Text-Picture-Material in science education: A comparison of Omani and German teachers’ attitudes, motivational orientations and self-regulatory skills

References

• Ainsworth, S. 2006. “DeFt: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations.” Learning and Instruction 16: 183–198. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajda, K., M. Kahveci, N. Mansour, and M. M. Alarfaj. 2018. “Exploring Science Teachers’ Affective States: Pedagogical Discontentment, Self-Efficacy, Intentions to Reform, and Their Relationships.” Research in Science Education 48 (6): 1359–1386. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9606-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Balushi, S. M. 2016. “Science Education Research in Oman: Opportunities, Trends and Challenges.” In Science Education Research and Practice in Asia: Challenges and Opportunities, edited by M. H. Chiu, 125–153. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Alshaqsi, H., and A. Ambusaidi. 2018. “The Most Common Patterns of Classroom Dialogue Used by Science Teachers in Omani Cycle Two Schools.” International Journal Instruction 11 (1): 255–268. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.11118a.
   Google Scholar
• Ambusaidi, A. 2013. “12th Grade Students’ Estimations of Science Teachers’ Possession of Active Teacher Traits and Their Relation to Some Educational Variables.” Mu’tah Lil-Buhuth Wad Dirasat: Humanities and Social Sciences Series 2 (28): 313–342.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P., and J. Sweller. 2005. “The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, edited by R. E. Mayer, 135–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., and M. P. Bal. 2010. “Weekly Work Engagement and Performance: A Study Among Starting Teachers.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 83 (1): 189–206. doi:10.1348/096317909X402596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy 1 (4): 139–161. doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., and M. Kunter. 2013. ”The COACTIV Model of Teachers’ Professional Competence.” In Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers: Results from the COACTIV Project. edited by M. Kunter. Mathematics teacher education v. 8, 25–48. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bildungsberichterstattung, A. 2014. Bildung in Deutschland 2014: Ein Indikatorengestützter Bericht Mit Einer Analyse zur Bildung von Menschen Mit Behinderungen [Education in Germany 2014: An Indicator-Based Report with an Analysis of Education of People with Disabilities]. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag. https://www.bildungsbericht.de/de/bildungsberichte-seit-2006/bildungsbericht-2014/bildung-in-deutschland-2014.
   Google Scholar
• Boer, A. D., S. J. Pijl, and A. Minnaert. 2011. “Regular Primary Schoolteachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education: A Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 15 (3): 331–353. doi:10.1080/13603110903030089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brünken, R., J. L. Plass, and D. Leutner. 2003. “Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 53–61. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge University Press. 2020. “Education Reform: Partnering with Oman’s Ministry of Education.” Accessed January 11, 2020. https://www.cambridge.org/us/educationreform/case-studies/partnering-omans-ministry-education/.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, K. K. C., and M. Winterbottom. 2021. “Students’ Integration of Textbook Representations into Their Understanding of Photomicrographs: Epistemic Network Analysis.” Research in Science & Technological Education 1–20. doi:10.1080/02635143.2021.1920382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education. 6. ed. London: Routledge. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0731/2006017358-d.html.
   Google Scholar
• Collazos, C. A., and R. Gil. 2011. “Using Cross-Cultural Features in Web Design Patterns.” In 2011 Eighth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, 514–19: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Corp, I.B.M. 1989-2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2021. “Defining Teaching Quality Around the World.” European Journal of Teacher Education 44 (3): 295–308. doi:10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2000. “The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior.” Psychological Inquiry 11 (4): 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, D. M. 2010. “Testing for Factorial Invariance in the Context of Construct Validation.” Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 43 (2): 121–149. doi:10.1177/0748175610373459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. 2010. Applied Missing Data Analysis. Methodology in the Social Sciences. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackling, M., S. Peers, and V. Prain. 2007. “Primary Connections: Reforming Science Teaching in Australian Primary Schools.” Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association 53 (3): 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hochpöchler, U., W. Schnotz, T. Rasch, M. Ullrich, H. Horz, N. McElvany, and J. Baumert. 2013. “Dynamics of Mental Model Construction from Text and Graphics.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 28 (4): 1105–1126. doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0156-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standard Classification of Education, ISCED 2011. 2012. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002191/219109e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, T. S. 2021. “Cultural Differences in EFL Teaching Methods Between Korean and Non-Korean Teachers.” Elt 15 (1): 53. doi:10.5539/elt.v15n1p53.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, M. M., K. Neumann, and H. E. Fischer. 2017. “The Impact of Physics Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Motivation on Students’ Achievement and Interest.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54 (5): 586–614. doi:10.1002/tea.21378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khine, M. S., and D. L. Fisher. 2004. “Teacher Interaction in Psychosocial Learning Environments: Cultural Differences and Their Implications in Science Instruction.” Research in Science & Technological Education 22 (1): 99–111. doi:10.1080/0263514042000187566.
   Google Scholar
• Klusmann, U., M. Kunter, U. Trautwein, O. Lüdtke, and J. Baumert. 2008. “Teachers’ Occupational Well-Being and Quality of Instruction: The Important Role of Self-Regulatory Patterns.” Journal of Educational Psychology 100 (3): 702–715. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000. 2001. Education and skills. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• König, J. 2013. “First Comes the Theory, Then the Practice? On the Acquisition of General Pedagogical Knowledge During Initial Teacher Education.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11 (4): 999–1028. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9420-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Michael, Mullis, Ina, A. E. Beaton, Gonzales, Eugenio, Smith, Teresa, and Kelly, Dana. 1996. Mathematics Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Lynch School Faculty Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., I. V. S. Mullis, and P. Foy. 2008. TIMSS 2007: International Science Report : Findings from Iea’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center; Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., edited by. 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, C. V., H. Klieve, and H. Kanasa. 2019. “Exploring Australian Preservice Primary Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Teaching Science Using the Dimensions of Attitude Toward Science (DAS).” Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09910-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElvany, N., S. Schroeder, J. Baumert, W. Schnotz, H. Horz, and M. Ullrich. 2012. “Cognitively Demanding Learning Materials with Texts and Instructional Pictures: Teachers’ Diagnostic Skills, Pedagogical Beliefs and Motivation.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 27 (3): 403–420. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0078-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkov, M., and G. Hofstede. 2012. “Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 43 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1177/0022022110388567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mónico, P., A. K. Mensah, M. Grünke, T. Garcia, E. Fernández, and C. Rodríguez. 2020. “Teacher Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Inclusion: A Cross-Cultural Study in Ghana, Germany and Spain.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 24 (5): 527–543. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1471526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., M. O. Martin, P. Foy, D. Kelly, and B. Fishbein. 2020. TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., and B. O. Muthén. 1998-2018. “Mplus Version 8.1: Base Program and Combination Add-On.”
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oerke, B., N. McElvany, A. Ohle-Peters, H. Horz, and M. Ullrich. 2018a. “Einstellungen, Motivation Und Selbstwirksamkeit von Lehrkräften.” Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft 25 (4): 743. doi:10.1007/s11618-017-0804-9.
   Google Scholar
• Oerke, B., N. McElvany, A. Ohle-Peters, H. Horz, and M. Ullrich. 2018b. “The Impact of Instruction and Student Characteristics on the Development of Students’ Ability to Read Texts with Instructional Pictures.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 33 (2–3): 131. doi:10.1007/s10212-018-0375-z.
   Google Scholar
• Oman 2020. “Oman Vision 2040.” https://www.2040.om/en/oman-vision-2040/about-the-vision/.
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. D., and D. Pedder. 2011. “Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning.” Review of Educational Research 81 (3): 376–407. doi:10.3102/0034654311413609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opfermann, M., A. Schmeck, and H. E. Fischer. 2017. “Multiple Representations in Physics and Science Education – Why Should We Use Them?” In Multiple Representations in Physics Education, edited by D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, and H. E. Fischer, 1–22 10. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ostermeier, C., M. Prenzel, and R. Duit. 2010. “Improving Science and Mathematics Instruction: The SINUS Project as an Example for Reform as Teacher Professional Development.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (3): 303–327. doi:10.1080/09500690802535942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct.” Review of Educational Research 62 (3): 307–332. doi:10.3102/00346543062003307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pant, H. A., P. Stanat, U. Schroeders, A. Roppelt, T. Siegle, and C. Pohlmann. 2013. IQB-Ländervergleich 2012: Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen am Ende der Sekundarstufe I I [IQB-state-comparison 2012: Mathematics and science competences at the end of lower secondary school]. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, B. C., J. Hisley, and T. Kempler. 2000. ““What’s Everybody so Excited About?”: The Effects of Teacher Enthusiasm on Student Intrinsic Motivation and Vitality.” Journal of Experimental Education 68 (3): 217–236. doi:10.1080/00220970009600093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M., C. Delgado, K.-S. Tang, C. Bordas, and K. Norville. 2021. “A Taxonomy of Cognitive Image Functions for Science Curriculum Materials: Identifying and Creating ‘Performative’ Visual Displays.” International Journal of Science Education 1–30. doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1868609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, X., and S. Hu. 2021. “The Relationship Between Perceived Value Congruence and Teacher Commitment: A Moderated Mediation Model of Teacher Self-Efficacy and Time Pressure.” Educational Studies 1–18. doi:10.1080/03055698.2021.1931042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, K. J., S. L. Druker, H. E. Garnier, M. Lemmens, C. Chen, T. Kawanaka, D. Rasmussen, et al. 2006. “Teaching Science in Five Countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2006–2011.”National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, J. H., and C. Ringstaff. 2014. “Inspiring Instructional Change in Elementary School Science: The Relationship Between Enhanced Self-Efficacy and Teacher Practices.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 25 (6): 729–751. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9393-0.
   Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., U. Ludewig, M. Ullrich, H. Horz, N. McElvany, and J. Baumert. 2014. “Strategy Shifts During Learning from Texts and Pictures.” Journal of Educational Psychology 106 (4): 974–989. doi:10.1037/a0037054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., and I. Wagner. 2018. “Construction and Elaboration of Mental Models Through Strategic Conjoint Processing of Text and Pictures.” Journal of Educational Psychology 110 (6): 850–863. doi:10.1037/edu0000246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., I. Wagner, F. Zhao, M. Ullrich, H. Horz, N. McElvany, A. Ohle, and J. Baumert. 2017. “Development of Dynamic Usage of Strategies for Integrating Text and Picture Information in Secondary Schools.” In Competence Assessment in Education - Research, Models and Instruments, edited by D. Leutner, J. Fleischer, J. Grünkorn, and E. Klieme, 303–313. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S., T. Richter, N. McElvany, A. Hachfeld, J. Baumert, W. Schnotz, H. Horz, and M. Ullrich. 2011. “Teachers’ Beliefs, Instructional Behaviors, and Students’ Engagement in Learning from Texts with Instructional Pictures.” Learning and Instruction 21 (3): 403–415. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahat, M. A., A. Ohle-Peters, and A. Ambusaidi. 2022. Teaching with Texts and Pictures in Science Classes: Teachers’ Attitudes and Motivational Orientations at Different School Levels. Journal of Science Teacher Education 33(1): 107–123. doi:10.1080/1046560X.2021.1909231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, E. M., and S. Skaalvik. 2016. “Teacher Stress and Teacher Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Engagement, Emotional Exhaustion, and Motivation to Leave the Teaching Profession.” Ce 07 (13): 1785–1799. doi:10.4236/ce.2016.713182.
   Google Scholar
• Specialized Institute for Professional Training of Teachers. 2020. “Strategic Training Programs Targeting Science Teachers.” http://havasapps.com/test/moe/ar/.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, F. C., and E. Stern. 2002. “The Nature of Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Beliefs Matters for Students’ Achievement Gains: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Elementary Mathematics.” Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (2): 344–355. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianidou, F. 2002. “Analysis of Science Textbook Pictures About Energy and Pupils’ Readings of Them.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (3): 257–283. doi:10.1080/09500690110078905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., A. Woolfolk-Hoy, and W. K. Hoy. 1998. “Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and Measure.” Review of Educational Research 68 (2): 202–248. doi:10.3102/00346543068002202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J. 2018. “Picture This! Effects of Photographs, Diagrams, Animations, and Sketching on Learning and Beliefs About Learning from a Geoscience Text.” Applied Cognitive Psychology. doi:10.1002/acp.3495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar