References
- Aksela, M., and O. Haatainen 2019. “Project-Based Learning (PBL) in Practise: Active Teachers’ Views of Its’ Advantages and Challenges.” Paper presented at the Conference, International STEM in Education Conference, Brisbane, Australia. Accessed 26 June 2020. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/304045
- Barron, B., D. L. Schwartz, N. J. Vye, A. Moore, A. Petrosino, L. Zech, and J. D. Bransford; The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. 1998. “Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-based Learning.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 7: 271–311.
- Barron, B., and L. Darling-Hammond 2008. “Teaching for Meaningful Learning: A Review of Research on Inquiry-Based and Cooperative Learning. Book Excerpt.” George Lucas Educational Foundation. Accessed 26 June 2020. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539399.pdf
- Bell, S. 2010. “Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future.” The Clearing House 83 (2): 39–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415.
- Bender, W. N. 2012. Project-based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin Press.
- Blumenfeld, P. C., E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar. 1991. “Motivating Project-based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning.” Educational Psychologist 26 (3–4): 369–398. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139.
- Burmeister M and Eilks I. 2012. An example of learning about plastics and their evaluation as a contribution to Education for Sustainable Development in secondary school chemistry teaching. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, 13(2): 93–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90067F.
- Castro Silva, J., L. Amante, and J. Morgado. 2017. “School Climate, Principal Support and Collaboration among Portuguese Teachers.” European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (4): 505–520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1295445.
- Chen, C.-H., and Y.-C. Yang. 2019. “Revisiting the Effects of Project-based Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-analysis Investigating Moderators.” Educational Research Review 26: 71–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001.
- Czerniak, C. M., and C. C. Johnson. 2014. “Interdisciplinary Science Teaching.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by Lederman and Abell, 395–410. New York: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267.
- De Graaff, E., and A. Kolmos. 2007. “History of Problem-based and Project-based Learning.” In Management of Change: Implementation of Problem-based and Project-based Learning in Engineering, edited by E. de Graaff and A. Kolmos, 1–8. Rotterdam: Brill Sense.
- Dochy, F., M. Segers, P. Van Den Bossche, and D. Gijbels. 2003. “Effects of Problem-based Learning: A Meta-analysis.” Learning and Instruction 13 (5): 533–568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7.
- Du, X., and Y. Chaaban. 2020. “Teachers’ Readiness for a Statewide Change to PjBL in Primary Education in Qatar.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 14 (1). doi:https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28591.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/258557.
- Eronen, L., S. Kokko, and K. Sormunen. 2019. “Escaping the Subject-based Class: A Finnish Case Study of Developing Transversal Competencies in A Transdisciplinary Course.” The Curriculum Journal 30 (3): 264–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1568271.
- FNBE [Finnish National Board of Education] (2014). Perusopetuksen Opetussuunnitelma [The National Core Curriculum]. Accessed 26 June 2020. https://www.oph.fi/fi/koulutus-ja-tutkinnot/perusopetuksen-opetussuunnitelman-perusteet
- Frankl, V. E. 1984. Man’s Search for Meaning: An Introduction to Logotherapy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Frykholm, J., and G. Glasson. 2005. “Connecting Science and Mathematics Instruction: Pedagogical Context Knowledge for Teachers.” School Science and Mathematics 105 (3): 127–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18047.x.
- Grantham, H. S., M. Bode, E. McDonald-Madden, E. T. Game, A. T. Knight, and H. P. Possingham. 2010. “Effective Conservation Planning Requires Learning and Adaptation.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8 (8): 431–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/080151.
- Huntley, M. A. 1999. “Theoretical and Empirical Investigations of Integrated Mathematics and Science Education in the Middle Grades with Implications for Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 50 (1): 57–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719905000107.
- Ishimaru A M. (2019). From Family Engagement to Equitable Collaboration. Educational Policy, 33(2): 350–385. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817691841.
- Kang, J., and T. Keinonen. 2018. “The Effect of Student-centered Approaches on Students’ Interest and Achievement in Science: Relevant Topic-based, Open and Guided Inquiry-based, and Discussion-based Approaches.” Research in Science Education 48 (4): 865–885. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9590-2.
- Kelchtermans, G. 2006. “Teacher Collaboration and Collegiality as Workplace Conditions: A Review.” Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 52: 220–237.
- Kim, J. Y., and K. Y. Lim. 2019. “Promoting Learning in Online, Ill-structured Problem Solving: The Effects of Scaffolding Type and Metacognition Level.” Computers & Education 138: 116–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.001.
- Klein, D. C. D., H. F. O’Neil, R. A. Dennis, and E. L. Baker 1997. “The Five Families of Cognitive Learning: A Context in Which to Conduct Cognitive Demands Analysis of Technologies.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Accessed 26 June 2020. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED424234.pdf
- Lam, S. F., R. W. Y. Cheng, and H. C. Choy. 2010. “School Support and Teacher Motivation to Implement Project-based Learning.” Learning and Instruction 20 (6): 487–497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.07.003.
- Långström, I. 2017. “Jump in the Water and You Will Learn to Swim: Acase Study of Teachers’ Experiences of Implementing a Multidisciplinary Learning Package.” Master’s thesis, University of Tampere, Finland. Accessed 26 June 2020. https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/101740/GRADU-1499435067.pdf?sequence=1
- Lederman, N. G., and M. L. Niess. 1997. “Integrated, Interdisciplinary, or Thematic Instruction? Is This a Question or Is It Questionable Semantics?” School Science and Mathematics 97 (2): 57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17342.x.
- Martin-Hansen, L. 2002. Defining inquiry. The science teacher, 69(2): 34–37.
- Marx, R. W., P. C. Blumenfeld, J. S. Krajcik, and E. Soloway. 1997. “Enacting Project-based Science: Challenges for Practice and Policy.” The Elementary School Journal 97 (4): 341–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/461870.
- Mentzer, G. A., C. M. Czerniak, and L. Brooks. 2017. “An Examination of Teacher Understanding of Project Based Science as a Result of Participating in an Extended Professional Development Program: Implications for Implementation.” School Science and Mathematics 117 (1–2): 76–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12208.
- Muckenthaler, M., T. Tillmann, S. Weiß, and E. Kiel. 2020. “Teacher Collaboration as a Core Objective of School Development.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1747501.
- NGSS [Next Generation Science Standards]. 2014. Accessed 26 June 2020. www.nextgenscience.org.
- OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. 2013. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Teaching and Learning International Survey TALIS 2013 Conceptual Framework. Paris, France. Accessed 26 June 2020. http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/talis-2013-results.htm.
- Ohno, T. 2006. “Ask ‘Why’ Five Times about Every Matter.” Toyota Traditions. Accessed 26 June 2020. https://www.toyota-myanmar.com/about-toyota/toyota-traditions/quality/ask-why-five-times-about-every-matter.
- Ontario Ministry of Education. 2019. “Environmental Education.” Accessed 26 June 2020. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/teachers/enviroed/education.html
- Osterwalder, A., and Y. Pigneur. 2010. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
- Park, J.-Y., and J.-B. Son. 2010. “Transitioning toward Transdisciplinary Learning in a Multidisciplinary Environment.” International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning 6 (1): 82–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.6.1.82.
- PMI [Project Management Institute]. 2013. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Fifth ed. Newtown Square, Pa: Project Management Institute.
- Rios, J. A., G. Ling, R. Pugh, D. Becker, and A. Bacall. 2020. “Identifying Critical 21st-century Skills for Workplace Success: A Content Analysis of Job Advertisements.” Educational Researcher 49 (2): 80–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19890600.
- Ronfeldt, M., S. O. Farmer, K. McQueen, and J. A. Grissom. 2015. “Teacher Collaboration in Instructional Teams and Student Achievement.” American Educational Research Journal 52 (3): 475–514. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215585562.
- Ronis, D. L. 2008. Problem-based Learning for Math & Science: Integrating Inquiry and the Internet. New Delhi, India: Corwin Press.
- Rowley, J. (2002). Using Case Studies in Research. Management research news.
- Sage, S. M. 1996. “A Qualitative Examination of Problem-based Learning at the K-8 Level: Preliminary Findings.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED398263. Accessed16 December 2021.
- Samson, G. 2014. “From Writing to Doing: The Challenges of Implementing Integration (And Interdisciplinarity) in the Teaching of Mathematics, Sciences, and Technology.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 14 (4): 346–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2014.964883.
- Sawyer, L. B. E., and S. E. Rimm‐Kaufman. 2007. “Teacher Collaboration in the Context of the Responsive Classroom Approach.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 13 (3): 211–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701299767.
- Sinek, S. 2009. Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action. New York, New York: Penguin.
- Stein, Z., M. Connell, and H. Gardner. 2008. “Exercising Quality Control in Interdisciplinary Education: Toward an Epistemologically Responsible Approach.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3–4): 401–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00655.x.
- Stevenson, R. B. 2007. “Schooling and Environmental Education: Contradictions in Purpose and Practice.” Environmental Education Research 13 (2): 139–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701295726.
- Stuckey, M., A. Hofstein, R. Mamlok-Naaman, and I. Eilks. 2013. “The Meaning of ‘Relevance’ in Science Education and Its Implications for the Science Curriculum.” Studies in Science Education 49 (1): 1–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463.
- TENK. 2019. Ethical Review in Human Sciences. Accessed 26 June 2020. https://tenk.fi/en/ethical-review/ethical-review-human-sciences.
- Thomas, J. W. 2000. A Review of Research on Project-based Learning, 49. San Reafael, CA: The Autodesk foundation.
- Tolppanen S., Jäppinen I., Kärkkäinen S., Salonen A. and Keinonen T. 2019. Relevance of Life-Cycle Assessment in Context-Based Science Education: A Case Study in Lower Secondary School. Sustainability, 11(21): 5877. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215877.
- Tolppanen, S., and K. Tirri. 2014. “How an Enrichment Summer Program Is Meeting the Expectations of Gifted Science Students: A Case Study from Finland.” International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity 2 (1): 103–115.
- Tolppanen, S., and M. Aksela. 2018. “Identifying and Addressing Students‘ Questions on Climate Change.” The Journal of Environmental Education 49 (5): 375–389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1417816.
- Trott, C. D., T. L. Even, and S. M. Frame. 2020. “Merging the Arts and Sciences for Collaborative Sustainability Action: A Methodological Framework.” Sustainability Science 15 (4): 1067–1085. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00798-7.
- Turkka, J., O. Haatainen, and M. Aksela. 2017. “Integrating Art into Science Education: A Survey of Science Teachers’ Practices.” International Journal of Science Education 39 (10): 1403–1419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1333656.
- Venville, G. J., J. Wallace, L. J. Rennie, and J. A. Malone. 2002. “Curriculum Integration: Eroding the High Ground of Science as a School Subject?” Studies in Science Education 37 (1): 43–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560177.
- Viro, E., and J. Joutsenlahti. 2018. “Projektityöskentelyn Kehittäminen Yläkoulun Matematiikan Opetuksessa [Developing Project Work in Mathematics Teaching in Upper Secondary School].” FMSERA Journal 2 (1): 90–99. Accessed16 December 2021. https://journal.fi/fmsera/article/view/69879 .
- Walker, A., and H. Leary. 2009. “A Problem Based Learning Meta Analysis: Differences across Problem Types, Implementation Types, Disciplines, and Assessment Levels.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning 3 (1): 6. doi:https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1061.
- Wang, H.-H., M. Charoenmuang, N. A. Knobloch, and R. L. Tormoehlen. 2020. “Defining Interdisciplinary Collaboration Based on High School Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of STEM Integration Using a Complex Designed System.” International Journal of STEM Education 7 (1): 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0201-4.
- Yazan, B. 2015. “Three Approaches to Case Study Methods in Education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake.” The Qualitative Report 20 (2): 134–152.
- Yew, E. H., and K. Goh. 2016. “Problem-based Learning: An Overview of Its Process and Impact on Learning.” Health Professions Education 2 (2): 75–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004.