Need supportive collaborative learning: are teachers necessary or do students support each other’s basic psychological needs?

References

• Almasi, J. F., J. F. O’Flahavan, and P. Arya. 2001. “A Comparative Analysis of Student and Teacher Development in More and Less Proficient Discussions of Literature.” Reading Research Quarterly 36 (2): 96–120. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.2.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assor, A., and H. Kaplan. 2001. “Mapping the Domain of Autonomy Support: Five Important Ways to Enhance or Undermine Students’ Experience of Autonomy in Learning.” In Trends and Prospects in Motivation Research, edited by A. Efklides, R. Sorrentino, and J. Kuhl, 99–118. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S. C., and B. B. Schwarz. 2016. “Argumentation for Learning: Well-trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories.” Educational Psychologist 51 (2): 164–187. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S. C., B. B. Schwarz, and J. Gil. 2012. “Small-group, Computer-mediated Argumentation in Middle-school Classrooms: The Effects of Gender and Different Types of Online Teacher Guidance.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (3): 375–397. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02030.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belmont, M., E. Skinner, J. Wellborn, and J. Connell (1992). “Two Measures of Teacher Provision of Involvement, Structure, and Autonomy Support.” Technical report. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
   Google Scholar
• Broeck, A., M. Vansteenkiste, H. Witte, B. Soenens, and W. Lens. 2010. “Capturing Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness at Work: Construction and Initial Validation of the Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction Scale.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 83 (4): 981–1002. doi:10.1348/096317909X481382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2000. “The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-determination of Behavior.” Psychological Inquiry 11 (4): 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2004. Handbook of Self-determination Research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. 2011. “Promoting Thinking, Problem-solving and Reasoning during Small Group Discussions.” Teachers and Teaching 17 (1): 73–89. doi:10.1080/13540602.2011.538498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiffenhagen, C. 2012. “Making Rounds: The Routine Work of the Teacher during Collaborative Learning with Computers.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 7 (1): 11–42. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9134-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänze, M., and R. Berger. 2007. “Cooperative Learning, Motivational Effects, and Student Characteristics: An Experimental Study Comparing Cooperative Learning and Direct Instruction in 12th Grade Physics Classes.” Learning and Instruction 17 (1): 29–41. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., J. Reeve, and E. L. Deci. 2010. “Engaging Students in Learning Activities: It Is Not Autonomy Support or Structure but Autonomy Support and Structure.” Journal of Educational Psychology 102 (3): 588–600. doi:10.1037/a0019682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., P. A. Kirschner, A. Hadwin, H. Järvenoja, J. Malmberg, M. Miller, and J. Laru. 2016. “Socially Shared Regulation of Learning in CSCL: Understanding and Prompting Individual- and Group-level Shared Regulatory Activities.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 11 (3): 263–280. doi:10.1007/s11412-016-9238-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., and K. Issroff. 2005. “Learning Technologies: Affective and Social Issues in Computer-supported Collaborative Learning.” Computers & Education 44 (4): 395–408. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, F., F. Paas, and P. A. Kirschner. 2009. “A Cognitive Load Approach to Collaborative Learning: United Brains for Complex Tasks.” Educational Psychology Review 21 (1): 31–42. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., P. A. Kirschner, and W. Jochems. 2003. “Identifying the Pitfalls for Social Interaction in Computer-supported Collaborative Learning Environments: A Review of the Research.” Computers in Human Behavior 19 (3): 335–353. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., E. Raes, B. Lismont, F. Timmers, F. Dochy, and E. Cascallar. 2014. “A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Face-to-face Cooperative Learning. Do Recent Studies Falsify or Verify Earlier Findings?” Educational Research Review 10: 133–149. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W. C., C. J. Wang, O. S. Tan, C. Koh, and J. Ee. 2009. “A Self-determination Approach to Understanding Students’ Motivation in Project Work.” Learning and Individual Differences 19: 139–145. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnaert, A., M. Boekaerts, C. de Brabander, and M.-C. Opdenakker. 2011. “Students’ Experiences of Autonomy, Competence, Social Relatedness and Interest within a CSCL Environment in Vocational Education: The Case of Commerce and Business Administration.” Vocations and Learning 4 (3): 175–190. doi:10.1007/s12186-011-9056-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munneke, L., J. Andriessen, G. Kanselaar, and P. A. Kirschner. 2007. “Supporting Interactive Argumentation: Influence of Representational Tools on Discussing a Wicked Problem.” Computers in Human Behavior 23 (3): 1072–1088. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., and L. Muthén. 2017. Mplus Version 7: User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, A. M., and C. E. Hmelo-Silver. 2013. “What Is Collaborative Learning? an Overview.” In The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning, P, edited by C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chann, and A. M. O’Donnell, p. 1–16. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oortwijn, M. B., M. Boekaerts, P. Vedder, and J.-W. Strijbos. 2008. “Helping Behaviour during Cooperative Learning and Learning Gains: The Role of the Teacher and of Pupils’ Prior Knowledge and Ethnic Background.” Learning and Instruction 18 (2): 146–159. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls, M., R. Dekker, and B. Hout-Wolters. 2007. “Teacher Help for Conceptual Level Raising in Mathematics.” Learning Environments Research 10 (3): 223–240. doi:10.1007/s10984-007-9032-1.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. 2009. “Why Teachers Adopt a Controlling Motivating Style toward Students and How They Can Become More Autonomy Supportive.” Educational Psychologist 44 (3): 159–175. doi:10.1080/00461520903028990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., H. Jang, D. Carrell, S. Jeon, and J. Barch. 2004. “Enhancing Students‘ Engagement by Increasing Teachers‘ Autonomy Support.” Motivation and Emotion 28 (2): 147–169. doi:10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbeck, C. A., M. D. Ginsburg-Block, J. W. Fantuzzo, and T. R. Miller. 2003. “Peer-assisted Learning Interventions with Elementary School Students: A Meta-analytic Review.” Journal of Educational Psychology 95: 240–257. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseth, C. J., D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson. 2008. “Promoting Early Adolescents’ Achievement and Peer Relationships: The Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Goal Structures.” Psychological Bulletin 134: 223–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms, A., and T. Nichols. 2014. “Social Loafing: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Management Policy and Practice 15 (1): 58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., and M. J. Belmont. 1993. “Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement across the School Year.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 571–581. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroet, K., M.-C. Opdenakker, and A. Minnaert. 2013. “Effects of Need Supportive Teaching on Early Adolescents’ Motivation and Engagement: A Review of the Literature.” Educational Research Review 9: 65–87. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche, P., W. H. Gijselaers, M. Segers, and P. A. Kirschner. 2006. “Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in CL Environments.” Small Group Research 37 (5): 490–521. doi:10.1177/1046496406292938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, A., and J. Janssen. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Teacher Guidance during Collaborative Learning in Primary and Secondary Education.” Educational Research Review 27: 71–89. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., R. M. Ryan, and B. Soenens. 2020. “Basic Psychological Need Theory: Advancements, Critical Themes, and Future Directions.” Motivation and Emotion 44 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. 2009. “The Teacher’s Role in Promoting Collaborative Dialogue in the Classroom.” The British Journal of Educational Psychology 79: 1–28. doi:10.1348/000709908X380772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., S. H. Farivar, and A. M. Mastergeorge. 2002. “Productive Helping in Cooperative Groups.” Theory into Practice 41 (1): 13–20. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., K. Mari Nemer, and M. Ing. 2006. “Small-Group Reflections: Parallels between Teacher Discourse and Student Behavior in Peer- Directed Groups.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (1): 63–119. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger, A., and F. Fischer. 2006. “A Framework to Analyze Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Computer-supported CL.” Computers & Education 46 (1): 71–95. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar