1,678
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Negotiation, embeddedness, and non-threatening learning environments as themes of science and language convergence for English language learners

, &

References

  • Akkus, R., Gunel, M., & Hand, B. (2007). Comparing an inquiry‐based approach known as the science writing heuristic to traditional science teaching practices: Are there differences? International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1745–1765. doi:10.1080/09500690601075629
  • Alcon, E. G. (1993). High cognitive questions in NNS group classroom discussion: Do they facilitate comprehension and production of the foreign language? RELC Journal, 45, 73–85. doi:10.1177/003368829302400105
  • Almarza, D. J. (2005). Connecting multicultural education theories with practice: A case study of an intervention course using the realistic approach in teacher education. Bilingual Research Journal, 29, 527–539. doi:10.1080/15235882.2005.10162850
  • Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Researcher Journal, 26, 213–239.10.1080/15235882.2002.10668709
  • Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skills. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406. doi:0033-295X/82/8904-0369
  • Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist, 48, 35–44. doi:0003-066X/93/
  • Ardasheva, Y., Bowden, J. O., Morrison, J. A., & Tretter, T. R. (2015). Comic relief: Using comic and illustrated trade books to support science learning in first year English language learners. Science Scope, 38, 39–47.
  • Ardasheva, Y., Norton-Meier, L., Tretter, T. R., & Brown, S. (2015). Integrating science and literacy for young English language learners: A pilot study. NYS TESOL Journal, 2, 3–16.
  • Ardasheva, Y., Tretter, T. R., & Kinny, M. (2012). English language learners and academic achievement: Revisiting the threshold hypothesis. Language Learning, 62, 769–812. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00652.x
  • August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cardenas-Hagan, E., & Francis, D. J. (2009). The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 345–376. doi:10.1080/19345740903217623
  • August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272.10.1037/h0046669
  • Ayaduray, J., & Jacobs, G. M. (1997). Can learner strategy instruction succeed? The case of higher order questions and elaborated responses. System, 25, 561–570. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00044-4
  • Bailey, A. L., & Butler, F. A. (2003). An evidentiary framework for operationalizing academic language for broad application to K-12 education: A design document ( Research Report No. 611). Retrieved from The Center for the Study of Evaluation National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/r611.pdf
  • Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., LaFramenta, C., & Ong, C. (2004). Towards the characterization of academic language in upper elementary classrooms ( Research Report No. 621). Retrieved from The Center for the Study of Evaluation National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/r621.pdf
  • Banks, J. A., Au, K. H., Ball, A. F., Bell, P., Gordon, E. W., Gutiérrez, K. D., … Zhou, M. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life-deep. Seattle, WA: The Learning in Informal and Formal Environments Center & the Center for Multicultural Education, University of Washington.
  • Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50–73. doi:10.1002/tea.20269
  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood press.
  • Braine, G. (Ed.). (2005). Teaching English to the world: History, curriculum, and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Braun, C. (1976). Teacher expectations: Sociopsychological dynamics. Review of Educational Research, 46, 185–213. doi:10.3102/00346543046002185
  • Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92, 473–498. doi:10.1002/sce.20278
  • Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2011). Argumentation and reasoning in life and in school: Implications for the design of school science learning environments. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 117–133). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Bricker, L. A., Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2014). ‘She Has to Drink Blood of the Snake’: Culture and prior knowledge in science/health education. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1457–1475. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.827817
  • British Council. (2013). The English effect: The impact of English, what it’s worth to the UK and why it matters to the world. Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/organisation/publications/the-english-effect
  • Brok, P., Tartwijk, J., Wubbels, T., & Veldman, I. (2010). The differential effect of the teacher–student interpersonal relationship on student outcomes for students with different ethnic backgrounds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 199–221. doi:10.1348/000709909X465632
  • Buxton, C., Allexsaht-Snider, M., Aghasaleh, R., Kayumova, S., Kim, S., Choi, Y., & Cohen, A. (2014). Potential benefits of bilingual constructed responses science assessments for emergent bilingual learners. Double Helix, 1(2), 1–21.
  • Buxton, C., Allexsaht-Snider, M., Suriel, R., Kayumova, S., Choi, Y., Bouton, B., & Baker, M. (2013). Using Educative Assessments to Support Science Teaching for Middle School English-language Learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 347–366. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9329-5
  • Buxton, C., & Lee, O. (2014). English learners in science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 204–223). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Buxton, C., Salinas, A., Mahotiere, M., Lee, O., & Secada, W. G. (2013). Leveraging cultural resources through teacher reasoning: Teachers analyze second language learners’ problem solving in science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 31–42. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.01.003
  • Callanan, M. A. (2001). At-risk preschoolers’ questions and explanations: Science in action at home and in the classroom. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.
  • Callanan, M. A., & Jipson, J. (2001). Explanatory conversations and young children’s developing scientific literacy. In K. Crowley, C. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 21–49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Capella-Santana, N. (2003). Voices of teacher candidates: Positive changes in multicultural attitudes and knowledge. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 182–190. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2754242910.1080/00220670309598806
  • Cavagnetto, A. R. (2010). Argument to foster scientific literacy: A review of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts. Review of Educational Research, 80, 336–371. doi:10.3102/0034654310376953
  • Cavallo, A. M. L., & Gomez, P. A. (2010). Promoting science understanding and fluency among Hispanic English language learners: Strategies, explorations, and new directions. In D. W. Sunal, C. Szymanski Sunal, & E. L. Wright (Eds.), Teaching science with Hispanic ELLs in K-16 classrooms (pp. 65–99). Greenwich, CT: IAP Information Age.
  • Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Chanlen, N., & Hand, B. (2011, January). The impacts of the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach on students’ critical thinking skills. Paper presented at the international meeting of the Association for Science Teacher Education (ASTE). Minneapolis, MN.
  • Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. E. (2003). Effective reading programs for English language learners: A best-evidence synthesis ( Research Report No. 66). Retrieved from The Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk, http://www.csos.jhu.edu/crespar/techReports/Report66.pdf
  • Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. E. (2005). Effective reading programs for English language learners and other language-minority students. Bilingual Research Journal, 29, 241–267.10.1080/15235882.2005.10162835
  • Clark, U. (2014). Which variety of English should you speak? Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/blog/which-variety-english-should-you-speak
  • Clewell, B. C., de Cohen, C. C., Campbell, P. B., Perlman, L. Deterding, N., Manes, S., … Carson, R. (2004). Review of evaluation studies of mathematics and science curricula and professional development models. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
  • Cole, M. W., & Hebert, M. (2010, April–May). Effectiveness of peer-mediated learning for English language learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/
  • Cook, G., Boals, T., & Lundberg, T. (2011, November). Academic achievement for English Learners – What can we reasonably expect? The Phi Delta Kappan, 93, 66–69.10.1177/003172171109300316
  • Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher–student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113–143. doi:10.3102/003465430298563
  • Crowther, D. T., Storke, E., & Leonis, B. (2011, March). Science for ELL: Modifications to SIOP/GLAD for inquiry teaching. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Convention, New Orleans, LA.
  • Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 337–357. doi:10.1002/tea.20053
  • Cummins, J. (1981). Empirical and theoretical underpinnings of bilingual education. Journal of Education, 163, 16–30.
  • Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Datnow, A., Borman, G. D., Stringfield, S. C., Overman, L. T., & Castellano, M. (2003). Comprehensive school reform in culturally and linguistically divers contexts: Implementation and outcomes from a four-year study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 143–170. doi:10.3102/01623737025002143
  • Datnow, A., Stingfield, S., & Castello, M. (2005). School reform and the education of culturally and linguistically diverse students. In C. R. O’Donnell & L. A. Yamauchi (Eds.), Culture and context in human behavior change: Theory, research, and application (pp. 179–204). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford, MA: Blackwell.
  • Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.
  • Dutro, S., & Morgan, C. (2001). Rethinking English language instruction: An architectural approach. In G. Garcia (Ed.), English learners: Reaching highest levels of English literacy (pp. 227–258). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  • Dwordin, J. (2006). The family stories project: Using funds of knowledge for writing. The Reading Teacher, 59, 510–520. doi:10.1598/RT.59.6.1
  • Echevarria, J., Richards-Tutor, C., Canges, R., & Francis, D. (2011). Using the SIOP model to promote the acquisition of language and science concepts with English learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34, 334–351. doi:10.1080/15235882.2011.623600
  • Echevarria, J., Richards-Tutor, C., Chinn, V., & Ratleff, P. (2011). Did they get it? The role of fidelity in teaching English learners. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 54, 425–434. doi:10.1598/JAAL.54.6.4
  • Ellis, N. C. (1994). Implicit and explicit language learning: An overview. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 1–32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 491–520. doi:10.1080/09500690500339092
  • Fang, Z. (2008). Going beyond the fab five: Helping students cope with the unique linguistic challenges of expository reading in intermediate grades. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51, 476–487. doi:10.1598/JAAL.51.6
  • Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). Technicality and reasoning in Science: Beyond vocabulary. In Z. Fang & M. J. Schleppegrell (Eds.), Reading in secondary content areas (pp. 18–38). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students’ science literacy through reading infusion. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 262–273.10.1080/00220670903383051
  • Fillmore, L. W., & Snow, C. E. (2005). What teachers need to know about language. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Academic success for English language learners: Strategies for K-12 mainstream teachers (pp. 47–75). White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Flores, B., Cousin, P., & Diaz, E. (1991). Transforming deficit myths about learning, language, and culture. Language Arts, 68, 369–379.
  • Fradd, S. H., Lee, O., Sutman, F. X., & Saxton, M. K. (2001). Promoting science literacy with English language learners through instructional materials development: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 25, 479–501.10.1080/15235882.2001.11074464
  • Fraser-Abder, P., Doria, J. A., Yang, J.-S., & De Jesus, A. (2010). Using funds of knowledge in an ethnically concentrated classroom environment to teach nutrition. Science Activities, 47, 141–150. doi:10.1080/00368121003642204
  • Fry, R. (2008). The role of schools in the English language learner achievement gap. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
  • Furman, J. S. (2008). Tensions in multicultural teacher education research: Demographics and the need to demonstrate effectiveness. Education and Urban Society, 41, 55–79. doi:10.1177/0013124508321440
  • Galbraith, D. (1992). Conditions for discovery through writing. Instructional Science, 21, 45–71. doi:10.1007/BF00119655
  • Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education, 171, 5–17.
  • Gee, J. P. (2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44, 714–725. doi:10.1598/JAAL.44.8.3
  • Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English-language learners. Exceptional Children, 66, 454–470.
  • Goldenberg, C. (2008). Teaching English language learners: What the research does and does not say. American Educator, 33, 8–23.
  • Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (1997). Content-based instruction: Research foundations. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 5–21). White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.
  • Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (Eds.). (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hakuta, K., Butler, Y., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? (Policy Report 2000–1). San Francisco, CA: University of California, Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Foundations of language development. London: Edward Arnold.10.1016/B978-0-12-443701-2.50025-1
  • Hand, B. (Ed.). (2008). Science inquiry, argument and language: The case for the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Hand, B., & Keys, C. (1999). Inquiry investigation. The Science Teacher, 66, 27–29.
  • Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L., & Jang, J. Y. (Eds.). (in press). More voices from the classroom: International teachers’ experience with argument-based inquiry. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Hand, B., Wallace, C., & Yang, E. (2004). Using the science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh grade science: Quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 131–149. doi:10.1080/0950069032000070252
  • Hellekaer, G. O. (2009). Academic English reading proficiency at the university level: A Norwegian case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21, 198–222.
  • Hensley, M. (2005). Empowering parents of multicultural backgrounds. In N. Gonzalez, L. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge (pp. 143–151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Henze, R. C., & Lucas, T. (1993). Shaping instruction to promote the success of language minority students: An analysis of four high school classes. Peabody Journal of Education, 69, 54–81. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/149260310.1080/01619569309538751
  • Howell, P. B., Thomas, S., & Ardasheva, Y. (2011). Talk in the classroom: Meeting the developmental, cultural, and academic needs of middle school students. Middle Grades Research Journal, 6, 47–63.
  • Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 129–140. doi:10.1017/S0272263105050084
  • Hussin, H. (2006). Dimensions of questioning: A qualitative study of current classroom practice in Malaysia. Teaching English as a Second Language-Electronic Journal, 10, 1–18.
  • Janzen, J. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78, 1010–1038. doi:10.3102/0034654308325580
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). ‘Doing the lesson’ or ‘doing science’: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757–792. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757:AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
  • Kao, G., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in education achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 417–442. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100019
  • Keys, C. (1994). The development of scientific reasoning skills in conjunction with collaborative writing assignments: An interpretive study of six ninth-grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1003–1022. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310912
  • Keys, C. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83, 115–130. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:2<115::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Kieffer, M., Lesaux, N. K., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. (2009). Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1168–1201. doi:10.3102/0034654309332490
  • Kim, J., & Herman, J. L. (2009). A three-state study of English learner progress. Educational Assessment, 14, 212–231. doi:10.1080/10627190903422831
  • Klein, P. D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 203–270. doi:1040-726X/99/0900-0203
  • Klein, P. D. (2006). The challenges of scientific literacy: From the viewpoint of second‐generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 143–178. doi:10.1080/09500690500336627
  • Kopriva, R. J., Bauman, J., Cameron, C., & Triscari, R. (2009). Final research report obtaining necessary parity through academic rigor in science: A report to the US Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.onpar.us/Reports/ONPARResearchReport.pdf
  • Kopriva, R. J., Emick, J. E., Hipolito-Delgado, C. P., & Cameron, C. A. (2007). Do proper accommodation assignments make a difference? Examining the impact of improved decision making on scores for English language learners. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 26, 11–20. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00097.x
  • Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
  • Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319–337. doi:10.1002/sce.3730770306
  • Kyle, D. W., McIntyre, E., Miller, K. B., & Moore, G. H. (2002). Reaching out: A K-8 resource for connecting families and schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Guerrero, C., Huerta, M., & Fan, Y. (2012). The effect of an instructional intervention on middle school English learners’ science and English reading achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 987–1011. doi:10.1002/tea.21031
  • Lazarin, M. (2006, March). Improving assessment and accountability for English language learners in the no child left behind act. ( Issue Brief No. 6). Washington, DC: National Council of La Raza.
  • Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75, 491–530. doi:10.3102/00346543075004491
  • Lee, O., & Buxton, C. (2013). Integrating science and English proficiency for English language learners. Theory into Practice, 52, 31–42. doi:10.1080/07351690.2013.743772
  • Lee, O., Deaktor, R., Enders, C., & Lambert, J. (2008). Impact of a multiyear professional development intervention on science achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 726–747. doi:10.1002/tea.20231
  • Lee, O., Deaktor, R. A., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2005). An instructional intervention’s impact on the science and literacy achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 857–887. doi:10.1002/tea.20071
  • Lee, O., & Maerten-Rivera, J. (2012). Teacher change in elementary science instruction with English language learners: Results of a multi-year professional development intervention across multiple grades. Teachers College Record, 114, 1–44.
  • Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R. D., LeRoy, K., & Secada, W. G. (2008). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 31–52. doi:10.1002/tea.20209
  • Lee, O., Penfield, R. D., & Buxton, C. (2011). Relationship between ‘form’ and ‘content’ in science writing among English language learners. Teachers College Record, 113, 1401–1434.
  • Lee, O., Penfield, R. D., & Maerten-Rivera, J. (2009). Effects of fidelity of implementation on science achievement gains among English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 836–859. doi:10.1002/tea.20335
  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Licona, M. M. (2013). Mexican and Mexican-American children’s funds of knowledge as interventions into deficit thinking: Opportunities for praxis in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8, 859–872. doi:10.1007/s11422-013-9515-6
  • Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–141. doi:10.1093/applin/4.2.126
  • Long, M. H. (1987). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom. In M. H. Long & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings (pp. 339–354). New York, NY: Newbury House.
  • Long, M. H. (2006). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 357–371. url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/32996110.1111/modl.1998.82.issue-3
  • Lucas, T., & Grinberg, J. (2008). Responding to the linguistic reality of mainstream classrooms: Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Freiman-Nemser, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed.). (pp. 606–636). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lucas, T., Henze, R., & Donato, R. (1990). Promoting the success of Latino Language-minority students: An exploratory study of six high schools. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 315–341. doi:0017-8055/90/0800-0315
  • Lucas, T., Villegas, A. M., & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 361–373. doi:10.1177/0022487108322110
  • de la Luz Reyes, M. (1992). Challenging venerable assumptions: Literacy instruction for linguistically different students. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 427–447. doi:0017-8055/92/1100-0427
  • MacKay, T. (2003, March). Gee’s theory of D/discourse and research in teaching English as a second language: Implications for the mainstream. Paper session presented at the meeting of Education Graduate Symposium. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
  • Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). ‘Something to shoot for’: A systemic functional approach to teaching genre in secondary school science. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom (pp. 17–42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405–430. doi:10.1093/applin/ami051
  • Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mantzicopoulos, P., Patrick, H., & Samarapungavan, A. (2013). Science literacy in school and home contexts: Kindergarteners’ science achievement and motivation. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 62–119. doi:10.1080/07370008.2012.742087
  • Martin-Beltran, M. (2010). The two-way language bridge: Co-constructing bilingual language learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 254–277. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01020.x
  • May, P. N. (1991). Field analysis of the integrated activity learning sequence approach to science instruction at the elementary school level. Part 1: Student performance. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A, Humanities and Social Sciences, 52, 2405. ( AAT No. 9134976)
  • McIntyre, E., Kyle, D., Moore, G., Sweazy, R. A., & Greer, S. (2001). Linking home and school through family visits. Language Arts, 78, 264–272.
  • Miller, J. (2009). Teaching refugee learners with interrupted education in science: Vocabulary, literacy and pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 571–592. doi:10.1080/09500690701744611
  • Mohan, B. A. (1979). Relating language teaching and content teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 171–182. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/358620810.2307/3586208
  • Moje, E. B. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31, 1–44. doi:10.3102/0091732X07300046
  • Moje, E. B., McIntosh-Ciechanowski, K., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 38–70. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/415175910.1598/RRQ.39.1.4
  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534
  • Moll, L. C., & Gonzalez, N. (2004). Engaging life: A funds-of-knowledge approach to multicultural education. In J. A. Banks & C. A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 699–715). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Moll, L. C., & Whitmore, K. F. (1996). Vygotsky in Classroom practice: Moving from individual transmission to social transmission. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 19–42). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–504). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2011). The growing number of English learner students 2008/2009. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/files/uploads/9/growingLEP_0809.pdf
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413–448. doi:10.3102/00346543076003413
  • New York Department of Education. (2009). Diverse learners on the road to success: The performance of New Your City’s English language learners. New York, NY: Author, Office of English Language Learners.
  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.
  • Nguyen, H. T., & Masunaga, H. (2011, April). Perceptions of English skills development: Comparison between Vietnamese college students from the city and rural areas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
  • Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136
  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224–240. doi:10.1002/sce.10066
  • Norton-Meier, L., Hand, B., Hockenberry, L., & Wise, K. (2008). Questions, claims, & evidence: The important place of argument in children’s science writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • O’Boyle, A. (2010). Interpersonal aspects of thinking skills in an intercultural language learning context. Language Society and Culture, 31, 62–71. Retrieved from http://www.educ.utas.edu.au/users/tle/JOURNAL/
  • Oral, Ş. B. (2012). Providing a rationale for promoting argument-based inquiry approach to science education: A Deweyan pragmatist aesthetics perspective [Special Issue]. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 2, 69–78.
  • Park, Y., Yoon, S., Hand, B., Therrien, W. J., & Shelley, M. (2013a). The effectiveness of argument-based teaching & learning approach for improving the vocabulary, reading, writing ability of students with special needs in inclusive education. Korean Journal of Special Education, 48, 301–317.
  • Park, Y., Yoon, S., Hand, B., Therrien, W. J., & Shelley, M. (2013b). The effectiveness of argument-based teaching & learning approach for improving the critical thinking and scientific ability of elementary students with special needs. The Journal of Special Children Education, 15, 491–515.
  • Park, Y., Yoon, S., Hand, B., Therrien, W. J., & Shelley, M. (2013c). The effectiveness of argument-based teaching & learning approach for improving the science and math ability and the relation of critical thinking ability to the science and math ability of elementary students with special needs. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science, 5, 411–433.
  • Quality Counts (2009). Quality Counts 2009: Portrait of a population – How English-language learners are putting schools to the test [Special issue]. Education Week, 28.
  • Quinn, H., Lee, O., & Valdés, G. (2012). Language demands and opportunities in relation to next generation science standards for English language learners: What teachers need to know. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Understanding Language Initiative.
  • Rahm, J. (2014, October). Stories of learning, identity, navigations and boundary crossings in STEM in non-dominant communities: New imaginaries for research and action. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1–15 [ online forum]. doi:10.1007/s11422-014-9627-7
  • Reardon, S. E., & Galindo, C. (2009). The Hispanic-White achievement gap in math and reading in the elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 853–891. doi:10.3102/0002831209333184
  • Reyes, I. (2007/2008). English language learners’ discourse strategies in science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 31, 95–114. doi:10.1080/15235880802640631
  • Rice, D. C., Pappamihiel, N. E., & Lake, V. E. (2004). Lesson adaptations and accommodations: Working with native speakers and English language learners in the same science classroom. Childhood Education, 80, 121–127.10.1080/00094056.2004.10522787
  • Richardson Bruna, K., Roberta, V., & Perales Escudero, M. (2007). What’s language got to do with it? A case study of academic language instruction in a high school ‘English Learner Science’ class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 36–54. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.00
  • Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and ‘noticing’ hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283–331. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x
  • Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. (2011). Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95, 217–257. doi:10.1002/sce.20421
  • Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework ( Tech. Rep. No. 2003-1). Irvine, CA: University of California, Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
  • Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129
  • Schweingruber, H. A., Duschl, R. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Shymansky, J. A., Hedges, L. V., & Woodworth, G. (1990). A re-assessment of the effects of inquiry-based science curricula of the sixties on student achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 127–144. doi:10.1002/tea.3660270205
  • Siegel, M. A. (2007). Striving for equitable classroom assessments for linguistic minorities: Strategies for and effects of revising life science items. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 864–881. doi:10.1002/tea.20176
  • Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 290–322. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.3.4
  • Snow, M. A. (2001). Content-based and immersion models for second and foreign language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). (pp. 303–318). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x
  • Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 664–687. doi:10.1002/tea.10040
  • Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 370–391. doi:10.1093/applin/16.3.371
  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285–304. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5
  • Taboda, A. (2012). Relationships of general vocabulary, science vocabulary, and student questioning with science comprehension in students with varying levels of English proficiency. Instructional Science, 40, 901–923. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9196-z
  • Tharp, R. G. (1989). Culturally compatible education: A formula for designing effective classrooms. In H. T. Truaba, G. Spindler, & L. Spindler (Eds.), What do anthropologists have to say about dropouts? (pp. 51–66). New York, NY: Falmer Press.
  • Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa-Cruz, CA: University of California, Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.
  • Tibbs, E., & Crowther, D. T. (2011, January). A study of science vocabulary instruction utilizing the blended (20/80) approach using tiered vocabulary method in inquiry science for ELL students. Paper presented at the Association of Science Teacher Education. Minneapolis, MN.
  • Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., & Koch, J. (2014). Integrating literacy and science for English language learners: From learning-to-read to reading-to-learn. The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 410–426. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.833072
  • Tong, F., Irby, B., Lara-Alecio, R., Yoon, M., & Mathes, P. (2010). Hispanic English learners’ responses to longitudinal English instructional intervention and the effect of gender: A multilevel analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 542–566. doi:10.1086/651195
  • UK Department of Education. (2011). Developing quality tuition: Effective practice in schools – English as an additional language. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/developing-quality-tuition-effective-practice-in-schools-english-as-an-additional-language
  • Vélez-Ibáñez, C. G., & Greenberg, J. B. (1992). Formation and transformation of funds of knowledge among US-Mexican households. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 23, 313–335. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3195869
  • Verplaetse, L. S. (1998). How content teachers interact with English language learners. TESOL Journal, 7, 24–28.
  • Verplaetse, L. S. (2001). How content teachers allocate turns to limited English proficient students. Journal of Education, 183, 19–35.
  • Vollmer, G. (2000). Praise and stigma: Teachers’ construction of the ‘typical ESL student’. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 21, 53–66. doi:10.1080/07256860050000795
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.1037/11193-000
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Walker, J., Sampson, V., & Zimmerman, C. (2011). Argument-driven inquiry: An introduction to a new instructional model for use in undergraduate chemistry labs. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 1048–1056. doi:10.1021/ed100622h
  • Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529–552. doi:10.1002/tea.1017
  • Whitmore, K. F., & Crowell, C. G. (1994). Inventing a classroom: Life in a bilingual, whole language learning community. York, ME: Stenhouse.
  • Whitmore, K. F., Martens, P., Goodman, Y. M., & Owocki, G. (2005). Critical lessons from the transactional perspective on early literacy research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4, 291–325. doi:10.1177/1468798404047291
  • Willner, L. S., Rivera, C., & Acosta, B. D. (2009). Ensuring accommodations used in content assessments are responsive to English-language learners. The Reading Teacher, 62, 696–698. doi:10.1598/RT.62.8.8
  • Wolff-Michael, R., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). Vygotsky’s neglected legacy: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186–232. doi:10.3102/0034654306298273
  • Yore, L. D. (2001). What is meant by constructivist science teaching and will be science education community stay the course for meaningful reform? Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5. Retrieved from http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/yore.html
  • Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 559–589. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4
  • Youngs, C. S., & Youngs, G. A., Jr. (2001). Predictors of mainstream teachers’ attitudes toward ELL students. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 97–120. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/358786110.2307/3587861
  • Zuengler, J., & Miller, E. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 40, 35–58. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4026451010.2307/40264510
  • Zurawsky, C., & Gordon, E. W. (2004). Closing the gap: High achievement for students of color. Research Points, 2, 1–4. Retrieved from http://www.aera.net/uploadedFiles/Journals_and_Publications/Research_Points/RP_Fall-04.pdf
  • Zwiers, J. (2006). Integrating academic language, thinking, and content: Learning scaffolds for non-native speakers in the middle grades. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 317–332. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.005
  • Zwiers, J. (2007). Teacher practices and perspectives for developing academic language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 93–116. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00135.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.