The effects of school choice on students and public education: evidence from South Korea

References

• Abdulkadiroğlu, A., J. D. Angrist, S. M. Dynarski, T. J. Kane, and P. A. Pathak. 2011. “Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: Evidence from Boston’s Charters and Pilots.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (2): 699–748. doi:10.1093/qje/qjr017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulkadiroğlu, A., P. A. Pathak, and C. R. Walters. 2018. “Free to Choose: Can School Choice Reduce Student Achievement?” American Economic Journal. Applied Economics 10 (1): 175–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulkadiroğlu, A., P. A. Pathak, J. Schellenberg, and C. R. Walters. 2020. “Do Parents Value School Effectiveness?” American Economic Review 110 (5): 1502–1539. doi:10.1257/aer.20172040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G. A., and R. E. Kranton. 2002. “Identity and Schooling: Some Lessons for the Economics of Education.” Journal of Economic Literature 40 (4): 1167–1201. doi:10.1257/.40.4.1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altonji, J. G., T. E. Elder, and C. R. Taber. 2005a. “An Evaluation of Instrumental Variable Strategies for Estimating the Effects of Catholic Schooling.” Journal of Human Resources 40 (4): 791–821. doi:10.3368/jhr.XL.4.791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altonji, J. G., T. E. Elder, and C. R. Taber. 2005b. “Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools.” Journal of Political Economy 113 (1): 151–184. doi:10.1086/426036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., and J. S. Pischke. 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con Out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.24.2.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashenfelter, O. 1978. “Estimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 60 (1): 47–57. doi:10.2307/1924332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E. P. 2005. “The Effect of Charter Schools on Charter Students and Public Schools.” Economics of Education Review 24 (2): 133–147. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, S. Y. 2014. “Shadow Education and Academic Success in Republic of Korea.” In Korean Education in Changing Economic and Demographic Contexts (pp. 39–58). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Á., J. Calero, and J. O. Escardíbul. 2012. “Private Tutoring and Academic Achievement in Korea: An Approach through PISA-2006.” KEDI Journal of Educational Policy 9 (2): 299–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., and J. Hwang. 2017. “The Effect of School Choice on Student’s Academic Performance: Evidence from Policy Change in Korea.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 58 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, J. B., B. A. Jacob, and S. Levitt. 2006. “The Effect of School Choice on Participants: Evidence from Randomized Lotteries.” Econometrica 74 (5): 1191–1230. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00702.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustmann, C., H. Ku, and D. W. Kwak. 2018. “Why are Single-sex Schools Successful?” Labour Economics 54: 79–99. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2018.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egalite, A. J., and P. J. Wolf. 2016. “A Review of the Empirical Research on Private School Choice.” Peabody Journal of Education 91 (4): 441–454. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2016.1207436.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, W. N., and R. M. Schwab. 1995. “Finishing High School and Starting College: Do Catholic Schools Make a Difference?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (4): 941–974. doi:10.2307/2946645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjellman, A. M., K. Yang Hansen, and D. Beach. 2019. “School Choice and Implications for Equity: The New Political Geography of the Swedish Upper Secondary School Market.” Educational Review 71 (4): 518–539. doi:10.1080/00131911.2018.1457009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman, L. M. 2017. “Educational Attainment Effects of Public and Private School Choice.” Journal of School Choice 11 (4): 642–654. doi:10.1080/15582159.2017.1395619.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glazerman, S., and D. Dotter. 2017. “Market Signals: Evidence on the Determinants and Consequences of School Choice from a Citywide Lottery.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 39 (4): 593–619. doi:10.3102/0162373717702964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, Y., L. C. Wang, and H. S. Yang. 2018. “Does Greater School Autonomy Make a Difference? Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment in South Korea.” Journal of Public Economics 161: 15–30. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. 1981. “Throwing Money at Schools.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1 (1): 19–41. doi:10.2307/3324107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., and S. G. Rivkin. 2003. “Does Public School Competition Affect Teacher Quality?” In The Economics of School Choice, 23–48. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, J. S., C. A. Neilson, and S. D. Zimmerman (2012). “The Effect of School Choice on Intrinsic Motivation and Academic Outcomes (No. W18324).” National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C. M. 2000. “Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?” American Economic Review 90 (5): 1209–1238. doi:10.1257/aer.90.5.1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C. M. 2003. “School Choice and School Productivity. Could School Choice Be a Tide that Lifts All Boats?” In The Economics of School Choice, 287–342. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbar, H., C. J. Fong, E. Germain, D. Li, J. Sanchez, W. L. Sun, and M. Devall. 2019. “The Competitive Effects of School Choice on Student Achievement: A Systematic Review.” Educational Policy 0895904819874756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. B. Krueger. 2006. “Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-being.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1257/089533006776526030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, C. 2007. “Classroom Peer Effects and Academic Achievement: Quasi-randomization Evidence from South Korea.” Journal of Urban Economics 61 (3): 458–495. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2006.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, C., C. Park, and M. J. Lee. 2007. “Effects of Ability Mixing in High School on Adulthood Earnings: Quasiexperimental Evidence from South Korea.” Journal of Population Economics 20 (2): 269–297. doi:10.1007/s00148-006-0090-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B., and G. Kim. 2015. “The Impacts of Coeducation in High School on the College Scholastic Ability Test.” KDI Journal of Economic Policy 37: 65–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. (2010). “Analysis of the Effects of Private Education on Academic Achievement and Labor Market Performance.” KDI Reports, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T., J. H. Lee, and Y. Lee. 2008. “Mixing versus Sorting in Schooling: Evidence from the Equalization Policy in South Korea.” Economics of Education Review 27 (6): 697–711. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. 2018. “The Effects of School Choice on Achievement Gaps between Private and Public High Schools: Evidence from the Seoul High School Choice Program.” International Journal of Educational Development 60: 25–32. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y. 2013. Private Tutoring and Its Impact on Students’ Academic Achievement, Formal Schooling, and Educational Inequality in Korea. New York: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, D. 1997. “The Effects of Catholic Secondary Schooling on Educational Achievement.” Journal of Labor Economics 15 (1, Part 1): 98–123. doi:10.1086/209848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., J. R. Behrman, and J. Choi. 2013. “Causal Effects of Single-sex Schools on College Entrance Exams and College Attendance: Random Assignment in Seoul High Schools.” Demography 50 (2): 447–469. doi:10.1007/s13524-012-0157-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. S. 2013. “Essays in Empirical Microeconomics.” Doctoral dissertation, NJ: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y. S. 2016. “Autonomy, Incentives, and School Performance.” KDI Journal of Economic Policy 38 (3): 1–15. doi:10.23895/kdijep.2016.38.3.1.
   Google Scholar
• Pathak, P. A. 2017. “What Really Matters in Designing School Choice Mechanisms.” Advances in Economics and Econometrics 1: 176–214.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P., W. Howell, P. J. Wolf, and D. Campbell. 2003. “School Vouchers. Results from Randomized Experiments.” In The Economics of School Choice, 107–144. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhinesmith, E. 2017. “A Review of the Research on Parent Satisfaction in Private School Choice Programs.” Journal of School Choice 11 (4): 585–603. doi:10.1080/15582159.2017.1395639.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, C. E. 1998. “Private School Vouchers and Student Achievement: An Evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (2): 553–602. doi:10.1162/003355398555685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruijs, N., and H. Oosterbeek. 2019. “School Choice in Amsterdam: Which Schools are Chosen When School Choice Is Free?” Education Finance and Policy 14 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1162/edfp_a_00237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, D., and C. Kang. 2013. “Do Private Tutoring Expenditures Raise Academic Performance? Evidence from Middle School Students in South Korea.” Asian Economic Journal 27 (1): 59–83. doi:10.1111/asej.12002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiswall, M., L. Stiefel, A. E. Schwartz, and J. Boccardo. 2014. “Does Attending a STEM High School Improve Student Performance? Evidence from New York City.” Economics of Education Review 40: 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar