.com/kxjvft9o3pbr/currículo-deliberativo.
  • Reese, W. J. 2001. “The Origins of Progressive Education.” History of Education Quarterly 41 (01): 1–24.10.1111/j.1748-5959.2001.tb00072.x
  • Reid, W. A. 1993. “Does Schwab Improve on Tyler? A Response to Jackson.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 25 (6): 499–510.10.1080/0022027930250601
  • Reid, W. A. 1999. Curriculum as Institution and Practice: Essays in the Deliberative Tradition. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Roby, I. V. 2008. “How Joe Schwab Thinks.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 24 (1): 85–89.
  • Samuel, F. A. 2010. “Educational Visions from Two Continents: What Tagore Adds to the Deweyan Perspective.” Educational Philosophy and Theory: Virtual issue 43: 1–13.
  • Säther, J. 2003. “The Concept of Ideology in Analyses of Fundamental Questions in Science Education.” Science & Education 12 (3): 237–260.10.1023/A:1024003702528
  • Schwab, J. J. 1954/1978. “Eros and Education: A Discussion of one Aspect of Discussion.” In Science, Curriculum and Liberal Education: Selected Essays, I. Westbury & edited by N. Wilkof, 105–132. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Schwab, J. J. 1962. “The Teaching of Science: The Teaching of Science as Enquiry.” In The Teaching of Science, edited by J. J. Schwaband and O. Brandwein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Schwab, J. J. 1963. Biology Teachers’ Handbook. New York: Wiley.
  • Schwab, J. J. 1964. “Problems, Topics and Issues.” In Education and the Structure of Knowledge, edited by S. Eilam, 4–47. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Schwab, J. J. 1969a. College Curriculum and Student Protest. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Schwab, J. J. 1969b. “The Practical: A Language for Curriculum.” The School Review 8 (1): 1–23.
  • Schwab, J. J. 1971. “The Practical: Arts of Eclectic.” The School Review 79: 493–542.10.1086/442998
  • Schwab, J. J. 1973. “The Practical 3: Translation into Curriculum.” The School Review 81: 501–522.10.1086/443100
  • Schwab, J. J. 1984. Personal Correspondence.
  • Schwab, J. J. 1975. Community: A Mission for the Schools. Unpublished Book Manuscript.
  • Schwab, J. J. 1983. “The Practical 4: Something for Curriculum Professors To Do.” Curriculum Inquiry 13 (3): 239–265.10.1080/03626784.1983.11075885
  • Schwab, J. J. 1987. “A Reply to Charles Wegener.” Curriculum Inquiry 17 (2): 229–233.10.1080/03626784.1987.11075287
  • Schwab, J. J. 2007. Guide to the Joseph J. Schwab Papers 1939–1986, 1–20. Chicago, IL: Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library. http://ead.lib.uchicago.edu/learn_on3.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.SCHWABJJ&q=schwab.
  • Schwab, J. J., S. Fox, J. Lukinsky, B. Cohen, and Camp Counsellors. 2004. Deliberations on Camp Ramah Character Education Curriculum 1962–1966. 6 sessions on 14 CDs I-III: Eclectic Arts & Psychology; IV-VI: Bunk vs. Activity Groups; Roles of Religion & Aesthetics, X-XI: Director, Counselor, and Camper Relations; XII-XIII: Invitations to Inquiry and the Startup Book; XIII-XIV: Text Questions, Thought Questions, and Literacy Criticism. Titles Provided by Lemuel Roby. [email protected].
  • Shulman, L. S. 1984. “The Practical and the Eclectic: A Deliberation on Teaching and Educational Research.” Curriculum Inquiry 14 (2): 183–200.10.1080/03626784.1984.11075920
  • Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14.
  • Shulman, L. 2004. The Wisdom of Practice: Essays on Learning, Teaching and Learning to Teach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Skinner, B. F. 1969. Contingencies of Reinforcement: A Theoretical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Tamir, P., and V. Lunetta. 1978. “An Analysis of Laboratory Inquiries in the BSCS Yellow Version.” American Biology Teacher 40 (6): 353–357.10.2307/4446267
  • Tell, C. 2001. “Appreciating Good Teaching: A Conversation with Lee Shulman.” Educational Leadership 58 (5): 6–11.
  • Thorndike, E. L. 1912. “The Measurement of Educational Products.” The School Review 20 (5): 289–299.10.1086/435934
  • Tyler, R. 1984. “Personal Reflections on The Practical 4.” Curriculum Inquiry 14 (1): 97–102.10.1080/03626784.1984.11075909
  • Weiss, C. 1995. “Nothing as Practical as Good Theory: Exploring Theory-based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families.” New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods and Contexts 1: 65–92.
  • Wegener, C. 1987. “Being Practical with Schwab.” Curriculum Inquiry 16 (2): 215–232.
  • Westbury, I. 2005. “Reconsidering Schwab's ‘Practicals’: A response to Peter Hlebowitsh’s ‘Generational Ideas in Curriculum: A Historical Triangulation’.” Curriculum Inquiry 35 (1): 89–101.10.1111/j.1467-873X.2005.00317.x
  • Westbury, I., and M. Osborne 2001. “Joseph J. Schwab 1910–1988.” In Fifty Modern Thinkers on Education: From Piaget to the Present Day, edited by J. Palmer, 73–78. New York: Routledge.
  • Westbury, I., and N. Wilkof. 1978. Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education: Selected Essays. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wong, O. 1977. “Adapting BSCS Materials for Use in Hong Kong Middle School.” The American Biology Teacher, 39(4), 211–213).
  • Xu, Y. 2009. “School-Based Teacher Development Through a School–University Collaborative Project: A Case Study of a Recent Initiative in China.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 41 (1): 49–66.10.1080/00220270802546740

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.