References
- *Acosta, S., & Hsu, H.-Y. (2014). Shared academic values: Testing a model of the association between Hong Kong parents’ and adolescents’ perception of the general value of science and scientific literacy. Educational Studies, 40(2), 174–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2013.866889.
- Adams, C. M. (2014). Collective student trust: A social resource for urban elementary students. Educational Administatration Quarterly, 50(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x13488596
- *Alacacı, C., & Erbaş, A. K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.03.006
- *Akyüz, G. (2014). The effects of student and school factors on mathematics achievement in TIMSS 2011. Education and Science, 39(172), 150–162.
- Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211433290
- *Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). Influence of motivation, self-beliefs, and instructional practices on science achievement of adolescents in Canada. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9144-9
- *Azina, I. N., & Halimah, A. (2012). Student factors and mathematics achievement: Evidence from TIMSS 2007. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.843a
- Bae, S. H. (2007). The relationship between ISO 9000 participation and educational outcomes of schools. Quality Assurance in Education: an International Perspective, 15(3), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880710773156
- Basl, J. (2011). Effect of school on interest in natural sciences: A comparison of the Czech Republic, Germany, Finland, and Norway based on PISA 2006. International Journal of Science Education, 33 (1), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518641
- *Bassani, C. (2008). Social capital and disparities in canadian youth’s mathematics achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(3), 727–760.doi:10.2307/20466722
- *Bauer, D. J., Gottfredson, N. C., Dean, D., & Zucker, R. A. (2013). Analyzing repeated measures data on individuals nested within groups: Accounting for dynamic group Effects. Psychological Methods, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030639
- Becker, B. J., & Wu, M.-J. (2007). The synthesis of regression slopes in meta-analysis. Statistical Science, 22(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-STS243
- Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., & Kim, N. J. (2017a). A Bayesian network meta-analysis to synthesize the influence of contexts of scaffolding use on cognitive outcomes in STEM education. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1042–1081. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317723009
- Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017b). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
- *Berends, M., Lucas, S. R., & Penaloza, R. V. (2008). How changes in families and schools are related to trends in black-white test scores. Sociology of Education, 81(4), 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100401
- *Bellibas, M. S. (2016). Who are the most disadvantaged? Factors associated with the achievement of students with low socio-economic backgrounds. Educational Sciences-Theory & Practice, 16(2), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.0257.
- Berkowitz, R., Moore, H., Astor, R. A., & Benbenishty, R. (2017). A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 425–469. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669821
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2013). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 3. Biostat.
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2014). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 3.3.070[Computer software]). Biostat.
- Bosworth, D., Lyonette, C., Wilson, R., Bayliss, M., & Fathers, S. (2013). The supply of and demand for high-level STEM skills. IKCES Evidence Report, 77.
- Bryk, A. S., & Thum, Y. M. (1989). The effects of high school organization on dropping out: An exploratory investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312026003353
- *Carolan, B. V., Weiss, C. C., & Matthews, J. S. (2015). Which middle school model works best? Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Youth & Society, 47(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X13478625.
- Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015). {metaSEM}: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1521), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521
- *Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects of inequality, family and school on mathematics achievement: Country and student differences. Social Forces, 88(4), 1645–1676. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0019
- *Cho, M.-O., Scherman, V., & Gaigher, E. (2014). Exploring differential science performance in Korea and South Africa: A multilevel analysis. Perspectives in Education, 32(4), 21–39.
- Cohen, J., McCabe, E. M., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213.
- Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
- D’Agostino, J. V. (2000). Instructional and school effects on students’ longitudinal reading and mathematics achievements. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(2), 197–235. https://doi.org/10.1076/0924-3453(200006)11:2;1-q;ft197
- *Demir, I., Kilic, S., & Unal, H. (2010). Effects of students’ and schools’ characteristics on mathematics achievement: Findings from PISA 2006. Innovation and Creativity in Education, 2(2), 3099–3103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.472.
- Dettweiler, U., Uenlue, A., Lauterbach, G., Becker, C., & Gschrey, B. (2015). Investigating the motivational behavior of pupils during outdoor science teaching within self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00125.
- DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 2170–2192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899
- Donker, A. S., de Boer, H., Kostons, D., Dignath van Ewijk, C. C., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
- Duval, S. J., & Tweedie, R. L. (2000). Trim and fill. A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
- Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
- Eisenhart, M., Weis, L., Allen, C. D., Cipollone, K., Stich, A., & Dominguez, R. (2015). High school opportunities for STEM. Comparing inclusive STEM-focused and comprehensive high schools in two US cities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 763–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21213
- Fouad, N. A., Hackett, G., Smith, P. L., Kantamneni, N., Fitzpatrick, M., Haag, S., & Spencer, D. (2010). Barriers and supports for continuing in mathematics and science: Gender and educational level differences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.06.004
- Fredericks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M.-T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2017). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning. A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Education, 55(2), 271-298. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21419
- Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching. A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
- Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creativitiy and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133
- *George, R. (2000). Measuring change in students’ attitudes toward science over time: An application of latent variable growth modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009491500456
- George, R., & Kaplan, D. (1997). A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS:88. Science Education, 82(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199801)82:1<93::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-W
- *Gill, M. G., Ashton, P., & Algina, J. (2004). Authoritative schools: A test of a model to resolve the school effectiveness debate. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.10.002
- *Gilleece, L., Cosgrove, J., & Sofroniou, N. (2010). Equity in mathematics and science outcomes: Characteristics associated with high and low achievement on PISA 2006 in Ireland. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9199-2
- Greenfield, T. A. (1997). Gender- and grade-level differences in science interest and participation. Science Education, 81(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199706)81:3<259::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-C
- Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361–396. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066003361
- Gregory, A., & Weinstein, R. S. (2004). Connection and regulation at home and in school: Predicting growth in achievement for adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(4), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403258859
- Grossman.P.L., P., Cohen, J., Ronfeldt, M., & Brown, L. (2014). The test matters: The relationship between classroom observation scores and teacher value added on multiple types of assessment. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14544542
- Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as context. The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching Educational Researcher, 24 (8),5–11,23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X024008005
- *Grubb, W. N. (2008). Multiple resources, multiple outcomes: Testing the “Improved” school finance with NELS88. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 104–144. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308636.
- *Hampden-Thompson, G., & Bennett, J. (2013). Science teaching and learning activities and students’ engagement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1325–1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608093
- Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737019002141
- Harwell, M., Maeda, Y., Bishop, K., & Xie, A. (2017). The surprisingly modest relationship between SES and educational achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1123668
- Hedges, L. V., Pigott, T. D., Polanin, J. R., Ryan, A. M., Tocci, C., & Williams, R. T. (2016). The question of school resources and student achievement. A history and reconsideration. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16667070
- Hogrebe, M. C., & Tate, W. F. (2010). School composition and context factors that moderate and predict 10th-grade science proficiency. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1096–1136.
- Holland, A., & Andre, T. (1987). Participation on extracurricular activities in secondary school. What is known, what needs to be known? Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 437–466. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057004437
- *Horn, D., Balazsi, I., Takacs, S., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Tracking and inequality of learning outcomes in Hungarian secondary schools. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 36(4), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-006-9003-9
- Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis. Correcting error and bias in research findings (Vol. 2). Sage Publications.
- *Kim, M. M., & Placier, M. (2004). Comparison of academic development in catholic versus non-catholic private secondary schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n5.2004 5
- *Istrate, O., Noveanu, G., & Smith, T. M. (2006). Exploring sources of variation in Romanian science achievement. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 36(4), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-006-9006-6
- *Konstantopoulos, S. (2006). Trends of school effects on student achievement: Evidence from NLS:72, HSB:82, and NELS:92. Teachers College Record, 108(12), 2550–2581.
- *Jiang, F., & McComas, W. F. (2015). The effects of inquiry teaching on student science achievement and attitudes: Evidence from propensity score analysis of PISA data. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 554–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.1000426.
- *Ker, H. W. (2015). The impacts of student-, teacher- and school-level factors on mathematics achievement: An exploratory comparative investigation of Singaporean students and the USA students. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 254–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1026801.
- *Karakolidis, A., Pitsia, V., & Emvalotis, A. (2016). Examining students’ achievement in mathematics: A multilevel analysis of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 data for Greece. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.013.
- Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
- *Lam, T. Y. P., & Lau, K. C. (2014). Examining factors affecting science achievement of Hong Kong in PISA 2006 using hierarchical linear modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2463–2480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.879223.
- Lamb, R. L., Anneta, L., Meldrum, J., & Vallett, D. (2012). Measuring science interest: Rasch validation of the science interest survey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 643–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9314-z
- *Liu, Y., Wu, A. D., & Zumbo, B. D. (2006). The relation between outside of school factors and mathematics achievement: A cross-country study among the U.S. and five top-performing Asian countries. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies, 6(1), 1–35.
- *Lee, C., & Kim, E. (2010). Academic readiness for college: The role of school administrators. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 6(4), 14–28.
- Logan, M. R., & Skamp, K. R. (2013). The impact of teachers and their science teaching on students’ ‘science interest’: A four-year study. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2879–2904. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667167
- *Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2006). School sector and academic achievement: A multilevel analysis of NAEP mathematics data. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 651–698. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043004651.
- Lupton, R. (2005). Social justice and school improvement: Improving the quality of schooling in the poorest neighbourhoods. British Educational Research Journal, 31(5), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500240759
- Ma, X., & Klinger, D. A. (2000). Hierarchical linear modelling of student and school effects on academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1585867
- *Ma, X., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2002). The development of science achievement in middle and high school - Individual differences and school effects. Evaluation Review, 26(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x02026004003.
- *Ma, X., & Ma, L. (2004). Modeling stability of growth between mathematics and science achievement during middle and high school. Evaluation Review, 28(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X03261025.
- Maag Merki, K., Emmerich, M., & Holmeier, M. (2015). Further development of educational effectiveness theory in a multilevel context: From theory to methodology and from empirical evidence back to theory. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.938930
- Machts, N., Kaiser, J., Schmidt, F. T. C., & Möller, J. (2016). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 19, 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.003
- *Magen-Nagar, N. (2016). The effects of learning strategies on mathematical literacy: A comparison between lower and higher achieving countries. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.77083.
- Malti, T., & Krettenauer, T. (2013). The relation of moral emotion attributions to prosocial and antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 84(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01851.x
- *Matsuoka, R. (2014). Disparities between schools in japanese compulsory education: Analyses of a cohort using TIMSS 2007 and 2011. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook. (8), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.8.77. 8
- Matt, G. E., & Cook, T. D. (2009). Threats to the validity of generalized inferences. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), s (p. 537–560). Russell Sage Foundation.
- Means, B., Wang, H., Young, V., Peters, V. L., & Lynch, S. J. (2016). STEM-focused high schools as a strategy for enhancing readiness for postsecondary STEM programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 709–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21313
- *Mere, K., Reiska, P., & Smith, T. M. (2006). Impact of SES on Estonian students’ science achievement across different cognitive domains. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 36(4), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-006-9007-5.
- Mickelson, R. A., Bottia, M. C., & Lambert, R. (2013). Effects of school racial composition on K-12 mathematics outcomes. A metaregression analysis. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 121–158. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312475322
- Middleton, J. A., Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2015). Why mathematics education needs large-scale research. In J. A. Middleton, J. Cai, & S. Hwang (Eds.), Large-scale studies in mathematics education (pp. 1–13). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07716-1_1
- *Milford, T., Ross, S. P., & Anderson, J. O. (2010). An opportunity to better understand schooling: The growing presence of PISA in the Americas. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9201-z.
- *Mohammadpour, E. (2012a). Factors accounting for mathematics achievement of Singaporean Eighth-Graders. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(3), 507–518.
- *Mohammadpour, E. (2012b). A multilevel study on trends in Malaysian secondary school students’ science achievement and associated school and student predictors. Science Education, 96(6), 1013–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21028.
- *Mohammadpour, E. (2013). A three-level multilevel analysis of Singaporean eighth-graders science achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.005.
- *Mo, Y., Singh, K., & Chang, M. (2013). Opportunity to learn and student engagement: A HLM study on eighth grade science achievement. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-011-9126-5.
- *Mohammadpour, E., & Ghafar, M. N. A. (2014). Mathematics achievement as a function of within- and between-school differences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(2), 189–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.725097.
- *Mohammadpour, E., & Shekarchizadeh, A. (2015). Mathematics achievement in high- and low-achieving secondary schools. Educational Psychology, 35(6), 689–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.864753.
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(7), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
- Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7(1) (105-125). https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.105
- Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2016). TIMSS advanced 2015 assessment framework. Boston College.
- Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
- National Research Council. (2011a). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The National Academic Press.
- National Research Council. (2011b). Successful STEM education: A workshop summary. The National Academic Press.
- National Research Council. (2013, 21.11.2017). Next generation science standards. For states, by states. https://www.nextgenscience.org/
- Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C., & Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and carrier orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1067–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863
- OECD Publishing, Paris. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume 1): Excellence and equity in education. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
- Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2006). Differences between secondary schools: A study about school context, group composition, school practice, and school effects with special attention to public and Catholic schools and types of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(1), 87–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450500264457
- Osborne, J., Sion, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science. A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
- *Parcel, T. L., & Dufur, M. J. (2001). Capital at home and at school: Effects on student achievement. Social Forces, 79(3), 881–911. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0021.
- *Papanastasiou, C. (2002). School, teaching and family influence on student attitudes toward science, based on TIMSS data for Cyprus. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(02)00013-5.
- *Papanastasiou, C. (2008). A residual analysis of effective schools and effective teaching in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.01.005.
- Park, H.-J. (2005). Look on Korean secondary education through the analysis of the PISA study. Kedi Journal of Educational Policy, 2(2), 23–38.
- *Perera, L. D. H. (2014). Parents’ attitudes towards science and their children’s science achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3021–3041. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.949900.
- Perry, B. L., & Morris, E. W. (2014). Suspending progress: Collateral consequences of exclusionary punishment in public schools. American Sociological Review, 79(6), 1067–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414556308
- Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175
- Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher-student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434
- *Radisic, J., Videnovic, M., & Baucal, A. (2015). Math anxiety-contributing school and individual level factors. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0224-7.
- R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Reinhold, S., Holzberger, D., & Seidel, T. (2018). Encouraging a career in science: A research review of secondary schools’ effects on students’ STEM orientation. Studies in Science Education, 54(1), 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2018.1442900
- Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885450
- *Roscigno, V. J. (2000). Family/school inequality and African-American/Hispanic achievement. Social Problems, 47(2), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2000.47.2.03x0291e.
- *Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107(9), 1999–2045. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00583.x.
- Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., & Stuebing, K. K. (2014). Meta-analysis with complex research designs: Dealing with dependence from multiple measures and multiple group comparisons. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 328–363. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313500826
- Scheerens, J. (2015). Theories on educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(1), 10–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.858754
- Scheerens, J., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Integrating teacher education effectiveness research into educational effectiveness models. Educational Research Review, 18, 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.03.002
- *Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Institutional and student factors and their influence on advanced mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596601.
- Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307310317
- *Shin, J., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2009). Student and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: International comparisons between Korea, Japan and the USA. School Psychology International, 30(5), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034309107070.
- Shuell, T. J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 726–764). New York: Macmilan.
- Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417
- Slagt, M., Dubas, J. S., Dekovic, M., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2016). Differences in sensitivity to parenting depending on child temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 142(10), 1069–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000061
- *Sousa, S., Park, E. J., & Armor, D. J. (2012). Comparing effects of family and school factors on cross-national academic achievement using the 2009 and 2006 PISA Surveys. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 14(5), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2012.726535.
- *Son, J.-W., Han, S. W., Kang, C., & Kwon, O. N. (2016). A comparative analysis of the relationship among quality instruction, teacher self-efficacy, student background, and mathematics achievement in South Korea and the United States. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1755–1779. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1532a.
- Southworth, S. (2010). Examining the effects of school composition on North Carolina student achievement over time. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(29), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v18n29.2010
- *Strayhorn, T. L. (2010). The role of schools, families, and psychological variables on math achievement of black high school students. High School Journal, 93(4), 177–194.doi: 10.2307/40865058.
- *Sun, L., Bradley, K. D., & Akers, K. (2012). A multilevel modelling approach to investigating factors impacting science achievement for secondary school students: PISA Hong Kong Sample. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2107–2125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.708063.
- *Taskinen, P. H., Schütte, K., & Prenzel, M. (2013). Adolescents’ motivation to select an academic science-related career: The role of school factors, individual interest, and science self-concept. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(8), 717–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.853620.
- *Tavsancil, E., & Yalcin, S. (2015). A determination of Turkish student’s achievement using hierarchical linear models in trends in international mathematics-science study (TIMSS) 2011. Anthropologist, 22(2), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891891.
- *Suter, L. E. (2016). Outside school time: An examination of science achievement and non-cognitive characteristics of 15-year olds in several countries. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1147661.
- Thapa, A., & Cohen, J. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907
- *Thien, L. M. (2016). Malaysian students’ performance in mathematics literacy in PISA from gender and socioeconomic status perspectives. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0295-0.
- Thien, L. M., & Ong, M. Y. (2015). Malaysian and Singaporean students’ affective characteristics and mathematics performance: Evidence from PISA 2012. Springerplus, 4(1), 563. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1358-z.
- Thrupp, M., & Lupton, R. (2006). Taking school contexts more seriously: The social justice challenge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(3), 308–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00348.x
- *Van den Broeck, A., Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2005). The effects of student characteristics on mathematics achievement in Flemish TIMSS 1999 data. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500110745.
- *Tsai, L.-T., & Yang, -C.-C. (2015). Hierarchical effects of school-, classroom-, and student-level factors on the science performance of eighth-grade Taiwanese students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1166–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1022625.
- *Topcu, M. S., Arikan, S., & Erbilgin, E. (2015). Turkish students’ science performance and related factors in PISA 2006 and 2009. Australian Educational Researcher, 42(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0157-9.
- Valentine, J. C, Pigott, T. D, & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). How many studies do you need?: a primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal Of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(2), 215–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998609346961
- Van Ewijk, R., & Sleegers, P. (2010). The effect of peer socioeconomic status on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 5, 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.001
- *Veerman, G.-J. M., & Dronkers, J. (2016). Ethnic composition and school performance in the secondary education of Turkish migrant students in seven countries and 19 European educational systems. International Migration Review, 50(3), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12185.
- Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/
- *Webster, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (2000). Accounting for variation in science and mathematics achievement: A multilevel analysis of Australian data - Third International mathematics and science study (TIMSS). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(3), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1076/0924-3453(200009)11:3;1-g;ft339.
- *Wilkins, J. L. M., & Ma, X. (2002). Predicting student growth in mathematical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 288–298. doi:10.1080/00220670209596602.
- *Willms, J. D. (2010). School composition and contextual effects on student outcomes. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1008–1037.
- *Wiseman, A. W. (2012). The impact of student poverty on science teaching and learning: A cross-national comparison of the South African case. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(7), 941–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211408861.
- Wood, N. B., Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Viewing the school environment through multiple lenses. In search of school-level variables tied to student achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20108
- *Zhang, D., & Campbell, T. (2015). An examination of the impact of teacher quality and “opportunity gap” on student science achievement in China. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(3), 489–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9491-z.
- *Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2016). How does ICT use influence students’ achievements in math and science over time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2431–2449. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1297a.