The effect of teacher influence relative to principal influence in school decision-making on teacher job attitudes

References

• Blasé, J., and J. Blasé. 2004. “The Dark Side of School Leadership: Implications for Administrator Preparation.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 3 (4): 245–273. doi:10.1080/15700760490503733.
   Google Scholar
• Bogler, R. 2005. “The Power of Empowerment: Mediating the Relationship Between teachers’ Participation in Decision Making and Their Professional Commitment.” Journal of School Leadership 15 (1): 76–98. doi:10.1177/105268460501500104.
   Google Scholar
• Bogler, R., and A. Somech. 2004. “Influence of Teacher Empowerment on teachers’ Organizational Commitment, Professional Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Schools.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (3): 277–289. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, R. 2011. “Distributed Leadership in Organizations: A Review of Theory and Research.” International Journal of Management Reviews 13 (3): 251–269. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman, G., and M. Dowling. 2008. “Teacher Attrition and Retention: A Meta-Analytic and Narrative Review of the Research.” Review of Educational Research 78 (3): 367–409. doi:10.3102/0034654308321455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezicha, K. F., and E. J. Fuller. 2019. “Building teachers’ Trust in Principals: Exploring the Effects of the Match Between Teacher and Principal Race/Ethnicity and Gender and Feelings of Trust.” Journal of School Leadership 29 (1): 25–53. doi:10.1177/1052684618825087.
   Google Scholar
• Brezicha, K. F., S. Ikoma, H. Park, and G. K. LeTendre. 2020. “The Ownership Perception Gap: Exploring Teacher Job Satisfaction and Its Relationship to teachers’ and principals’ Perception of Decision-Making Opportunity.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 23 (4): 428–456. doi:10.1080/13603124.2018.1562098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., P. B. Sebring, E. Allensworth, S. Luppescu, and J. Q. Easton. 2010. Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannata, M., R. McCrory, G. Sykes, D. Anagnostopoulos, and K. A. Frank. 2010. “Exploring the Influence of National Board Certified Teachers in Their Schools and Beyond.” Educational Administration Quarterly 46 (4): 463–490. doi:10.1177/0013161X10375605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., C. Barbaranelli, L. Borgogni, L. Petitta, and A. Rubinacci. 2003. “Teachers’, School Staff’s and parents’ Efficacy Beliefs as Determinants of Attitude Toward School.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 18 (1): 15–31. doi:10.1007/BF03173601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerit, Y. 2009. “The Effects of Servant Leadership Behaviours of School Principals on teachers’ Job Satisfaction.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 37 (5): 600–623. doi:10.1177/1741143209339650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, S. C. 1991. “Review of Research on Teacher Participation in School Decision-Making.” Review of Research in Education 17 (1): 225–266. doi:10.3102/0091732X017001225.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2000. “The“what” and“why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior.” Psychological Inquiry 11 (4): 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M. 1962. “Power-Dependence Relations.” American Sociological Review 27 (1): 31–41. doi:10.2307/2089716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fradkin-Hayslip, A. 2021. “Teacher Autonomy, Motivation, and Job Satisfaction: Perceptions of Elementary School Teachers According to Self-Determination Theory.” Ilkogretim Online 20 (2): 198–205.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, D., L. Drysdale, and B. Mulford. 2006. “Models of Successful Principal Leadership.” School Leadership & Management 26 (4): 371–395. doi:10.1080/13632430600886921.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., and R. H. Heck. 2010. “Leadership for Learning: Does Collaborative Leadership Make a Difference in School Improvement.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 38 (6): 654–678. doi:10.1177/1741143210379060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2004. “Distributed Leadership and School Improvement.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 32 (1): 11–24. doi:10.1177/1741143204039297.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2010. “Teacher Leadership as Distributed Leadership: Heresy, Fantasy or Possibility?” School Leadership & Management 23 (3): 313–324. doi:10.1080/1363243032000112801.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, D. 2009. “Education Policy, Distributed Leadership and Socio‐cultural Theory.” Educational Review 61 (2): 139–150. doi:10.1080/00131910902844721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher, R. 2005. “The Distribution of Leadership and Power in Schools.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 26 (2): 253–267. doi:10.1080/0142569042000294200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hightower, A., M. S. Knapp, J. A. Marsh, and M. W. McLaughlin. 2002. School Districts and Institutional Renewal. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., and C. G. Miskel. 2013. Educational Administration. 9th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., G. Devos, and H. Van Keer. 2009. “The Influence of Distributed Leadership on teachers’ Organizational Commitment: A Multilevel Approach.” The Journal of Educational Research 103 (1): 40–52. doi:10.1080/00220670903231201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M. 1996. “Teachers’ Decision-Making Power and School Conflict.” Sociology of Education 69 (2): 159–176. doi:10.2307/2112804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M. 2003. Who Controls teachers’ Work? Power and Accountability in America’s Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M., and H. May. 2012. “The Magnitude, Destinations, and Determinants of Mathematics and Science Teacher Turnover.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 34 (4): 435–464. doi:10.3102/0162373712454326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. M. 2012. “Influence Matters: The Link Between Principal and Teacher Influence Over School Policy and Teacher Turnover.” Journal of School Leadership 22 (5): 875–901. doi:10.1177/105268461202200503.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. M., and C. Marriott. 2012. “The Interaction of Principal and Teacher Instructional Influence as a Measure of Leadership as an Organizational Quality.” Educational Administration Quarterly 48 (2): 230–258. doi:10.1177/0013161X11432925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M., M. A. Kraft, and J. P. Papay. 2012. “How Context Matters in High-Need Schools: The Effects of teachers’ Working Conditions on Their Professional Satisfaction and Their students’ Achievement.” Teachers College Record 114 (10): 1–39. doi:10.1177/016146811211401004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., and J. D. Kammeyer-Mueller. 2012. “Job Attitudes.” Annual Review of Psychology 63 (1): 341–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapa, R., and B. Gimbert. 2018. “Job Satisfaction, School Rule Enforcement, and Teacher Victimization.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 29 (1): 150–168. doi:10.1080/09243453.2017.1395747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. 2004. “An Event History Analysis of Teacher Attrition: Salary, Teacher Tracking, and Socially Disadvantaged Schools.” Journal of Experimental Education 72 (3): 195–220. doi:10.3200/JEXE.72.3.195-220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M., M. Copland, and J. Talbert. 2003. Leading for Learning: Reflective Tools for School and District Leaders. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., and B. Mascall. 2008. “Collective Leadership Effects on Student Achievement.” Educational Administration Quarterly 44 (4): 529–561. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., J. W. Keeley, Y. Sui, and L. Sang. 2021. “Impact of Distributed on Teacher Job Satisfaction in China: The Mediating Roles of Teacher Autonomy and Teacher Collaboration.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 71: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A. 1976. “The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction.” In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by M. D. Dunette, 1293–1349. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Lumby, J. 2013. “Distributed Leadership: The Uses and Abuses of Power.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 41 (5): 581–597. doi:10.1177/1741143213489288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, C. J., and J. J. Hox. 2005. “Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Model.” Methodology 1 (3): 86–92. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86.
   Google Scholar
• Malen, B., and M. V. Cochran. 2008. “Beyond Pluralistic Patterns of Power: Research on the Micropolitics of Schools.” In Handbook of Education Politics and Policy, edited by B. S. Cooper, J. G. Cibulka, and L. D. Fusarelli, 148–178. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mangin, M. M. 2008. “The Influence of Organizational Design on Instructional Teacher Leadership.” In Effective Teacher Leadership, edited by M. M. Magin and S. R. Stoelinga, 77–98. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., and S. M. Printy. 2003. “Principal Leadership and School Performance: An Integration of Transformational and Instructional Leadership.” Educational Administration Quarterly 39 (3): 370–397. doi:10.1177/0013161X03253412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoKoena, S. 2017. “Shared Leadership: How is the Phenomenon Understood in Theory and Practiced in the Schools?” International Journal of Business and Management Studies 9 (1): 177–191.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, P. 2002. Power: A Philosophical Analysis. 2nd ed. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, Y., R. Yan, and D. Pounder. 2018. “Collective Leadership: Principals’ Decision Influence and the Supportive or Inhibiting Decision Influence of Other Stakeholders.” Educational Administration Quarterly 54 (2): 216–248. doi:10.1177/0013161X17723427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, A., and F. Huang. 2019. “Teacher Job Satisfaction by Principal Support and Teacher Cooperation: Results from the Schools and Staffing Survey.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 27: 11. doi:10.14507/epaa.27.4174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2016. Supporting Teacher Professionalism: Insights from TALIS 2013. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, R. G., and T. C. Valesky. 2007. Organizational Power in Education: Adaptive Leadership and School Reform. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. H., Cooc, N., Lee, K. H. 2020. “Relationships between teacher influence in managerial and instruction-related decision-making, job satisfaction, and professional commitment: A multivariate multilevel model.“ Educational Management Administration & Leadership 51 (1): 116–137. doi:10.1177/1741143220971287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. 2001. The Politics of Organizational Decision-Making. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pietsch, M., P. Tulowitzki, and T. Koch. 2019. “On the Differential and Shared Effects of Leadership for Learning on teachers’ Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction: A Multilevel Perspective.” Educational Administration Quarterly 55 (5): 705–741. doi:10.1177/0013161X18806346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, H. E. 2012. “Principal–Teacher Interactions: How Affective Relationships Shape Principal and Teacher Attitudes.” Educational Administration Quarterly 48 (1): 39–85. doi:10.1177/0013161X11417126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., and A. S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, E. M., and G. T. Schneider. 1994. “A Decade of Teacher Empowerment: An Empirical Analysis of Teacher Involvement in Decision-Making, 1980–1991.” Journal of Educational Administration 32 (1): 43–58. doi:10.1108/09578239410051844.
   Google Scholar
• Riehl, C., and J. W. Sipple. 1996. “Making the Most of Time and Talent: Secondary School Organizational Climates, Teaching Task Environments, and Teacher Commitment.” American Educational Research Journal 33 (4): 873–901. doi:10.3102/00028312033004873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P., and T. A. Judge. 2013. Organizational Behavior. 14th ed. London, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Roch, C. H., and C. Montague. 2021. “Teaching in the Virtual World: Examining teachers’ Job Satisfaction and Turnover.” Social science quarterly 102 (6): 2795–2811. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. 1987. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys.New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, D. J., J. D. Watt, and G. J. Greguras. 2004. “Reexamining the Job Satisfaction-Performance Relationship: The Complexity of Attitudes.” The Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (1): 165. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., J. M. Leslie, J. K. Spybrook, and X. Ma. 2012. “Are Principal Background and School Processes Related to Teacher Job Satisfaction? A Multilevel Study Using Schools and Staffing Survey 2003–04.” American Educational Research Journal 49 (2): 200–230. doi:10.3102/0002831211419949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., and J. Xia. 2012. “The Relationship Between teachers’ and principals’ Decision-Making Power: Is It a Win-Win Situation or a Zero-Sum Game?” International Journal of Leadership in Education 159 (2): 153–174. doi:10.1080/13603124.2011.624643.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. M., and K. J. Rowley. 2005. “Enhancing Commitment or Tightening Control: The Function of Teacher Professional Development in an Era of Accountability.” Educational Policy 19 (1): 126–154. doi:10.1177/0895904804270773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smylie, M. A., and J. W. Denny. 1990. “Teacher Leadership: Tensions and Ambiguities in Organizational Perspective.” Educational Administration Quarterly 26 (3): 235–259. doi:10.1177/0013161X90026003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A. 2010. “Participative Decision Making in Schools: A Mediating-Moderating Analytical Framework for Understanding School and Teacher Outcomes.” Educational Administration Quarterly 46 (2): 174–209. doi:10.1177/1094670510361745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A., and R. Bogler. 2002. “Antecedents and Consequences of Teacher Organizational and Professional Commitment.” Educational Administration Quarterly 38 (4): 555–577. doi:10.1177/001316102237672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., R. Halverson, and J. B. Diamond. 2001. “Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective.” Educational Researcher 30 (3): 23–28. doi:10.3102/0013189X030003023.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., and K. Healey. 2010. “Conceptualizing School Leadership and Management from a Distributed Perspective: An Exploration of Some Study Operations and Measures.” The Elementary School Journal 111 (2): 253–281. doi:10.1086/656300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, A., and J. Xia. 2018. “Teacher-Perceived Distributed Leadership, Teacher Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction: A Multilevel SEM Approach Using the 2013 TALIS Data.” International Journal of Educational Research 92: 86–97. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen‐moran, M. 2001. “Collaboration and the Need for Trust.” Journal of Educational Administration 39 (4): 308–331. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005493.
   Google Scholar
• White, P. A. 1992. “Teacher Empowerment Under “Ideal” School-Site Autonomy.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14 (1): 69–82. doi:10.3102/01623737014001069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, J., M. Izumi, and X. Gao. 2015. “School Process and Teacher Job Satisfaction at Alternative Schools: A Multilevel Study Using SASS 2007-08 Data.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 14 (2): 167–203. doi:10.1080/15700763.2014.997935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, J., and J. Shen. 2020. “The Principal-Teacher’s Power Relationship Revisited: A National Study Based on the 2011–12 SASS Data.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 19 (3): 477–496. doi:10.1080/15700763.2019.1586962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, J., J. Shen, and J. Sun. 2020. “Tight, Loose, or Decoupling? A National Study of the Decision-Making Power Relationship Between District Central Offices and School Principals.” Educational Administration Quarterly 56 (3): 396–434. doi:10.1177/0013161X19851174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, B., and A. Deniz. 2014. “The Relationship Between Power Distance and Organizational Commitment in Primary Schools.” Educational Research and Reviews 9 (19): 750–760. doi:10.5897/ERR2014.1869.
   Google Scholar