Cross-national study on students and school factors affecting science literacy

References

• Ainley, M., and J. Ainley. 2011. “Student Engagement with Science in Early Adolescence: The Contribution of Enjoyment to Students’ Continuing Interest in Learning about Science.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (1): 4–12. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al‐Samarrai, S. 2006. “Achieving Education for All: How Much Does Money Matter?” Journal of International Development: the Journal of the Development Studies Association 18 (2): 179–206. doi:10.1002/jid.1190.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. S. 1982. “The Search for School Climate: A Review of the Research.” Review of Educational Research 52 (3): 368–420. doi:10.3102/00346543052003368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. O., H. S. Lin, D. F. Treagust, S. P. Ross, and L. D. Yore. 2007. “Using Large-scale Assessment Datasets for Research in Science and Mathematics Education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5 (4): 591–614. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9090-y.
   Google Scholar
• Areepattamannil, S., J. G. Freeman, and D. A. Klinger. 2011. “Influence of Motivation, Self-beliefs, and Instructional Practices on Science Achievement of Adolescents in Canada.” Social Psychology of Education 14 (2): 233–259. doi:10.1007/s11218-010-9144-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aypay, A., M. Erdoğan, and M. A. Sözer. 2007. “Variation among Schools on Classroom Practices in Science Based on TIMSS‐1999 in Turkey.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (10): 1417–1435. doi:10.1002/tea.20202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. 1979. Insan Nitelikleri Ve Öğrenme. (Çev. Özçelik, D.A.). [Human Characteristics and Learning]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objetives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, US: D. Mckay.
   Google Scholar
• Buuren, S. V., and K. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, 2011. “Mice: “Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R.”Journal of Statistical Software 45(3): 1–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R., and B. McCrae. 2011. “Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 Science.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (1): 7–26. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core Team, R. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer 441 Software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, K. 2002. New Small Learning Communities: Findings from Recent Literature. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, J., M. O. Valente, and J. Conboy. 2011. “Student Characteristics and PISA Science Performance Portugal in Cross-national Comparison.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 12: 322–329. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.041.
   Google Scholar
• Galini, R., and P. Efthymia. 2009. “Dimensions of the Classroom Climate, as Perceived by the Students, Related to Their Teachers’ Evaluation Approach on Their Overall Performance in a Greek Primary School Sample.” New Horizons in Education 57 (2): 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, R., L. V. Hedges, and R. D. Laine. 1996. “The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement.” Review of Educational Research 66 (3): 361–396. doi:10.3102/00346543066003361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., and L. Woessmann. 2011. “How Much Do Educational Outcomes Matter in OECD Countries?” Economic Policy 26 (67): 427–491. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0327.2011.00265.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., R. D. Laine, and R. Greenwald. 1994. “Does Money Matter? A Meta Analysis of Studies of the Effects of Differential School Inputs on Student Achievement.” Educational Researcher 23: 9–10. doi:10.2307/1177220.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, E. S. C. 2009. “Characteristics of East Asian Learners: What We Learned from PISA.” Educational Research Journal 24 (2): 327.
   Google Scholar
• JGil-Flores, J., and S. García-Gómez. 2017. “The Importance of Teaching Practices in Relation to Regional Educational Policies in Explaining PISA Achievement.” Revista De Educación 378: 50–74.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Castellanos, O. 2010. “Relationship between Educational Resources and School Achievement: A Mixed Method Intra-district Analysis.” The Urban Review 42 (4): 351–371. doi:10.1007/s11256-010-0166-6.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., and D. Su. 2016. “On Matrix Sampling and Imputation of Context Questionnaires with Implications for the Generation of Plausible Values in Large-scale Assessments.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 41 (1): 57–80. doi:10.3102/1076998615622221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knipprath, H. 2010. “What PISA Tells Us about the Quality and Inequality of Japanese Education in Mathematics and Science.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 8 (3): 389–408. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9196-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konishi, C., S. Hymel, B. D. Zumbo, and Z. Li. 2010. “Do School Bullying and Student—Teacher Relationships Matter for Academic Achievement? A Multilevel Analysis.” Canadian Journal of School Psychology 25 (1): 19–39. doi:10.1177/0829573509357550.
   Google Scholar
• Kotte, D., P. Lietz, and M. M. Lopez. 2005. “Factors Influencing Reading Achievement in Germany and Spain: Evidence from PISA 2000.” International Education Journal 6 (1): 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer, B. K., and H. J. Walberg. 1981. “A Synthesis of Social and Psychological Influences on Science Learning.” Science Education 65 (1): 11–23. doi:10.1002/sce.3730650104.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, S. L., C. Stevens, J. Martinez, and R. Ye. 2015. “A Cross-national Study of Students’ Attitudes toward School.” Pastoral Care in Education 33 (1): 33–46. doi:10.1080/02643944.2015.1005120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S. 2014. “The Relationship between Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Is It a Myth or Reality?” The Journal of Educational Research 107 (3): 177–185. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.807491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. 1988. “Missing-data Adjustments in Large Surveys.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 6 (3): 287–296. doi:10.1080/07350015.1988.10509663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounkaew, K. 2013. “Explaining Urban–Rural Differences in Educational Achievement in Thailand Evidence from PISA Literacy Data.” Economics of Education Review 37: 213–225. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luiselli, J., R. Putnam, M. Handler, and A. Feinberg. 2005. “Whole-school Positive Behaviour Support: Effects on Student Discipline Problems and Academic Performance.” Educational Psychology 25 (2–3): 183–198. doi:10.1080/0144341042000301265.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X. 2003. “Sense of Belonging to School: Can Schools Make a Difference?” Journal of Educational Research 96 (6): 340–350. doi:10.1080/00220670309596617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., L. Ma, and K. D. Bradley. 2008. “Using Multilevel Modeling to Investigate School Effects.” In Multilevel Modeling of Educational Data, edited by A. A. O’Connell and D. B. McCoach, 59–110. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X. 2008. “Within-school Gender Gaps in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy.” Comparative Education Review 52 (3): 437–460. doi:10.1086/588762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., and J. L. M. Wilkins. 2002. “The Development of Science Achievement in Middle and High Schoolr: Individual Differences and School Effects.” Evaluation Review 26 (4): 395–417. doi:10.1177/0193841X02026004003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., I. V. Mullis, P. Foy, and G. M. Stanco. 2012. “TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science.” In International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Maslowski, R., J. Scheerens, and H. Luyten. 2007. “The Effect of School Autonomy and School Internal Decentralization on Students’ Reading Literacy.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 18 (3): 303–334. doi:10.1080/09243450601147502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2002. Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2004. Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First Results from PISA 2003. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264006416-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World (Vol. 1: Analysis). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Lessons from PISA for the United States, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016a. PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264266490-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016b. PISA 2015 Results (Volume II): Policies and Practices for Successful Schools. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264267510-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. PISA 2017 technical report. Paris: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003. “Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özçelik, D. A. 2011. “Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme.” In [Measurement and Evaluation]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Ozel, M., S. Caglak, and M. Erdogan. 2013. “Are Affective Factors a Good Predictor of Science Achievement? Examining the Role of Affective Factors Based on PISA 2006.” Learning and Individual Difference 24: 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkan, Y. Ö. 2016. “Okulları Başarılarına Göre Sınıflandırmada Etkili Olan Değişkenlerin PISA 2012 Türkiye Verileri Aracılığıyla Incelenmesi.” [Investigation of the Classification Variables Effective on Success of the School by PISA 2012 Turkey Data].” International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 8 (2): 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, L. 2008. “Using PISA to Examine Educational Inequality.” Orbis Scholae 2 (2): 77–86. doi:10.14712/23363177.2018.235.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and E. V. De Groot. 1990. “Motivational and Self-regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1): 33. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., and A. S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. J., and K. F. Punch. 1991. “The Relationship between Affect and Achievement in Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28 (2): 193–209. doi:10.1002/tea.3660280209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. B., K. Lauver, H. Le, D. Davis, R. Langley, and A. Carlstrom. 2004. “Do Psychosocial and Study Skill Factors Predict College Outcomes? A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 130 (2): 261. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowan, B. 2002. “Large-scale, Cross-national Surveys of Educational Achievement: Promises, Pitfalls, and Possibilities.” In Methodological Advances in Cross-national Surveys of Educational Achievement, edited by A. C. Porter and A. Gamoran, 321–349. Washington, DC: National Acade.
   Google Scholar
• Schenker, N., and J. M. Taylor. 1996. “Partially Parametric Techniques for Multiple Imputation.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 22 (4): 425–446. doi:10.1016/0167-9473(95)00057-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schibeci, R. A. 1984. “Attitudes to Science: An Update.” Studies in Science Education 11: 26–59. doi:10.1080/03057268408559913.
   Google Scholar
• Schibeci, R. A., and J. P. Riley. 1986. “Influence of Students’ Background and Perceptions on Science Attitudes and Achievement.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23 (3): 177–187. doi:10.1002/tea.3660230302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, W. H. 2005. “Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Student Expectations: Results from PISA 2003.” In Online Submission.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., H. Lee, and Y. Kim. 2009. “Student and School Factors Affecting Mathematics Achievement: International Comparisons between Korea, Japan and the USA.” School Psychology International 30 (5): 520–537. doi:10.1177/0143034309107070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrigley, R. L. 1990. “Attitude and Behaviour are Correlates.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27: 97–113. doi:10.1002/tea.3660270203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sini, B., B. Muzzulini, S. Schmidt, and C. Tinti. 2018. “School Motivation: A Comparison between Kenya and Italy.” Journal of Educational Research 111 (6): 746–755. doi:10.1080/00220671.2018.1427035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøberg, S., and C. Schreiner. 2005. “How Do Learners in Different Cultures Relate to Science and Technology? Results and Perspectives from the Project ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education).” Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 6 (2): 1–17. Foreword.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, L. 2009. “Achievement Differences between Large and Small Schools in Texas.” The Rural Educator 30 (2): 20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L., K. D. Bradley, and K. Akers. 2012. “A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating Factors Impacting Science Achievement for Secondary School Students: PISA Hong Kong Sample.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (14): 2107–2125. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.708063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taş, U. E., Ö. Arıcı, H. B. Ozarkan, and B. Özgürlük. 2016. “PISA 2015 Ulusal Raporu.” In [PISA 2015 National Report]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Thapa, A., J. Cohen, S. Guffey, and A. Higgins-D’Alessandro. 2013. “A Review of School Climate Research.” Review of Educational Research 83 (3): 357–385. doi:10.3102/0034654313483907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thien, L. M., I. G. N. Darmawan, and M. Y. Ong. 2015. “Affective Characteristics and Mathematics Performance in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand: What Can PISA 2012 Data Tell Us?” Large-scale Assessments in Education 3 (1): 3. doi:10.1186/s40536-015-0013-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uline, C., and M. Tschannen-Moran. 2008. “The Walls Speak: The Interplay of Quality Facilities, School Climate, and Student Achievement.” Journal of Educational Administration 46 (1): 55–73. doi:10.1108/09578230810849817.
   Google Scholar
• Voight, A., and M. Nation. 2016. “Practices for Improving Secondary School Climate: A Systematic Review of the Research Literature.” American Journal of Community Psychology 58 (1–2): 174–191. doi:10.1002/ajcp.12074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. T., and J. L. Degol. 2016. “School Climate: A Review of the Construct, Measurement, and Impact on Student Outcomes.” Educational Psychology Review 28 (2): 315–352. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinburgh, M. 1995. “Gender Differences in Student Attitudes toward Science: A Meta‐analysis of the Literature from 1970 to 1991.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32 (4): 387–398. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willms, J. D. 2003. Student Engagement at School: A Sense of Belonging and Participation: Results from PISA 2000. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Willson, V. L. 1983. “A Meta‐analysis of the Relationship between Science Achievement and Science Attitude: Kindergarten through College.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20 (9): 839–850. doi:10.1002/tea.3660200906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wößmann, L. 2003. “Schooling Resources, Educational Institutions and Student Performance: The International Evidence.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65 (2): 117–170. doi:10.1111/1468-0084.00045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wößmann, L. 2010. “Families, Schools and Primary-school Learning: Evidence for Argentina and Colombia in an International Perspective.” Applied Economics 42 (21): 2645–2665. doi:10.1080/00036840801964617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar