Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression

References

• Albanese, A., Danhoni Neves, M. C., & Vicentini, M. (1997). Models in science and in education: A critical review of research on students’ ideas about the Earth and its place in the universe. Science & Education, 6, 573–590.
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. (2012). Eliciting student responses relative to a learning progression: Assessment challenges. In A. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 241–256). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Rejoinder: Situative versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance. Educational Researcher, 26(4), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Barnea, N., & Dori, Y. J. (1999). High-school chemistry students’ performance and gender differences in a computerized molecular modeling learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 257–271.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Morran, J. (2002). Addressing children’s alternative frameworks of the Moon’s phases and eclipses. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 859–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Keating, T., Barab, S., & Hay, K. (2005). Using virtual reality computer models to support student understanding of astronomical concepts. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24, 333–356.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. (1989). Children’s understanding of familiar astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 502–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, A. A. (2005). Spatial ability and Earth science conceptual understanding. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 402–414.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Wilson, M., & Yao, S. Y. (2011). Road maps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 9, 71–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2011.591654
   Google Scholar
• Blown, E., & Bryce, T. (2010). Conceptual coherence revealed in multi-modal representations of astronomy knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 31–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (1996). Science and core knowledge. Journal of Philosophy of Science, 63, 515–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, B. M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J. E., Samper, A., & Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 269–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2011). The nature of gestures’ beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 102–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T. B., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. D. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform (CPRE Report). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• DeLoache, J. S. (1989). Young children’s understanding of the correspondence between a scale model and a larger space. Cognitive Development, 4, 121–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). Learning progressions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 606–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., & Rivet, A. E. (2013). Science learning progressions. Science, 339, 396–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47, 123–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From everyday to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist’s world. Review of Educational Research, 79, 39–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. (1984). Observation reconsidered. Philosophy of Science, 51, 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J., & Wiser, M. (2012). The potential of learning progression research to inform the design of state science standards. In A. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 435–460). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2012). Learning progressions to support ambitious teaching practices. In A. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 405–434). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs Jr., R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glensberg, A. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotwals, A. (2012). Introduction: Leaping into learning progressions in science. In A. Alonzo & A. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 3–12). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Gotwals, A. W., Songer, N. B., & Bullard, L. (2012). Assessing students’ progressing abilities to construct scientific explanations. In A. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 183–210). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.),Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harle, M., & Towns, M. (2011). A review of spatial ability literature, its connection to chemistry, and implications for instruction. Chemical Education Review, 88, 351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M. (2010). Components of spatial intelligence. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 52, 265–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M. (2011). The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 446–474. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01150.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Montello, D., Richardson, A., Ishikaa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34, 151–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Paper prepared for the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), Washington, DC. Retrieved May 27, 2008, from http://www.nciea.org/
   Google Scholar
• Heyer, I. (2012). Establishing the empirical relationship between non-science majoring undergraduate learners’ spatial thinking skills and their conceptual astronomy knowledge ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, S. M., Trundle, K. C., & Sackes, M. (2010). Using a planetarium software program to promote conceptual change with young children. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, T., & Kastens, K. (2005). Why some students have trouble with maps and other spatial representations. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 184–197.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1149–1180. doi:10.1002/tea.21051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kali, Y., & Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geological structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 369–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, C., Agan, L., & Sneider, C. (2005). Learning about phases of the Moon and eclipses: A guide for teachers and curriculum developers. Astronomy Education Review, 4, 19–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from project 2061’s curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 522–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikas, E. (2000). The influence of teaching on students’ explanations and illustrations of the day/night cycle and seasonal changes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 281–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikas, E. (2003). University students’ conceptions of different physical phenomena. Journal of Adult Development, 10, 139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C. (2008). Geoscience education: An overview. Studies in Science Education, 44, 187–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatzky, R., Loomis, J., Beall, A., Chance, S., & Golledge, R. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Mental images and the brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 333–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., Gurlitt, J., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2013). Learning relative motion concepts in immersive and non-immersive virtual environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 952–962. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9441-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Revising the visualizer–verbalizer: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 47–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory & Cognition, 33, 710–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. (2011). Learning progressions provide road maps for the development and validity of assessments and curriculum materials. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research Perspective, 9, 155–158. doi:10.1080/15366367.2011.603617
   Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. S., Sutherland, L. M., Drago, K., & Merritt, J. (2012). The promise and value of learning progression research. In S. Bernholt, K. Neumann, & P. Nentwig (Eds.), Making it tangible: Learning outcomes in science education (pp. 261–284). Munster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4, 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115–142. doi:10.1080/03057260208560189
   Google Scholar
• Liben, L., Christensen, A., & Kastens, K. (2010). Gestures in geology: The roles of spatial skills, expertise, and communicative context. In C. Holscher, T. F. Shipley, M. O. Belardinelli, J. A. Bateman, & N. S. Newcombe (Eds.), Spatial Cognition VII (pp. 95–111). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Liben, L., & Downs, R. (1993). Understanding person-space-map relations: Cartographic and developmental perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 29, 739–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liben, L., & Downs, R. (1997). Can–ism and Can’tianism: A straw child. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87, 159–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liben, L. S., Myers, L. J., & Kastens, K. A. (2008). Locating oneself on a map in relation to person qualities and map characteristics. In C. Freksa, N. S. Newcombe, P. Gardenfors, & S. Wolfl (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on spatial cognition VI: Learning, reasoning, and talking about space (pp. 171–187). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1470–1498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mant, J., & Summers, M. (1993). Some primary-school teachers’ understanding of Earth’s place in the universe. Research Papers in Education, 8, 101–129.
   Google Scholar
• Mathewson, J. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83, 33–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, J. M., & Clement, J. (1999). Use of a computer simulation to develop mental simulations for understanding relative motion concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 921–944. doi:10.1080/095006999290237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2012). Framework for K-12 science education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 162–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N. S., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what, and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4, 102–111. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (1992). Children’s early ability to solve perspective-taking problems. Developmental Psychology, 28, 635–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padalkar, S., & Ramadas, J. (2011). Designed and spontaneous gestures in elementary astronomy education. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1703–1739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palen, S., & Proctor, A. (2006). Astronomy in the K-8 core curriculum: A survey of state requirements nationwide. Astronomy Education Review, 5, 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J., & Heywood, D. (1998). The Earth and beyond: Developing primary teachers’ understanding of basic astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 503–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnafes, O. (2012). Developing explanations and developing understanding: Students explain the phases of the Moon using visual representations. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 359–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, L. M., Fox, P. T., Downs, J. H., Glass, T., Hirsch, T. B., Martin, C. C., … Lancaster, J. L. (1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Letters to Nature, 375, 54–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D. (2009a). A cross-age study of children’s knowledge of apparent celestial motion. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1571–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D. (2009b). Early elementary students’ development of astronomy concepts in the planetarium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 192–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D. (2012). Challenges in defining and validating an astronomy learning progression. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 77–100). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, J., Flarend, A., Palma, C., Rubin, K., & Botzer, B. (2013, April). Development of a learning progression for the formation of the solar system. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Rio Grande, PR.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., Kocareli, A., & Slagle, C. (2013). Learning to explain astronomy across moving frames of reference: Exploring the role of classroom and planetarium-based instructional contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 1–24. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.843211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., & Krajcik, J. (2010). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an Earth-based perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 768–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., & Maynard, L. (2013). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: An exploration of students’ reasoning about the seasons. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., Wasko, K. D., & Slagle, C. (2011). Children learning to explain daily celestial motion: Understanding astronomy across moving frames of reference. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1963–1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., & Zahm, V. M. (2010). Covering the standards: Astronomy teachers’ preparation and beliefs. Astronomy Education Review, 9, 010110-1–010110-28.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., Zahm, V. M., & Rice, R. (2010). Inquiry and astronomy: Preservice teachers’ investigations of celestial motion. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 471–493.
   Google Scholar
• Rigal, R. (1996). Right-left orientation, mental rotation, and perspective-taking: When can children imagine what people see from their own viewpoint? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 831–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivet, A. E., & Kastens, K. A. (2012). Developing a construct-based assessment to examine students’ analogical reasoning around physical models in Earth science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 713–743. doi:10.1002/tea.21029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. J., & Aman, C. J. (1993). Developmental differences in giving directions: Spatial frames of references and mental rotation. Child Development, 64, 1258–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogat, A., Anderson, C., Foster, J., Goldberg, G., Hicks, J., Kanter, D., … Wiser, M. (2011). Developing learning progressions in support of the new science standards: A RAPID workshop series (CPRE Report). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schoon, K. J. (1995). The origin and extent of alternative conceptions in the Earth and space sciences: A survey of pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 7, 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Physical imagery: Kinematic versus dynamic models. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 433–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., … Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapere, D. (1982). The concept of observation of science and philosophy. Philosophy of Science, 49, 485–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Anecdote, opinion and whim: Lessons in curriculum development from primary science education in England and Wales. Research Papers in Education, 19, 293–321. doi:10.1080/0267152042000247981
   Google Scholar
• Shea, N. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2013). From theory to data: The process of refining learning progressions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22, 7–32. doi:10.1080/10508406.2012.691924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., & Confrey, J. (2007). From conceptual change to transformative modelling: A case study of an elementary teacher in learning astronomy. Science Education, 91, 948–966. doi:10.1002/sce.20224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., & Confrey, J. (2010). Justifying alternative models in learning astronomy: A study of K-8 teachers’ understanding of frames of reference. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1–29. doi:10.1080/09500690802412449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 4, 1–98. doi:10.1080/15366367.2006.9678570
   Google Scholar
• Sorby, S. (2009). Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 459–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 687–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, K., & Padalkar, S. (2009). Visualisation and reasoning in explaining the phases of the Moon. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 395–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 9–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., & Minogue, J. (2006). Conceptual boundaries and distance: Students’ and experts’ concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 282–319. doi:10.1002/tea.20123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases before and after instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 633–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of observable Moon phases and pattern of change in phases. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 87–101. doi:10.1007/s10972-006-9006-7
   Google Scholar
• Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2007). Fourth-grade elementary students’ conceptions of standards-based lunar concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 595–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., Christopher, J. E., & Sackes, M. (2010). The effect of guided inquiry-based instruction on middle school students’ understanding of lunar concepts. Research in Science Education, 40, 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, B. (2005). Visuospatial reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 209–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., Kim, J., & Cohen, A. (1999). Mental models of spatial relations and transformations from language. In G. Rickheir & C. Habel (Eds.), Mental models in discourse processing and reasoning (pp. 239–258). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H. (2000). Seeing the big picture: Map use and the development of spatial cognition. Developmental Science, 3, 247–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why, and how? Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, 148–181. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2012). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 352–402. doi:10.1037/a0028446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2007). The cognitive-situative divide and the problem of conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 42, 55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I., & Ikospentaki, K. (2005). Reconsidering the role of artifacts in reasoning: Children’s understanding of the globe as a model of the Earth. Learning and Instruction, 15, 333–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J. (2009). Gender differences in lunar-related scientific and mathematical understandings. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 2105–2122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 716–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar