High school biology students’ use of values in their moral argumentation and decision-making

References

• Armstrong, S. J., & Botzler, R. G. (1993). Environmental ethics—Divergence and convergence. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bagnoli, C. (2013). Moral dilemmas. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of ethics (pp. 1348–1357). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students’ research-informed socio-scientific activism: Re/visions for a sustainable future. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9260-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., Lubben, F., Campbell, B., & Robinson, A. (2010). Talking science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802713507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, S. (2013). Moral reasoning. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of ethics (pp. 3411–3422). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, D., Buntting, C., Fitzgerald, A., & Jones, A. (2020). Values in science education. The shifting sands. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42172-4
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, P. (2011). Three schools of ethics. In P. Curry (Ed.), Ecological ethics—An introduction (pp. 39–49). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2014). Case studies. In M. Denscombe (Ed.), The good research guide—For small-scale social research projects (pp. 54–65). Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. (1988). Approaches to the teaching of STS in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, M. (2009). Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701744595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, D., & Carlo, G. (2005). Moral development in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00094.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jickling, B. (2013). Normalizing catastrophe: An educational response. Environmental Education Research, 19(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.721114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jickling, B., Lotz-Sisitka, H., Olvitt, L., O’Donoghue, R., Schudel, I., McGarry, D., & Niblett, B. (2021). Environmental ethics—A sourcebook for educators. African Sun Media.
   Google Scholar
• Jickling, B., & Paquet, P. C. (2005). Wolf stories: Reflections on science, ethics, and epistemology. Environmental Ethics, 27(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200527226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., Buntting, C., Hipkins, R., McKim, A., Conner, L., & Saunders, K. (2012). Developing students’ futures thinking in science education. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9214-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juntunen, M. K., & Aksela, M. K. (2014). Improving students’ argumentation skills through a product life-cycle analysis project in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00068D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. (2006). Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1689–1716. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronlid, D. O., & Ohman, J. (2013). An environmental ethical conceptual framework for research on sustainability and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 19(1), 21–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.687043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance, M., & Little, M. (2007). Where the laws are. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaethics: Volume 2 (pp. 149–171). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97–128). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mephan, B. (2018). Ethical matrix. Food Ethics Council. Retrieved March 1, 2018, from https://www.foodethicscouncil.org/resources/ethicaltools/ethical-matrix.html
   Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., & Rest, J. R. (1995). The four components of acting morally. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral behaviour and moral development: An introduction (pp. 385–400). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nucci, L. (2013). Moral education. In H. LaFollette, J. Diegh, & S. (Eds.), Stroud. International Encyclopedia of Ethics (pp. 3349–3357). Wiley- Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Nucci, L. (2013). Moral education. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of ethics (pp. 3349–3357). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neoKohlbergian approach. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2000). A neo-kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education, 29(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713679390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridge, M. (2019). Moral non-naturalism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab: Stanford University. Retrieved August 11, 2022, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/moral-non-naturalism/
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Leij, T., Avraamidou, L., Wals, A., & Goedhart, M. (2021a). Supporting secondary students’ morality development in science education. Studies in Science Education, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1944716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Leij, T., Avraamidou, L., Wals, A., & Goedhart, M. (2021b). Biology students’ morality when engaged with moral dilemmas in the human-nature context. Frontiers in Education, 6, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.729685
   Google Scholar
• Van der Zande, P., Akkerman, S. F., Brekelmans, M., Waarlo, A. J., & Vermunt, J. D. (2012). Expertise for teaching biology situated in the context of genetic testing. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1741–1767. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.671557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, K. J. (1997). Ecofeminism: Women culture nature. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (1981). Conflicts of values. In B. Williams (Ed.), Moral luck (pp. 71–82). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L. (2015). Socioscientific Issues. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 998–1002). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Social and ethical issues in science education: A prelude to action. Science & Education, 17(8), 799–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9130-6
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar