The relationships among between-class ability grouping, teaching practices, and mathematics achievement: a large-scale empirical analysis

References

• Baines, E. 2013. “Ability Grouping.” In International Guide to Student Achievement, edited by J. Hattie and E. M. Anderman, 116–118. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Battista, M. T. 2010. “Engaging Students in Meaningful Mathematics Learning: Different Perspectives, Complementary Goals.” Journal of Urban Mathematics Education 3 (2): 34–46.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., M. Kunter, W. Blum, M. Brunner, T. Voss, A. Jordan, and Y.-M. Tsai. 2010. “Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress.” American Educational Research Journal 47 (1): 133–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 1997a. “Setting, Social Class and Survival of the Quickest.” British Educational Research Journal 23 (5): 575–595.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 1997b. “When Even the Winners are Losers: Evaluating the Experiences of Top Set Students.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 29 (2): 165–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., D. Wiliam, and M. Brown. 2000. “Students’ Experiences of Ability Grouping: Disaffection, Polarization and the Construction of Failure.” British Educational Research Journal 26: 631–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, C. C., J. P. Heubert, and H. M. Levin. 2006. “Accelerating Mathematics Achievement Using Heterogenous Grouping.” American Educational Research Journal 43: 105–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonaro, W. 2005. “Tracking, Students’ Effort, and Academic Achievement.” Sociology of Education 78 (1): 27–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheema, J. R. 2014. “A Review of Missing Data Handling Methods in Education Research.” Review of Educational Research 84 (4): 487–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-H., M. D. Crockett, T. Namikawa, J. Zilimu, and S. H. Lee. 2012. “Eighth Grade Mathematics Teachers’ Formative Assessment Practices in SES-different Classrooms: A Taiwan Study.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10: 553–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, R. W.-Y., D. M. McInerney, and M. M. C. Mok. 2014. “Does Big-fish–little-pond Effect Always Exist? Investigation of Goal Orientations as Moderators in the Hong Kong Context.” Educational Psychology 34 (5): 561–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirinda, B., and P. Barmby. 2018. “South African Grade 9 Mathematics Teachers’ Views on the Teaching of Problem Solving.” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 22 (1): 114–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, A. K. 2014. “An International Comparison of Achievement Inequality in Within- and Between-school Tracking Systems.” American Journal of Education 120 (3): 293–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, A. K., H. Dumont, and U. Trautwein. 2013. “Tracking Effects Depend on Tracking Type: An International Comparison of Students’ Mathematics Self-concept.” American Educational Research Journal 50 (5): 925–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, A. M., L. M. Singletary, R. C. Smith, P. A. Wagner, and R. T. Francisco. 2014. “Teacher Support for Collective Argumentation: A Framework for Examining How Teachers Support Students’ Engagement in Mathematics Activities.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 86: 401–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., and L. Kyriakides. 2008. The Dynamics of Educational Effectiveness: A Contribution to Policy, Practice and Theory in Contemporary Schools. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., P. Sammons, A. Kington, E. Regan, J. Ko, E. Brown, and D. Robertson. 2008. Effective Classroom Practice (ECP): A Mixed-method Study of Influences and Outcomes (Report submitted to the Economic and Social Research Council RES-000-23-1564). Nottingham: School of Education, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Dedrick, R., J. Ferron, M. Hess, K. Hogarty, J. Kromrey, T. Lang, et al. 2009. “Multilevel Modelling: A Review of Methodological Issues and Applications.” Review of Educational Research 79 (1): 69–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domina, T., P. Hanselman, N. Hwang, and A. McEachin. 2016. “Detracking and Tracking Up: Mathematics Course Placements in California Middle Schools, 2003-2013.” American Educational Research Journal 53 (4): 1229–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, M., J. Humphreys, J. Sebba, A. Dyson, F. Gallannaugh, and D. Muijs. 2007. Effective Teaching and Learning for Pupils in Low Attaining Groups. London: DCSF.
   Google Scholar
• Ells, A., Z. Ozgur, and L. Reiten. 2019. “Teacher Moves for Supporting Student Reasoning.” Mathematics Educational Research Journal 31: 107–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Else-Quest, N. M., J. S. Hyde, and M. C. Linn. 2010. “Cross-national Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 136 (1): 103–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgasz, H. 2010. “Streaming for Mathematics in Years 7-10 in Victoria: An Issue of Equity?” Mathematics Education Research Journal 22 (1): 57–90.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B., L. Archer, J. Hodgen, D. Pepper, B. Taylor, and M.-C. Travers. 2017. “Exploring the Relative Lack of Impact of Research on ‘Ability Grouping’ in England: A Discourse Analytic Account.” Cambridge Journal of Education 47 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. 2010. “Tracking and Inequality: New Directions for Research and Practice.” In The Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education, edited by M. W. Apple, S. J. Ball, and L. A. Gandin, 213–228. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M. 2016. “Commentary on “Does Sorting Students Improve Scores? An Analysis of Class Composition.” Journal of Advanced Academics 27 (2): 124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallam, S., and J. Ireson. 2005. “Secondary School Teachers’ Pedagogic Practices When Teaching Mixed and Structured Ability Classes.” Research Papers in Education 20 (1): 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H.-Y., and P.-J. Hsieh. 2019. “Survey on Implementation and Effectiveness of Ability Grouping in Eighth-grade Math Classes in Taiwan.” International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics 12 (4): 417–428.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, O., and H. Wildy. 2016. “The Effects of Streaming in the Secondary School on Learning Outcomes for Australian Students : A Review of the International Literature.” Australian Journal of Education 60 (1): 42–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juta, A., and C. Van Wyk. 2020. “Classroom Management as A Response to Challenges in Mathematics Education: Experiences from A Province in South Africa.” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 24 (1): 21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klieme, E., C. Pauli, and K. Reusser. 2009. “The Power Of Video Studies In Investigating Teaching And Learning In The Classroom.” In The Pythagoras Study, edited by T. Janik and T. Seidel, 137–160. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., and J. Baumert. 2006. “Who Is the Expert? Construct and Criteria Validity of Student and Teacher Ratings of Instruction.” Learning Environment Research 9: 231–251.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, M., and A. Ryve. 2012. “Balancing on the Edge of Competency-oriented versus Procedure-oriented Practices: Orchestrating Whole-class Discussions of Complex Mathematical Problems.” Mathematics Educational Research Journal 24: 447–465.
   Google Scholar
• Lavie, I., A. Steiner, and A. Sfard. 2019. “Routines We Live By: From Ritual to Exploration.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 101: 153–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. W., T. A. Walkowiak, and J. L. Nietfeld. 2017. “Characterization of Mathematics Instructional Practices for Prospective Elementary Teachers with Varying Levels of Self-efficacy in Classroom Management and Mathematics Teaching.” Mathematics Educational Research Journal 29: 45–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, P.-Y., and Y.-C. Hung. 2015. “Statistical Techniques Utilized in Analyzing PISA and TIMSS Data in Science Education from 1996 to 2013: A Methodological Review.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13: 1449–1468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, C., G. Van Der Westhuizen, and H. Tillema. 2013. “Teacher Knowledge of Learners’ Help-seeking in Mathematics Problem Solving.” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 17: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Markow, D., and M. Cooper. 2008. The MetLife Survey of the American Teacher: Past, Present and Future – A Survey of Teachers, Principals and Students. Accessed 9 November 2017 http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED504457.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mazenod, A., B. Francis, L. Archer, J. Hodgen, B. Taylor, A. Tereshchenko, and D. Pepper. 2019. “Nurturing Learning or Encouraging Dependency? Teacher Constructions of Students in Lower Attainment Groups in English Secondary Schools.” Cambridge Journal of Education 49 (1): 53–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrory, R., R. Floden, J. Ferrini-Mundy, M. D. Reckase, and S. L. Senk. 2012. “Knowledge of Algebra for Teaching: A Framework of Knowledge and Practices.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 43 (5): 584–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mijs, J. J. B. 2016. “Stratified Failure: Educational Stratification and Students’ Attributions of Their Mathematics Performance in 24 Countries.” Sociology of Education 89 (2): 137–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, C. 2002. “Where’s the Math? Prospective Teachers Visit the Workplace.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 50: 289–309.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds Know and What They Can Do With What They Know. Accessed 9 November 2017. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. PISA 2012 Technical Report. Accessed 9 November 2017. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-2012-technical-report-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 1993. Access and Achievement in Urban Education. London: Office for Standards in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003. “Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, F. G. 2005. “Grouping within Algebra I: A Structural Sieve with Powerful Effects for Low-income, Minority, and Immigrant Students.” Educational Policy 19: 262–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A.-K., C. Pauli, K. Reusser, K. Rakoczy, and E. Klieme. 2014. “One Lesson Is All You Need? Stability of Instructional Quality across Lessons.” Learning and Instruction 31: 2–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., C. Fischer, C. Selter, and C. Schober. 2019. “Combining Material- and Community-based Implementation Strategies for Scaling Up: The Case of Supporting Low-achieving Middle School Students.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 102: 361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., A. Bryk, Y. F. Cheong, R. Congdon, and M. Du Tolt. 2011. HLM7: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., and A. S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., P. Sammons, B. de Fraine, J. Van Damme, T. Townsend, C. Teddlie, and S. Stringfield. 2014. “Educational Effectiveness Research (EER): A State-of-the-art Review.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 25 (2): 197–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, P. 2010. “Social Origin, School Choice, and Student Performance.” Educational Research and Evaluation 16 (2): 107–129.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, L., and A. Jentsch. 2016. “Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Measuring Instructional Quality in Mathematics Education Using Classroom Observations.” ZDM Mathematics Education 48: 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, J. W. 2010. “International Evidence on Ability Grouping with Curriculum Differentiation and the Achievement Gap in Secondary Schools.” Teachers College Record 112 (5): 1490–1526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., M. C. Makel, and P. Olszewski-Kubilius. 2016. “What One Hundred Years of Research Says about the Effects of Ability Grouping and Acceleration on K–12 Students’ Academic Achievement: Findings of Two Second-order Meta-analyses.” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 849–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C. Y. 2020. Family Cultural Capital and Student Achievement: Theoretical Insights from PISA. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C. Y., and D. Liu. 2017. “What Is the Influence of Cultural Capital on Student Reading Achievement in Confucian as Compared to Non-Confucian Heritage Societies?” Compare 48 (6): 896–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., B. Francis, N. Craig, L. Archer, J. Hodgen, A. Mazenod, A. Tereshchenko, and D. Pepper. 2019. “Why Is It Difficult for Schools to Establish Equitable Practices in Allocating Students to Attainment ‘Sets’? .” British Journal of Educational Studies 67 (1): 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tieso, C. L. 2003. “Ability Grouping Is Not Just Tracking Aymore.” Roeper Review 26: 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Touro, J., E. Navarro-Ascencio, L. Lizasoain, E. Loez-Gonzalez, and M. J. G.-S. Pedro. 2019. “How Teachers’ Practices and Students’ Attitudes toward Technology Affect Mathematics Achievement: Results and Insights from PISA 2012.” Research Papers in Education 34 (3): 263–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. D., and D. Penney. 2014. “The Effects of Setting on Classroom Teaching and Student Learning in Mainstream Mathematics, English and Science Lessons: A Critical Review of the Literature in England.” Educational Review 66 (4): 411–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., M. Fang, and L. Shauman. 2015. “STEM Education.” Annual Review of Sociology 41: 331–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, H. S., and Y. Lee. 2017. “A Latent Profile Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling of the Instructional Quality of Mathematics Classrooms Based on the PISA 2012 Results of Korea and Singapore.” Asia Pacific Education Review 18: 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, R. 2003. “Grouping by Ability: A Self-fulfilling Prophecy.” Australian Mathematics Teacher 59 (4): 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, R. 2005. “The Construction of a Mathematical Habitus: Implications of Ability Grouping in the Middle Years.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 37 (5): 607–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar