Learning to facilitate dialogue: on challenges and teachers’ assessments of their own performance

References

• Alexander, R. 2008. Essays on Pedagogy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. 2018a. “Developing Dialogic Teaching: Genesis, Process, Trial.” Research Papers in Education 33 (5): 561–598. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. 2018b. Towards Dialogic Teaching. 5th ed. Cambridge: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N., J. A. Langer, M. Nystrand, and A. Gamoran. 2003. “Discussion-Based Approaches to Developing Understanding: Classroom Instruction and Student Performance in Middle and High School English.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (3): 685–730. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S. C., C. Howe, A. Lefstein, E. Matusov, and A. Reznitskaya. 2020. “Controversies and Consensus in Research on Dialogic Teaching and Learning.” Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal 8. doi:https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.312.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P., and W. C. Markarian. 2011. “Dialogic Teaching: Talk in Service of a Dialogic Stance.” Language and Education 25 (6): 515–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.597861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, D. 1987. “Good Reasoning: A Reconsideration Drawn from Experience with Philosophy for Children.” Analytic Teaching 8 (1): 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Costa-Carvalho, M., and M. Dina. 2017. “Thinking as a Community: Reasonableness and Emotions.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children,edited by M. R. Gregory, J. Haynes, and K. Murris, 127–134. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Justice. 2018. “Act on Supplementary Provisions to the Regulation on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data (The Data Protection Act).” https://www.datatilsynet.dk/media/7753/danish-data-protection-act.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. 1997. Det Flerstemmige Klasserum. Skrivning Og Samtale for at Lære. Århus: Klim.
   Google Scholar
• Echeverrria, E., and P. Hannam. 2017. “The Community of Philosophical Inquiry (P4C): A Pedagogical Proposal for Advancing Democracy.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children,edited by M. R. Gregory, J. Haynes, and K. Murris, 3–10. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farahani, M. F. 2014. “The Study on Challenges of Teaching Philosophy for Children.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116: 2141–2145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.534.
   Google Scholar
• García-Carrión, R., G. L. de Aguileta, M. Padrós, and M. Ramis-Salas. 2020. “Implications for Social Impact of Dialogic Teaching and Learning.” Frontiers in Psychology 11 (140). doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00140.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparatou, R. 2017. “Philosophy For/with Children and the Development of Epistimically Virtuous Agents.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children,edited by M. R. Gregory, J. Haynes, and K. Murris, 103–110. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzard, A. 2012. “Do You Need to Know Philosophy to Teach Philosophy to Children? A Comparison of Two Approaches.” Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 33 (1): 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Geijsel, F., and F. Meijers. 2005. “Identity Learning: The Core Process of Educational Change.” Educational Studies 31 (4): 419–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690500237488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, M. R., J. Haynes, and K. Murris. 2017. The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardman, F. 2019. “Embedding the Dialogic Pedagogy in the Classroom: What Is the Research Telling Us?” In The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education,edited by N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, and L. Major, 139–151, Abingdon, Oxon New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, J., and K. Murris. 2011. “The Provocation of an Epistemological Shift in Teacher Education through Philosophy with Children.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (2): 285–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00799.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., and M. Davies. 2019. “Teacher Professional Development to Support Classroom Dialogue: Challenges and Promises.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education,edited by N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, and L. Major, 238–253, Abingdon, Oxon New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., and N. Mercer. 2017. “Commentary on the Papers.” Language and Education 31 (1): 83–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. S. 2020. “The Art of Facilitating Philosophical Dialogues from the Perspective of Teachers.” Educational Studies 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1835612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. S. 2021. “The Impact of Philosophy with Children from the Perspective of Teachers.” Educational Studies 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1871323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S., and C. Collins. 2014. “Opening Teachers’ Minds to Philosophy: The Crucial Role of Teacher Education.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 (11): 1290–1299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.771450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A. 2008. “Changing Classroom Practice through the English National Literacy Strategy: A Micro-Interactional Perspective.” American Educational Research Journal 45 (3): 701–737. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, M., A. M. Sharp, and F. S. Oscanyan. 1980. Philosophy in the Classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle, S. 2008. “Dialogic Teaching: Discussing Theoretical Contexts and Reviewing Evidence from Classroom Practice.” Language and Education 22 (3): 222–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, S., and J. Thomas-Williams. 2012. “Dialogic Practice in Primary Schools: How Primary Head Teachers Plan to Embed Philosophy for Children into the Whole School.” Educational Studies 38 (1): 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2010.540824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markova, I. 2005. Dialogicality and Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, E. 1979. Dialogisch-Pragmatische Philosophiedidaktik. Hanover: Herman Schroedel Verlag KG.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, G. B. 1980. Philosophy and the Young Child. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matusov, E. 2018. “Mapping Dialogic Pedagogy: Instrumental and Non-instrumental Education.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology,edited by A. Rosa and J. Valsiner, 274–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBryde, F. 2013. “Teacher Self-efficacy and Teacher Practice: An Exploration of Existing Research and Dynamics of Teacher Self-efficacy in the Philosophy for Children Classroom.” Doctorate thesis, Newcastle University.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., S. Hennessy, and P. Warwick. 2019. “Dialogue, Thinking Together and Digital Technology in the Classroom: Some Educational Implications of a Continuing Line of Inquiry.” International Journal of Educational Research 97: 187–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., and C. O’Connor. 2015. “Conceptualizing Talk Moves as Tools: Professional Development Approaches for Academically Productive Discussions.” In Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue,edited by C. Asterhan, L. Resnick, and S. Clarke, 347–361, American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Murris, K. 2013. “The Epistemic Challenge of Hearing Child’s Voice.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 32 (3): 245–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9349-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naji, S., and R. Hashim. 2017. History, Theory and Practice of Philosophy for Children: International Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Naji, S. 2017. “P4C in Denmark.” In History, Theory and Practice of Philosophy for Children: International Perspectives,edited by S. Naji and R. Hashim, 143–149. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nihan Akkocaoğlu, Ç. 2018. “Philosophy for Children in Teacher Education: Effects, Difficulties, and Recommendations.” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 11 (2): 173–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019248591.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., L. L. Wu, A. Gamoran, S. Zeiser, and D. A. Long. 2003. “Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse.” Discourse Processes 35 (2): 135–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3502_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 1997b. Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Schoolroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 1997a. “Dialogic Instruction: When Recitation Becomes Conversation.” In Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Schoolroom,edited by M. Nystrand, 1–29. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oyler, J. 2015. “Expert Teacher Contributions to Argumentation Quality during Inquiry Dialogue.” Doctoral dissertation, Montclair State University.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., S. C. Christa, S. N. C. Asterhan, and F. Schantz. 2018. “Next Generation Research in Dialogic Learning.” In The Wiley Handbook of Teaching and Learning,edited by G. E. Hall, L. F. Quinn, and D. M. Gollnick, mer323–38. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., and I. Wilkinson. 2015. “Professional Development in Dialogic Teaching: Helping Teachers Promote Argument Literacy in Their Classrooms.” In The SAGE Handbook of Learning,edited by D. Scott, and E. Hargreaves, 219–231 https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-sage-handbook-of-learning/book242764, SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., and M. Glina. 2013. “Comparing Student Experiences with Story Discussions in Dialogic versus Traditional Settings.” The Journal of Educational Research 106 (1): 49–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.658458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., and M. Gregory. 2013. “Student Thought and Classroom Language: Examining the Mechanisms of Change in Dialogic Teaching.” Educational Psychologist 48 (2): 114–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A. 2012. “Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Language Use During Literature Discussions.” The Reading Teacher 65 (7): 446–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. F. 2006. “The Effects of a Teacher Development Programme Based on Philosophy for Children.” Master’s Thesis, University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Schleifer, M., P. Lebuis, A. Caron, and M.-F. Daniel. 1995. “Philosophy for Children Teachers as Collaborative Researchers.” Analytic Teaching 16 (1): 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, R. 2014. “”Inside-out Pedagogy”: Theorising Pedagogical Transformation through Teaching Philosophy.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 39 (6): 89–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n6.5.
   Google Scholar
• Sedova, K., Z. Salamounova, and R. Svaricek. 2014. “Troubles with Dialogic Teaching.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 3 (4): 274–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šeďová, K., Z. Šalamounová, R. Švaříček, and S. Martin. 2020. Getting Dialogic Teaching into Classrooms: Making Change Possible. Springer https://link.springer.com/book/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9243-0.
   Google Scholar
• Skidmore, David.et al 2016. ”Pedagogy and Dialogue.” In Dialogic Pedagogy, edited by David Skidmore, and Kyoko Murakami, 98–110. Bristol: Multilingual matters.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F., F. Hardman, K. Wall, and M. Mroz. 2004. “Interactive Whole Class Teaching in the National Literacy and Numercy Strategies.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (3): 395–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920410001689706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. 2017. “Negotiating Meaning in Classrooms: P4C as an Examplar of Dialogic Pedagogy.” In Philosophy for Children: Theories and Praxis in Teacher Education,edited by B. Anderson, 46–54. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Splitter, L. J. 2014. “Preparing Teachers to ‘Teach’ Philosophy for Children.” Journal of Philosophy in Schools 1 (1): 89–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.21913/jps.v1i1.995.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., and S. Trickey. 2007. “Collaborative Philosophical Enquiry for School Children: Cognitive Effects at 10–12 Years.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 271–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906x105328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., and S. Trickey. 2015. “The Role of Dialogue in Philosophy for Children.” In Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue,edited by C. Asterhan, L. Resnick, and S. Clarke, 99–110 https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/sdub/detail.action?docID=4866316, American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Turgeon, W. C. 2012. “The Place of ‘Philosophy’ in Preparing Teachers to Teach Pre-college Philosophy—Notes for a Conversation.” Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 32 (2): 68–74.
   Google Scholar
• Välitalo, R., H. Juuso, and A. Sutinen. 2016. “Philosophy for Children as an Educational Practice.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 35 (1): 79–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9471-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansieleghem, N. 2006. “Listening to Dialogue.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 25 (1–2): 175–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-006-0008-x.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Socio-cultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., A. Reznitskaya, K. Bourdage, J. Oyler, M. Glina, R. Drewry, M.-Y. Kim, and K. Nelson. 2017. “Toward a More Dialogic Pedagogy: Changing Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices through Professional Development in Language Arts Classrooms.” Language and Education 31 (1): 65–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, E., and P. Worley. 2019. “Teaching Critical Thinking and Metacognitive Skills through Philosophical Enquiry: A Practitioner’s Report on Experiments in the Classroom.” Childhood & Philosophy 1–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2019.46229.
   Google Scholar
• Worley, P. 2011. The if Machine: Philosophical Enquiry in the Classroom. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Worley, P. 2015. “Open Thinking, Closed Questioning: Two Kinds of Open and Closed Question.” Journal of Philosophy in Schools 2 (2): 17–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.21913/jps.v2i2.1269.
   Google Scholar
• Worley, P. 2016. “Ariadne’s Clew Absence and Presence in the Facilitation of Philosophical Conversations.” Journal of Philosophy in Schools 3 (2): 51–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.21913/jps.v3i2.1350.
   Google Scholar
• Yeazell, M. C. 1981. “What Happens to Teachers Who Teach Philosophy to Children.” Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children 2 (3/4): 86–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/thinking19812326.
   Google Scholar