The role of self-efficacy in the relationship between the learning environment and student engagement

References

• Apter, B., C. Arnold, and J. Swinson. 2010. “A Mass Observation Study of Student and Teacher Behavior in British Primary Classrooms.” Educational Psychology in Practice 26(2): 151–171. doi:10.1080/02667361003768518.
   Google Scholar
• Assor, A., H. Kaplan, and G. Roth. 2002. “Choice Is Good, but Relevance Is Excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and Suppressing Teacher Behaviors Predicting Students’ Engagement in Schoolwork.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 261–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R. 2015. “Defining and Measuring Engagement and Learning in Science: Conceptual, Theoretical, Methodological, and Analytical Issues.” Educational Psychologist 50: 84–94. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, A., S. Curtis, M. Goodwin, and S. Shields. 2013. “What Feedback Do Students Want?” Politics 1 (33): 66–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01446.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M., C. Cho, H. S. Ahn, and H. J. Kim. 2012. “Comparison of Self-beliefs for Predicting Student Motivation and Achievement.” The Journal of Educational Research 105: 336–352. doi:10.1080/00220671.2011.627401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J., and T. L. Good. 1986. “Teacher Behavior and Achievement.” In Handbook Of Research on Teaching, edited by, 328-375. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson, S. L., A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, Eds. 2012. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Den Brok, P., M. Brekelmans, and T. Wubbels. 2004. “Interpersonal Teacher Behaviour and Student Outcomes.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 15 (3–4): 407–442. doi:10.1080/09243450512331383262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, S. E., L. Mohan Welsh, M. Pressley, and M. M. Vincent. 2003. “How Nine Third-grade Teachers Motivate Student Academic Engagement?” The Elementary School Journal 103 (3): 239–267. doi:10.1086/499725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman, J. P. 2001. “Associations between Classroom Environment and Academic Efficacy.” Learning Environments Research 4: 243–257. doi:10.1023/A:1014490922622.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M. P. 2005. Psychology of Learning for Instruction. 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell, A. 2012. “Classroom Social Environments, Motivational Beliefs, and Student Engagement.” Unpublished doctoral diss., University of Southern California. doi:10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., M. Filsecker, and M. A. Lawson. 2016. “Student Engagement, Context, and Adjustment: Addressing Definitional, Measurement, and Methodological Issues.” Learning and Instruction 43: 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74: 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamre, B. K., R. C. Pianta, A. J. Mashburn, and J. T. Downer. 2007. Building a Science of Classrooms: Application of the CLASS Framework in over 4,000 U.S. Early Childhood and Elementary Classrooms. New York: Foundation for Child Development.
   Google Scholar
• Harbour, K. E., L. L. Evanovich, C. A. Sweigart, and L. E. Hughes. 2015. “A Brief Review of Effective Teaching Practices that Maximize Student Engagement.” Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 59 (1): 5–13. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.919136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidiroglu, F. M. 2014. “The Role of Perceived Classroom Goal Structures, Self-efficacy, and the Student Engagement in Seventh Grade Students’ Science Achievement.” Unpublished master’s thesis., Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., and F. Hyland. 2006. “Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing.” Language Teaching 39 (2): 83–101. doi:10.1017/S0261444806003399.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., and R. McClure. 2004. “Validity and Reliability of a Shortened, Revised Version of the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES).” Learning Environments Research 7 (1): 65–80. doi:10.1023/B:LERI.0000022279.89075.9f.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W. 1981. “Student-student Interaction: The Neglected Variable in Education.” Educational Researcher 10 (1): 5-10.
   Google Scholar
• Kagitci, B. 2013. “The Relationship Between Students’ Preference For Wrıtten Feedback And Improvement In Writing: Is The Preferred One The Best One” Unpublished master’s thesis., Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Kahraman, N., and S. Sungur. 2011. “The Contribution of Motivational Beliefs to Students’ Metacognitive Strategy Use.” Education and Science 36 (160): 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelloway, E. K. 1998. Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher’s Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• King, P. E., P. Schrodt, and J. Weisel. 2009. “The Instructional Feedback Orientation Scale: Conceptualizing and Validating a New Measure for Assessing Perceptions of Instructional Feedback.” Communication Education 58 (2): 235–261. doi:10.1080/03634520802515705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingir, S., Y. Tas, G. Gok, and S. Sungur Vural. 2013. “Relationships among Constructivist Learning Environment Perceptions, Motivational Beliefs, Self-regulation and Science Achievement.” Research in Science & Technological Education 31 (3): 205–226. doi:10.1080/02635143.2013.825594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2004. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed. NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, S. F., B. P. Wong, H. Yang, and Y. Liu. 2012. “Understanding Student Engagement with a Contextual Model.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 403–419. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., and J. B. Smith. 1993. “Effects of School Restructuring on the Achievement and Engagement of Middle School Students.” Sociology of Education 66: 164–187. doi:10.2307/2112735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., and P. R. Pintrich. 2003. “The Role of Self-efficacy Beliefs in Student Engagement and Learning in the Classroom.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 19 (2): 119–137. doi:10.1080/10573560308223.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M. 2000. “Student Engagement in Instructional Activity: Patterns in the Elementary, Middle, and High School Years.” American Educational Research Journal 37: 153–184. doi:10.3102/00028312037001153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, C., M. L. Maehr, L. Z. Hruda, E. Anderman, L. Anderman, Freeman, K. E., and T. Urdan. 2000. Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B. W. 2015. “Using Reading Times and Eye-movements to Measure Cognitive Engagement.” Educational Psychologist 50: 31–42. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1004068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education. 2006. Ilkogretim Fen Ve Teknoloji Dersi (6, 7 Ve 8. Siniflar) Ogretim Programi, Ankara. [elementary School Science and Technology Course (grade 6, 7, and 8) Curriculum]. Ankara: Turkish Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education. 2013. Ilkogretim Kurumları (ilkokullar Ve Ortaokullar) Fen Bilimleri Dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Ve 8. Sınıflar) Ogretim Programi [Elementary Institutions (primary and Middle Schools) Science Curricula (grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8)]. Ankara: Turkish Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., G. G. Wehlage, and S. D. Lamborn. 1992. “The Significance and Sources of Student Engagement.” In Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools, edited by F. M. Newmann, 11–39. NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, H., and J. Multisilta. 2016. “Digital Storytelling Promoting Twenty-first Century Skills and Student Engagement.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 25 (4): 451–468. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2015.1074610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. The ABC of Gender Equality in Education: Aptitude, Behaviour, Confidence. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkal, K., C. Tekkaya, J. Cakiroglu, and S. Sungur. 2009. “A Conceptual Model of Relationship among Constructivist Learning Environment Perceptions, Epistemological Beliefs, and Learning Approaches.” Learning and Individual Differences 19: 71–79. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 1996. “Self-efficacy Beliefs in Achievement Settings.” Review of Educational Research 66: 543–578. doi:10.3102/00346543066004543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., A. M. Ryan, and A. Kaplan. 2007. “Early Adolescents’ Perceptions of the Classroom Social Environment, Motivational Beliefs, and Engagement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99: 83–98. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and D. H. Schunk. 2002. Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and E. V. De Groot. 1990. “Motivational and Self-regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. 2012. “A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. J. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 149–172. NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. 2013. “How Students Create Motivationally Supportive Learning Environments for Themselves: The Concept of Agentic Engagement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105: 579–595. doi:10.1037/a0032690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., and C. Tseng. 2011. “Agency as a Fourth Aspect of Students’ Engagement during Learning Activities.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (4): 257–267. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., and W. Lee. 2014. “Students’ Classroom Engagement Produces Longitudinal Changes in Classroom Motivation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 106: 527–540. doi:10.1037/a0034934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. M., and H. Patrick. 2001. “The Classroom Social Environment and Changes in Adolescents’ Motivation and Engagement during Middle School.” American Educational Research Journal 38: 437–460. doi:10.3102/00028312038002437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., and R. G. Lomax. 2004. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 1982. “Effects of Effort Attributional Feedback on Children’s Perceived Self-efficacy and Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 548–556. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 1983. “Ability versus Effort Attributional Feedback: Differential Effects on Self-efficacy and Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 75 (6): 848–856. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.75.6.848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 1985. “Self-efficacy and Classroom Learning.” Psychology in the Schools 22 (2): 208–223. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 1995. “Self-efficacy and Education and Instruction.” In Self-efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application, edited by J. E. Maddux, 281–303. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., and C. A. Mullen. 2012. “Self-efficacy as an Engaged Learner.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 219–235. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Siewert, L. 2011. “The Effects of Written Teacher Feedback on the Academic Achievement of Fifth-grade Students with Learning Challenges.” Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 55 (1): 17–27. doi:10.1080/10459880903286771.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., B. C. Heddy, and D. Lombardi. 2015. “The Challenges of Defining and Measuring Student Engagement in Science.” Educational Psychologist 50: 1–13. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sungur, S., and S. Güngören. 2009. “The Role of Classroom Environment Perceptions in Self-regulated Learning and Science Achievement.” Elementary Education Online 8 (3): 883–900.
   Google Scholar
• Tas, Y., and C. Tekkaya. 2010. “Personal and Contextual Factors Associated with Students’ Cheating in Science.” The Journal of Experimental Education 78: 440–463. doi:10.1080/00220970903548046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. C., B. J. Fraser, and D. L. Fisher. 1997. “Monitoring Constructivist Classroom Learning Environments.” International Journal of Educational Research 27 (4): 293–302. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., A. Christensen, H. Z. Kackar-Cam, M. Trucano, and S. M. Fulmer. 2014. “Enhancing Students’ Engagement: Report of a 3-year Intervention with Middle School Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 51: 1195–1226. doi:10.3102/0002831214532515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., P. K. Thorpe, and M. K. Meyer. 1998. “Students’ Reports of Motivation and Negative Affect: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 90: 758–771. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. T., and R. Holcombe. 2010. “Adolescents’ Perceptions of School Environment, Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Middle School.” American Educational Research Journal 47 (3): 633–662. doi:10.3102/0002831209361209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., and J. S. Eccles. 2013. “School Context, Achievement Motivation, and Academic Engagement: A Longitudinal Study of School Engagement Using A Multidimensional Perspective.” Learning and Instruction 28: 12–23. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., J. Cakiroglu, and W. J. Boone. 2006. “Turkish High School Students’ Perceptions of Constructivist Learning Environment in Chemistry Classrooms and Their Attitudes Towards Chemistry.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, USA.
   Google Scholar