Depending on the kindness of strangers: the affective dimension of inspection visits to low-performing schools in Chile

References

• Anderson, B. 2010. “Modulating the Excess of Affect: Morale in a State of ‘Total War.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by M. Gregg and G. J. Seigworth, 161–185. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393047-007.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., M. Maguire, and A. Braun. 2012. How Schools Do Policy. Policy Enactments in Secondary School. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., M. Maguire, A. Braun, and K. Hoskins. 2011. “Policy Actors: Doing Policy Work in Schools.” Discourse 32 (4): 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394716.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardita, M.-C., Á. González, and C. V. Meyers. 2022. “How Are the ‘Losers’ of the School Accountability System Constructed in Chile, the USA and England?” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 52 (7): 1125–1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1851593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitan, K., A. Haep, and G. Steins. 2015. “School Inspections Still in Dispute - an Exploratory Study of School Principals Perceptions of School Inspections.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 18 (4): 418–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2014.958199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo Cuevas, S. 2019. “Visitas de Orientación y Evaluación Realizadas Por La Agencia de Calidad de La Educación En Chile: Significados Otorgados Por Directivos de Escuelas Públicas.” Temps d’Educació (57): 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1344/TE2019.57.17.
   Google Scholar
• Egido, P. M. 2019. “Percepciones Del Profesorado Sobre Las Políticas de Aseguramiento de La Calidad Educativa En Chile.” Educação & Sociedade 40 (July): 2019. https://doi.org/10.1590/es0101-73302019189573.
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., J. E. E. Gustafsson, H. Altrichter, G. Skedsmo, D. Kemethofer, and S. G. H. Huber. 2015. “Comparing Effects and Side Effects of Different School Inspection Systems Across Europe.” Comparative Education 51 (3): 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2015.1045769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., K. Jones, and J. Perryman. 2016. “Side Effects of School Inspection; Motivations and Contexts for Strategic Responses.” In Methods and Modalities of Effective School Inspections, edited by M. C. M. Ehren, 87–109. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_5.
   Google Scholar
• Falabella, A. 2020. “The Ethics of Competition: Accountability Policy Enactment in Chilean Schools’ Everyday Life.” Journal of Education Policy 35 (1): 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1635272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falabella, A. 2021. “The Seduction of Hyper-Surveillance: Standards, Testing, and Accountability.” Educational Administration Quarterly 57 (1): 113–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20912299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falabella, A., and L. F. de la Vega. 2016. “Políticas de Responsabilización Por Desempeño Escolar: Un Debate a Partir de La Literatura Internacional y El Caso Chileno.” Estudios Pedagogicos 42 (2): 395–413. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052016000200023.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., and H. F. James. 2003. “The Interview. From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text.” In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 61–106. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.; London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M., and G. J. Seigworth, eds. 2010. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393047.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S., L. Joakim, and C. John. 2014. “Inspection and Emotion: The Role of Affective Governing.” In Governing by Inspection, edited by S. Grek and J. Lindgren, 116–136. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., P. Tymms, D. Kemethofer, J. O’Hara, G. McNamara, S. Huber, E. Myrberg, G. Skedsmo, and D. Greger. 2017. “The Unintended Consequences of School Inspection: The Prevalence of Inspection Side-Effects in Austria, the Czech Republic, England, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland.” Oxford Review of Education 43 (6): 805–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1352499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luginbuhl, R., D. Webbink, and I. de Wolf. 2009. “Do Inspections Improve Primary School Performance?” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31 (3): 221–237. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709338315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matus, C. 2017. “The Uses of Affect in Education: Chilean Government Policies.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38 (2): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1087678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz-Chereau, B., and M. Ehren. 2021. Inspection Across the UK: How the Four Nations Intend to Contribute to School Improvement. Final Report. London: Edge Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Parcerisa, L. 2021. “To Align or Not to Align: The Enactment of Accountability and Data-Use in Disadvantaged School Contexts.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 33 (3): 455–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09341-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcerisa, L., and A. Falabella. 2017. “La Consolidación Del Estado Evaluador a Través de Políticas de Rendición de Cuentas: Trayectoria, Producción y Tensiones En El Sistema Educativo.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 25 (89): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.3177.
   Google Scholar
• Penninckx, M., J. Vanhoof, S. De Maeyer, and P. Van Petegem. 2014. “Exploring and Explaining the Effects of Being Inspected.” Educational Studies 40 (4): 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2014.930343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penninckx, M., J. Vanhoof, S. De Maeyer, and P. Van Petegem. 2016. “Effects and Side Effects of Flemish School Inspection.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 44 (5): 728–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215570305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. 2007. “Inspection and Emotion.” Cambridge Journal of Education 37 (2): 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640701372418.
   Google Scholar
• Pitton, V. O., and M. McKenzie. 2022. “What Moves Us Also Moves Policy: The Role of Affect in Mobilizing Education Policy on Sustainability.” Journal of Education Policy 37 (4): 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1852605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintelier, A., S. De Maeyer, and J. Vanhoof. 2020. “Determinants of Teachers’ Feedback Acceptance During a School Inspection Visit.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 31 (4): 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1750432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ríos, D. 2020. “The Role of Policy Legacies in the Alternative Trajectories of Test-Based Accountability.” Comparative Education Review 64 (4): 619–641. https://doi.org/10.1086/710767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. 2014. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by U. Flick, 170–183. Los Angeles; London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. 2015. “A Feel for Numbers: Affect, Data and Education Policy.” Critical Studies in Education 56 (1): 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.981198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verger, A., and L. Parcerisa. 2017. “La Globalización de La Rendición de Cuentas En El Ámbito Educativo: Una Revisión de Factores y Actores de Difusión de Políticas.” Revista Brasileira de Política e Administração Da Educação 33 (3): 663–684. https://doi.org/10.21573/vol33n32017.79301.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2022. “Affective Ideology and Education Policy: Implications for Critical Policy Research and Practice.” Journal of Education Policy 37 (4): 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1861339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2023. “Theorizing the Affective Regime of ‘Best Practice’ in Education Policy.” European Educational Research Journal 22 (2): 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211058294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar